{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T08:32:06Z","timestamp":1793953926094,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":125,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772755200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]],"date-time":"2026-03-06T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1772755200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Learn Disabil"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Mathematics fact fluency is essential for proficiency in advanced topics, such as algebra. However, many students in the United States, including those in elementary and secondary grades, experience mathematics difficulties (MD) and struggle to develop fluency with mathematics facts. We synthesized findings from 35 group-design studies, reporting 178 effect sizes (ESs), conducted between 1975 and June 2024, to evaluate the efficacy of fact fluency interventions and identify key malleable moderators of intervention outcomes. Results from a Robust Variance Estimation (RVE) model revealed an educationally meaningful average ES (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">g<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 0.76), providing evidence of the overall efficacy of fact fluency interventions. However, the prediction interval (\u22120.60 to 2.12) indicated substantial heterogeneity in treatment effects, warranting further investigation. To explore this variability, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to examine the role of intervention dosage indicators (e.g., frequency) and alignment indicators (e.g., grade level) while accounting for study-level confounders (e.g., publication era). Significant moderators included two dosage indicators (i.e., grouping and total sessions) and two alignment indicators (i.e., operation focus and outcome measures). We discuss these results in relation to limitations, implications for future research, and classroom practice.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/00222194261424914","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,11]],"date-time":"2026-03-11T10:22:33Z","timestamp":1773224553000},"page":"135-160","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":2,"title":["A Meta-Analysis of Mathematics Fact Fluency Interventions for Students With Mathematics Difficulties (MD)"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"59","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0000-8460-2348","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Grace P.","family":"Douglas","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas-Austin, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0670-1919","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jont\u00e9 A.","family":"Myers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Georgia State University, Atlanta, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6774-8695","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kathleen K.","family":"Mason","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas-Austin, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6424-6160","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sarah R.","family":"Powell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas-Austin, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6170-4701","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Danielle O.","family":"Lariviere","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas-Austin, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"reference":[{"issue":"5","key":"e_1_3_2_3_1","first-page":"2","article-title":"Improving basic multiplication fact recall for students with mathematics learning disabilities","volume":"34","author":"Abu-Hamour B.","year":"2019","unstructured":"Abu-Hamour B. (2019). Improving basic multiplication fact recall for students with mathematics learning disabilities. Mu\u2019tah Lil-Buhuth wad-Dirasat, Humanities and Social Sciences Series, 34(5), 2\u201354.","journal-title":"Mu\u2019tah Lil-Buhuth wad-Dirasat, Humanities and Social Sciences Series"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Agaliotis I. Teli A. (2016). Teaching arithmetic combinations of multiplication and division to students with learning disabilities or mild intellectual disability: The impact of alternative fact grouping and the role of cognitive and learning factors. Journal of Education and Learning 5(4) 90. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5539\/jel.v5n4p90","DOI":"10.5539\/jel.v5n4p90"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_1","unstructured":"Asempapa R. Sturgill D. (2017). How did we get here? The path to our current K-12 mathematics education curriculum in the United States. Aurco Journal 23 1\u201310. https:\/\/aurco.org\/journals\/AURCO_Journal_2017\/Current%20K%2012%20Mathematics%20Education%20Curriculum%20p1-10.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ashcraft M. H. Krause J. A. (2007). Working memory math performance and math anxiety. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14(2) 243\u2013248. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03194059","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03194059"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bailey D. H. Siegler R. S. Geary D. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Developmental Science 17 775\u2013785. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/desc.12155","DOI":"10.1111\/desc.12155"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baroody A. J. Eiland M. D. Purpura D. J. Reid E. E. (2013). Can computer-assisted discovery learning foster first graders\u2019 fluency with the most basic addition combinations? American Educational Research Journal 50(3) 533\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0002831212473349","DOI":"10.3102\/0002831212473349"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barrett C. A. VanDerHeyden A. M. (2020). A cost-effectiveness analysis of classwide math intervention. Journal of School Psychology 80 54\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsp.2020.04.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsp.2020.04.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benz S. A. Powell S. R. (2020). The influence of behavior on performance within a word-problem intervention for students with mathematics difficulty. Remedial and Special Education 42(3) 182\u2013192. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0741932520923063","DOI":"10.1177\/0741932520923063"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bloom H. S. Hill C. J. Black A. R. Lipsey M. W. (2008). Performance trajectories and performance gaps as achievement effect-size benchmarks for educational interventions. Journal of Educational Effectiveness 1(4) 289\u2013328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19345740802400072","DOI":"10.1080\/19345740802400072"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borenstein M. (2023). How to understand and report heterogeneity in a meta-analysis: The difference between I-squared and prediction intervals. Integrative Medicine Research 12(4) 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.imr.2023.101014","DOI":"10.1016\/j.imr.2023.101014"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bryant D. P. Bryant B. R. Roberts G. Vaughn S. Pfannenstiel K. H. Porterfield J. Gersten R. (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children 78(1) 7\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/001440291107800101","DOI":"10.1177\/001440291107800101"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns M. K. Aguilar L. N. Young H. Preast J. L. Taylor C. N. Walsh A. D. (2019). Comparing the effects of incremental rehearsal and traditional drill on retention of mathematics facts and predicting the effects with memory. School Psychology 34(5) 521\u2013530. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/spq0000312","DOI":"10.1037\/spq0000312"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns M. K. Codding R. S. Boice C. H. Lukito G. (2010). Meta-analysis of acquisition and fluency math interventions with instructional and frustration level skills: Evidence for a skill-by-treatment interaction. School Psychology Review 39(1) 69\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02796015.2010.12087791","DOI":"10.1080\/02796015.2010.12087791"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns M. K. Duesenberg-Marshall M. D. Romero M. E. Sussman-Dawson K. J. Singell E. (2024). Meta-Analysis of the effect of technology-based mathematical fact practice on mathematics outcomes. Journal of Special Education Technology 40(3) 332\u2013343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01626434241288199","DOI":"10.1177\/01626434241288199"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns M. K. Kanive R. DeGrande M. (2012). Effect of a computer-delivered math fact intervention as a supplemental intervention for math in third and fourth grades. Remedial and Special Education 33(3) 184\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0741932510381652","DOI":"10.1177\/0741932510381652"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns M. K. Ysseldyke J. Nelson P. M. Kanive R. (2015). Number of repetitions required to retain single-digit multiplication math facts for elementary students. School Psychology Quarterly 30(3) 398\u2013405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/spq0000097","DOI":"10.1037\/spq0000097"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cason M. Young J. Kuehnert E. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of numerical competency development on achievement: Recommendations for mathematics educators. Investigations in Mathematics Learning 11(2) 134\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19477503.2018.1425591","DOI":"10.1080\/19477503.2018.1425591"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cheema J. R. Galluzzo G. (2013). Analyzing the gender gap in math achievement: Evidence from a large-scale US sample. Research in Education 90(1) 98\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7227\/RIE.90.1.7","DOI":"10.7227\/RIE.90.1.7"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christensen C. A. Gerber M. M. (1990). Effectiveness of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic math facts. Exceptionality 1(3) 149\u2013165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09362839009524751","DOI":"10.1080\/09362839009524751"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cirino P. T. Fuchs L. S. Elias J. T. Powell S. R. Schumacher R. F. (2015). Cognitive and mathematical profiles for different forms of learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities 48(2) 156\u2013175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022219413494239","DOI":"10.1177\/0022219413494239"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clarke B. Doabler C. T. Turtura J. Smolkowski K. Kosty D. B. Sutherland M. Kurtz-Nelson E. Fien H. Baker S. K. (2020). Examining the efficacy of a kindergarten mathematics intervention by group size and initial skill: Implications for practice and policy. The Elementary School Journal 121(1) 125\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/710041","DOI":"10.1086\/710041"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_1","first-page":"55","article-title":"Music as a mnemonic device for children with learning disabilities","volume":"5","author":"Claussen D. W.","year":"1997","unstructured":"Claussen D. W., Thaut M. H. (1997). Music as a mnemonic device for children with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Music Therapy, 5, 55\u201366.","journal-title":"Canadian Journal of Music Therapy"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Codding R. S. Burns M. K. Lukito G. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 26(1) 36\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Codding R. S. Nelson P. M. Parker D. C. Edmunds R. Klaft J. (2022). Examining the impact of a tutoring program implemented with community support on math proficiency and growth. Journal of School Psychology 90 82\u201393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsp.2021.11.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsp.2021.11.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Codding R. S. VanDerHeyden A. M. Martin R. J. Desai S. Allard N. Perrault L. (2016). Manipulating treatment dose: Evaluating the frequency of a small group intervention targeting whole number operations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 31(4) 208\u2013220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ldrp.12120","DOI":"10.1111\/ldrp.12120"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cogan L. S. Schmidt W. H. Guo S. (2018). The role that mathematics plays in college- and career-readiness: Evidence from PISA. Journal of Curriculum Studies 51(4) 530\u2013553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00220272.2018.1533998","DOI":"10.1080\/00220272.2018.1533998"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780203771587","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203771587"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cook B. G. Buysse V. Klingner J. K. Landrum T. J. McWilliam R. A. Tankersley M. Test D. W. (2015). CEC\u2019s standards for classifying the evidence base of practices in special education. Remedial and Special Education 36(4) 220\u2013234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0741932514557271","DOI":"10.1177\/0741932514557271"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cozad L. E. Riccomini P. J. (2016). Effects of digital-based math fluency interventions on learners with math difficulties: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship 5(2) 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.58729\/2167-3454.1053","DOI":"10.58729\/2167-3454.1053"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dennis M. S. Sharp E. Chovanes J. Thomas A. Burns R. M. Custer B. Park J. (2016). A meta-analysis of empirical research on teaching students with mathematics learning difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 31(3) 156\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ldrp.12107","DOI":"10.1111\/ldrp.12107"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duval S. Tweedie R. (2000). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot\u2013based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56(2) 455\u2013463. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_1","volume-title":"Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics","author":"Findell B.","year":"2001","unstructured":"Findell B., Swafford J., Kilpatrick J. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_1","unstructured":"Fisher Z. Tipton E. Zhipeng H. Chen S. (2023). robumeta: Robust variance meta regression (R package version 2.0). https:\/\/CRAN.Rproject.org\/package=robumeta"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fryer Jr R. G. Levitt S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(2) 210\u2013240. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1257\/app.2.2.210","DOI":"10.1257\/app.2.2.210"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Hamlet C. L. Powell S. R. Capizzi A. M. Seethaler P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities 39(5) 467\u2013475. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222194060390050701","DOI":"10.1177\/00222194060390050701"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Malone A. S. (2017). The taxonomy of intervention intensity. Teaching Exceptional Children 50(1) 35\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00400599187581666","DOI":"10.1177\/0040059917703962"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Geary D. C. Compton D. L. Fuchs D. Schatschneider C. Hamlett C. L. DeSelms J. Seethaler P. M. Wilson J. Craddock C. F. Bryant J. D. Luther K. Changas P. (2013). Effects of first-grade number knowledge tutoring with contrasting forms of practice. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(1) 58\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0030127","DOI":"10.1037\/a0030127"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Gilbert J. K. Powell S. R. Cirino P. T. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. Seethaler P. M. Tolar T. D. (2016). The role of cognitive processes foundational math skill and calculation accuracy and fluency in word-problem solving versus prealgebraic knowledge. Developmental Psychology 52(12) 2085\u20132098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/dev0000227","DOI":"10.1037\/dev0000227"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Seethaler P. M. Sterba S. K. Craddock C. Fuchs D. Compton D. L. Geary D. C. Changas P. (2021). Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-Problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 113(1) 86\u2013103. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/edu0000467","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000467"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Powell S. R. Hamlett C. L. Fuchs D. Cirino P. T. Fletcher J. M. (2008). Remediating computational deficits at third grade: A randomized field trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 1(1) 2\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19345740701692449","DOI":"10.1080\/19345740701692449"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Powell S. R. Seethaler P. M. Cirino P. T. Fletcher J. M. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. (2010). The effects of strategic counting instruction with and without deliberate practice on number combination skill among students with mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences 20(2) 89\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.lindif.2009.09.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.lindif.2009.09.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuchs L. S. Powell S. R. Seethaler P. M. Cirino P. T. Fletcher J. M. Fuchs D. Hamlett C. L. Zumeta R. O. (2009). Remediating number combination and word problem deficits among students with mathematics difficulties: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology 101(3) 561\u2013576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0014701","DOI":"10.1037\/a0014701"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geary D. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 47(6) 1539\u20131552. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0025510","DOI":"10.1037\/a0025510"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geary D. C. (2013). Early foundations for mathematics learning and their relations to learning disabilities. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(1) 23\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721412469398","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721412469398"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hedges L. V. Tipton E. Johnson M. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods 1(1) 39\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jrsm.5","DOI":"10.1002\/jrsm.5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hill C. J. Bloom H. S. Black A. R. Lipsey M. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives 2(3) 172\u2013177. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holmes W. Dowker A. (2013). Catch up numeracy: A targeted intervention for children who are low-attaining in mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education 15(3) 249\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14794802.2013.803779","DOI":"10.1080\/14794802.2013.803779"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_50_1","unstructured":"Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 Pub. L. No. 108-446 118 Stat. 2647. (2004)."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jefferson T. (2020). Sponsorship bias in clinical trials: Growing menace or dawning realisation? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 113(4) 148\u2013157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0141076820914242","DOI":"10.1177\/0141076820914242"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jitendra A. K. Alghamdi A. Edmunds R. McKevett N. M. Mouanoutoua J. Roesslein R. (2020). The effects of tier 2 mathematics interventions for students with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children 87(3) 307\u2013325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0014402920969187","DOI":"10.1177\/0014402920969187"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0014402917737467"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jordan N. C. Kaplan D. Locuniak M. N. Ramineni C. (2007). Predicting first\u2013grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 22(1) 36\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2007.00229.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2007.00229.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jordan N. C. Resnick I. Rodrigues J. Hansen N. Dyson N. (2017). Delaware longitudinal study of fraction learning: Implications for helping children with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities 50(6) 621\u2013630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022219416662","DOI":"10.1177\/0022219416662033"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joseph L. M. Konrad M. Cates G. Vajcner T. Eveleigh E. Fishley K. M. (2012). A meta-analytic review of the cover-copy-compare and variations of this self-management procedure. Psychology in the Schools 49(2) 122\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pits.20622","DOI":"10.1002\/pits.20622"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kanive R. Nelson P. M. Burns M. K. Ysseldyke J. (2014). Comparison of the effects of computer-based practice and conceptual understanding interventions on mathematics fact retention and generalization. The Journal of Educational Research 107(2) 83\u201389. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00220671.2012.759405","DOI":"10.1080\/00220671.2012.759405"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 38(1) 52\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5395\/rde.2013.38.1.52","DOI":"10.5395\/rde.2013.38.1.52"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim S. A. Bryant D. P. Bryant B. R. Shin M. Ok M. W. (2023). A multilevel meta-analysis of whole number computation interventions for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education 44(4) 332\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/07419325221117293","DOI":"10.1177\/07419325221117293"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kiru E. W. Doabler C. T. Sorrells A. M. Cooc N. A. (2017). A synthesis of technology-mediated mathematics interventions for students with or at risk for mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology 33(2) 111\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0162643417745835","DOI":"10.1177\/0162643417745835"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kleinert W. L. Codding R. S. Minami T. Gould K. (2018). A meta-analysis of the taped problems intervention. Journal of Behavioral Education 27(1) 53\u201380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0162643417745835","DOI":"10.1007\/s10864-017-9284-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kong J. E. Yan C. Serceki A. Swanson H. L. (2021). Word-problem-solving interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly 44(4) 248\u2013260. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/073194872199484","DOI":"10.1177\/0731948721994843"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kratochwill T. R. Levin J. R. (2010). Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychological Methods 15(2) 124\u2013144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0017736","DOI":"10.1037\/a0017736"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koponen T. K. Sorvo R. Dowker A. R\u00e4ikk\u00f6nen E. Viholainen H. Aro M. Aro T. (2018). Does multi-component strategy training improve calculation fluency among poor performing elementary school children? Frontiers in Psychology 9 1187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.01187","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2018.01187"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kroesbergen E. H. van Luit J. E. H. (2002). Teaching multiplication to low math performers: Guided versus structured instruction. Instructional Science 30(5) 361\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1019880913714","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1019880913714"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315150666"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lein A. E. Jitendra A. K. Harwell M. R. (2020). Effectiveness of mathematical word problem solving interventions for students with learning disabilities and\/or mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 112(7) 1388\u20131408. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/edu0000453","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000453"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lembke E. S. Hampton D. Beyers S. J. (2012). Response to intervention in mathematics: Critical elements. Psychology in the Schools 49(3) 257\u2013272. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/pits.21596","DOI":"10.1002\/pits.21596"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li G. Taljaard M. Van den Heuvel E. R. Levine M. A. Cook D. J. Wells G. A. Devereaux P. J. Thabane L. (2017). An introduction to multiplicity issues in clinical trials: The what why when and how. International Journal of Epidemiology 46(2) 746\u2013755. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ije\/dyw320","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyw320"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_70_1","volume-title":"Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms","author":"Lipsey M. W.","year":"2012","unstructured":"Lipsey M. W., Puzio K., Yun C., Hebert M. A., Steinka-Fry K., Cole M. W., Roberts M., Anthony K. S., Busick M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms (NCSER 2013-3000). National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_71_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mabbott D. J. Bisanz J. (2008). Computational skills working memory and conceptual knowledge in older children with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 41(1) 15\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022219407311003","DOI":"10.1177\/0022219407311003"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McNeish D. Wolf M. G. (2020). Thinking twice about sum scores. Behavior Research Methods 52(6) 2287\u20132305. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-020-01398-0","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-020-01398-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McTiernan A. Holloway J. Healy O. Hogan M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of the morningside math facts curriculum on fluency stability endurance and application outcomes. Journal of Behavioral Education 25(1) 49\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10864-015-9227-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s10864-015-9227-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McVancel S. M. Missall K. N. Bruhn A. L. (2018). Examining incremental rehearsal: Multiplication fluency with fifth-grade students with math IEP goals. Contemporary School Psychology 22(3) 220\u2013232. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40688-018-0178-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s40688-018-0178-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_75_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Menesses K. F. Gresham F. M. (2009). Relative efficacy of reciprocal and nonreciprocal peer tutoring for students at-risk for academic failure. School Psychology Quarterly 24(4) 266\u2013275. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0018174","DOI":"10.1037\/a0018174"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_76_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morano S. Randolph K. Markelz A. M. Church N. (2020). Combining explicit strategy instruction and mastery practice to build arithmetic fact fluency. Teaching Exceptional Children 53(1) 60\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.177\/0040059920906455","DOI":"10.1177\/0040059920906455"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morris S. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods 11(2) 364\u2013386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1094428106291059","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428106291059"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers J. A. Arsenault T. L. Powell S. R. Witzel B. S. Tanner E. Pigott T. D. (2024). Considerations for intensifying word-problem interventions for students with MD: A qualitative umbrella review of relevant meta-analyses. Journal of Learning Disabilities 58(2) 83\u2013111. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222194241281293","DOI":"10.1177\/00222194241281293"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_79_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers J. A. Brownell M. T. Griffin C. C. Hughes E. M. Witzel B. S. Gage N. A. Peyton D. Acosta K. Wang J. (2021). Mathematics interventions for adolescents with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 36(2) 145\u2013166. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ldrp.12244","DOI":"10.1111\/ldrp.12244"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_80_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers J. A. Hughes E. M. Witzel B. S. Anderson R. D. Owens J. (2023). A meta-analysis of mathematical interventions for increasing the word problem solving performance of upper elementary and secondary students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 16(1) 1\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19345747.2022.208013","DOI":"10.1080\/19345747.2022.2080131"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_81_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Myers J. A. Witzel B. S. Powell S. R. Li H. Pigott T. D. Xin Y. P. Hughes E. M. (2022). A meta-analysis of mathematics word-problem solving interventions for elementary students who evidence mathematics difficulties. Review of Educational Research 92(5) 695\u2013742. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/00346543211070049","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543211070049"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_82_1","unstructured":"National Center for Education Statistics. (2024). The nation\u2019s report card: Mathematics performance of students in the US. US Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences. https:\/\/www.nationsreportcard.gov\/reports\/mathematics\/2024\/g4_8\/?grade=4"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_83_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nelson G. Carter H. Boedeker P. Knowles E. Buckmiller C. Eames J. (2023). A meta-analysis and quality review of mathematics interventions conducted in informal learning environments with caregivers and children. Review of Educational Research 94(1) 112\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/00346543231156182","DOI":"10.3102\/00346543231156182"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nelson G. Powell S. R. (2018). A systematic review of longitudinal studies of mathematics difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities 51(6) 523\u2013539. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022219417714773","DOI":"10.1177\/0022219417714773"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nelson P. M. Burns M. K. Kanive R. Ysseldyke J. E. (2013). Comparison of a math fact rehearsal and a mnemonic strategy approach for improving math fact fluency. Journal of School Psychology 51(6) 659\u2013667. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jsp.2013.08.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jsp.2013.08.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_86_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Okolo C. M. (1992). The effect of computer-assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality 3(4) 195\u2013211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09362839209524815","DOI":"10.1080\/09362839209524815"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_87_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Omizo M. M. Cubberly W. E. Cubberly R. D. (2006). Modelling techniques perceptions of self-efficacy and arithmetic achievement among learning disabled children. The Exceptional Child 32(2) 99\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0156655850320206","DOI":"10.1080\/0156655850320206"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_88_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ou G. Zhao K. Zuo R. Wu J. (2024). Effects of research funding on the academic impact and societal visibility of scientific research. Journal of Informetrics 18(4) 101592. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2024.101592","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2024.101592"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_89_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Page M. J. McKenzie J. Bossuyt P. Boutron I. Hoffmann T. Mulrow C. D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 372 Article 71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.n71","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.n71"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_90_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4614-2278-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_91_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pigott T. D. Polanin J. R. (2020). Methodological guidance paper: High-quality meta-analysis in a systematic review. Review of Educational Research 90(1) 24\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0034654319877153","DOI":"10.3102\/0034654319877153"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_92_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pixner S. Moeller K. Kraut C. (2023). Tigro-M: A program for automatization of multiplication facts. Psychology 14(05) 857\u2013879. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4236\/psych.2023.145046","DOI":"10.4236\/psych.2023.145046"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pollack C. Wilmot D. Centanni T. M. Halverson K. Frosch I. D\u2019Mello A. M. Romeo R. R. Imhof A. Capella J. Wade K. Al Dahhan N. Z. Gabrieli J. D. E. Christodoulou J. A. (2021). Anxiety motivation and competence in mathematics and reading for children with and without learning difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology 12 1\u201313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.704821","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2021.704821"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_94_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Porter A. McMaken J. Hwang J. Yang R. (2011). Common Core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Researcher 40(3) 103\u2013116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/0013189X11405038","DOI":"10.3102\/0013189X11405038"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_95_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Powell S. R. Akther S. S. Yoon N. Y. Berry K. A. Nemcek C. Fall A. Roberts G. (2023). The effect of addition and subtraction practice within a word-problem intervention on addition and subtraction outcomes. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 38(3) 182\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ldrp.12319","DOI":"10.1111\/ldrp.12319"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_96_1","unstructured":"Powell S. R. Barnes M. A. Root J. Hughes E. M. Ketterlin-Geller L. Nelson G. Rojo M. Allsopp D. H. Witzel B. S. Myers J. A. Flores M. M. Lembke E. S. Burns M. K. Namkung J. Poncy B. Ennis R. P. Morin L. L. Arsenault T. L. Doabler C. T. . . .Peltier C. (2025). The NCTM\/CEC position statement on teaching mathematics to students with disabilities: What\u2019s in it and what\u2019s not. Research in Special Education 2 1\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25894\/rise.2796"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_97_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Powell S. R. Benz S. A. Mason E. N. Lembke E. S. (2022). How to structure and intensify mathematics intervention. Beyond Behavior 31(5) 5\u201315. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10742956211072267","DOI":"10.1177\/10742956211072267"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_98_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Powell S. R. Fuchs L. S. Fuchs D. Cirino P. T. Fletcher J. M. (2009). Effects of fact retrieval tutoring on third-grade students with math difficulties with and without reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 24(1) 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2008.01272.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1540-5826.2008.01272.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_99_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Price G. R. Mazzocco M. M. M. Ansari D. (2013). Why mental arithmetic counts: Brain activation during single digit arithmetic predicts high school math scores. The Journal of Neuroscience 33(1) 156\u2013163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1523.JNEUROSCI.2936-12.2013","DOI":"10.1523\/JNEUROSCI.2936-12.2013"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_100_1","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_101_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Re A. M. Benavides-Varela S. Pedron M. De Gennaro M. A. Lucangeli D. (2020). Response to a specific and digitally supported training at home for students with mathematical difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology 11 2039. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.02039","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.02039"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_102_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reed H. C. Gemmink M. Broens-Paffen M. Kirschner P. A. Jolles J. (2015). Improving multiplication fact fluency by choosing between competing answers. Research in Mathematics Education 17(1) 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14794802.2014.962074","DOI":"10.1080\/14794802.2014.962074"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_103_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0040059916685053"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_104_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rodgers M. A. Pustejovsky J. E. (2021). Evaluating meta-analytic methods to detect selective reporting in the presence of dependent effect sizes. Psychological Methods 26(2) 141\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/met0000300","DOI":"10.1037\/met0000300"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_105_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salminen J. Koponen T. R\u00e4s\u00e4nen P. Aro M. (2015). Preventive support for kindergarteners most at-risk for mathematics difficulties: Computer-assisted intervention. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 17(4) 273\u2013295. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10986065.2015.1083837","DOI":"10.1080\/10986065.2015.1083837"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_106_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schoenfeld A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy 18(1) 253\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0895904803260042","DOI":"10.1177\/0895904803260042"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_107_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stanley T. D. (2017). Limitations of PET-PEESE and other meta-analysis methods. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8(5) 581\u2013591. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550617693062","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617693062"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_108_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stevens E. A. Rodgers M. A. Powell S. R. (2018). Mathematics interventions for upper elementary and secondary students: A meta-analysis of research. Remedial and Special Education 39(6) 327\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0741932517731887","DOI":"10.1177\/0741932517731887"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_109_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stickney E. M. Sharp L. B. Kenyon A. S. (2012). Technology-enhanced assessment of math fact automaticity. Assessment for Effective Intervention 37(2) 84\u201394. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1534508411430321","DOI":"10.1177\/1534508411430321"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_110_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stocker J. D. Kubina R. M. (2016). Impact of cover copy and compare on fluency outcomes for students with disabilities and math deficits: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 61(1) 56\u201368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1045988X.2016.1196643","DOI":"10.1080\/1045988X.2016.1196643"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_111_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swanson H. L. Lussier C. Orosco M. (2013). Effects of cognitive strategy interventions and cognitive moderators on word problem solving in children at risk for problem solving difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice 28(4) 170\u2013183. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ldrp.12019","DOI":"10.1111\/ldrp.12019"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_112_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swanson H. L. Olide A. F. Kong J. E. (2018). Latent class analysis of children with math difficulties and\/or math learning disabilities: Are there cognitive differences? Journal of Educational Psychology 110(7) 931\u2013951. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/edu0000252","DOI":"10.1037\/edu0000252"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_113_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tanner-Smith E. E. Tipton E. Polanin J. R. (2016). Handling complex meta-analytic data structures using robust variance estimates: A tutorial in R. Journal of Developmental Life Course Criminology 2 85\u2013112. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40865-016-0026-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s40865-016-0026-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_114_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tipton E. Bryan C. Murray J. McDaniel M. Schneider B. Yeager D. S. (2023). Why meta-analyses of growth mindset and other interventions should follow best practices for examining heterogeneity: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). Psychological Bulletin 149(3\u20134) 229\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bul0000384","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000384"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_115_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tournaki N. (2003). The differential effects of teaching addition through strategy instruction versus drill and practice to students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 36(5) 449\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222194030360050601","DOI":"10.1177\/00222194030360050601"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_116_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"VanDerHeyden A. M. Burns M. K. (2005). Using curriculum-based assessment to guide elementary mathematics instruction: Effect on individual and group accountability scores. Assessment for Effective Intervention 30(3) 15\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/073724770503000302","DOI":"10.1177\/073724770503000302"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_117_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Galen M. S. Reitsma P. (2010). Learning basic addition facts from choosing between alternative answers. Learning and Instruction 20(1) 47\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.01.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.learninstruc.2009.01.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_118_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Lissa C. J. (2017). MetaForest: Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis using random forests. Open Science Framework. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17605\/OSF.IO\/KHJGB","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/myg6s"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_119_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Luit J. E. Naglieri J. A. (1999). Effectiveness of the master program for teaching special children multiplication and division. Journal of Learning Disabilities 32(2) 98\u2013107. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/002221949903200201","DOI":"10.1177\/002221949903200201"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_120_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vaughn S. Wexler J. Leroux A. Roberts G. Denton C. Barth A. Fletcher J. (2011). Effects of intensive reading intervention for eighth-grade students with persistently inadequate response to intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities 45(6) 515\u2013525. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022219411402692","DOI":"10.1177\/0022219411402692"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_121_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vembye M. H. Pustejovsky J. E. Pigott T. D. (2023). Power approximations for overall average effects in meta-analysis with dependent effect sizes. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 48(1) 70\u2013102. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3102\/10769986221127379","DOI":"10.3102\/10769986221127379"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_122_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Viechtbauer W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software 36(3) 1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v036.i03","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v036.i03"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_123_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang X. S. Perry L. B. Malpique A. Tobias I. (2023). Factors predicting mathematics achievement in PISA: A systematic review. Large-Scale Assessments in Education 11(24) 24\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40536-023-00174-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s40536-023-00174-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_124_1","volume-title":"Bridging the gap between arithmetic and algebra","author":"Witzel B.","year":"2016","unstructured":"Witzel B. (2016). Bridging the gap between arithmetic and algebra. Council for Exceptional Children."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_125_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Witzel B. Myers J. Root J. Freeman-Green S. Riccomini P. Mims P. (2024). Research should focus on improving mathematics proficiency for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education 57(4) 240\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00224669231168","DOI":"10.1177\/00224669231168373"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_126_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Woodward J. (2006). Developing automaticity in multiplication facts: Integrating strategy instruction with timed practice drills. Learning Disability Quarterly 29(4) 269\u2013289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/30035554","DOI":"10.2307\/30035554"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_127_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Xin Y. P. Jitendra A. K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education 32(4) 207\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/002246699903200402","DOI":"10.1177\/002246699903200402"}],"container-title":["Journal of Learning Disabilities"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00222194261424914","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/00222194261424914","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00222194261424914","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,19]],"date-time":"2026-05-19T10:12:23Z","timestamp":1779185543000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00222194261424914"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]},"references-count":125,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/00222194261424914"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00222194261424914","relation":{},"ISSN":["0022-2194","1538-4780"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0022-2194","type":"print"},{"value":"1538-4780","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,6]]}}}