{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T12:05:41Z","timestamp":1777896341196,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":25,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]],"date-time":"2022-11-18T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1668729600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Linacre Q"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In a responsum from 2018, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) judged hysterectomy as permissible when a uterus is unable to bring any pregnancy to term, raising the question of why such hysterectomy does not constitute direct sterilization forbidden by previous responsa from 1975 and 1993. This paper outlines these theological views, both supportive and against, concerning the consistency of the CDF\u2019s 2018 decision with both its 1993 responsa and the Principle of Double Effect (PDE). It argues that the Principle of Double Effect (PDE) can be applied to explain the CDF\u2019s judgement, provided that the hysterectomy is regarded as concerning infecundity, the inability to have a live birth. In cases of hysterectomy concerning sterilization, the preservation of the woman\u2019s life (the good effect) is evaluated against her sterilization (the bad effect). In cases of hysterectomy concerning infecundity, sexual intercourse without miscarriages (the good effect) is evaluated against the removal of the uterus (the bad effect). This paper argues that, when the hysterectomy described by the CDF in its 2018 re sponsum is evaluated in terms of the PDE as concerning infecundity, such hysterectomy is found to meet all four conditions and is therefore permissible.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/00243639221116218","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]],"date-time":"2022-11-18T05:32:00Z","timestamp":1668749520000},"page":"333-348","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Infecundity and the Principle of Double Effect in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith\u2019s 2018\n                    <i>Responsum<\/i>\n                    on Hysterectomy"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"90","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7100-950X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Steven","family":"Dezort","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Blinn College, Bryan, TX, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr22-00243639221116218","unstructured":"Note on Primary Sources: All references to the Summa Theologiae are from The Summa Theologiae of St. Thomas Aquinas, Second and Revised Edition (1920). Literally translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Kevin Knight. Online Edition (2017). https:\/\/www.newadvent.org\/summa\/"},{"key":"bibr1-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201818468"},{"key":"bibr2-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"655","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201818340","volume":"18","author":"Bedford E. L.","year":"2018","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"key":"bibr3-00243639221116218","first-page":"1","volume":"27","author":"Cataldo P. J.","year":"2019","journal-title":"Health Care Ethics USA"},{"key":"bibr4-00243639221116218","unstructured":"Catechism of the Catholic Church. 1997. Second Edition. https:\/\/www.vatican.va\/archive\/ENG0015\/_INDEX.HTM"},{"key":"bibr5-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201919445"},{"key":"bibr101-00243639221116218","unstructured":"Cavanaugh T. A. 2006. Double effect reasoning: doing good and avoiding evil. Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford and New York, p. 26."},{"key":"bibr6-00243639221116218","volume-title":"The Holy See, Vatican City State","author":"Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith","year":"1975"},{"key":"bibr7-00243639221116218","volume-title":"[Donum vitae] Instruction on Respect for Human Life in its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation Replies to Certain Questions of the Day","author":"Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith","year":"1987"},{"key":"bibr8-00243639221116218","volume-title":"Responses to Questions Proposed Concerning \u201cUterine Isolation\u201d and Related Matters","author":"Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith","year":"1993"},{"key":"bibr9-00243639221116218","volume-title":"Response to a Question on the Liceity of a Hysterectomy in Certain Cases","author":"Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith","year":"2018"},{"key":"bibr10-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201919446"},{"key":"bibr11-00243639221116218","first-page":"665","volume":"18","author":"Ethicists of the National Catholic Bioethics Center","year":"2018","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"key":"bibr12-00243639221116218","first-page":"378","volume-title":"Neo-Scholastic Essays","author":"Feser E.","year":"2015"},{"key":"bibr13-00243639221116218","volume-title":"Compendium theologiae moralis","author":"Gury J. P.","year":"1866"},{"key":"bibr15-00243639221116218","volume-title":"Familiaris Consortio","author":"John Paul","year":"1981"},{"key":"bibr14-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/004056394901000102"},{"key":"bibr100-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5840\/ncbq201111174"},{"key":"bibr16-00243639221116218","volume-title":"Humanae Vitae","author":"Paul VI","year":"1968"},{"key":"bibr17-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"91","DOI":"10.14422\/pen.v74.i279.y2018.005","volume":"74","author":"Penner S","year":"2018","journal-title":"Revista De Investigaci\u00f3n E Informaci\u00f3n Filos\u00f3fica"},{"key":"bibr102-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1353\/tho.2000.0002"},{"key":"bibr18-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0024363920908367"},{"key":"bibr19-00243639221116218","volume-title":"A Manual of Moral Theology for English-Speaking Countries","volume":"1","author":"Slater T.","year":"1908"},{"key":"bibr20-00243639221116218","first-page":"653","volume":"18","author":"Smith J.","year":"2018","journal-title":"National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly"},{"key":"bibr21-00243639221116218","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005"}],"container-title":["The Linacre Quarterly"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00243639221116218","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/00243639221116218","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00243639221116218","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T08:20:00Z","timestamp":1777623600000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00243639221116218"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]]},"references-count":25,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2023,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/00243639221116218"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00243639221116218","relation":{},"ISSN":["0024-3639","2050-8549"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0024-3639","type":"print"},{"value":"2050-8549","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2022,11,18]]}}}