{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,14]],"date-time":"2026-10-14T11:18:31Z","timestamp":1791976711734,"version":"4.4.0"},"reference-count":14,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]],"date-time":"2013-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1362096000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"abstract":"\n Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n We assessed voice outcomes following unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Methods:<\/jats:title>\n We performed a retrospective chart review of 72 patients with UVFP proven by laryngeal electromyography, including their Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) scores at presentation and at the study end point (at the return of vocal fold motion or before the decision regarding definitive treatment).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Results:<\/jats:title>\n The average VHI-10 score on presentation was 26.9 of 40 (27.2 for patients who recovered motion and 26.7 for those who did not; p = 0.847). A recovery of vocal fold motion was experienced by 35% of patients, and 76.4% of patients underwent temporary vocal fold injection. For the patients who recovered motion, the average changes in VHI-10 score were \u221222.3 for those with injection and \u221211.4 for those without (p = 0.027). For patients without motion recovery, the average changes in VHI-10 score were \u22129.5 for those with injection and \u22120.8 for those without (p = 0.027). At the study end point, 84% of patients with return of motion had normal VHI-10 scores, in contrast to 21% of patients without motion recovery (p = 0.0009).<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>\n \n Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n A return of vocal fold motion is a vital determinant of voice outcome in patients with UVFP. However, despite recovery of vocal fold motion, 16% of patients in this study still had significant voice handicap. In contrast, 21% of patients without motion recovery had normal VHI-10 scores. This information can be used to counsel patients on voice outcome (precluding permanent treatment) with and without recovery of motion. There may be long-term voice benefit from early temporary vocal fold injection.<\/jats:p>\n <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/000348941312200309","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,8,18]],"date-time":"2015-08-18T06:15:14Z","timestamp":1439878514000},"page":"197-204","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":38,"title":["Voice Outcome following Acute Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"122","author":[{"given":"VyVy N.","family":"Young","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Libby J.","family":"Smith","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Clark","family":"Rosen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MLG.0b013e3180de4d49"},{"key":"bibr2-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/MLG.0b013e31816f27ee"},{"key":"bibr3-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21143"},{"key":"bibr4-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0385-8146(83)80001-7"},{"key":"bibr5-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21965"},{"key":"bibr6-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.20737"},{"key":"bibr7-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00005537-200409000-00009"},{"key":"bibr8-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jvoice.2011.04.006"},{"key":"bibr9-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jns.2009.04.004"},{"key":"bibr10-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21097"},{"key":"bibr11-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.20629"},{"key":"bibr12-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/lary.21884"},{"key":"bibr13-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1001\/archotol.134.4.380"},{"key":"bibr14-000348941312200309","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0003-9993(03)00146-1"}],"container-title":["Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/000348941312200309","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/000348941312200309","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:20:46Z","timestamp":1777375246000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/000348941312200309"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]},"references-count":14,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/000348941312200309"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/000348941312200309","relation":{},"ISSN":["0003-4894","1943-572X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0003-4894","type":"print"},{"value":"1943-572X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2013,3]]}}}