{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,23]],"date-time":"2025-10-23T21:04:42Z","timestamp":1761253482490,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"11-12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,1]],"date-time":"2020-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1577836800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Services\/SiteLicenses"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Urol Int"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"abstract":"<b><i>Aim:<\/i><\/b> The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic effectiveness of the 2 block types. We also aimed to evaluate the effect of these block types on the postoperative complications and parental satisfaction. <b><i>Materials and Methods:<\/i><\/b> This prospective observational study was conducted between April and July 2019 at a training and research hospital. Patients aged between 5 and 12 years in the ASA I-II group, who were scheduled for circumcision, were included in the study. The primary outcome was the pain measured using the Children\u2019s Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale and the Faces Pain Scale-Revised. The secondary outcomes were the postoperative complications and parenteral satisfactions. <b><i>Results:<\/i><\/b> The number of patients receiving a pudendal block (<i>n<\/i> = 40) and dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) block (<i>n<\/i> = 40) was equal. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups that were administered a DPNB and pudendal block in terms of pain scores (<i>p<\/i> &#x3e; 0.05). We did not observe any postoperative block-related complications or side effects. Parents reported excellent satisfaction in both groups. <b><i>Discussion:<\/i><\/b> Ultrasound (US)-guided pudendal nerve block and US-guided DPNB provided effective and long-lasting postoperative analgesia for circumcision surgery. <b><i>Conclusions:<\/i><\/b> This study has shown that both blocks provide postoperative analgesia with similar effectiveness and ensured a very comfortable period at the circumcision surgery. Clinicians can use either of these techniques depending on their clinical circumstances and experience. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000509173","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,13]],"date-time":"2020-08-13T21:00:53Z","timestamp":1597352453000},"page":"871-877","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":9,"title":["A Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Dorsal Penile Nerve Block and Ultrasound-Guided Pudendal Nerve Block in Circumcision"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"104","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2714-9046","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Volkan","family":"Ozen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9863-8560","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dogakan","family":"Yigit","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/adc.86.2.76"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/14651858.CD003005.pub2"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000645"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1155\/2019\/6875756"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057x1003800317"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0310057x0703500217"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.urology.2017.11.006"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/pan.13650"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0304-3959(01)00314-1"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1365-2044.2011.06753.x"},{"key":"ref11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-9592.2010.03405.x"},{"key":"ref12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/pan.13727"},{"key":"ref13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0940-9602(96)80030-6"},{"key":"ref14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/pan.13286"},{"key":"ref15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000355"},{"key":"ref16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/AAP.0000000000000447"}],"container-title":["Urologia Internationalis"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/509173","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/509173","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T15:44:09Z","timestamp":1745423049000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000509173"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"11-12","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,16]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,11,17]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000509173","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["0042-1138","1423-0399"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0042-1138"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-0399"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020]]}}}