{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,8,2]],"date-time":"2025-08-02T19:12:45Z","timestamp":1754161965870,"version":"3.41.2"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]],"date-time":"2025-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744675200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]],"date-time":"2025-04-15T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1744675200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Blood Purif"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Introduction: The rationale behind using higher dialysate flow rates stems from the idea of maximizing a dialysis membrane\u2019s extraction ratio. Subsequent developments in dialysis membrane design, including the hollow fiber undulations, spacer yarns, and altering the fiber packing density, helped reduce blood and dialysate flow mismatch in dialysis membranes. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of in-center dialysis patients. Adult (age \u226518 years) in-center hemodialysis patients who were receiving dialysis at the centers 3 months prior to and 3 months following the change in dialysate flow rates were included in the study (December 2022 to May 2023). Dialysate flow rates were reduced from 800 to 600 mL\/min \u2013 using the same access and dialysis membrane. Results: Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. The change of dialysate flow rate did not result in a statistically significant change in dialysis dose (Kt\/V&lt;sub&gt;urea&lt;\/sub&gt;). All regression coefficients were below 0.05 (i.e., a 0.05 change in dialysis dose for flow rate 600 vs. 800 mL\/min). Significant associations were found between dialysis dose and both the blood flow rate and dialysate sodium, but these were also clinically negligible differences. Analysis of patients\u2019 laboratory testing showed no statistically significant difference in serum electrolyte values (sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, blood urea nitrogen, and creatinine). Conclusion: In patients treated using the same dialysate filter and dialysis access, changing the dialysate flow rate from 800 to 600 mL\/min does not result in clinically significant changes in either patients\u2019 measured serum electrolytes or dialysis dose. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000545898","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,16]],"date-time":"2025-04-16T12:01:22Z","timestamp":1744804882000},"page":"353-356","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Effect of Lowering Dialysate Flow Rate on Dialysis Dose and Laboratory Values"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"54","author":[{"given":"Maryn","family":"Gardner","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nicole E.","family":"Wyatt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Neil","family":"Sanghani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Ahmed","family":"Attia","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Andrew","family":"Guide","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Robert A.","family":"Greevy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Megha","family":"Salani","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7782-1160","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Osama","family":"El Shamy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.kint.2023.04.008"},{"key":"ref2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ki.1997.274"},{"key":"ref3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM198111123052003"},{"key":"ref4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/ki.1985.160"},{"key":"ref5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa021583"},{"key":"ref6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/j.ajkd.2004.09.023"},{"key":"ref7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1681\/asn.v13suppl_1s53"},{"key":"ref8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2215\/CJN.02630311"},{"key":"ref9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12882-015-0013-9"},{"key":"ref10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0272-6386(00)70308-8"}],"container-title":["Blood Purification"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/bpu\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1159\/000545898\/4365850\/000545898.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article-pdf\/doi\/10.1159\/000545898","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,29]],"date-time":"2025-07-29T16:02:53Z","timestamp":1753804973000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000545898"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,28]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000545898","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{"is-supplemented-by":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.6084\/m9.figshare.28797479","asserted-by":"subject"}]},"ISSN":["0253-5068","1421-9735"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0253-5068"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1421-9735"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,15]]}}}