{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,7]],"date-time":"2026-02-07T15:09:55Z","timestamp":1770476995514,"version":"3.49.0"},"reference-count":55,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]],"date-time":"2003-04-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1049155200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Communication Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:p> Two experiments, conducted approximately 6 weeks apart, examined the conjoint effects of participant rationality, as assessed by the Rational- Experiential Inventory, and base-rate information on apprehension about a threat. Experiment 1 predicted and found that high-rationality individuals who first received context-expanding information about a relatively likely hazard (traffic deaths) manifested less apprehension in response to a subsequent news story about a less likely threat (anthrax death) than did highs who read only the anthrax-death story. It was further predicted and found that among low-rationality individuals this relationship was reversed. Experiment 1 was conducted when the anthrax threat was perceived to be quite serious. The interaction was not found in Experiment 2, after national attention to anthrax decreased. Findings are discussed in terms of how high- and low- rationality individuals process threat-related information and how they respond to changes in the perceived seriousness of threat. <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/0093650202250880","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,28]],"date-time":"2003-04-28T10:25:30Z","timestamp":1051525530000},"page":"198-223","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":13,"title":["Antidotes for Anthrax Anecdotes"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Charles R.","family":"Berger","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Communication, University of California, Davis"}]},{"given":"Joel T.","family":"Johnson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, Davis"}]},{"given":"Eun-Ju","family":"Lee","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Communication at the University of California, Davis"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,4,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"atypb1","unstructured":"Altheide, D. L. (2002). Creating fear: News and the construction of crisis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter."},{"key":"atypb2","unstructured":"Baesler, E. J. (1991). Message processing of evidence and the long term retention and judgment of beliefs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson."},{"key":"atypb3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365094021005002"},{"key":"atypb4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. ActaPsychologica, 44, 211-233.","DOI":"10.1016\/0001-6918(80)90046-3"},{"key":"atypb5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02761.x"},{"key":"atypb6","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00748.x"},{"key":"atypb7","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berger, C. R. (2001). Making it worse than it is: Quantitative depictions of threatening trends in the news. Journal of Communication, 46,655-677.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02901.x"},{"key":"atypb8","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093650202029002001"},{"key":"atypb9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365093020001005"},{"key":"atypb10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365094021001004"},{"key":"atypb11","unstructured":"Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb12","unstructured":"Chen, S. & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford."},{"key":"atypb13","unstructured":"Cohl, H. A. (1997). Are we scaring ourselves to death? How pessimism, paranoia, and a misguided media are leading us toward disaster. New York: St. Martins."},{"key":"atypb14","unstructured":"Crossen, C. (1994). Tainted truth: The manipulation of fact in America. New York: Simon & Schuster."},{"key":"atypb15","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02760.x"},{"key":"atypb16","unstructured":"De Becker, G. (2002). Fear less: Real truth about risk, safety, and security in a time of terrorism. New York: Little, Brown."},{"key":"atypb17","unstructured":"Demers, D. P. & Nichols, S. (1987). Precision journalism: A practical guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb18","unstructured":"Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In S. M. Friendman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb19","unstructured":"Epstein, S. (1990). Cognitive-experiential self-theory. In L. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research: Theory and research (pp. 165-192). New York: Guilford."},{"key":"atypb20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.49.8.709"},{"key":"atypb21","unstructured":"Epstein, S. (in press). Cognitive-experiential self-theory: An integrative, psychodynamic theory of personality. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology. Volume 5: Personality and social."},{"key":"atypb22","unstructured":"Epstein, S.& Pacini, R.(1999).Some basic issues regarding dual-process theories from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 462-482). New York: Guilford."},{"key":"atypb23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.71.2.390"},{"key":"atypb24","unstructured":"Furedi, F. (1997). The culture of fear: Risk taking and the morality of low expectation. London: Cassell."},{"key":"atypb25","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 6, 223-230.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x"},{"key":"atypb26","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365094021005003"},{"key":"atypb27","unstructured":"Glassner, B. (1999). Culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. New York: Basic Books."},{"key":"atypb28","unstructured":"Griffin, R. J. (1999). Using systematic thinking to choose and evaluate evidence. In M. Friendman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 225-248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb29","unstructured":"Hadden, S. G. (1989). A citizen\u2019s right to know: Risk communication and public policy. Boulder, CO: Westview."},{"key":"atypb30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365028000700401"},{"key":"atypb31","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hirsch, P. (1981). On not learning from one\u2019s own mistakes: A reanalysis of Gerbner et al.\u2019s findings on cultivation analysis, Part II. Communication Research, 8, 3-37.","DOI":"10.1177\/009365028100800101"},{"key":"atypb32","unstructured":"Hogarth, R. M. (1980). Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision. Chichester, UK: Wiley."},{"key":"atypb33","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S0140525X00041157"},{"key":"atypb34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00395.x"},{"key":"atypb35","unstructured":"Meyer, P. (1979). Precision journalism: A reporter\u2019s introduction to social science methods (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press."},{"key":"atypb36","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Morgan, M. & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 20 (pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.","DOI":"10.1080\/23808985.1997.11678937"},{"key":"atypb37","unstructured":"Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1990). Cultivation analysis: Conceptualization and methodology. In N. Signorielli & M. Morgan (Eds.), Cultivation analysis: New directions in media effects research (pp. 13-34). Newbury Park, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb38","unstructured":"Nisbett, R. E. & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall."},{"key":"atypb39","unstructured":"Norris, P. & Epstein, S. (2002). The investigation of some fundamental issues concerning rational-analytical and intuitive-experiential thinking styles with a short form of the rational-experiential inventory. Manuscript submitted for publication."},{"key":"atypb40","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.76.6.972"},{"key":"atypb41","unstructured":"Paulos, J. A. (1995). A mathematician reads the newspaper. New York: Basic Books."},{"key":"atypb42","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. New York: Springer-Verlag.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-4964-1"},{"key":"atypb43","unstructured":"Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford."},{"key":"atypb44","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L. & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9780511804403"},{"key":"atypb45","unstructured":"Science in the streets: Report of the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on the Communication of Scientific Risk (1984). New York: Priority Press."},{"key":"atypb46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/hcr\/27.1.94"},{"key":"atypb47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365093020003005"},{"key":"atypb48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1126\/science.3563507"},{"key":"atypb49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.39.5.806"},{"key":"atypb50","unstructured":"Wildavsky, A. (1979). No risk is the highest risk of all. American Scientist, 67, 32-37."},{"key":"atypb51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.82.5.742"},{"key":"atypb52","unstructured":"Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill."},{"key":"atypb53","unstructured":"Zillmann, D.& Brosius, H.B.(2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb54","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08838159409364246"},{"key":"atypb55","unstructured":"Zillmann, D., Perkins, J. W. & Sundar, S. S. (1992). Impression-formation effects of printed news varying in descriptive precision and exemplification. Medienpsychologie, 3, 168-185."}],"container-title":["Communication Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0093650202250880","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0093650202250880","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,2]],"date-time":"2025-03-02T19:05:09Z","timestamp":1740942309000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/0093650202250880"}},"subtitle":["The Role of Rationality and Base-Rate Data in Assuaging Apprehension"],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]},"references-count":55,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/0093650202250880"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093650202250880","relation":{},"ISSN":["0093-6502","1552-3810"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0093-6502","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-3810","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003,4]]}}}