{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,14]],"date-time":"2025-05-14T03:41:29Z","timestamp":1747194089348,"version":"3.40.5"},"reference-count":0,"publisher":"Walter de Gruyter GmbH","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,19]],"date-time":"2021-11-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1637280000000},"content-version":"unspecified","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Grazer Philos. Stud."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,19]]},"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract<\/jats:title>\n\t\t\t\t\t<jats:p>In this article the authors identify and analyse points of agreement and disagreement between Michael Ayers and Charles Travis, starting from their views on \u2018things before us\u2019. The authors then try to spell out what separates these philosophers in matters concerning perception, knowledge and language. In spite of their both being self-professed realists, equally critical of conceptualism and representationalism, Ayers\u2019 empiricism and Travis\u2019 anti-empiricism lead them to different positions in these three areas. It is shown that in the case of Ayers they hinge on \u201cordinary\u201d objects and a <jats:sc>KK<\/jats:sc> principle (knowledge that and how we know), whereas in the case of Travis they are articulated around occasion-sensitivity and anti-psychologism.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1163\/18756735-00000150","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,29]],"date-time":"2021-11-29T11:05:07Z","timestamp":1638183907000},"page":"584-599","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Thing before Us"],"prefix":"10.1163","volume":"98","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8656-2447","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Sofia","family":"Miguens","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade do Porto Porto Portugal"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2399-7002","authenticated-orcid":true,"given":"Naomi","family":"Osorio-Kupferblum","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e4t Wien Vienna Austria"}]}],"member":"374","container-title":["Grazer Philosophische Studien"],"original-title":[],"link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/journals\/gps\/98\/4\/article-p584_8.xml","content-type":"text\/html","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/downloadpdf\/journals\/gps\/98\/4\/article-p584_8.xml","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,29]],"date-time":"2021-11-29T11:06:18Z","timestamp":1638183978000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/brill.com\/view\/journals\/gps\/98\/4\/article-p584_8.xml"}},"subtitle":["Agreement and Disagreement between Travis and Ayers"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,19]]},"references-count":0,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4"},"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/18756735-00000150","relation":{},"ISSN":["0165-9227","1875-6735"],"issn-type":[{"type":"print","value":"0165-9227"},{"type":"electronic","value":"1875-6735"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,11,19]]}}}