{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,13]],"date-time":"2026-09-13T23:45:09Z","timestamp":1789343109229,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"MIT Press - Journals","issue":"7","content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>Perceiving speech requires the integration of different speech cues, that is, formants. When the speech signal is split so that different cues are presented to the right and left ear (dichotic listening), comprehension requires the integration of binaural information. Based on prior electrophysiological evidence, we hypothesized that the integration of dichotically presented speech cues is enabled by interhemispheric phase synchronization between primary and secondary auditory cortex in the gamma frequency band. We tested this hypothesis by applying transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS) bilaterally above the superior temporal lobe to induce or disrupt interhemispheric gamma-phase coupling. In contrast to initial predictions, we found that gamma TACS applied in-phase above the two hemispheres (interhemispheric lag 0\u00b0) perturbs interhemispheric integration of speech cues, possibly because the applied stimulation perturbs an inherent phase lag between the left and right auditory cortex. We also observed this disruptive effect when applying antiphasic delta TACS (interhemispheric lag 180\u00b0). We conclude that interhemispheric phase coupling plays a functional role in interhemispheric speech integration. The direction of this effect may depend on the stimulation frequency.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_01498","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,4]],"date-time":"2019-11-04T18:52:22Z","timestamp":1572893542000},"page":"1242-1250","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":16,"title":["Bilateral Gamma\/Delta Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Affects Interhemispheric Speech Sound Integration"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Basil C.","family":"Preisig","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"},{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"},{"name":"University of Zurich"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Matthias J.","family":"Sjerps","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"},{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexis","family":"Hervais-Adelman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Zurich"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Anne","family":"K\u00f6sem","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Lyon Neuroscience Research Center (CRNL), Lyon, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Peter","family":"Hagoort","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"},{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lars","family":"Riecke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Maastricht University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bayaz\u0131t,  O., Oniz,  A., Hahn,  C., G\u00fcnt\u00fcrk\u00fcn,  O., & Ozg\u00f6ren,  M. (2009). Dichotic listening revisited: Trial-by-trial ERP analyses reveal intra- and interhemispheric differences. Neuropsychologia, 47, 536\u2013545.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.002"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benjamini,  Y., & Hochberg,  Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B: Methodological, 57, 289\u2013300.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bouton,  S., Chambon,  V., Tyrand,  R., Guggisberg,  A. G., Seeck,  M., Karkar,  S., et al (2018). Focal versus distributed temporal cortex activity for speech sound category assignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 115, E1299\u2013E1308.","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1714279115"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chang,  E. F., Rieger,  J. W., Johnson,  K., Berger,  M. S., Barbaro,  N. M., & Knight,  R. T. (2010). Categorical speech representation in human superior temporal gyrus. Nature Neuroscience, 13, 1428\u20131432.","DOI":"10.1038\/nn.2641"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eichele,  T., Nordby,  H., Rimol,  L. M., & Hugdahl,  K. (2005). Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 405\u2013412.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.017"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fell,  J., & Axmacher,  N. (2011). The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 105\u2013118.","DOI":"10.1038\/nrn2979"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Flinker,  A., Doyle,  W. K., Mehta,  A. D., Devinsky,  O., & Poeppel,  D. (2019). Spectrotemporal modulation provides a unifying framework for auditory cortical asymmetries. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 393\u2013403.","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-019-0548-z"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fries,  P.\n           (2005). A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: Neuronal communication through neuronal coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 474\u2013480.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2005.08.011"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giraud,  A. L., & Poeppel,  D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 511\u2013517.","DOI":"10.1038\/nn.3063"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gross,  J., Hoogenboom,  N., Thut,  G., Schyns,  P., Panzeri,  S., Belin,  P., et al (2013). Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biology, 11, e1001752.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1001752"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heimrath,  K., Kuehne,  M., Heinze,  H. J., & Zaehle,  T. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) traces the predominance of the left auditory cortex for processing of rapidly changing acoustic information. Neuroscience, 261, 68\u201373.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroscience.2013.12.031"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helfrich,  R. F., Knepper,  H., Nolte,  G., Str\u00fcber,  D., Rach,  S., Herrmann,  C. S., et al (2014). Selective modulation of interhemispheric functional connectivity by HD-tACS shapes perception. PLOS Biology, 12, e1002031.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.1002031"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henshall,  K. R., Sergejew,  A. A., McKay,  C. M., Rance,  G., Shea,  T. L., Hayden,  M. J., et al (2012). Interhemispheric transfer time in patients with auditory hallucinations: An auditory event-related potential study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84, 130\u2013139.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2012.01.020"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hugdahl,  K., & Westerhausen,  R. (2016). Speech processing asymmetry revealed by dichotic listening and functional brain imaging. Neuropsychologia, 93, 466\u2013481.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2015.12.011"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"J\u00e4ncke,  L.\n           (2002). Does \u201ccallosal relay\u201d explain ear advantage in dichotic monitoring?Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 7, 309\u2013320.","DOI":"10.1080\/13576500143000267"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keitel,  A., Ince,  R. A. A., Gross,  J., & Kayser,  C. (2017). Auditory cortical delta-entrainment interacts with oscillatory power in multiple fronto-parietal networks. Neuroimage, 147, 32\u201342.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2016.11.062"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kimura,  D.\n           (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163\u2013178.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-9452(67)80010-8"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"K\u00f6sem,  A., & Wassenhove,  V. v. (2017). Distinct contributions of low- and high-frequency neural oscillations to speech comprehension. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32, 536\u2013544.","DOI":"10.1080\/23273798.2016.1238495"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liberman,  A. M., & Mattingly,  I. G. (1989). A specialization for speech perception. Science, 243, 489\u2013494.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.2643163"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luo,  H., & Poeppel,  D. (2007). Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex. Neuron, 54, 1001\u20131010.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuron.2007.06.004"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mathiak,  K., Hertrich,  I., Lutzenberger,  W., & Ackermann,  H. (2001). Neural correlates of duplex perception: A whole-head magnetencephalography study. NeuroReport, 12, 501\u2013506.","DOI":"10.1097\/00001756-200103050-00015"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meier,  J., Nolte,  G., Schneider,  T. R., Engel,  A. K., Leicht,  G., & Mulert,  C. (2019). Intrinsic 40Hz-phase asymmetries predict tACS effects during conscious auditory perception. PLoS One, 14, e0213996.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0213996"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mesgarani,  N., Cheung,  C., Johnson,  K., & Chang,  E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343, 1006\u20131010.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.1245994"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Obleser,  J., Zimmermann,  J., Van Meter,  J., & Rauschecker,  J. P. (2007). Multiple stages of auditory speech perception reflected in event-related fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 2251\u20132257.","DOI":"10.1093\/cercor\/bhl133"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Poeppel,  D.\n           (2003). The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as \u2018asymmetric sampling in time\u2019. Speech Communication, 41, 245\u2013255.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0167-6393(02)00107-3"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pollmann,  S., Maertens,  M., von Cramon,  D. Y., Lepsien,  J., & Hugdahl,  K. (2002). Dichotic listening in patients with splenial and nonsplenial callosal lesions. Neuropsychology, 16, 56\u201364.","DOI":"10.1037\/0894-4105.16.1.56"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Preisig,  B. C., & Sjerps,  M. J. (2019). Hemispheric specializations affect interhemispheric speech sound integration during duplex perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145, EL190\u2013EL196.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.5092829"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Preisig,  B. C., Sjerps,  M. J., K\u00f6sem,  A., & Riecke,  L. (2019). Dual-site high-density 4 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation applied over auditory and motor cortical speech areas does not influence auditory-motor mapping. Brain Stimulation, 12, 775\u2013777.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2019.01.007"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rand,  T. C.\n           (1974). Dichotic release from masking for speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 678\u2013680.","DOI":"10.1121\/1.1914584"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riecke,  L., Formisano,  E., Herrmann,  C. S., & Sack,  A. T. (2015). 4-Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation phase modulates hearing. Brain Stimulation, 8, 777\u2013783.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2015.04.004"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riecke,  L., Formisano,  E., Sorger,  B., Ba\u015fkent,  D., & Gaudrain,  E. (2018). Neural entrainment to speech modulates speech intelligibility. Current Biology, 28, 161\u2013169.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cub.2017.11.033"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Riecke,  L., Sack,  A. T., & Schroeder,  C. E. (2015). Endogenous delta\/theta sound-brain phase entrainment accelerates the buildup of auditory streaming. Current Biology, 25, 3196\u20133201.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cub.2015.10.045"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rimmele,  J. M., Zion Golumbic,  E., Schr\u00f6ger,  E., & Poeppel,  D. (2015). The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene. Cortex, 68, 144\u2013154.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2014.12.014"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rufener,  K. S., Krauel,  K., Meyer,  M., Heinze,  H.-J., & Zaehle,  T. (2019). Transcranial electrical stimulation improves phoneme processing in developmental dyslexia. Brain Stimulation, 12, 930\u2013937.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2019.02.007"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rufener,  K. S., Oechslin,  M. S., Zaehle,  T., & Meyer,  M. (2016). Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) differentially modulates speech perception in young and older adults. Brain Stimulation, 9, 560\u2013565.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2016.04.002"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rufener,  K. S., Zaehle,  T., Oechslin,  M. S., & Meyer,  M. (2016). 40 Hz-Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) selectively modulates speech perception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 101, 18\u201324.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijpsycho.2016.01.002"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saoud,  H., Josse,  G., Bertasi,  E., Truy,  E., Chait,  M., & Giraud,  A. L. (2012). Brain-speech alignment enhances auditory cortical responses and speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 275\u2013281.","DOI":"10.1523\/JNEUROSCI.3970-11.2012"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saturnino,  G. B., Madsen,  K. H., Siebner,  H. R., & Thielscher,  A. (2017). How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site transcranial alternating current stimulation. Neuroimage, 163, 68\u201380.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2017.09.024"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schaal,  N. K., Williamson,  V. J., & Banissy,  M. J. (2013). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the supramarginal gyrus facilitates pitch memory. European Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 3513\u20133518.","DOI":"10.1111\/ejn.12344"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shamir,  M., Ghitza,  O., Epstein,  S., & Kopell,  N. (2009). Representation of time-varying stimuli by a network exhibiting oscillations on a faster time scale. PLoS Computational Biology, 5, e1000370.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1000370"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sparks,  R., & Geschwind,  N. (1968). Dichotic listening in man after section of neocortical commissures. Cortex, 4, 3\u201316.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0010-9452(68)80009-7"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinmann,  S., Leicht,  G., Ertl,  M., Andreou,  C., Polomac,  N., Westerhausen,  R., et al (2014). Conscious auditory perception related to long-range synchrony of gamma oscillations. Neuroimage, 100, 435\u2013443.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2014.06.012"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinmann,  S., Meier,  J., Nolte,  G., Engel,  A. K., Leicht,  G., & Mulert,  C. (2018). The callosal relay model of interhemispheric communication: New evidence from effective connectivity analysis. Brain Topography, 31, 218\u2013226.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10548-017-0583-x"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ten Oever,  S., de Graaf,  T. A., Bonnemayer,  C., Ronner,  J., Sack,  A. T., & Riecke,  L. (2016). Stimulus presentation at specific neuronal oscillatory phases experimentally controlled with tACS: Implementation and applications. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 10, 240.","DOI":"10.3389\/fncel.2016.00240"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thielscher,  A., Antunes,  A., & Saturnino,  G. B. (2015). Field modeling for transcranial magnetic stimulation: A useful tool to understand the physiological effects of TMS? In Proceeding of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 222\u2013225.","DOI":"10.1109\/EMBC.2015.7318340"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turi,  Z., Csifcs\u00e1k,  G., Boayue,  N. M., Aslaksen,  P., Antal,  A., Paulus,  W., et al (2019). Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults. European Journal of Neuroscience, 50, 3261\u20133268.","DOI":"10.1111\/ejn.14403"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vines,  B. W., Schnider,  N. M., & Schlaug,  G. (2006). Testing for causality with transcranial direct current stimulation: Pitch memory and the left supramarginal gyrus. NeuroReport, 17, 1047\u20131050.","DOI":"10.1097\/01.wnr.0000223396.05070.a2"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vossen,  A., Gross,  J., & Thut,  G. (2015). Alpha power increase after transcranial alternating current stimulation at alpha frequency (\u03b1-tACS) reflects plastic changes rather than entrainment. Brain Stimulation, 8, 499\u2013508.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2014.12.004"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Westerhausen,  R., Gr\u00fcner,  R., Specht,  K., & Hugdahl,  K. (2009). Functional relevance of interindividual differences in temporal lobe callosal pathways: A DTI tractography study. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1322\u20131329.","DOI":"10.1093\/cercor\/bhn173"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Westerhausen,  R., & Hugdahl,  K. (2008). The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: A review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1044\u20131054.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2008.04.005"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"W\u00f6stmann,  M., Vosskuhl,  J., Obleser,  J., & Herrmann,  C. S. (2018). Opposite effects of lateralised transcranial alpha versus gamma stimulation on auditory spatial attention. Brain Stimulation, 11, 752\u2013758.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.brs.2018.04.006"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaehle,  T., Beretta,  M., J\u00e4ncke,  L., Herrmann,  C. S., & Sandmann,  P. (2011). Excitability changes induced in the human auditory cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: Direct electrophysiological evidence. Experimental Brain Research, 215, 135\u2013140.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-011-2879-5"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zaehle,  T., Lenz,  D., Ohl,  F. W., & Herrmann,  C. S. (2010). Resonance phenomena in the human auditory cortex: Individual resonance frequencies of the cerebral cortex determine electrophysiological responses. Experimental Brain Research, 203, 629\u2013635.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-010-2265-8"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zatorre,  R. J., & Belin,  P. (2001). Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 946\u2013953.","DOI":"10.1093\/cercor\/11.10.946"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zoefel,  B., Allard,  I., Anil,  M., & Davis,  M. H. (2020). Perception of rhythmic speech is modulated by focal bilateral transcranial alternating current stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32, 226\u2013240.","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_01490"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zoefel,  B., Archer-Boyd,  A., & Davis,  M. H. (2018). Phase entrainment of brain oscillations causally modulates neural responses to intelligible speech. Current Biology, 28, 401\u2013408.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cub.2017.11.071"},{"key":"2022042815133475200_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zoefel,  B., Davis,  M. H., Valente,  G., & Riecke,  L. (2019). How to test for phasic modulation of neural and behavioural responses. Neuroimage, 202, 116175.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2019.116175"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/7\/1242\/2013546\/jocn_a_01498.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/7\/1242\/2013546\/jocn_a_01498.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,29]],"date-time":"2022-04-29T00:36:36Z","timestamp":1651192596000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article\/32\/7\/1242\/95429\/Bilateral-Gamma-Delta-Transcranial-Alternating"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"7","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn_a_01498","relation":{},"ISSN":["0898-929X","1530-8898"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0898-929X","type":"print"},{"value":"1530-8898","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2020,7]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,7,1]]}}}