{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T15:09:48Z","timestamp":1777907388219,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":22,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,13]],"date-time":"2021-06-13T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1623542400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Trop Doct"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Loop ileostomy is commonly performed for typhoid ileal perforations as temporary faecal diversion. This is associated with several stoma-related complications and also requires further surgery for its closure. Thus, we were prompted to conduct a prospective observational study on the safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations. After dealing with the perforation, a ghost ileostomy was performed in 10 selected patients with favourable circumstances; otherwise, a conventional loop ileostomy was performed in 19 patients. The two groups were comparable (p\u2009&gt;\u20090.05) for morbidity and mortality except for stoma-related complications, seen only in the loop ileostomy group. Body weight was better preserved in the ghost ileostomy group. One patient in the ghost ileostomy group required conversion to loop ileostomy owing to signs of intra-peritoneal suture leak, without any detriment to outcome. Our study shows safety, feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in selected patients with typhoid ileal perforations, thus avoiding loop ileostomy in one-third of patients.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/00494755211007002","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,13]],"date-time":"2021-06-13T13:44:20Z","timestamp":1623591860000},"page":"497-500","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Feasibility and efficacy of ghost ileostomy in typhoid ileal perforations: A prospective observational study"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"51","author":[{"given":"Prabhat","family":"Shukla","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Resident, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-4005-9862","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Uday","family":"Somashekar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dileep S","family":"Thakur","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Reena","family":"Kothari","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Dhananjaya","family":"Sharma","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, India"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,13]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-00494755211007002","first-page":"205","volume":"21","author":"Sharma D","year":"2002","journal-title":"Ind J Gastroenterol"},{"key":"bibr2-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-019-03428-6"},{"key":"bibr3-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.amjsurg.2009.12.017"},{"key":"bibr4-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10151-019-02127-2"},{"key":"bibr5-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciy1094"},{"key":"bibr6-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1258\/td.2010.090135"},{"key":"bibr7-00494755211007002","first-page":"135","volume":"28","author":"Chaudhary P","year":"2015","journal-title":"Ann Gastroenterol"},{"key":"bibr8-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/cid\/ciaa1309"},{"key":"bibr9-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mittal S, Singh H, Munghate A, et\u00a0al. A comparative study between the outcome of primary repair versus loop ileostomy in ileal perforation.\n                      Surg Res Pract.\n                      Epub ahead of print 27 March 2014. DOI: 10.1155\/2014\/729018.","DOI":"10.1155\/2014\/729018"},{"key":"bibr10-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-016-4811-3"},{"key":"bibr11-00494755211007002","first-page":"e11249","volume":"12","author":"Mehboob A","year":"2020","journal-title":"Cureus"},{"key":"bibr12-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-009-0660-z"},{"key":"bibr13-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/codi.12997"},{"key":"bibr14-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Patil V, Vijayakumar A, Ajitha MB, et\u00a0al. Comparison between tube ileostomy and loop ileostomy as a diversion procedure.\n                      ISRN Surg.\n                      Epub ahead of print 18 December 2012. DOI: 10.5402\/2012\/547523\/.","DOI":"10.5402\/2012\/547523"},{"key":"bibr15-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4103\/1319-3767.82583"},{"key":"bibr16-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00384-019-03255-9"},{"key":"bibr17-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.suronc.2018.05.018"},{"key":"bibr18-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/DCR.0b013e3182716ca1"},{"key":"bibr19-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00464-014-3974-z"},{"key":"bibr20-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.21873\/anticanres.13429"},{"key":"bibr21-00494755211007002","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zenger S, Gurbuz B, Can U, et\u00a0al. Comparative study between ghost ileostomy and defunctioning ileostomy in terms of morbidity and cost-effectiveness in low anterior resection for rectal cancer.\n                      Langenbecks Arch Surg\n                      2021; 406: 339\u2013347.","DOI":"10.1007\/s00423-021-02089-w"},{"key":"bibr22-00494755211007002","first-page":"PC23","volume":"10","author":"Babu RG","year":"2016","journal-title":"J Clin Diagn Res"}],"container-title":["Tropical Doctor"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00494755211007002","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/00494755211007002","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/00494755211007002","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T13:33:14Z","timestamp":1777642394000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/00494755211007002"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,13]]},"references-count":22,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/00494755211007002"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/00494755211007002","relation":{},"ISSN":["0049-4755","1758-1133"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0049-4755","type":"print"},{"value":"1758-1133","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2021,6,13]]}}}