{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T12:36:55Z","timestamp":1777898215425,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":38,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]],"date-time":"2026-03-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1774656000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100001330","name":"Dr. Scholl Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100001330","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Psychol Rep"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Does the source and distinctiveness of misinformation in social media posts affect its believability? Across two studies, we examine this question utilizing vignette experimental survey designs that manipulated the source, accuracy of information, and whether the information was familiar or distinctive (unfamiliar). Four different topics with different political or moral positions were used to assess how effects varied across topics. True posts were found to be more believable than misinformation posts across the four topics in Study one (n = 595). In study two (n = 514), misinformation was rated as more believable, more accurate, and more trustworthy if it was unfamiliar rather than familiar. Source effects were significant but smaller than the distinctiveness effect. Posts from the source of authority were rated as more believable than those from a friend. Distinctive messages receive initial assessments of higher credibility, suggesting a heuristic process. However, the personally relevant topic of COVID, showed higher believability for unfamiliar misinformation, but also a higher percentage intending to verify the information through additional research. Those supporting more conservative views perceived misinformation as more believable. These findings are consistent with the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/00332941261438080","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]],"date-time":"2026-03-28T22:52:40Z","timestamp":1774738360000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Judging the Believability of Social Media Misinformation: Source and Message Distinctiveness"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"given":"Victoria","family":"Ward","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Trevor","family":"Rowe","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Milka","family":"Georgieva","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Flanagan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Tanner","family":"Duderstadt","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Joi Rae","family":"Connor","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Rylee","family":"Abaya","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jeff R.","family":"Huntsinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Jennifer","family":"Forestal","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Mohammed","family":"Abuhamad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Eric","family":"Chan-Tin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1568-1577","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Loretta J.","family":"Stalans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Loyola University Chicago"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2196\/19458"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1098\/rsos.180593"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2053168019848554"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10584-018-2192-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/15534510.2016.1157096"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2017.11.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2019.03.032"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/13504622.2022.2085671"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0175799"},{"issue":"9","key":"e_1_3_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1","DOI":"10.3390\/bs12090302","article-title":"How personal values count in misleading news sharing with moral content","volume":"12","author":"D\u2019Errico F.","year":"2022","unstructured":"D\u2019Errico F., Corbelli G., Papapicco C., Paciello M. (2022). How personal values count in misleading news sharing with moral content. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9), 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/bs12090302","journal-title":"Behavioral Sciences"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1257\/089533005775196732"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/09637214241280907"},{"issue":"129","key":"e_1_3_5_14_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: Current status and future directions","volume":"12","author":"Gongane V. U.","year":"2022","unstructured":"Gongane V. U., Munot M. V., Anuse A. D. (2022). Detection and moderation of detrimental content on social media platforms: Current status and future directions. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 12(129), 1\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s13278-022-00951-3","journal-title":"Social Network Analysis and Mining"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/a0021847"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/xap0000279"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2007.10.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s11845-022-02936-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-981-97-0669-3_33"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aao2998"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0002764219869403"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jarmac.2017.07.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-020-01033-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_24_1","article-title":"Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all","author":"Moravec P. L.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moravec P. L., Minas R. K., Dennis A. R. (2018). Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all. Social Science Research Network. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.3269541","journal-title":"Social Science Research Network"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_25_1","volume-title":"Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment","author":"Nisbett R. E.","year":"1980","unstructured":"Nisbett R. E., Ross L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Prentice Hall."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/amp0001447"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0065-2601(08)60214-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-024-02086-1"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_5_29_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it?","volume":"119","author":"Phillipp-Muller A.","year":"2022","unstructured":"Phillipp-Muller A., Lee S. W. S., Petty R. E. (2022). Why are people antiscience, and what can we do about it? PNAS, 119(3), 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2120755119","journal-title":"PNAS"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1038\/s41562-023-01540-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3389\/fpos.2021.647957"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-022-01374-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/pops.12586"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2021.111269"},{"key":"#cr-split#-e_1_3_5_35_1.1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tulin M. Hameleers M. de Vreese C. Aalberg T. Corbu N. Van Erkel P. Esser F. Gehle L. Halagiera D. Hopmann D. N. Koc-Michalska K. Matthes J. Mihelj S. Schemer C. Stetka V. Str\u00f6mb\u00e4ck J. Terren L. Theocharis Y. (2025). Why do citizens choose to read fact-checks in the context of the Russian war in Ukraine? The role of directional and accuracy motivations in nineteen democracies. The International Journal of Press\/Politics 30","DOI":"10.1177\/19401612241233533"},{"key":"#cr-split#-e_1_3_5_35_1.2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"(3) 679-704. (Original work published 2025). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/19401612241233533","DOI":"10.1177\/19401612241233533"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167219858654"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/20445911.2022.2149757"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1145\/3373464.3373475"}],"container-title":["Psychological Reports"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00332941261438080","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/00332941261438080","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00332941261438080","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T09:23:59Z","timestamp":1777627439000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00332941261438080"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]]},"references-count":38,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/00332941261438080"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00332941261438080","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-2941","1558-691X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0033-2941","type":"print"},{"value":"1558-691X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,3,28]]},"article-number":"00332941261438080"}}