{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,27]],"date-time":"2026-02-27T04:01:20Z","timestamp":1772164880909,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":26,"publisher":"MIT Press","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,27]],"date-time":"2021-04-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1619481600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":116,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,15]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>The Metadata 2020 initiative is an ongoing effort to bring various scholarly communications stakeholder groups together to promote principles and standards of practice to improve the quality of metadata. To understand the perspectives and practices regarding metadata of the main stakeholder groups (librarians, publishers, researchers, and repository managers), we conducted a survey during summer 2019. The survey content was generated by representatives from the stakeholder groups. A link to an online survey (17 or 18 questions depending on the group) was distributed through multiple social media, listserv, and blog outlets. Responses were anonymous, with an optional entry for names and email addresses for those who were willing to be contacted later. Complete responses (N = 211; 87 librarians, 27 publishers, 48 repository managers, and 49 researchers) representing 23 countries on four continents were analyzed and summarized for thematic content and ranking of awareness and practices. Across the stakeholder groups, the level of awareness and usage of metadata methods and practices was highly variable. Clear gaps across the groups point to the need for consolidation of schema and practices, as well as broad educational efforts to increase knowledge and implementation of metadata in scholarly communications.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00133","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,4,27]],"date-time":"2021-04-27T17:44:04Z","timestamp":1619545444000},"page":"454-473","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["An international, multistakeholder survey about metadata awareness, knowledge, and use in scholarly communications"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"2","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6258-4369","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Kathryn A.","family":"Kaiser","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2748-811X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Michelle","family":"Urberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Independent Researcher and Maverick Publishing Specialists"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6650-359X","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Maria","family":"Johnsson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Lund University, Sweden"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4086-3196","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Jennifer","family":"Kemp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2161-3781","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Alice","family":"Meadows","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"National Information Standards Organization (NISO)"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3188-6273","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Laura","family":"Paglione","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Metadata 2020, Spherical Cow Group"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,15]]},"reference":[{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib1","author":"About Metadata","year":"2020"},{"issue":"41","key":"2025073014031230300_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1629\/uksg.441","article-title":"What is all this fuss about? Is wrong metadata really bad for libraries and their end-users?","volume":"31","author":"Bascones","year":"2018","journal-title":"Insights"},{"issue":"2","key":"2025073014031230300_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"146","DOI":"10.1629\/uksg.302","article-title":"A renaissance in library metadata? The importance of community collaboration in a digital world","volume":"29","author":"Bull","year":"2016","journal-title":"Insights"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib4","author":"Crossref","year":"2020"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib5","author":"DataCite","year":"2020"},{"issue":"1","key":"2025073014031230300_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.1016\/j.acalib.2012.11.010","article-title":"Open access metadata, catalogers, and vendors: The future of cataloging records","volume":"39","author":"Flynn","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Academic Librarianship"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib7","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e38698","DOI":"10.3897\/rio.5.e38698","article-title":"A literature review of scholarly communications metadata","volume":"5","author":"Gregg","year":"2019","journal-title":"Research Ideas and Outcomes"},{"issue":"4","key":"2025073014031230300_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/s13321-017-0190-6","article-title":"A metadata-driven approach to data repository design","volume":"9","author":"Harvey","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journal of Cheminformatics"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib9","article-title":"Industry leaders\u2019 perspectives on the digital transformation","author":"Imbue Partners","year":"2017","journal-title":"Journey in Publishing"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib100","author":"Initiative for Open Abstracts","year":"2021"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib10","first-page":"5","article-title":"Metadata for research discovery and management","volume":"187","author":"Jennings","year":"2017","journal-title":"Catalogue and Index"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib11","first-page":"28","article-title":"The rise and fall of the Great Library of Alexandria: An animated introduction","volume":"2","author":"Jones","year":"2018","journal-title":"Open Culture"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib12","author":"Journal Article Tag Suite","year":"2020"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib13","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.4666086","article-title":"Metadata 2020 metadata usage survey methods and results summary (Version 0.1.0)","author":"Kaiser","year":"2021","journal-title":"Zenodo"},{"issue":"1\u20134","key":"2025073014031230300_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"207","DOI":"10.1080\/0361526X.2018.1428483","article-title":"Can richer metadata rescue research?","volume":"74","author":"Kemp","year":"2018","journal-title":"The Serials Librarian"},{"issue":"2","key":"2025073014031230300_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0117619","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0117619","article-title":"Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data","volume":"10","author":"Kratz","year":"2015","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"393","DOI":"10.1098\/rsnr.2016.0036","article-title":"The disruptive potential of data publication","volume":"70","author":"Leonelli","year":"2016","journal-title":"Notes and Records"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib17","article-title":"ADMINS \u2013 for computer based library management","author":"McIntosh","year":"1967"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5281\/zenodo.4666192","article-title":"Metadata 2020 metadata usage survey questions (Version 0.1.0)","author":"Metadata 2020","year":"2021","journal-title":"Zenodo"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib19","author":"Metadata 2020 Personas","year":"2020"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib20","author":"ORCID","year":"2020"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5061\/dryad.4f4qrfj8s","article-title":"Raw data: An international, multi-stakeholder survey about metadata awareness, knowledge, and use in scholarly communications [Excel spreadsheet]","author":"Paglione","year":"2021"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-030-00668-6_8","article-title":"The SPAR ontologies","volume-title":"Proceedings of the 17th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2018)","author":"Peroni","year":"2018"},{"issue":"5","key":"2025073014031230300_bib23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"961","DOI":"10.1108\/JD-10-2015-0123","article-title":"The conceptual landscape of digital curation","volume":"72","author":"Poole","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Documentation"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib24","author":"PubMed","year":"2020"},{"key":"2025073014031230300_bib25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"160018","DOI":"10.1038\/sdata.2016.18","article-title":"The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship","volume":"3","author":"Wilkinson","year":"2016","journal-title":"Scientific Data"}],"container-title":["Quantitative Science Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/2\/2\/454\/1930739\/qss_a_00133.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/2\/2\/454\/1930739\/qss_a_00133.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,7,30]],"date-time":"2025-07-30T18:03:33Z","timestamp":1753898613000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article\/2\/2\/454\/100689\/An-international-multistakeholder-survey-about"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"references-count":26,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,7,15]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00133","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00133\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00133\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00133\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00133\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00133\/v1\/review2","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2641-3337"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2641-3337","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2021]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2021]]}}}