{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,11]],"date-time":"2026-07-11T17:55:13Z","timestamp":1783792513154,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":11,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,1]],"date-time":"2012-07-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1341100800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Public Health Rep"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We assessed the perceived utility of data collected through ArboNET, the national arboviral surveillance system, and evaluated state health department user satisfaction with system function.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>We used an online assessment tool to collect information about types of arboviral surveillance conducted, user satisfaction with ArboNET's performance, and use of data collected by the system. Representatives of all 53 reporting jurisdictions were asked to complete the assessment during spring 2009.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Representatives of 48 (91%) jurisdictions completed the assessment. Two-thirds of respondents were satisfied with ArboNET's overall performance. Most concerns were related to data transmission, particularly the lack of compatibility with the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). Users found mosquito (85%), human disease (80%), viremic blood donor (79%), and veterinary disease (75%) surveillance data to be useful. While there was disagreement about the usefulness of avian mortality and sentinel animal surveillance, only 15% of users supported eliminating these categories. Respondents found weekly maps and tables posted on the U.S. Geological Survey (92%) and CDC (88%) websites to be the most useful reports generated from ArboNET data. Although many jurisdictions were willing to report additional clinical or laboratory data, time and resource constraints were considerations. Most respondents (71%) supported review and possible revision of the national case definition for human arboviral disease.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions.<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>As a result of this assessment, CDC and partner organizations have made ArboNET NEDSS-compatible and revised national case definitions for arboviral disease. Alternative data-sharing and reporting options are also being considered. Continued evaluation of ArboNET will help ensure that it continues to be a useful tool for national arboviral disease surveillance.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/003335491212700406","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,7,4]],"date-time":"2017-07-04T02:56:04Z","timestamp":1499136964000},"page":"383-390","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":27,"title":["State Health Department Perceived Utility of and Satisfaction with ArboNET, the U.S. National Arboviral Surveillance System"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"127","author":[{"given":"Nicole P.","family":"Lindsey","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, CO"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jennifer A.","family":"Brown","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, CO"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lon","family":"Kightlinger","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"South Dakota Department of Health, Pierre, SD"},{"name":"Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lauren","family":"Rosenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Atlanta, GA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Marc","family":"Fischer","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, Fort Collins, CO"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"name":"The ArboNET Evaluation Working Group","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2012,7,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-003335491212700406","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJM200106143442401"},{"key":"bibr2-003335491212700406","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4269\/ajtmh.2008.79.974"},{"issue":"2","key":"bibr3-003335491212700406","first-page":"1","volume":"59","author":"Lindsey NP","year":"2010","journal-title":"MMWR Surveill Summ"},{"key":"bibr4-003335491212700406","unstructured":"West Nile virus activity\u2014United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010;59(25):769\u201372"},{"key":"bibr5-003335491212700406","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.antiviral.2009.10.008"},{"issue":"39","key":"bibr6-003335491212700406","first-page":"841","volume":"45","author":"CDC","year":"1996","journal-title":"MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep"},{"key":"bibr7-003335491212700406","unstructured":"Locally acquired dengue\u2014Key West, Florida, 2009\u20132010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2010; 59(19):577\u201381."},{"key":"bibr8-003335491212700406","unstructured":"West Nile virus activity\u2014United States, October 10\u201316, 2002, and update on West Nile virus infections in recipients of blood transfusions. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002; 51(14):929\u201331."},{"key":"bibr9-003335491212700406","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1056\/NEJMoa030969"},{"key":"bibr10-003335491212700406","unstructured":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance: Neuroinvasive and non-neuroinvasive domestic arboviral diseases. 2004 [cited 2010 May 7]. Available from: URL: http:\/\/www.cdc.gov\/osels\/ph_surveillance\/nndss\/casedef\/arboviral_2004.htm"},{"key":"bibr11-003335491212700406","unstructured":"SurveyMonkey. SurveyMonkey\u00ae software [cited 2010 May 7]. Available from: URL: http:\/\/www.surveymonkey.com"}],"container-title":["Public Health Reports\u00ae"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/003335491212700406","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/003335491212700406","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T09:30:28Z","timestamp":1777627828000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/003335491212700406"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]},"references-count":11,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/003335491212700406"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/003335491212700406","relation":{},"ISSN":["0033-3549","1468-2877"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0033-3549","type":"print"},{"value":"1468-2877","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2012,7]]}}}