{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T03:31:52Z","timestamp":1747193512583,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":42,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,1,1]],"date-time":"2022-01-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1640995200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Horm Res Paediatr"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Introduction:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; Ghrelin concentrations decline during puberty by an unclear mechanism. Acylated ghrelin (AG) is unstable in sampling tubes, but no standardized sampling protocol exists. We hypothesized that ghrelin levels decrease as a consequence of increased gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) signalling and that the addition of a protease inhibitor to sampling tubes preserves the AG levels. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; In this randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study, 13 girls with suspected central precocious puberty were included. They performed an adjusted GnRH stimulation test twice and were given Relefact LHRH&lt;sup&gt;\u00ae&lt;\/sup&gt; (100 \u03bcg\/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;\/sup&gt;) or saline in a randomized order. Blood was sampled repeatedly for 150 min for the analysis of hormone concentrations. Oestradiol levels were only measured at baseline. The protease inhibitor 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride hydrochloride (AEBSF) was added to the sampling tubes. Specific ELISA kits were used for the analysis of AG and desacylated ghrelin (DAG) levels. &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; Neither AG nor DAG levels changed after GnRH analogue injection in comparison to saline. The addition of AEBSF preserved AG levels (650.1 \u00b1 257.1 vs. 247.6 \u00b1 123.4 pg\/mL, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; &amp;#x3c; 0.001) and decreased DAG levels (51.9 [12.5\u2013115.7] vs. 143.5 [71.4\u2013285.7] pg\/mL, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; &amp;#x3c; 0.001). Both AG and DAG levels were inversely associated with insulin levels (&lt;i&gt;r&lt;\/i&gt; = \u22120.73, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; = 0.005, and &lt;i&gt;r&lt;\/i&gt; = \u22120.78, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; = 0.002, respectively). AG levels were inversely associated with oestradiol levels (rho = \u22120.57, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;\/i&gt; = 0.041). &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt; Ghrelin levels do not decrease following a pharmacological dose of a GnRH analogue in the short term in girls. Addition of a protease inhibitor to the sampling tubes decreases AG degradation, resulting in preserved AG and decreased DAG levels. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000526147","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,27]],"date-time":"2022-07-27T21:00:37Z","timestamp":1658955637000},"page":"442-451","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Randomized Trial of the Effect of a GnRH Analogue Injection on Ghrelin Levels in Girls"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"95","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2641-5629","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Rodanaki","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3425-8195","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Eva","family":"Rask","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5292-4913","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria","family":"Lodefalk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1"},{"key":"ref2"},{"key":"ref3"},{"key":"ref4"},{"key":"ref5"},{"key":"ref6"},{"key":"ref7"},{"key":"ref8"},{"key":"ref9"},{"key":"ref10"},{"key":"ref11"},{"key":"ref12"},{"key":"ref13"},{"key":"ref14"},{"key":"ref15"},{"key":"ref16"},{"key":"ref17"},{"key":"ref18"},{"key":"ref19"},{"key":"ref20"},{"key":"ref21"},{"key":"ref22"},{"key":"ref23"},{"key":"ref24"},{"key":"ref25"},{"key":"ref26"},{"key":"ref27"},{"key":"ref28"},{"key":"ref29"},{"key":"ref30"},{"key":"ref31"},{"key":"ref32"},{"key":"ref33"},{"key":"ref34"},{"key":"ref35"},{"key":"ref36"},{"key":"ref37"},{"key":"ref38"},{"key":"ref39"},{"key":"ref40"},{"key":"ref41"},{"key":"ref42"}],"container-title":["Hormone Research in Paediatrics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/526147","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/www.karger.com\/Article\/Pdf\/526147","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T15:13:13Z","timestamp":1745421193000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000526147"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"references-count":42,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,11]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,17]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000526147","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1663-2818","1663-2826"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1663-2818"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1663-2826"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}}}