{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,10,29]],"date-time":"2025-10-29T18:38:28Z","timestamp":1761763108061,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":21,"publisher":"S. Karger AG","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]],"date-time":"2022-12-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672099200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]],"date-time":"2022-12-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1672099200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pages\/terms-and-conditions"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Pathobiology"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Introduction:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt;  The Paris classification highlights the need to focus on accurately identifying high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC). Herein, we aimed to assess the overall implementation and diagnostic performance of the Paris classification for reporting urinary cytology in a cancer center.   &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Methods:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt;  All urinary cytology reports from July 2018 to December 2019 were collected (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;\/i&gt; = 1,240). Only voided urine samples were included (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;\/i&gt; = 1,180). Risk of high-grade malignancy (ROHM) was calculated for each Paris category. The diagnostic performance of urinary cytology was assessed, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy.   &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Results:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt;  The distribution of categories was: 0.3% unsatisfactory, 90.5% negative for HGUC, 5.6% atypical urothelial cells (AUC), 1.6% suspicious for HGUC, 1.9% HGUC, and 0.1% other malignancies. No diagnosis of low-grade urothelial neoplasia was given. The ROHM was 21.4% for negative for HGUC, 66.7% for AUC, 91.7% for suspicious for HGUC, and 100% for HGUC. When using suspicious for HGUC as a cutoff, the diagnostic performance of urinary cytology in identifying HGUC histology was 46% sensitivity, 98% specificity, 96% PPV, 68% NPV, and 74% accuracy.   &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Conclusion:&lt;\/i&gt;&lt;\/b&gt;  Specificity of urinary cytology was very high (with only 1 false-positive result), which is important since this will trigger a clinical intervention. The ROHM for each category was in accordance with literature, except for AUC where ROHM was slightly higher (66.7%). This may be explained by the study population characteristics (cancer center; many patients treated with intravesical therapies; lack of clinical annotation for patients referred from outside institutions). <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1159\/000527980","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]],"date-time":"2022-12-27T22:00:26Z","timestamp":1672178426000},"page":"233-240","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Evaluation of the Implementation and Diagnostic Accuracy of the Paris Classification for Reporting Urinary Cytology in Voided Urine Specimens: A Cyto-Histological Correlation Study in a Cancer Center"],"prefix":"10.1159","volume":"90","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6829-1391","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jo\u00e3o","family":"Lobo","sequence":"first","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Cl\u00e1udia","family":"Lobo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Lu\u00eds","family":"Le\u00e7a","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"\u00c2ngelo","family":"Rodrigues","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3171-4666","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rui","family":"Henrique","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]},{"given":"Paula","family":"Monteiro","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[]}],"member":"127","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"ref1"},{"key":"ref2"},{"key":"ref3"},{"key":"ref4"},{"key":"ref5"},{"key":"ref6"},{"key":"ref7"},{"key":"ref8"},{"key":"ref9"},{"key":"ref10"},{"key":"ref11"},{"key":"ref12"},{"key":"ref13"},{"key":"ref14"},{"key":"ref15"},{"key":"ref16"},{"key":"ref17"},{"key":"ref18"},{"key":"ref19"},{"key":"ref20"},{"key":"ref21"}],"container-title":["Pathobiology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pat\/article-pdf\/90\/4\/233\/3983765\/000527980.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/pat\/article-pdf\/90\/4\/233\/3983765\/000527980.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,4,23]],"date-time":"2025-04-23T15:32:45Z","timestamp":1745422365000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/karger.com\/article\/doi\/10.1159\/000527980"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]]},"references-count":21,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,9]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000527980","archive":["Portico"],"relation":{},"ISSN":["1015-2008","1423-0291"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"1015-2008"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1423-0291"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,12,27]]}}}