{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,20]],"date-time":"2026-09-20T16:37:38Z","timestamp":1789922258220,"version":"4.0.1"},"reference-count":34,"publisher":"Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)","issue":"3","content-domain":{"domain":["www.ahajournals.org"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Stroke"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1997,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n            <jats:italic>Background and Purpose<\/jats:italic>\n            Stroke-related physical disability can diminish quality of daily living, place care burden on families, and increase need for long-term institutionalization. We developed a prognostic index for use in research and with potential for adaptation to clinical practice that establishes the likelihood of an individual achieving a specific stage of functional recovery after stroke rehabilitation.\n          <\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>\n            <jats:italic>Methods<\/jats:italic>\n            We constructed the index using logistic regression based on 3760 patient records from 96 rehabilitation facilities in 31 states. The stage, as measured by the Functional Independence Measure, includes achievement of the following: independence in eating, grooming, and dressing the upper body; continence in bowel and bladder; and transfer between a bed and chair with supervision only.\n          <\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>\n            <jats:italic>Results<\/jats:italic>\n            This stage was achieved by 26.1% of patients functioning below it at rehabilitation admission. Disability onset of less than 60 days was associated with more than a 3-fold increase in the likelihood of achieving the stage (adjusted odds ratio, 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.0 to 6.0). Each eight-point increase in an eight-item activities of daily living score, measured at admission to rehabilitation, increased the odds 2.5-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 2.8). For those living alone or employed before the stroke, the odds of achieving the stage increased by factors of 1.3 and 2.2, respectively. The index showed minimal shrinkage on cross validation. The achievement of this profile of function is important because 95.3% of stroke patients who achieved or exceeded it were discharged home, as opposed to only 66.8% of those who did not achieve it.\n          <\/jats:p>\n          <jats:p>\n            <jats:italic>Conclusions<\/jats:italic>\n            The index can be used to establish prognoses for individual stroke patients at admission to rehabilitation with regard to achieving this stage. Achievement of the stage is associated with a high likelihood of discharge to home.\n          <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1161\/01.str.28.3.550","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2011,6,17]],"date-time":"2011-06-17T20:08:03Z","timestamp":1308341283000},"page":"550-556","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/crossmarkpolicy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":73,"title":["A Prediction Model for Functional Recovery in Stroke"],"prefix":"10.1161","volume":"28","author":[{"given":"Margaret G.","family":"Stineman","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Greg","family":"Maislin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Roger C.","family":"Fiedler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carl V.","family":"Granger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"276","reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_1_2","unstructured":"Dobkin B. The economic impact of stroke. Neurology. 1995;45(suppl 1):S6-S9."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/str.23.8.1636182"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","unstructured":"Hosek S Kane R Carney M Hartman J Reboussin D Serrato C Melvin J. Charges and Outcomes for Rehabilitative Care. Santa Monica Calif: Rand Corp; 1986. R-3424-HCFA."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/str.21.1.2300995"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/str.25.1.8266360"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"133","DOI":"10.1016\/0003-9993(94)90385-9","volume":"75","year":"1994","unstructured":"Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:133-143.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","first-page":"217","volume":"53","year":"1972","unstructured":"Hyman MD. Social psychological determinants of patients\u2019 performance in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1972;53:217-226.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","first-page":"316","volume":"65","year":"1984","unstructured":"Novack TA, Satterfield WT, Connor M. Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:316-319.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00013614-198604000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","unstructured":"Guide for the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Version 4.0. Buffalo NY: State University of New York at Buffalo 1990."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1963.03060120024016"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","first-page":"61","volume":"14","year":"1965","unstructured":"Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J. 1965;14:61-65.","journal-title":"Md Med J"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","unstructured":"SAS Institute Inc. SAS Procedures Guide Release 6.03 Edition. Cary NC: SAS Institute Inc; 1991."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","unstructured":"Kleinbaum DG Kupper LL Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. 2nd ed. Boston Mass: PWS-Kent; 1988."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordjournals.aje.a115101"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.143.1.7063747"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hosmer DW Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.","DOI":"10.2307\/2531779"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00992953"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003246-198510000-00009"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.1993.03510240069035"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199404000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/str.22.8.1866749"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06947.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0140-6736(93)92813-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","first-page":"21","volume":"63","year":"1982","unstructured":"Smith ME, Garraway WM, Smith DL, Akhtar AJ. Therapy impact on functional outcome in a controlled trial of stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:21-24.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199404000-00005"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","first-page":"881","volume":"71","year":"1990","unstructured":"Stineman MG, Williams SV. Predicting inpatient rehabilitation length of stay. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:881-887.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","first-page":"100","volume":"70","year":"1989","unstructured":"Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham G, Kramer A. The stroke rehabilitation outcome study, part II: relative merits of the Barthel Index score and a four-item subscore in predicting patient outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:100-103.","journal-title":"Arch Phys Med Rehabil"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005650-199304000-00006"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archneur.1987.00520230051013"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1161\/str.21.1.2300994"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7326\/0003-4819-105-3-413"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","unstructured":"Kim J Mueller CW. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. Newbury Park Calif: SAGE Publications Inc; 1978."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM197507312930501"}],"container-title":["Stroke"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ahajournals.org\/doi\/full\/10.1161\/01.STR.28.3.550","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,5,12]],"date-time":"2024-05-12T22:34:05Z","timestamp":1715553245000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.ahajournals.org\/doi\/10.1161\/01.STR.28.3.550"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1997,3]]},"references-count":34,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1997,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1161\/01.STR.28.3.550"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1161\/01.str.28.3.550","relation":{},"ISSN":["0039-2499","1524-4628"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0039-2499","type":"print"},{"value":"1524-4628","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1997,3]]},"assertion":[{"value":"1996-07-22","order":0,"name":"received","label":"Received","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"1996-12-03","order":1,"name":"accepted","label":"Accepted","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}},{"value":"1997-03-01","order":2,"name":"published","label":"Published","group":{"name":"publication_history","label":"Publication History"}}]}}