{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]],"date-time":"2026-05-19T16:01:10Z","timestamp":1779206470653,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":89,"publisher":"MIT Press - Journals","issue":"4","content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>In vision science, a particularly controversial topic is whether and how quickly the semantic information about objects is available outside foveal vision. Here, we aimed at contributing to this debate by coregistering eye movements and EEG while participants viewed photographs of indoor scenes that contained a semantically consistent or inconsistent target object. Linear deconvolution modeling was used to analyze the ERPs evoked by scene onset as well as the fixation-related potentials (FRPs) elicited by the fixation on the target object (t) and by the preceding fixation (t \u2212 1). Object\u2013scene consistency did not influence the probability of immediate target fixation or the ERP evoked by scene onset, which suggests that object\u2013scene semantics was not accessed immediately. However, during the subsequent scene exploration, inconsistent objects were prioritized over consistent objects in extrafoveal vision (i.e., looked at earlier) and were more effortful to process in foveal vision (i.e., looked at longer). In FRPs, we demonstrate a fixation-related N300\/N400 effect, whereby inconsistent objects elicit a larger frontocentral negativity than consistent objects. In line with the behavioral findings, this effect was already seen in FRPs aligned to the pretarget fixation t \u2212 1 and persisted throughout fixation t, indicating that the extraction of object semantics can already begin in extrafoveal vision. Taken together, the results emphasize the usefulness of combined EEG\/eye movement recordings for understanding the mechanisms of object\u2013scene integration during natural viewing.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_01504","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2019,11,26]],"date-time":"2019-11-26T00:36:44Z","timestamp":1574728604000},"page":"571-589","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":80,"title":["Fixation-related Brain Potentials during Semantic Integration of Object\u2013Scene Information"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Moreno I.","family":"Coco","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of East London"},{"name":"CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Antje","family":"Nuthmann","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Christian-Albrechts-Universit\u00e4t zu Kiel"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Olaf","family":"Dimigen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Humboldt-Universit\u00e4t zu Berlin"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrews,  S., & Veldre,  A. (2019). What is the most plausible account of the role of parafoveal processing in reading?Language and Linguistics Compass, 13, e12344.","DOI":"10.1111\/lnc3.12344"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Antes,  J. R.\n           (1974). The time course of picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 62\u201370.","DOI":"10.1037\/h0036799"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barr,  D. J., Levy,  R., Scheepers,  C., & Tily,  H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 255\u2013278.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2012.11.001"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bates,  D., M\u00e4chler,  M., Bolker,  B. M., & Walker,  S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1\u201348.","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v067.i01"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Belke,  E., Humphreys,  G. W., Watson,  D. G., Meyer,  A. S., & Telling,  A. L. (2008). Top\u2013down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1444\u20131458.","DOI":"10.3758\/PP.70.8.1444"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Biederman,  I.\n           (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77\u201380.","DOI":"10.1126\/science.177.4043.77"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bonitz,  V. S., & Gordon,  R. D. (2008). Attention to smoking-related and incongruous objects during scene viewing. Acta Psychologica, 129, 255\u2013263.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2008.08.006"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borges,  M. T., Fernandes,  E. G., & Coco,  M. I. (2019). Age-related differences during visual search: The role of contextual expectations and cognitive control mechanisms. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13825585.2019.1632256.","DOI":"10.1080\/13825585.2019.1632256"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brouwer,  A.-M., Reuderink,  B., Vincent,  J., van Gerven,  M. A. J., & van Erp,  J. B. F. (2013). Distinguishing between target and nontarget fixations in a visual search task using fixation-related potentials. Journal of Vision, 13, 17.","DOI":"10.1167\/13.3.17"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cimminella,  F., Della Sala,  S., & Coco,  M. I. (in press). Parallel and extra-foveal processing of object semantics during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13414-019-01906-1.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-019-01906-1"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coco,  M. I., Araujo,  S., & Petersson,  K. M. (2017). Disentangling stimulus plausibility and contextual congruency: Electro-physiological evidence for differential cognitive dynamics. Neuropsychologia, 96, 150\u2013163.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.008"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cornelissen,  T. H. W., Sassenhagen,  J., & V\u00f5,  M. L.-H. (2019). Improving free-viewing fixation-related EEG potentials with continuous-time regression. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 313, 77\u201394.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2018.12.010"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cornelissen,  T. H. W., & V\u00f5,  M. L.-H. (2017). Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object\u2013scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 154\u2013168.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-016-1203-7"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dandekar,  S., Privitera,  C., Carney,  T., & Klein,  S. A. (2012). Neural saccadic response estimation during natural viewing. Journal of Neurophysiology, 107, 1776\u20131790.","DOI":"10.1152\/jn.00237.2011"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davenport,  J. L., & Potter,  M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559\u2013564.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0956-7976.2004.00719.x"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Debener,  S., Thorne,  J., Schneider,  T. R., & Viola,  F. C. (2010). Using ICA for the analysis of multi-channel EEG data. In M.Ullsperger & S.Debener (Eds.), Simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Recording, analysis, and application (pp. 121\u2013133). New York: Oxford University Press.","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780195372731.003.0008"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib17","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"De Graef,  P., Christiaens,  D., & d'Ydewalle,  G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317\u2013329.","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00868064"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delorme,  A., & Makeig,  S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open sorce toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9\u201321.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Devillez,  H., Guyader,  N., & Gu\u00e9rin-Dugu\u00e9,  A. (2015). An eye fixation-related potentials analysis of the P300 potential for fixations onto a target object when exploring natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 15, 20.","DOI":"10.1167\/15.13.20"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimigen,  O.\n           (2020). Optimizing the ICA-based removal of ocular EEG artifacts from free viewing experiments. Neuroimage, 207, 116117.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2019.116117"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimigen,  O., & Ehinger,  B. V. (2019). Analyzing combined eye-tracking\/EEG experiments with (non)linear deconvolution models. BioRxiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1101\/735530.","DOI":"10.1101\/735530"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimigen,  O., Kliegl,  R., & Sommer,  W. (2012). Trans-saccadic parafoveal preview benefits in fluent reading: A study with fixation-related brain potentials. Neuroimage, 62, 381\u2013393.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2012.04.006"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dimigen,  O., Sommer,  W., Hohlfeld,  A., Jacobs,  A. M., & Kliegl,  R. (2011). Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 552\u2013572.","DOI":"10.1037\/a0023885"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Draschkow,  D., Heikel,  E., V\u00f5,  M. L.-H., Fiebach,  C. J., & Sassenhagen,  J. (2018). No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object\u2013scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 120, 9\u201317.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.016"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dyck,  M., & Brodeur,  M. B. (2015). ERP evidence for the influence of scene context on the recognition of ambiguous and unambiguous objects. Neuropsychologia, 72, 43\u201351.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.023"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ehinger,  B. V., & Dimigen,  O. (2019). Unfold: An integrated toolbox for overlap correction, non-linear modeling, and regression-based EEG analysis. PeerJ, 7, e7838.","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj.7838"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feldman,  J.\n           (2003). What is a visual object?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 252\u2013256.","DOI":"10.1016\/S1364-6613(03)00111-6"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fenske,  M. J., Aminoff,  E., Gronau,  N., & Bar,  M. (2006). Top\u2013down facilitation of visual object recognition: Object-based and context-based contributions. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 3\u201321.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0079-6123(06)55001-0"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ganis,  G., & Kutas,  M. (2003). An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 123\u2013144.","DOI":"10.1016\/S0926-6410(02)00244-6"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garcia-Diaz,  A., Fdez-Vidal,  X. R., Pardo,  X. M., & Dosil,  R. (2012). Saliency from hierarchical adaptation through decorrelation and variance normalization. Image and Vision Computing, 30, 51\u201364.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.imavis.2011.11.007"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gareze,  L., & Findlay,  J. M. (2007). Absence of scene context effects in object detection and eye gaze capture. In R. P. G.van Gompel, M. H.Fischer, W. S.Murray, & R. W.Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 617\u2013637). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-008044980-7\/50031-8"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib32","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hauk,  O., Davis,  M. H., Ford,  M., Pulverm\u00fcller,  F., & Marslen-Wilson,  W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30, 1383\u20131400.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib33","unstructured":"Henderson,  J. M., & Ferreira,  F. (2004). Scene perception for psycholinguists. In J. M.Henderson & F.Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world (pp. 1\u201358). New York: Psychology Press."},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson,  J. M., Hayes,  T. R., Peacock,  C. E., & Rehrig,  G. (2019). Meaning and attentional guidance in scenes: A review of the meaning map approach. Vision, 3, 19.","DOI":"10.3390\/vision3020019"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson,  J. M., Weeks,  P. A., Jr., & Hollingworth,  A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210\u2013228.","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.25.1.210"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hohenstein,  S., & Kliegl,  R. (2014). Semantic preview benefit during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 166\u2013190.","DOI":"10.1037\/a0033670"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hwang,  A. D., Wang,  H.-C., & Pomplun,  M. (2011). Semantic guidance of eye movements in real-world scenes. Vision Research, 51, 1192\u20131205.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2011.03.010"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Itti,  L., Koch,  C., & Niebur,  E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 1254\u20131259.","DOI":"10.1109\/34.730558"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib39","unstructured":"Jung,  T.-P., Humphries,  C., Lee,  T.-W., Makeig,  S., McKeown,  M. J., Iragui,  V., et al (1998). Extended ICA removes artifacts from electroencephalographic recordings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 10, 894\u2013900."},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kamienkowski,  J. E., Ison,  M. J., Quiroga,  R. Q., & Sigman,  M. (2012). Fixation-related potentials in visual search: A combined EEG and eye tracking study. Journal of Vision, 12, 4.","DOI":"10.1167\/12.7.4"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaunitz,  L. N., Kamienkowski,  J. E., Varatharajah,  A., Sigman,  M., Quiroga,  R. Q., & Ison,  M. J. (2014). Looking for a face in the crowd: Fixation-related potentials in an eye-movement visual search task. Neuroimage, 89, 297\u2013305.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2013.12.006"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kliegl,  R., Dambacher,  M., Dimigen,  O., Jacobs,  A. M., & Sommer,  W. (2012). Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychological Research, 76, 145\u2013158.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00426-011-0376-x"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kretzschmar,  F., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,  I., & Schlesewsky,  M. (2009). Parafoveal versus foveal N400s dissociate spreading activation from contextual fit. NeuroReport, 20, 1613\u20131618.","DOI":"10.1097\/WNR.0b013e328332c4f4"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kristensen,  E., Rivet,  B., & Gu\u00e9rin-Dugu\u00e9,  A. (2017). Estimation of overlapped eye fixation related potentials: The general linear model, a more flexible framework than the ADJAR algorithm. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10, 1\u201327.","DOI":"10.16910\/jemr.10.1.7"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kutas,  M., & Federmeier,  K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621\u2013647.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.131123"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kutas,  M., & Hillyard,  S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 161\u2013163.","DOI":"10.1038\/307161a0"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kuznetsova,  A., Brockhoff,  P. B., & Christensen,  R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82, 1\u201326.","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v082.i13"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"LaPointe,  M. R. P., & Milliken,  B. (2016). Semantically incongruent objects attract eye gaze when viewing scenes for change. Visual Cognition, 24, 63\u201377.","DOI":"10.1080\/13506285.2016.1185070"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loftus,  G. R., & Mackworth,  N. H. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565\u2013572.","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.4.4.565"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mackworth,  N. H., & Morandi,  A. J. (1967). The gaze selects information details within pictures. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 547\u2013552.","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03210264"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maris,  E., & Oostenveld,  R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164, 177\u2013190.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matuschek,  H., Kliegl,  R., Vasishth,  S., Baayen,  H., & Bates,  D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305\u2013315.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2017.01.001"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mensen,  A., & Khatami,  R. (2013). Advanced EEG analysis using threshold-free cluster-enhancement and non-parametric statistics. Neuroimage, 67, 111\u2013118.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2012.10.027"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moores,  E., Laiti,  L., & Chelazzi,  L. (2003). Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 182\u2013189.","DOI":"10.1038\/nn996"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mudrik,  L., Lamy,  D., & Deouell,  L. Y. (2010). ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object\u2013scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 48, 507\u2013517.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.011"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mudrik,  L., Shalgi,  S., Lamy,  D., & Deouell,  L. Y. (2014). Synchronous contextual irregularities affect early scene processing: Replication and extension. Neuropsychologia, 56, 447\u2013458.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.020"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib57","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Niefind,  F., & Dimigen,  O. (2016). Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study. Psychophysiology, 53, 1784\u20131798.","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.12765"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib58","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nikolaev,  A. R., Meghanathan,  R. N., & van Leeuwen,  C. (2016). Combining EEG and eye movement recording in free viewing: Pitfalls and possibilities. Brain and Cognition, 107, 55\u201383.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandc.2016.06.004"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib59","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A.\n           (2013). On the visual span during object search in real-world scenes. Visual Cognition, 21, 803\u2013837.","DOI":"10.1080\/13506285.2013.832449"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib60","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A.\n           (2014). How do the regions of the visual field contribute to object search in real-world scenes? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 342\u2013360.","DOI":"10.1037\/a0033854"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A.\n           (2017). Fixation durations in scene viewing: Modeling the effects of local image features, oculomotor parameters, and task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 370\u2013392.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-016-1124-4"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A., de Groot,  F., Huettig,  F., & Olivers,  C. N. L. (2019). Extrafoveal attentional capture by object semantics. PLoS One, 14, e0217051.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0217051"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib63","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A., & Einh\u00e4user,  W. (2015). A new approach to modeling the influence of image features on fixation selection in scenes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1339, 82\u201396.","DOI":"10.1111\/nyas.12705"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib64","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nuthmann,  A., & Henderson,  J. M. (2010). Object-based attentional selection in scene viewing. Journal of Vision, 10, 20.","DOI":"10.1167\/10.8.20"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib65","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pl\u00f6chl,  M., Ossand\u00f3n,  J. P., & K\u00f6nig,  P. (2012). Combining EEG and eye tracking: Identification, characterization, and correction of eye movement artifacts in electroencephalographic data. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 278.","DOI":"10.3389\/fnhum.2012.00278"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib66","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"R\u00e4m\u00e4,  P., & Baccino,  T. (2010). Eye fixation-related potentials (EFRPs) during object identification. Visual Neuroscience, 27, 187\u2013192.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0952523810000283"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib67","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rayner,  K.\n           (2014). The gaze-contingent moving window in reading: Development and review. Visual Cognition, 22, 242\u2013258.","DOI":"10.1080\/13506285.2013.879084"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib68","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rayner,  K., Balota,  D. A., & Pollatsek,  A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 473\u2013483.","DOI":"10.1037\/h0080111"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib69","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sassenhagen,  J., & Draschkow,  D. (2019). Cluster-based permutation tests of MEG\/EEG data do not establish significance of effect latency or location. Psychophysiology, 56, e13335.","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.13335"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib70","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Satterthwaite,  F. E.\n           (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110\u2013114.","DOI":"10.2307\/3002019"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib71","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Serences,  J. T.\n           (2004). A comparison of methods for characterizing the event-related BOLD timeseries in rapid fMRI. Neuroimage, 21, 1690\u20131700.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2003.12.021"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib72","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simola,  J., Le Fevre,  K., Torniainen,  J., & Baccino,  T. (2015). Affective processing in natural scene viewing: Valence and arousal interactions in eye-fixation-related potentials. Neuroimage, 106, 21\u201333.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2014.11.030"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib73","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith,  N. J., & Kutas,  M. (2015a). Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: I. The rERP framework. Psychophysiology, 52, 157\u2013168.","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.12317"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib74","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith,  N. J., & Kutas,  M. (2015b). Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: II. Nonlinear effects, overlap correction, and practical considerations. Psychophysiology, 52, 169\u2013181.","DOI":"10.1111\/psyp.12320"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib75","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith,  S. M., & Nichols,  T. E. (2009). Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage, 44, 83\u201398.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib76","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stoll,  J., Thrun,  M., Nuthmann,  A., & Einh\u00e4user,  W. (2015). Overt attention in natural scenes: Objects dominate features. Vision Research, 107, 36\u201348.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.visres.2014.11.006"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib77","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tatler,  B. W., Brockmole,  J. R., & Carpenter,  R. H. S. (2017). LATEST: A model of saccadic decisions in space and time. Psychological Review, 124, 267\u2013300.","DOI":"10.1037\/rev0000054"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib78","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thickbroom,  G. W., Knezevi\u010d,  W., Carroll,  W. M., & Mastaglia,  F. L. (1991). Saccade onset and offset lambda waves: Relation to pattern movement visually evoked potentials. Brain Research, 551, 150\u2013156.","DOI":"10.1016\/0006-8993(91)90927-N"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib79","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Underwood,  G., & Foulsham,  T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1931\u20131949.","DOI":"10.1080\/17470210500416342"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib80","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Underwood,  G., Templeman,  E., Lamming,  L., & Foulsham,  T. (2008). Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 159\u2013170.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.concog.2006.11.008"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib81","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"U\u0161\u0107umli\u0107,  M., & Blankertz,  B. (2016). Active visual search in non-stationary scenes: Coping with temporal variability and uncertainty. Journal of Neural Engineering, 13, 016015.","DOI":"10.1088\/1741-2560\/13\/1\/016015"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib82","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V\u00f5,  M. L.-H., & Henderson,  J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9, 24.","DOI":"10.1167\/9.3.24"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib83","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V\u00f5,  M. L.-H., & Henderson,  J. M. (2011). Object\u2013scene inconsistencies do not capture gaze: Evidence from the flash-preview moving-window paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1742\u20131753.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-011-0150-6"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib84","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"V\u00f5,  M. L.-H., & Wolfe,  J. M. (2013). Differential electrophysiological signatures of semantic and syntactic scene processing. Psychological Science, 24, 1816\u20131823.","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797613476955"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib85","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weiss,  B., Knakker,  B., & Vidny\u00e1nszky,  Z. (2016). Visual processing during natural reading. Scientific Reports, 6, 26902.","DOI":"10.1038\/srep26902"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib86","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Winkler,  I., Debener,  S., M\u00fcller,  K.-R., & Tangermann,  M. (2015). On the influence of high-pass filtering on ICA-based artifact reduction in EEG-ERP. Paper presented at the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 4101\u20134105). Milan, Italy: IEEE.","DOI":"10.1109\/EMBC.2015.7319296"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib87","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wolfe,  J. M., Alvarez,  G. A., Rosenholtz,  R., Kuzmova,  Y. I., & Sherman,  A. M. (2011). Visual search for arbitrary objects in real scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73, 1650\u20131671.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13414-011-0153-3"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib88","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wu,  C.-C., Wick,  F. A., & Pomplun,  M. (2014). Guidance of visual attention by semantic information in real-world scenes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 54.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.00054"},{"key":"2022042815031452700_bib89","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yan,  M., Richter,  E. M., Shu,  H., & Kliegl,  R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561\u2013566.","DOI":"10.3758\/PBR.16.3.561"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/4\/571\/2013247\/jocn_a_01504.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/4\/571\/2013247\/jocn_a_01504.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,29]],"date-time":"2022-04-29T00:18:28Z","timestamp":1651191508000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article\/32\/4\/571\/95391\/Fixation-related-Brain-Potentials-during-Semantic"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]},"references-count":89,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn_a_01504","relation":{},"ISSN":["0898-929X","1530-8898"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0898-929X","type":"print"},{"value":"1530-8898","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2020,4]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,4,1]]}}}