{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,21]],"date-time":"2025-02-21T23:50:57Z","timestamp":1740181857919,"version":"3.37.3"},"reference-count":6,"publisher":"MIT Press","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]],"date-time":"2022-04-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1649721600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":101,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["direct.mit.edu"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":[],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n               <jats:p>In a recent letter to QSS, Kyle Siler (2021), made harsh comments against the decision of the editors to publish a controversial paper signed by Alessandro Strumia (2021) about gender differences in high-energy physics. My aim here is to point to the elements in Siler\u2019s letter that are typical of a new tendency to replace rational and technical arguments with a series of moral statements and ex cathedra affirmations that are not supported by cogent arguments. Such an approach can only be detrimental to rational debates within the bibliometric research community.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_c_00178","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]],"date-time":"2022-04-12T21:31:32Z","timestamp":1649799092000},"page":"315-318","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/mitpressjournals.corrections.policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Towards a moralization of bibliometrics? A response to Kyle Siler"],"prefix":"10.1162","volume":"3","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4729-1269","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Yves","family":"Gingras","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"D\u00e9partement d\u2019histoire, Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Montr\u00e9al, Montr\u00e9al, Quebec, Canada"}]}],"member":"281","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"2022041221312762600_bib1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5163","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-018-07634-8","article-title":"The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration","volume":"9","author":"AlShebli","year":"2018","journal-title":"Nature Communications"},{"key":"2022041221312762600_bib2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"5855","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-020-19723-8","article-title":"The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance","volume":"11","author":"AlShebli","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nature Communications"},{"key":"2022041221312762600_bib3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"6446","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-020-20617-y","article-title":"Retraction Note: The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance","volume":"11","author":"AlShebli","year":"2020","journal-title":"Nature Communications"},{"key":"2022041221312762600_bib4","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1101\/2020.10.10.20210666","article-title":"An overview of retraction status and reasons of non-Cochrane systematic reviews in medicine","author":"Shi","year":"2020","journal-title":"MedRXiv"},{"issue":"3","key":"2022041221312762600_bib5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"1119","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_c_00153","article-title":"L\u2019Affaire Strumia reveals troubling gatekeeping values and outcomes at Quantitative Science Studies","volume":"2","author":"Siler","year":"2021","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"},{"issue":"1","key":"2022041221312762600_bib6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","first-page":"225","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00114","article-title":"Gender issues in fundamental physics: A bibliometric analysis","volume":"2","author":"Strumia","year":"2021","journal-title":"Quantitative Science Studies"}],"container-title":["Quantitative Science Studies"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/3\/1\/315\/2008358\/qss_c_00178.pdf","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"syndication"},{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article-pdf\/3\/1\/315\/2008358\/qss_c_00178.pdf","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]],"date-time":"2022-04-12T21:31:34Z","timestamp":1649799094000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/qss\/article\/3\/1\/315\/110564\/Towards-a-moralization-of-bibliometrics-A-response"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"references-count":6,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2022,4,12]]}},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_c_00178","relation":{},"ISSN":["2641-3337"],"issn-type":[{"type":"electronic","value":"2641-3337"}],"subject":[],"published-other":{"date-parts":[[2022]]},"published":{"date-parts":[[2022]]}}}