{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,24]],"date-time":"2026-04-24T10:54:05Z","timestamp":1777028045337,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":56,"publisher":"MIT Press - Journals","issue":"5","content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>One challenge of learning a foreign language (L2) in adulthood is the mastery of syntactic structures that are implemented differently in L2 and one's native language (L1). Here, we asked how L2 speakers learn to process syntactic constructions that are in direct conflict between L1 and L2, in comparison to structures without such a conflict. To do so, we measured EEG during sentence reading in three groups of German learners of Dutch with different degrees of L2 experience (from 3 to more than 18 months of L2 immersion) as well as a control group of Dutch native speakers. They read grammatical and ungrammatical Dutch sentences that, in the conflict condition, contained a structure with opposing word orders in Dutch and German (sentence-final double infinitives) and, in the no-conflict condition, a structure for which word order is identical in Dutch and German (subordinate clause inversion). Results showed, first, that beginning learners showed N400-like signatures instead of the expected P600 for both types of violations, suggesting that, in the very early stages of learning, different neurocognitive processes are employed compared with native speakers, regardless of L1\u2013L2 similarity. In contrast, both advanced and intermediate learners already showed native-like P600 signatures for the no-conflict sentences. However, their P600 signatures were significantly delayed in processing the conflicting structure, even though behavioral performance was on a native level for both these groups and structures. These findings suggest that L1\u2013L2 word order conflicts clearly remain an obstacle to native-like processing, even for advanced L2 learners.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_01528","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,14]],"date-time":"2020-01-14T12:49:10Z","timestamp":1579006150000},"page":"822-846","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":15,"title":["Tracking Syntactic Conflict between Languages over the Course of L2 Acquisition: A Cross-sectional Event-related Potential Study"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"32","author":[{"given":"Anne","family":"Mickan","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Radboud University Nijmegen"},{"name":"Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, International Max Planck Research School for Language Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}]},{"given":"Kristin","family":"Lemh\u00f6fer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Radboud University Nijmegen"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alem\u00e1n Ba\u00f1\u00f3n,  J., Fiorentino,  R., & Gabriele,  A. (2014). Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1\u2013L2 similarity and structural distance. Second Language Research, 30, 275\u2013306.","DOI":"10.1177\/0267658313515671"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alem\u00e1n Ba\u00f1\u00f3n,  J., Fiorentino,  R., & Gabriele,  A. (2018). Using event-related potentials to track morphosyntactic development in second language learners: The processing of number and gender agreement in Spanish. PLoS One, 13, e0200791.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0200791"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib3","unstructured":"Baayen,  R. H., Piepenbrock,  R., & Gulikers,  L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database. Retrieved from celex.mpi.nl\/."},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Birdsong,  D.\n           (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9\u201349.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9922.2006.00353.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bowden,  H. W., Steinhauer,  K., Sanz,  C., & Ullman,  M. T. (2013). Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia, 51, 2492\u20132511.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.004"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bultena,  S., Danielmeier,  C., Bekkering,  H., & Lemh\u00f6fer,  K. (2017). Electrophysiological correlates of error monitoring and feedback processing in second language learning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 29.","DOI":"10.3389\/fnhum.2017.00029"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caffarra,  S., Molinaro,  N., Davidson,  D., & Carreiras,  M. (2015). Second language syntactic processing revealed through event-related potentials: An empirical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 51, 31\u201347.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neubiorev.2015.01.010"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen,  L., Shu,  H., Liu,  Y., Zhao,  J., & Li,  P. (2007). ERP signatures of subject\u2013verb agreement in L2 learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 161\u2013174.","DOI":"10.1017\/S136672890700291X"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davidson,  D. J., & Indefrey,  P. (2009). Plasticity of grammatical recursion in German learners of Dutch. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1335\u20131369.","DOI":"10.1080\/01690960902981883"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Delorme,  A., & Makeig,  S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trail EEG dynamics including independent component anlaysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9\u201321.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u00edaz,  B., Erdocia,  K., de Menezes,  R. F., Mueller,  J. L., Sebasti\u00e1n-Gall\u00e9s,  N., & Laka,  I. (2016). Electrophysiological correlates of second-language syntactic processes are related to native and second language distance regardless of age of acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 133.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2016.00133"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ensz,  K. Y.\n           (1982). French attitudes toward typical speech errors of American speakers of French. Modern Language Journal, 66, 133\u2013139.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-4781.1982.tb06972.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erdocia,  K., & Laka,  I. (2018). Negative transfer effects on L2 word order processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 337.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.00337"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Erdocia,  K., Zawiszewski,  A., & Laka,  I. (2014). Word order processing in a second language: From VO to OV. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 43, 815\u2013837.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10936-013-9280-4"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Flege,  J. E., & Liu,  S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults' acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527\u2013552.","DOI":"10.1017\/S0272263101004041"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Foucart,  A., & Frenck-Mestre,  C. (2011). Grammatical gender processing in L2: Electrophysiological evidence of the effect of L1\u2013L2 syntactic similarity. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 379\u2013399.","DOI":"10.1017\/S136672891000012X"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib17","unstructured":"Gardner,  R. C., Cl\u00e9ment,  R., Smythe,  P. C., & Smythe,  C. L. (1979). Attitudes and motivation test battery: Revised manual(Research Bulletin, no. 15). London, Ontario, Canada: Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario."},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillon Dowens,  M., Guo,  T., Guo,  J., Barber,  H. A., & Carreiras,  M. (2011). Gender and number processing in Chinese learners of Spanish\u2014Evidence from event related potentials. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1651\u20131659.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.034"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gillon Dowens,  M., Vergara,  M., Barber,  H. A., & Carreiras,  M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1870\u20131887.","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn.2009.21304"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gratton,  G., Coles,  M. G. H., & Donchin,  E. (1983). A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 55, 468\u2013484.","DOI":"10.1016\/0013-4694(83)90135-9"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Groppe,  D. M., Urbach,  T. P., & Kutas,  M. (2011). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials\/fields I: A critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology, 48, 1711\u20131725.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1469-8986.2011.01273.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hagoort,  P., Brown,  C., & Groothusen,  J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 439\u2013483.","DOI":"10.1080\/01690969308407585"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hahne,  A.\n           (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 251\u2013266.","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1010490917575"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib24","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartshorne,  J. K., Tenenbaum,  J. B., & Pinker,  S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2\/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263\u2013277.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.04.007"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartsuiker,  R. J., Pickering,  M. J., & Veltkamp,  E. (2004). Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish\u2013English bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, 409\u2013414.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hopp,  H.\n           (2010). Ultimate attainment in L2 inflection: Performance similarities between non-native and native speakers. Lingua, 120, 901\u2013931.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2009.06.004"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kotz,  S. A.\n           (2009). A critical review of ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain and Language, 109, 68\u201374.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandl.2008.06.002"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kotz,  S. A., Holcomb,  P. J., & Osterhout,  L. (2008). ERPs reveal comparable syntactic sentence processing in native and non-native readers of English. Acta Psychologia, 128, 514\u2013527.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2007.10.003"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kutas,  M., & Federmeier,  K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621\u2013647.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.093008.131123"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib30","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lemh\u00f6fer,  K., & Broersma,  M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 325\u2013343.","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-011-0146-0"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lemh\u00f6fer,  K., Schriefers,  H., & Indefrey,  P. (2014). Idiosyncratic grammars: Syntactic processing in second language comprehension uses subjective feature representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 1428\u20131444.","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_00609"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib32","unstructured":"Macmillan,  N. A., & Creelman,  C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence."},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib33","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maris,  E., & Oostenveld,  R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164, 177\u2013190.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McLaughlin,  J., Osterhout,  L., & Kim,  A. (2004). Neural correlates of second-language word learning: Minimal instruction produces rapid change. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 703\u2013704.","DOI":"10.1038\/nn1264"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib35","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McLaughlin,  J., Tanner,  D., Pitk\u00e4nen,  I., Frenck-Mestre,  C., Inoue,  K., Valentine,  G., et al (2010). Brain potentials reveal discrete stages of L2 grammatical learning. Language Learning, 60, 123\u2013150.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9922.2010.00604.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meulman,  N., Stowe,  L. A., Sprenger,  S. A., Bresser,  M., & Schmid,  M. S. (2014). An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail?Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1072.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2014.01072"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib37","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morgan-Short,  K., Steinhauer,  K., Sanz,  C., & Ullman,  M. T. (2012). Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 933\u2013947.","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn_a_00119"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ojima,  S., Nakata,  H., & Kakigi,  R. (2005). An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: Effects of proficiency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1212\u20131228.","DOI":"10.1162\/0898929055002436"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oostenveld,  R., Fries,  P., Maris,  E., & Schoffelen,  J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 156869.","DOI":"10.1155\/2011\/156869"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Osterhout,  L., McLaughlin,  J., Pitk\u00e4nen,  I., Frenck-Mestre,  C., & Molinaro,  N. (2006). Novice learners, longitudinal designs, and event-related potentials: A means for exploring the neurocognition of second language processing. Language Learning, 56, 199\u2013230.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9922.2006.00361.x"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Politzer-Ahles,  S., Schluter,  K., Wu,  K., & Almeida,  D. (2016). Asymmetries in the perception of Mandarin tones: Evidence from mismatch negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1547\u20131570.","DOI":"10.1037\/xhp0000242"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Queen,  R., & Boland,  J. E. (2015). I think your going to like me: Exploring the role of errors in email messages on assessments of potential housemates. Linguistics Vanguard, 1, 283\u2013293.","DOI":"10.1515\/lingvan-2015-0011"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib43","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rossi,  S., Gugler,  M. F., Friederici,  A. D., & Hahne,  A. (2006). The impact of proficiency on syntactic second-language processing of German and Italian: Evidence from event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 2030\u20132048.","DOI":"10.1162\/jocn.2006.18.12.2030"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ruxton,  G. D., & Beauchamp,  G. (2008). Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 690\u2013693.","DOI":"10.1093\/beheco\/arn020"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sabourin,  L., & Stowe,  L. A. (2008). Second language processing: When are first and second languages processed similarly?Second Language Research, 24, 397\u2013430.","DOI":"10.1177\/0267658308090186"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schmid,  M. S., Dusseldorp,  E., van Hell,  J. G., & Tokowicz,  N. (2010). Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 26, 43\u201374.","DOI":"10.1177\/0267658309337637"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinhauer,  K.\n           (2014). Event-related potentials (ERPs) in second language research: A brief introduction to the technique, a selected review, and an invitation to reconsider critical periods in L2. Applied Linguistics, 35, 393\u2013417.","DOI":"10.1093\/applin\/amu028"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinhauer,  K., & Drury,  J. E. (2012). On the early left-anterior negativity (ELAN) in syntax studies. Brain and Language, 120, 135\u2013162.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.bandl.2011.07.001"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib49","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steinhauer,  K., White,  E. J., & Drury,  J. E. (2009). Temporal dynamics of late second language acquisition: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Second Language Research, 25, 13\u201341.","DOI":"10.1177\/0267658308098995"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib50","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanner,  D., Inoue,  K., & Osterhout,  L. (2014). Brain-based individual differences in online L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 277\u2013293.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1366728913000370"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib51","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanner,  D., McLaughlin,  J., Herschensohn,  J., & Osterhout,  L. (2013). Individual differences reveal stages of L2 grammatical acquisition: ERP evidence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 367\u2013382.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1366728912000302"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib52","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ullman,  M. T.\n           (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative\/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 717\u2013726.","DOI":"10.1038\/35094573"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib53","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"VanRullen,  R.\n           (2011). Four common conceptual fallacies in mapping the time course of recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 365.","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2011.00365"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"White,  E. J., Genesee,  F., & Steinhauer,  K. (2012). Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners. PLoS One, 7, e52318.","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0052318"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib55","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yuan,  B.\n           (2017). Can L2 sentence processing strategies be native-like? Evidence from English speakers' L2 processing of Chinese base-generated-topic sentences. Lingua, 191\u2013192, 42\u201364.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lingua.2017.04.001"},{"key":"2022042815131278200_bib56","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zawiszewski,  A., Guti\u00e9rrez,  E., Fern\u00e1ndez,  B., & Laka,  I. (2011). Language distance and non-native syntactic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 400\u2013411.","DOI":"10.1017\/S1366728910000350"}],"container-title":["Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/5\/822\/2013286\/jocn_a_01528.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article-pdf\/32\/5\/822\/2013286\/jocn_a_01528.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,29]],"date-time":"2022-04-29T00:30:33Z","timestamp":1651192233000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/jocn\/article\/32\/5\/822\/95451\/Tracking-Syntactic-Conflict-between-Languages-over"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]},"references-count":56,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]},"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/jocn_a_01528","relation":{},"ISSN":["0898-929X","1530-8898"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0898-929X","type":"print"},{"value":"1530-8898","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2020,5]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,5,1]]}}}