{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,17]],"date-time":"2026-03-17T05:31:50Z","timestamp":1773725510627,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":158,"publisher":"MIT Press","issue":"1","content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Computational Linguistics"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation. In this article, we go beyond the state of the art in several ways. (i) We deal with actual Web data and take up the challenges given by the variety of registers, multiple domains, and unrestricted noisy user-generated Web discourse. (ii) We bridge the gap between normative argumentation theories and argumentation phenomena encountered in actual data by adapting an argumentation model tested in an extensive annotation study. (iii) We create a new gold standard corpus (90k tokens in 340 documents) and experiment with several machine learning methods to identify argument components. We offer the data, source codes, and annotation guidelines to the community under free licenses. Our findings show that argumentation mining in user-generated Web discourse is a feasible but challenging task.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/coli_a_00276","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2016,12,14]],"date-time":"2016-12-14T19:29:07Z","timestamp":1481743747000},"page":"125-179","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":104,"title":["Argumentation Mining in User-Generated Web Discourse"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"43","author":[{"given":"Ivan","family":"Habernal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"German Institute for Educational Research and Technische Universit\u00e4t Darmstadt"}]},{"given":"Iryna","family":"Gurevych","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Technische Universit\u00e4t Darmstadt and German Institute for Educational Research"}]}],"member":"281","reference":[{"key":"bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2109"},{"key":"bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ammari, Tawfiq, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Accessing social support and overcoming judgment on social media among parents of children with special needs. In International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, pages 22\u201331, Ann Arbor, MI.","DOI":"10.1609\/icwsm.v8i1.14503"},{"key":"bib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-009-9154-y"},{"key":"bib4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-014-9335-1"},{"key":"bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/coli.07-034-R2"},{"key":"bib7","unstructured":"Bal, Bal Krishna and Patrick Saint Dizier. 2010. Towards building annotated resources for analyzing opinions and argumentation in news editorials. In Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10), pages 1152\u20131158, Valletta."},{"key":"bib8","unstructured":"Baldwin, Timothy, Paul Cook, Marco Lui, Andrew MacKinlay, and Li Wang. 2013. How noisy social media text, how different social media sources? In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 356\u2013364, Nagoya."},{"key":"bib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/089443939401200102"},{"key":"bib10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10462-010-9154-1"},{"key":"bib11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jecp.2011.07.003"},{"key":"bib12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1359105309353647"},{"key":"bib13","unstructured":"Bex, Floris, Trevor Bench-capon, and Bart Verheij. 2012. Persuasive precedents. In Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, pages 171\u2013175, Istanbul."},{"key":"bib16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/S1793351X11001328"},{"key":"bib17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2005.11.004"},{"key":"bib18","unstructured":"Bj\u00f6rnsson, C. H. 1968. L\u00e4sbarhet. Pedagogiskt Utvecklingsarbete vid Stockholms Skolor. 6. Liber."},{"key":"bib19","unstructured":"Blair, J. Anthony. 2004. Argument and its uses. Informal Logic, 24:137\u2013151."},{"key":"bib20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9235-6"},{"key":"bib21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/jmlr.2003.3.4-5.993"},{"key":"bib22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2107"},{"key":"bib23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSC.2013.38"},{"key":"bib24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2733373.2806245"},{"key":"bib25","unstructured":"Burfoot, Clinton, Steven Bird, and Timothy Baldwin. 2011. Collective classification of congressional floor-debate transcripts. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1506\u20131515, Portland, OR."},{"key":"bib27","unstructured":"Cabrio, Elena and Serena Villata. 2012. Combining textual entailment and argumentation theory for supporting online debates interactions. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Short Papers - Volume 2, ACL '12, pages 208\u2013212, Jeju Island."},{"key":"bib29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/748198"},{"key":"bib30","unstructured":"Choi, Jinho D. 2012. Optimization of Natural Language Processing Components for Robustness and Scalability. Ph.D. thesis, University of Colorado Boulder, Computer Science and Cognitive Science."},{"key":"bib31","unstructured":"Cinkov\u00e1, Silvie, Martin Holub, and Vincent Kr\u00ed\u017e . 2012. Managing uncertainty in semantic tagging. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL '12, pages 840\u2013850, Avignon."},{"key":"bib32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/h0076540"},{"key":"bib33","unstructured":"Conrad, Alexander, Janyce Wiebe, and Rebecca Hwa. 2012. Recognizing arguing subjectivity and argument tags. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Extra-Propositional Aspects of Meaning in Computational Linguistics, pages 80\u201388, Jeju Island."},{"key":"bib34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00994018"},{"key":"bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cullen, Rowena and Sarah Morse. 2011. Who's contributing: Do personality traits influence the level and type of participation in online communities. In 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pages 1\u201311, Kauai, HI","DOI":"10.1109\/HICSS.2011.496"},{"key":"bib36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1351324909990209"},{"key":"bib39","unstructured":"Dippold, Doris. 2007. Using speech frames to research interlanguage pragmatics: Facework strategies in L2 German argument. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(3):285\u2013308."},{"key":"bib40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0004-3702(94)00041-X"},{"key":"bib41","unstructured":"Dunn, William N. 2011. Public Policy Analysis. Pearson."},{"key":"bib42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-5201"},{"key":"bib43","unstructured":"Egg, Markus. 2007. Meaning and use of rhetorical questions. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 73\u201378, Amsterdam."},{"key":"bib44","unstructured":"Eisenstein, Jacob. 2013. What to do about bad language on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 359\u2013369, Atlanta, GA."},{"key":"bib45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.20012"},{"key":"bib46","unstructured":"Farkas, Rich\u00e1rd, Veronika Vincze, Gy\u00f6rgy M\u00f3ra, J\u00e1nos Csirik, and Gy\u00f6rgy Szarvas. 2010. The CONLL-2010 Shared Task: Learning to detect hedges and their scope in natural language text. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 1\u201312, Uppsala."},{"key":"bib47","unstructured":"Faulkner, Adam Robert. 2014. Automated Classification of Argument Stance in Student Essays: A Linguistically Motivated Approach with an Application for Supporting Argument Summarization. Ph. D. Dissertation, City University of New York."},{"key":"bib48","unstructured":"Feng, Vanessa Wei and Graeme Hirst. 2011. Classifying arguments by scheme. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Volume 1, HLT '11, pages 987\u2013996, Portland, OR."},{"key":"bib49","unstructured":"Ferschke, Oliver. 2014. The Quality of Content in Open Online Collaboration Platforms: Approaches to NLP-supported Information Quality Management in Wikipedia. PhD dissertation, Technische Universit\u00e4t Darmstadt, Darmstadt."},{"key":"bib52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/h0057532"},{"key":"bib53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2014.11.005"},{"key":"bib54","unstructured":"Florou, Eirini, Stasinos Konstantopoulos, Antonis Koukourikos, and Pythagoras Karampiperis. 2013. Argument extraction for supporting public policy formulation. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Language Technology for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, and Humanities, pages 49\u201354, Sofia."},{"key":"bib55","unstructured":"Foster, Jennifer, Ozlem Cetinoglu, Joachim Wagner, Joseph Le Roux, Joakim Nivre, Deirdre Hogan, and Josef van Genabith. 2011. From news to comment: Resources and benchmarks for parsing the language of Web 2.0. In Proceedings of 5th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 893\u2013901, Chiang Mai."},{"key":"bib56","unstructured":"Fournier, Chris. 2013. Evaluating text segmentation using boundary edit distance. In Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1702\u20131712, Sofia."},{"key":"bib57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(90)90003-V"},{"key":"bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freeman, James B. 2011.Argument Structure:Representation and Theory, volume 18 of Argumentation Library. Springer Netherlands.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-007-0357-5"},{"key":"bib61","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/sce.21057"},{"key":"bib62","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/978-1-4666-4711-4.ch010"},{"key":"bib63","unstructured":"Georgila, Kallirroi, Ron Artstein, Angela Nazarian, Michael Rushforth, David Traum, and Katia Sycara. 2011. An annotation scheme for cross-cultural argumentation and persuasion dialogues. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2011 Conference: the 12th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 272\u2013278, Portland, OR."},{"key":"bib64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2106"},{"key":"bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gottipati, Swapna, Minghui Qiu, Yanchuan Sim, Jing Jiang, and Noah A. Smith. 2013. Learning topics and positions from Debatepedia. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1858\u20131868, Seattle, WA.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D13-1191"},{"key":"bib69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1089-2699.6.1.38"},{"key":"bib70","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/D14-1012"},{"key":"bib71","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D15-1255"},{"key":"bib72","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0024-3841(01)00044-4"},{"key":"bib73","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07294360.2010.502559"},{"key":"bib74","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X1000292X"},{"key":"bib75","unstructured":"Hasan, Kazi Saidul and Vincent Ng. 2012. Predicting stance in ideological debate with rich linguistic knowledge. In Proceedings of COLING 2012: Posters, pages 451\u2013460, Mumbai."},{"key":"bib76","unstructured":"Hasan, Kazi Saidul and Vincent Ng. 2013. Stance classification of ideological debates: Data, models, features, and constraints. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, pages 1348\u20131356, Nagoya."},{"key":"bib78","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.poetic.2014.05.001"},{"key":"bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Houy, Constantin, Tim Niesen, Peter Fettke, and Peter Loos. 2013. Towards automated identification and analysis of argumentation structures in the decision corpus of the German federal constitutional court. In 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST-13), page 7. Menlo Park, CA.","DOI":"10.1109\/DEST.2013.6611332"},{"key":"bib80","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ecresq.2012.03.002"},{"key":"bib81","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(99)00056-9"},{"key":"bib82","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10994-009-5108-8"},{"key":"bib86","unstructured":"Ketcham, V. A. 1917. The Theory and Practice of Argumentation and Debate. Macmillan, New York."},{"key":"bib87","unstructured":"Kluge, Roland. 2014a. Automatic analysis of arguments about controversial educational topics in Web documents, Masters thesis, Ubiquitious Knowledge Processing Lab, TU Darmstadt."},{"key":"bib89","unstructured":"Kreutel, Karen. 2007. \u201cI'm not agree with you.\u201d ESL learners' expressions of disagreement. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 11(3):1\u201335."},{"key":"bib91","unstructured":"Lafferty, John D., Andrew McCallum, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 282\u2013289, San Francisco, CA."},{"key":"bib92","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2307\/2529310"},{"key":"bib93","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-2166(03)00032-8"},{"key":"bib94","unstructured":"Le, Quoc and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-14), pages 1188\u20131196, Beijing."},{"key":"bib95","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/COLI_a_00152"},{"key":"bib97","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2014.04.013"},{"key":"bib98","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1351324912000307"},{"key":"bib99","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2850417"},{"key":"bib100","unstructured":"Llewellyn, Clare, Claire Grover, Jon Oberlander, and Ewan Klein. 2014. Re-using an argument corpus to aid in the curation of social media collections. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'14), pages 462\u2013468, Reykjavik."},{"key":"bib101","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-012-9284-5"},{"key":"bib103","unstructured":"Madnani, Nitin, Michael Heilman,Joel Tetreault, and Martin Chodorow. 2012. Identifying high-level organizational elements in argumentative discourse. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 20\u201328, Montreal."},{"key":"bib105","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/P14-5010"},{"key":"bib107","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2014.04.002"},{"key":"bib108","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X10000968"},{"key":"bib109","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08839510600938193"},{"key":"bib110","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-008-9120-0"},{"key":"bib111","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9240-9"},{"key":"bib113","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10506-010-9104-x"},{"key":"bib114","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/2522848.2522857"},{"key":"bib115","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0883-0355(02)00009-5"},{"key":"bib116","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9241-8"},{"key":"bib118","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nguyen, Vinh Van, Minh Le Nguyen, and Akira Shimazu. 2009. Clause Splitting with Conditional Random Fields. Information and Media Technologies, 4(12):57\u201375.","DOI":"10.5715\/jnlp.16.1_47"},{"key":"bib119","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.vaccine.2011.10.072"},{"key":"bib120","unstructured":"Niehaus, James, Victoria Romero, Jonathan Pfautz, Scott Neal Reilly, Richard Gerrig, and Peter Weyhrauch. 2012. Towards a computational model of narrative persuasion: A broad perspective. In Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative, pages 181\u2013182, Istanbul."},{"key":"bib121","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s12052-014-0011-6"},{"key":"bib124","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-011-9242-7"},{"key":"bib125","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2104"},{"key":"bib126","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.77.4.688"},{"key":"bib127","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2014.899270"},{"key":"bib128","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2105"},{"key":"bib129","unstructured":"Park, Souneil, Kyung Soon Lee, and Junehwa Song. 2011. Contrasting opposing views of news articles on contentious issues. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 340\u2013349, Portland, OR."},{"key":"bib130","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-2112"},{"key":"bib131","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/jcini.2013010101"},{"key":"bib132","unstructured":"Peldszus, Andreas and Manfred Stede. 2013b. Ranking the annotators: An agreement study on argumentation structure. In Proceedings of the 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, pages 196\u2013204, Sofia."},{"key":"bib133","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D15-1110"},{"key":"bib134","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-0663.77.5.562"},{"key":"bib135","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.40.3.432"},{"key":"bib139","unstructured":"Prasad, Rashmi, Nikhil Dinesh, Alan Lee, Eleni Miltsakaki, Livio Robaldo, Aravind Joshi, and Bonnie Webber. 2008. The Penn Discourse TreeBank 2.0. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), pages 1\u20134, Marrakech."},{"key":"bib140","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13645579.2013.774172"},{"key":"bib141","unstructured":"Qiu, Minghui and Jing Jiang. 2013. A latent variable model for viewpoint discovery from threaded forum posts. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 1031\u20131040, Atlanta, GA."},{"key":"bib142","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qiu, Minghui, Liu Yang, and Jing Jiang. 2013. Modeling interaction features for debate side clustering. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pages 873\u2013878, Burlingame, CA.","DOI":"10.1145\/2505515.2505634"},{"key":"bib143","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654313487606"},{"key":"bib144","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-012-9280-9"},{"key":"bib145","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/S0218213004001922"},{"key":"bib146","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-4416-9"},{"key":"bib147","unstructured":"Reed, Chris and Douglas Walton. 2003. Argumentation schemes in argument-as-process and argument-as-product. In Proceedings of the Conference Celebrating Informal Logic, pages 1\u201311, Windsor, Ontario."},{"key":"bib148","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00653.x"},{"key":"bib149","unstructured":"Rooney, Niall, Hui Wang, and Fiona Browne. 2012. Applying kernel methods to argumentation mining. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, pages 272\u2013275, Marco Island, FL."},{"key":"bib150","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1109\/ICSC.2012.59"},{"key":"bib151","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/19462166.2012.663539"},{"key":"bib152","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2009.08.019"},{"key":"bib153","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11412-009-9080-x"},{"key":"bib154","unstructured":"Schiappa, Edward and John P. Nordin. 2013. Argumentation: Keeping Faith with Reason. Pearson UK."},{"key":"bib155","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcps.2011.04.002"},{"key":"bib156","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0378-2166(77)90029-7"},{"key":"bib158","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schneider, Jodi, Tudor Groza, and Alexandre Passant. 2013. A review of argumentation for the Social Semantic Web. Semantic Web, 4(2):159\u2013218.","DOI":"10.3233\/SW-2012-0073"},{"key":"bib159","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schneider, Jodi, Krystian Samp, Stefan Decker, and Alexandre Passant. 2013. Arguments about deletion: How experience improves the acceptability of arguments in ad-hoc online task groups. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pages 1069\u20131079, San Antonio, TX.","DOI":"10.1145\/2441776.2441897"},{"key":"bib160","unstructured":"Schneider, Jodi and Adam Wyner. 2012. Identifying consumers' arguments in text. In Diana Maynard, Marieke van Erp, and Brian Davis, editors, Semantic Web and Information Extraction SWAIE 2012, pages 31\u201342, Galway City."},{"key":"bib162","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sergeant, Alan. 2013. Automatic argumentation extraction. In ESWC 2013, pages 656\u2013660, Montpellier.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-38288-8_46"},{"key":"bib163","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/135467896394564"},{"key":"bib164","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1024059024337"},{"key":"bib165","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1750481308098765"},{"key":"bib166","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Socher, Richard, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2013. Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 1631\u20131642, Seattle, WA.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D13-1170"},{"key":"bib167","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Somasundaran, Swapna and Janyce Wiebe. 2009. Recognizing stances in online debates. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP, pages 226\u2013234, Suntec.","DOI":"10.3115\/1687878.1687912"},{"key":"bib168","unstructured":"Stab, Christian and Iryna Gurevych. 2014a. Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays. In Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pages 1501\u20131510, Dublin."},{"key":"bib169","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stab, Christian and Iryna Gurevych. 2014b. Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 46\u201356, Doha.","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/D14-1006"},{"key":"bib170","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-011-9174-5"},{"key":"bib171","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2014.05.022"},{"key":"bib172","unstructured":"Teninbaum, Gabriel H. 2011. Who cares? Drexel Law Review, 3:485\u2013519."},{"key":"bib173","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/977035.977051"},{"key":"bib174","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1162\/089120102762671936"},{"key":"bib175","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/1699648.1699696"},{"key":"bib178","unstructured":"Tjong, Erik F., Kim Sang, and Herv\u00e9 D\u00e9jean. 2001. Introduction to the CoNLL-2001 shared task: Clause identification. In Proceedings of the ACL 2001 Workshop on Computational Natural Language Learning (ConLL), pages 5\u20139, Toulouse."},{"key":"bib179","unstructured":"Toulmin, Stephen, Richard Rieke, and Allan Janik. 1984. An Introduction to Reasoning. Macmillan, New York."},{"key":"bib182","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-1305"},{"key":"bib187","unstructured":"Villalba, Maria Paz Garcia and Patrick Saint-Dizier. 2012. Some facets of argument mining for opinion analysis. In Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, COMMA 2012, pages 23\u201334, Vienna."},{"key":"bib188","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10503-005-4419-6"},{"key":"bib190","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3115\/v1\/W14-4918"},{"key":"bib191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-642-54903-8_10"},{"key":"bib192","unstructured":"Walker, Marilyn, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, and Ricky Grant. 2012. Stance classification using dialogic properties of persuasion. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 592\u2013596, Montr\u00e9al."},{"key":"bib195","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4018\/jcini.2012070103"},{"key":"bib197","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3390\/e15114969"},{"key":"bib198","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1351324911000337"},{"key":"bib199","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.compedu.2005.04.003"},{"key":"bib200","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0361-476X(03)00024-9"},{"key":"bib201","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0741088309333019"},{"key":"bib202","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.pragma.2013.12.004"},{"key":"bib203","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang, Qi, Jin Qian, Huan Chen, Jihua Kang, and Xuanjing Huang. 2013. Discourse level explanatory relation extraction from product reviews using first-order logic. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 946\u2013957, Seattle, WA.","DOI":"10.18653\/v1\/D13-1097"}],"container-title":["Computational Linguistics"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/www.mitpressjournals.org\/doi\/pdf\/10.1162\/COLI_a_00276","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,6,13]],"date-time":"2025-06-13T16:39:36Z","timestamp":1749832776000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/coli\/article\/43\/1\/125-179\/1561"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]},"references-count":158,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1162\/COLI_a_00276"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/coli_a_00276","relation":{},"ISSN":["0891-2017","1530-9312"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0891-2017","type":"print"},{"value":"1530-9312","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2017,4]]}}}