{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T07:28:31Z","timestamp":1780471711234,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":51,"publisher":"MIT Press - Journals","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Computational Linguistics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Logical negation is a challenge for distributional semantics, because predicates and their negations tend to occur in very similar contexts, and consequently their distributional vectors are very similar. Indeed, it is not even clear what properties a \u201cnegated\u201d distributional vector should possess. However, when linguistic negation is considered in its actual discourse usage, it often performs a role that is quite different from straightforward logical negation. If someone states, in the middle of a conversation, that \u201cThis is not a dog,\u201d the negation strongly suggests a restricted set of alternative predicates that might hold true of the object being talked about. In particular, other canids and middle-sized mammals are plausible alternatives, birds are less likely, skyscrapers and other large buildings virtually impossible. Conversational negation acts like a graded similarity function, of the sort that distributional semantics might be good at capturing. In this article, we introduce a large data set of alternative plausibility ratings for conversationally negated nominal predicates, and we show that simple similarity in distributional semantic space provides an excellent fit to subject data. On the one hand, this fills a gap in the literature on conversational negation, proposing distributional semantics as the right tool to make explicit predictions about potential alternatives of negated predicates. On the other hand, the results suggest that negation, when addressed from a broader pragmatic perspective, far from being a nuisance, is an ideal application domain for distributional semantic methods.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00262","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,9,28]],"date-time":"2016-09-28T14:20:41Z","timestamp":1475072441000},"page":"637-660","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":11,"title":["There Is No Logical Negation Here, But There Are Alternatives: Modeling Conversational Negation with Distributional Semantics"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"42","author":[{"given":"Germ\u00e1n","family":"Kruszewski","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Mind\/Brain Sciences, University of Trento"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Denis","family":"Paperno","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Mind\/Brain Sciences, University of Trento"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Raffaella","family":"Bernardi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Mind\/Brain Sciences, University of Trento"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marco","family":"Baroni","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Mind\/Brain Sciences, University of Trento"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"281","reference":[{"key":"R1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2007.05.005"},{"key":"R2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/lnc3.12050"},{"key":"R3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, Marco, Raffaella Bernardi, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2014. Frege in space: A program for compositional distributional semantics. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology, 9(6):5\u2013110.","DOI":"10.33011\/lilt.v9i.1321"},{"key":"R4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroni, Marco, Georgiana Dinu, and Germ\u00e1n Kruszewski. 2014. Don't count, predict! A systematic comparison of context-counting vs. context-predicting semantic vectors. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 238\u2013247, Baltimore, MD.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P14-1023"},{"key":"R5","unstructured":"Baroni, Marco and Alessandro Lenci. 2011. How we BLESSed distributional semantic evaluation. In Proceedings of the EMNLP GEMS Workshop, pages 1\u201310, Edinburgh."},{"key":"R6","unstructured":"Baroni, Marco and Roberto Zamparelli. 2010. Nouns are vectors, adjectives are matrices: Representing adjective-noun constructions in semantic space. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1183\u20131193, Boston, MA."},{"key":"R7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-011-0183-8"},{"key":"R8","unstructured":"Cherubini, Paolo and Alberto Mazzocco. 2003. L'effetto della somiglianza nella comprensione della negazione. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 2:327\u2013353."},{"key":"R9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10992-010-9142-6"},{"key":"R11","unstructured":"Clark, Stephen, Bob Coecke, and Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh. 2008. A compositional distributional model of meaning. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Quantum Interaction, pages 133\u2013140, Oxford."},{"key":"R12","unstructured":"Coecke, Bob, Mehrnoosh Sadrzadeh, and Stephen Clark. 2010. Mathematical foundations for a compositional distributional model of meaning. Linguistic Analysis, 36:345\u2013384."},{"key":"R13","unstructured":"Dinu, Georgiana, Nghia The Pham, and Marco Baroni. 2013. General estimation and evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models. In Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, pages 50\u201358, Sofia."},{"key":"R14","unstructured":"Drucker, Harris, Christopher Burges, Linda Kaufman, Alex Smola, and Vladimir Vapnik. 1996. Support vector regression machines. In Proceedings of NIPS, pages 155\u2013161, Denver, CO."},{"key":"R15","unstructured":"Erk, Katrin. 2010. What is word meaning, really? (And how can distributional models help us describe it?). In Proceedings of the EMNLP GEMS Workshop, pages 17\u201326, Uppsala, Sweden."},{"key":"R16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lnco.362"},{"key":"R17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/1613715.1613831"},{"key":"R18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00017"},{"key":"R19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/00335557243000067"},{"key":"R20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1006\/jmla.1996.0022"},{"key":"R21","unstructured":"Evert, Stefan. 2005. The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences. Ph.D dissertation, Stuttgart University."},{"key":"R22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brainres.2008.07.099"},{"key":"R26","unstructured":"Grefenstette, Edward. 2013. Towards a formal distributional semantics: Simulating logical calculi with tensors. In Proceedings of *SEM, pages 1\u201310, Atlanta, GA."},{"key":"R28","unstructured":"Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof. 1984. Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam."},{"key":"R29","unstructured":"Guevara, Emiliano. 2010. A regression model of adjective-noun compositionality in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the EMNLP GEMS Workshop, pages 33\u201337, Uppsala."},{"key":"R30","unstructured":"Hermann, Karl Moritz, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2013. \u201cNot not bad\u201d is not \u201cbad\u201d: A distributional account of negation. In Proceedings of ACL Workshop on Continuous Vector Space Models and their Compositionality, pages 74\u201382, Sofia."},{"key":"R32","unstructured":"Horn, Laurence. 1972. On the Semantics Properties of the Logical Operators in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University Linguistics Club."},{"key":"R33","unstructured":"Hovy, Ed. 2010. Negation and modality in distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Negation and Speculation in Natural Language Processing, page 50, Uppsala."},{"key":"R35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00627775"},{"key":"R36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krifka, Manfred. 1992. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In SALT, pages 127\u2013158, Ithaca, NY.","DOI":"10.3765\/salt.v1i0.2492"},{"key":"R37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kruszewski, Germ\u00e1n and Marco Baroni. 2015. So similar and yet incompatible: Toward automated identification of semantically compatible words. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 64\u2013969, Denver, CO.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/N15-1097"},{"key":"R38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.104.2.211"},{"key":"R39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/tacl_a_00134"},{"key":"R40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/tacl_a_00219"},{"key":"R42","unstructured":"Mikolov, Tomas, Wen-tau Yih, and Geoffrey Zweig. 2013. Linguistic regularities in continuous space word representations. In Proceedings of NAACL, pages 746\u2013751, Atlanta, GA."},{"key":"R43","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1551-6709.2010.01106.x"},{"key":"R44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/COLI_a_00143"},{"key":"R46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13546780143000170"},{"key":"R47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0278-7393.18.4.835"},{"key":"R48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13546780500371241"},{"key":"R49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.entcs.2011.01.028"},{"key":"R50","unstructured":"Roller, Stephen, Katrin Erk, and Gemma Boleda. 2014. Inclusive yet selective: Supervised distributional hypernymy detection. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 1025\u20131036, Dublin."},{"key":"R51","unstructured":"Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. Ph.D. dissertation, GLSA, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst."},{"key":"R52","unstructured":"Sahlgren, Magnus. 2006. The Word-Space Model. Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm University."},{"key":"R53","unstructured":"Silberer, Carina and Mirella Lapata. 2012. Grounded models of semantic representation. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1423\u20131433, Jeju Island."},{"key":"R54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1613\/jair.2934"},{"key":"R55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2003.10.003"},{"key":"R56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-5371(65)80060-3"},{"key":"R57","unstructured":"Wason, Peter. 1966. Reasoning. In B. M. Foss, editor, New Horizons in Psychology, volume 1. Penguin, Harmondsworth, UK, pages 135\u2013151."},{"key":"R58","unstructured":"Wason, Peter. 1971. In real life negatives are false. Communication and Cognition, 4:239\u2013253."},{"key":"R59","unstructured":"Weeds, Julie, Daoud Clarke, Jeremy Reffin, David Weir, and Bill Keller. 2014. Learning to distinguish hypernyms and co-hyponyms. In Proceedings of COLING, pages 2249\u20132259, Dublin."},{"key":"R60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/1075096.1075114"}],"container-title":["Computational Linguistics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mitpressjournals.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1162\/COLI_a_00262","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,7,9]],"date-time":"2022-07-09T09:57:40Z","timestamp":1657360660000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/coli\/article\/42\/4\/637-660\/1550"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]},"references-count":51,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1162\/COLI_a_00262"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/coli_a_00262","relation":{},"ISSN":["0891-2017","1530-9312"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0891-2017","type":"print"},{"value":"1530-9312","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2016,12]]}}}