{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T14:10:48Z","timestamp":1785161448755,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":8,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784937600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784937600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Med Sci Law"],"abstract":"<jats:p>There is a view that doctors who prepare medico-legal reports should obtain feedback from the subjects of their reports. The view of the authors is that this is a misunderstanding of General Medical Council guidance on appraisal and revalidation. The practical, empirical, legal and ethical reasons are set out.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/00258024261471770","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]],"date-time":"2026-07-25T12:47:20Z","timestamp":1784983640000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Should medical experts seek feedback from the subjects of their reports?"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0575-3277","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Keith","family":"Rix","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Chambers of Mark Love"},{"name":"Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Life Sciences, University of Chester"},{"name":"Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Gwen","family":"Adshead","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Forensic Psychotherapy, Broadmoor Hospital"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","unstructured":"General Medical Council. Guidance on supporting information for revalidation."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","unstructured":"Family Procedure Rules 2010 SI 2010\/2955."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","unstructured":"Ministry of Justice and Family Justice Council. Joint Ministry of Justice and Family Justice Council Response. Standards for expert witnesses in Children\u2019s Proceedings in the family courts."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","unstructured":"Family Procedure Rules 25 BPD Annex [Internet] (cited 2025 Nov 15). Available from: https:\/\/www.justice.gov.uk\/courts\/procedure-rules\/family\/practice_directions\/practice-direction-25b-the-duties-of-an-expert-the-experts-report-and-arrangements-for-an-expert-to-attend-court."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rix K. Avoiding judicial dissatisfaction with and criticism of healthcare experts. Medicine Science and the Law. 2026 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00258024261446489.","DOI":"10.1177\/00258024261446489"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","unstructured":"https:\/\/www.rcpsych.ac.uk\/improving-care\/ccqi\/multi-source-feedback\/maep\/maep-newsletter-resources."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","unstructured":"\u2018Health professionals and pharmaceutical products (VAT Notice 701\/57)\u2019. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/guidance\/health-professionals-pharmaceutical-products-and-vat-notice-70157."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-443-06833-1.00001-7"}],"container-title":["Medicine, Science and the Law"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00258024261471770","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/00258024261471770","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00258024261471770","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T13:18:53Z","timestamp":1785158333000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00258024261471770"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]]},"references-count":8,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/00258024261471770"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00258024261471770","relation":{},"ISSN":["0025-8024","2042-1818"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0025-8024","type":"print"},{"value":"2042-1818","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,25]]},"article-number":"00258024261471770"}}