{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,22]],"date-time":"2026-03-22T05:35:35Z","timestamp":1774157735696,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,28]],"date-time":"2022-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1664323200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>ABSTRACT<\/jats:title><jats:p>The open science movement has gained significant momentum within the last few years. This comes along with the need to store and share research artefacts, such as publications and research data. For this purpose, research repositories need to be established. A variety of solutions exist for implementing such repositories, covering diverse features, ranging from custom depositing workflows to social media-like functions.<\/jats:p><jats:p>In this article, we introduce the FAIREST principles, a framework inspired by the well-known FAIR principles, but designed to provide a set of metrics for assessing and selecting solutions for creating digital repositories for research artefacts. The goal is to support decision makers in choosing such a solution when planning for a repository, especially at an institutional level. The metrics included are therefore based on two pillars: (1) an analysis of established features and functionalities, drawn from existing dedicated, general purpose and commonly used solutions, and (2) a literature review on general requirements for digital repositories for research artefacts and related systems. We further describe an assessment of 11 widespread solutions, with the goal to provide an overview of the current landscape of research data repository solutions, identifying gaps and research challenges to be addressed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/dint_a_00159","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,9,28]],"date-time":"2022-09-28T22:13:41Z","timestamp":1664403221000},"page":"202-241","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["FAIREST: A Framework for Assessing Research Repositories"],"prefix":"10.3724","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Mathieu","family":"d'Aquin","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"LORIA, Universit\u00e9 de Lorraine, CNRS, INRIA 54506, Vand\u0153uvre-l\u00e8s-Nancy, France"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Fabian","family":"Kirstein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fraunhofer FOKUS, 10589 Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, 10623 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Daniela","family":"Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"LaSIGE, Faculdade de Ci\u00eacias, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sonja","family":"Schimmler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fraunhofer FOKUS, 10589 Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, 10623 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sebastian","family":"Urbanek","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Fraunhofer FOKUS, 10589 Berlin, Germany"},{"name":"Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society, 10623 Berlin, Germany"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"2026","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,8]]},"reference":[{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"Have digital repositories come of age? the views of library directors","author":"Nicholas","year":"2013"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","article-title":"The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"185","DOI":"10.1002\/leap.1099","article-title":"Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of spanish researchers: Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate","volume":"30","author":"Borrego","year":"2017","journal-title":"Learned Publishing"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"Digital repositories ten years on: what do scientific researchers think of them and how do they use them?","author":"Nicholas","year":"2012"},{"issue":"4","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"851","DOI":"10.1007\/s10209-016-0475-y","article-title":"A comparison of research data management platforms: architecture, flexible metadata and interoperability","volume":"16","author":"Amorim","year":"2017","journal-title":"Universal Access in the Information Society"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.25304\/rlt.v26.2008","article-title":"ResearchGate and Academia.edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: a literature review","volume":"26","author":"Manca","year":"2018","journal-title":"Research in Learning Technology"},{"issue":"6","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"849","DOI":"10.1007\/s00778-010-0208-4","article-title":"The social bookmark and publication management system bibsonomy: A platform for evaluating and demonstrating Web 2.0 research","volume":"19","author":"Benz","year":"2010","journal-title":"The VLDB Journal"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"264","DOI":"10.1080\/01930826.2018.1436778","article-title":"Why so many repositories? examining the limitations and possibilities of the institutional repositories landscape","volume":"58","author":"Arlitsch","year":"2018","journal-title":"Journal of Library Administration"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","article-title":"The landscape of research data repositories in 2015: A re3data analysis","volume":"23","author":"Kindling","year":"2017","journal-title":"D-Lib Magazine"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"79","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lcats.2012.05.002","article-title":"Digital libraries: Comparison of 10 software","volume":"36","author":"Andro","year":"2012","journal-title":"Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services"},{"issue":"0","key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"6","article-title":"Are scientific data repositories coping with research data publishing?","volume":"15","author":"Assante","year":"2016","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"issue":"4","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"24","DOI":"10.29173\/iq904","article-title":"Research Data Repositories: Review of Current Features, Gap Analysis, and Recommendations for Minimum Requirements","volume":"39","author":"Austin","year":"2016","journal-title":"IASSIST Quarterly"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"25","article-title":"Functional requirements for research data repositories","volume":"8","author":"Kim","journal-title":"International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology"},{"issue":"10","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"2029","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.21339","article-title":"Scientific data repositories on the web: An initial survey","volume":"61","author":"Marcial","year":"2010","journal-title":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"A comparative review of various data repositories","author":"Murphy","year":"2017"},{"issue":"4","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"523","DOI":"10.1108\/02640471111156777","article-title":"Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation","volume":"29","author":"Joo","year":"2011","journal-title":"The Electronic Library"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"206","volume-title":"A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems","author":"Nielsen","year":"1993"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1108\/AJIM-02-2018-0026","article-title":"Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders\u2019 perspective","volume":"70","author":"M\u00e1chov\u00e1","year":"2018","journal-title":"Aslib Journal of Information Management"},{"issue":"1-2","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"10","DOI":"10.1162\/dint_r_00024","article-title":"FAIR Principles: Interpretations and Implementation Considerations","volume":"2","author":"Jacobsen","year":"2020","journal-title":"Data Intelligence"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"39","DOI":"10.1515\/itit-2019-0040","article-title":"From FAIR research data toward FAIR and open research software","volume":"62","author":"Hasselbring","journal-title":"it - Information Technology"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"1","article-title":"Towards FAIR principles for research software","volume":"3","author":"Lamprecht","year":"2019","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.5334\/dsj-2021-004","article-title":"From conceptualization to implementation: FAIR assessment of research data objects","volume":"20","author":"Devaraju","year":"2021","journal-title":"Data Science Journal"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"FAIR Data Maturity Model: Specification and guidelines","author":"Research Data Alliance FAIR Data Maturity Model Working Group","year":"2020"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"Turning fair into reality: final report and action plan from the european commission expert group on fair data","author":"European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation","year":"2018"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"144","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-020-0486-7","article-title":"The TRUST principles for digital repositories","volume":"7","author":"Lin","year":"2020","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1038\/s41597-021-00892-0","article-title":"Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures","volume":"8","author":"Carroll","year":"2021","journal-title":"Scientific Data"},{"issue":"1\/2","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","DOI":"10.1045\/january2015-assante","article-title":"Science 2.0 Repositories: Time for a Change in Scholarly Communication","volume":"21","author":"Assante","year":"2015","journal-title":"D-Lib Magazine"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"137","DOI":"10.1177\/0961000618788725","article-title":"The adoption of Web 2.0 technologies in academic libraries: A comparative exploration","volume":"52","author":"Williams","year":"2020","journal-title":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science"},{"issue":"3","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"165","DOI":"10.1080\/01639269.2014.934093","article-title":"ResearchGate and Academia.edu: Academic Social Networks","volume":"33","author":"Ovadia","year":"2014","journal-title":"Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"1586","article-title":"Digital object identifier (doi\u00ae) system","volume":"3","author":"Paskin","year":"2010","journal-title":"Encyclopedia of library and information sciences"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"Budapest open access initiative","author":"Chan","year":"2002"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"17","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-00026-8_2","article-title":"Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought","volume-title":"Opening Science","author":"Fecher","year":"2014"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","volume-title":"Figshare and the fair data principles","author":"Splawa-Neyman","year":"2018"},{"issue":"1","key":"2023030801042265800_","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"108","DOI":"10.1162\/dint_a_00033","article-title":"FAIR computational workflows","volume":"2","author":"Goble","year":"2020","journal-title":"Data Intelligence"},{"key":"2023030801042265800_","first-page":"85","volume-title":"Designing a generic research data infrastructure architecture with continuous software engineering","author":"de Sousa","year":"2018"}],"container-title":["Data Intelligence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/dint\/article-pdf\/5\/1\/202\/2074241\/dint_a_00159.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/dint\/article-pdf\/5\/1\/202\/2074241\/dint_a_00159.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,14]],"date-time":"2025-03-14T07:43:36Z","timestamp":1741938216000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/www.sciengine.com\/doi\/10.1162\/dint_a_00159"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,3,8]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/dint_a_00159","relation":{},"ISSN":["2641-435X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2641-435X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2023]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2023]]}}}