{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T04:18:04Z","timestamp":1780373884248,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":69,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2003,6,1]],"date-time":"2003-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1054425600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Communication Research"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In this study, three approaches commonly used by communication scientists to specify structural relationships using full-information maximum likelihood structural equation modeling are investigated. Specifically, a simulation study using Monte Carlo techniques was conducted to compare the structural paths generated by each of the three structural equation model types. Two of the three approaches utilized forms of latent variable modeling, and the third approach employed observed variables only. Of the three, the observed variable approach produced the most conservative structural path coefficients, whereas the hybrid latent variable approach generated the least attenuated coefficients. The appropriateness of each technique in modeling structural relationships is discussed and an argument is made for greater use of latent variable structural equation modeling in the field of communication.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/0093650203030003004","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2003,6,12]],"date-time":"2003-06-12T20:17:59Z","timestamp":1055449079000},"page":"332-354","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":160,"title":["A Monte Carlo Simulation of Observable Versus Latent Variable Structural Equation Modeling Techniques"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"30","author":[{"given":"Michael T.","family":"Stephenson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"R. Lance","family":"Holbert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2003,6,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"atypb1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519409539961"},{"key":"atypb2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0167-8116(95)00038-0"},{"key":"atypb3","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164497057005004"},{"key":"atypb4","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bentler, P. M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 1289-1298.","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.ps.31.020180.002223"},{"key":"atypb5","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.107.2.238"},{"key":"atypb6","unstructured":"Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software."},{"key":"atypb7","unstructured":"Blalock, H. M., Jr. (Ed.). (1971). Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine."},{"key":"atypb8","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9781118619179"},{"key":"atypb9","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.110.2.305"},{"key":"atypb10","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/08824099609362082"},{"key":"atypb11","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.107.2.260"},{"key":"atypb12","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x"},{"key":"atypb13","unstructured":"Carmines, E. G. (1986). The analysis of covariance structure models. In W. D. Berry & M. L. Beck (Eds.), New tools for social scientists: Advances and applications in research methods (pp. 23-55). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb14","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00096.x"},{"key":"atypb15","unstructured":"Chou, C. P. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 37-59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb16","unstructured":"Cohen, J. & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression \/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb17","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.78.1.98"},{"key":"atypb18","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.105.2.317"},{"key":"atypb19","unstructured":"Cudeck, R., du Toit, S. & S\u00f6rbom, D. (2001). Structural equation modeling: Present and future. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software."},{"key":"atypb20","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540119"},{"key":"atypb21","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0048-7333(01)00171-8"},{"key":"atypb22","unstructured":"Gerbing, D. W. & Anderson, J. C. (1993). Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 40-65). Newbury Park, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb23","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365000027004001"},{"key":"atypb24","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/01463379909370133"},{"key":"atypb25","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1460-2466.2003.tb03004.x"},{"key":"atypb26","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holbert, R. L. & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Structural equation modeling in the communication sciences, 1995-2000. Human Communication Research, 28, 531-551.","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00822.x"},{"key":"atypb27","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.59.1.67"},{"key":"atypb28","unstructured":"Hoyle, R. H. (Ed.). (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb29","unstructured":"Hoyle, R. H. & Kenny, D. A. (1999). Sample size, reliability, and tests of statistical mediation. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 195-222). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb30","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-006X.62.3.429"},{"key":"atypb31","unstructured":"Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb32","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519909540118"},{"key":"atypb33","unstructured":"Hunter, J. E. & Hamilton, M. A. (1995). PATH: A program in BASICA. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University, East Lansing."},{"key":"atypb34","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0377-2217(01)00226-0"},{"key":"atypb35","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/S15328007SEM0802_3"},{"key":"atypb36","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/biomet\/57.2.239"},{"key":"atypb37","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02291393"},{"key":"atypb38","unstructured":"J\u00f6reskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85-112). New York: Seminar Press."},{"key":"atypb39","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0193841X8100500502"},{"key":"atypb40","unstructured":"Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb41","unstructured":"Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston."},{"key":"atypb42","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1468-2958.1996.tb00385.x"},{"key":"atypb43","unstructured":"Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"atypb44","unstructured":"Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley."},{"key":"atypb45","unstructured":"MacCallum, R. C. (1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage."},{"key":"atypb46","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev.psych.51.1.201"},{"key":"atypb47","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.103.3.391"},{"key":"atypb48","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365096023002002"},{"key":"atypb49","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/105846099198659"},{"key":"atypb50","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365099026006005"},{"key":"atypb51","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/009365098025005001"},{"key":"atypb52","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/03637758709390238"},{"key":"atypb53","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519509540013"},{"key":"atypb54","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mooney, C. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo simulation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781412985116"},{"key":"atypb55","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164496056001004"},{"key":"atypb56","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02289400"},{"key":"atypb57","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/S15328007SEM0901_6"},{"key":"atypb58","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/S15328007SEM0802_7"},{"key":"atypb59","unstructured":"Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston."},{"key":"atypb60","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1207\/S15328007SEM0702_9"},{"key":"atypb61","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robert, C. P. & Casella, G. (1999). Monte Carlo statistical methods. New York: Springer.","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4757-3071-5"},{"key":"atypb62","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rubenstein, R. Y. (1981). Simulation and the Monte Carlo method. New York: John Wiley.","DOI":"10.1002\/9780470316511"},{"key":"atypb63","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/10705519509540020"},{"key":"atypb64","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.1.2.199"},{"key":"atypb65","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/ijpor\/10.3.195"},{"key":"atypb66","unstructured":"Smith, V. K. (1973). Monte Carlo methods: Their role for econometrics. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books."},{"key":"atypb67","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1021\/ac0200116"},{"key":"atypb68","unstructured":"Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agriculture Research, 20, 557-585."},{"key":"atypb69","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1214\/aoms\/1177732676"}],"container-title":["Communication Research"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0093650203030003004","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0093650203030003004","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T17:03:44Z","timestamp":1777395824000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/0093650203030003004"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2003,6]]},"references-count":69,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2003,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/0093650203030003004"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093650203030003004","relation":{},"ISSN":["0093-6502","1552-3810"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0093-6502","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-3810","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2003,6]]}}}