{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,24]],"date-time":"2026-03-24T06:24:33Z","timestamp":1774333473514,"version":"3.50.1"},"reference-count":49,"publisher":"MIT Press","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1722297600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":211,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n                  <jats:p>Aiming to explain and help reduce measured gender gaps in mathematics publications\u2014a discipline where single anonymized peer review practices and men editors are still the norm\u2014we study changes in authorships straddling a 2015 switch in peer review type and editor gender in the American Mathematical Monthly, one of the oldest mathematics journals in the United States. Our results show a significant increase in women authorships after the journal\u2019s switch to a woman editor and double anonymized reviews, an increase deemed exceptional relative to growth trends in comparable journals operating under field standards (men editors along with single anonymized reviews). We leverage literature, data-based observations and our own findings to argue for the likely effects of editor gender and peer review type separately and together as it concerns both women and newcomer authorships. Our study, the first to our knowledge on editorial and peer review changes in mathematics, contributes to a small body of literature on the impact of equity practices in peer review in science and mathematics. It also serves to introduce work, methods, and open problems on measuring and reducing the global gender gap in science and mathematics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00318","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,7,30]],"date-time":"2024-07-30T14:22:54Z","timestamp":1722349374000},"page":"593-612","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Impact of peer review type and editor gender on women authorships in mathematics"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"5","author":[{"given":"Guadalupe I.","family":"Lozano","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA"},{"name":"Center for University Education Scholarship, Office of the Provost, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA"}]},{"given":"Kelly","family":"MacArthur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA"}]},{"given":"Ben","family":"Barr","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Mathematics, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]},"reference":[{"issue":"2","key":"2024093020301595000_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"139","DOI":"10.1177\/089124390004002002","article-title":"Hierarchies, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations","volume":"4","author":"Acker","year":"1990","journal-title":"Gender & Society"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.1007\/s00013-016-0867-5","article-title":"Changes in the editorial board of Archiv der Mathematik","volume":"106","author":"Archiv der Mathematik","year":"2016","journal-title":"Archiv der Mathematik"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib3","volume-title":"Journal rankings for ARC mathematical sciences","author":"Australian Research Council","year":".."},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib4","volume-title":"Analyzing the impact of switching to double-blind review on women authorships in the American Mathematical Monthly","author":"Barr","year":"2017"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024093020301595000_bib5","first-page":"27","article-title":"Fitting linear mixed models in R","volume":"5","author":"Bates","year":"2005","journal-title":"R News"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"255","DOI":"10.1002\/sej.1429","article-title":"Gender differences in peer review of innovation","volume":"16","author":"Belz","year":"2022","journal-title":"Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal"},{"issue":"5","key":"2024093020301595000_bib7","first-page":"1041","article-title":"The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review","volume":"81","author":"Blank","year":"1991","journal-title":"American Economic Review"},{"issue":"11","key":"2024093020301595000_bib8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"985","DOI":"10.1525\/bio.2009.59.11.10","article-title":"To name or not to name: The effect of changing author gender on peer review","volume":"59","author":"Borzuk","year":"2009","journal-title":"BioScience"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024093020301595000_bib9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"4","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tree.2007.07.008","article-title":"Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors","volume":"23","author":"Budden","year":"2008","journal-title":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024093020301595000_bib10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"353","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tree.2008.04.001","article-title":"Response to Webb et al.: Double-blind review: Accept with minor revisions","volume":"23","author":"Budden","year":"2008","journal-title":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024093020301595000_bib11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3","DOI":"10.4169\/amer.math.monthly.122.01.3","article-title":"A letter from the editor: 2015 is the centennial year of the MAA","volume":"122","author":"Chapman","year":"2015","journal-title":"American Mathematical Monthly"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024093020301595000_bib12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"955","DOI":"10.4169\/amer.math.monthly.123.10.955","article-title":"A letter from the editor: The long and winding road","volume":"123","author":"Chapman","year":"2016","journal-title":"American Mathematical Monthly"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib13","article-title":"Journal rankings ditched: The experts respond","author":"Creagh","year":"2011","journal-title":"The Conversation"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.4171\/NEWS\/115\/2","article-title":"Mathematics subject classification 2020","volume":"115","author":"Dunne","year":"2020","journal-title":"EMS Newsletter"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"140","DOI":"10.1111\/1365-2435.12529","article-title":"Editor and reviewer gender influences the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal","volume":"30","author":"Fox","year":"2016","journal-title":"Functional Ecology"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib16","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"3599","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.4993","article-title":"Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution","volume":"9","author":"Fox","year":"2019","journal-title":"Ecology and Evolution"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib17","volume-title":"A global approach to the gender gap in mathematical, computing, and natural sciences: How to measure it, how to reduce it?","author":"Guillop\u00e9","year":"2020"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e21718","DOI":"10.7554\/eLife.21718","article-title":"Research: Gender bias in scholarly peer review","volume":"6","author":"Helmer","year":"2017","journal-title":"eLife"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024093020301595000_bib19","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"179","DOI":"10.1145\/980972.981001","article-title":"The myth of the double-blind review? Author identification using only citations","volume":"5","author":"Hill","year":"2003","journal-title":"SIGKDD Explorations"},{"issue":"41","key":"2024093020301595000_bib20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2205779119","article-title":"Nobel and novice: Author prominence affects peer review","volume":"119","author":"Huber","year":"2022","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"issue":"1","key":"2024093020301595000_bib21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"11","DOI":"10.1080\/08820538.2021.1896757","article-title":"Single-blind and double-blind peer review: Effects on national representation","volume":"37","author":"Kalavar","year":"2022","journal-title":"Seminars in Ophthalmology"},{"issue":"6","key":"2024093020301595000_bib22","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1415","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.179.6.1791415","article-title":"Incidence and nature of unblinding by authors: Our experience at two radiology journals with double-blinded peer review policies","volume":"179","author":"Katz","year":"2002","journal-title":"American Journal of Roentgenology"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib23","article-title":"Open reviewer identities: Full steam ahead or proceed with caution?","author":"Kiermer","year":"2021","journal-title":"The Scholarly Kitchen"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib24","article-title":"Blind review review","author":"Lamb","year":"2018","journal-title":"AMS Blogs"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib25","article-title":"Present and future: How individuals, policies, institutions, and culture shape the evolving gender gap in science [Keynote address]","volume-title":"ICTP Conference on Global Approach to the Gender Gap in Mathematical, Computing and Natural Sciences: How to Measure It, How to Reduce It?","author":"Lozano","year":"2019"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024093020301595000_bib26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"927","DOI":"10.1515\/pac-2021-0105","article-title":"How culture, institutions, and individuals shape the evolving gender gap in science and mathematics: An equity provocation for the scientific community","volume":"93","author":"Lozano","year":"2021","journal-title":"Pure and Applied Chemistry"},{"issue":"9","key":"2024093020301595000_bib27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e326","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.0030326","article-title":"Peer review\u2014The newcomers\u2019 perspective","volume":"3","author":"Mainguy","year":"2005","journal-title":"PLOS Biology"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib28","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5","DOI":"10.1186\/s41073-018-0049-z","article-title":"Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics","volume":"3","author":"McGillivray","year":"2018","journal-title":"Research Integrity and Peer Review"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib30","first-page":"83","article-title":"Measuring and analyzing the gender gap in science through the joint data-backed study on publication patterns","volume-title":"A global approach to the gender gap in mathematical, computing, and natural sciences: How to measure it, how to reduce it?","author":"Mihaljevi\u0107","year":"2020"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib31","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"29","DOI":"10.3389\/fdata.2019.00029","article-title":"Reflections on gender analyses of bibliographic corpora","volume":"2","author":"Mihaljevi\u0107","year":"2019","journal-title":"Frontiers in Big Data"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024093020301595000_bib29","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0165367","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0165367","article-title":"The effect of gender in the publication patterns in mathematics","volume":"11","author":"Mihaljevi\u0107-Brandt","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib32","article-title":"Top of her game","author":"Nagy","year":"2015","journal-title":"Oberlin College & Conservatory News"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib33","article-title":"Dual-anonymous peer review (DAPR)","author":"NASA","year":"2020","journal-title":"NASA Science"},{"issue":"12","key":"2024093020301595000_bib34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1315","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2016.11014","article-title":"Single-blind vs double-blind peer review in the setting of author prestige","volume":"316","author":"Okike","year":"2016","journal-title":"JAMA"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib35","article-title":"Is double-blind review better?","author":"Palus","year":"2015","journal-title":"American Physical Society News"},{"issue":"2","key":"2024093020301595000_bib36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"163","DOI":"10.1093\/jole\/lzw009","article-title":"Double-blind reviewing at EvoLang 11 reveals gender bias","volume":"1","author":"Roberts","year":"2016","journal-title":"Journal of Language Evolution"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib37","volume-title":"Is publishing in the chemical sciences gender biased?","author":"Royal Society of Chemistry","year":"2019"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib38","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e156","DOI":"10.7717\/peerj-cs.156","article-title":"Comparison and benchmark of name-to-gender inference services","volume":"4","author":"Santamar\u00eda","year":"2018","journal-title":"PeerJ Computer Science"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"567","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-017-2264-7","article-title":"Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?","volume":"113","author":"Seeber","year":"2017","journal-title":"Scientometrics"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e035058","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjopen-2019-035058","article-title":"Gender and other potential biases in peer review: Cross-sectional analysis of 38,250 external peer review reports","volume":"10","author":"Severin","year":"2020","journal-title":"BMJ Open"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib41","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"eabd0299","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.abd0299","article-title":"Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals","volume":"7","author":"Squazzoni","year":"2021","journal-title":"Science Advances"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024093020301595000_bib42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0257919","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0257919","article-title":"Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study of 2329 Elsevier journals","volume":"16","author":"Squazzoni","year":"2021","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib43","article-title":"Introducing the Journal Citation Indicator: A new, field-normalized measurement of journal citation impact","author":"Szomszor","year":"2021","journal-title":"Clarivate"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib100","article-title":"The American Mathematical Monthly, list of issues","author":"Taylor & Francis Online","year":"2020"},{"issue":"10","key":"2024093020301595000_bib44","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e1913682","DOI":"10.1001\/jamanetworkopen.2019.13682","article-title":"Gender disparities in invited commentary authorship in 2459 medical journals","volume":"2","author":"Thomas","year":"2019","journal-title":"JAMA Network Open"},{"issue":"48","key":"2024093020301595000_bib45","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"12708","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1707323114","article-title":"Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review","volume":"114","author":"Tomkins","year":"2017","journal-title":"Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences"},{"key":"2024093020301595000_bib46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.48550\/arXiv.1702.00502","article-title":"Single versus double blind reviewing at WSDM 2017","author":"Tomkins","year":"2017","journal-title":"arXiv"},{"issue":"8","key":"2024093020301595000_bib47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"e0161357","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0161357","article-title":"Gender representation on journal editorial boards in the mathematical sciences","volume":"11","author":"Topaz","year":"2016","journal-title":"PLOS ONE"},{"issue":"7","key":"2024093020301595000_bib48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"351","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tree.2008.03.003","article-title":"Does double-blind review benefit female authors?","volume":"23","author":"Webb","year":"2008","journal-title":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution"}],"container-title":["Quantitative Science Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/5\/3\/593\/2472677\/qss_a_00318.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/5\/3\/593\/2472677\/qss_a_00318.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2024,9,30]],"date-time":"2024-09-30T16:30:34Z","timestamp":1727713834000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article\/5\/3\/593\/123782\/Impact-of-peer-review-type-and-editor-gender-on"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"references-count":49,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,8,1]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00318","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v1\/review3","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v2\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v2\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v1\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1162\/QSS_A_00318\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["2641-3337"],"issn-type":[{"value":"2641-3337","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2024]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2024]]}}}