{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T16:10:01Z","timestamp":1777911001875,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":60,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]],"date-time":"2020-03-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1583798400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pers Soc Psychol Bull"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Hostile sexism expresses derogation of women\u2019s competence and emphasizes that women will exploit men\u2019s relational dependence. Men who endorse hostile sexism perceive their female partners more negatively, but do these negative perceptions stem from motives for dominance or insecurities about dependence? We tested both perspectives by assessing bias in perceptions of partners\u2019 behaviors that challenge dominance (criticism, instruction, taking over) versus affirm partners are dependable (love, care, availability). Both members of 100 heterosexual couples reported how much they received and enacted these behaviors in (a) a lab-based discussion and (b) six monthly retrospective reports about an ongoing important goal. In both support contexts, men\u2019s hostile sexism was associated with underestimating dependability-relevant support, particularly when partners reported providing low support. This pattern did not emerge for dominance-relevant behaviors. These results indicate that men\u2019s hostile sexism involves insecurities about dependence, producing perceptions that female partners are less dependable than they actually are.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167220907475","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]],"date-time":"2020-03-10T05:55:52Z","timestamp":1583819752000},"page":"1491-1506","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":10,"title":["Men\u2019s Hostile Sexism and Biased Perceptions of Partners\u2019 Support: Underestimating Dependability Rather Than Overestimating Challenges to Dominance"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"46","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8095-6093","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Matthew D.","family":"Hammond","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Nickola C.","family":"Overall","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Auckland, New Zealand"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-0146167220907475","unstructured":"Ackerman R. A., Ledermann T., Kenny D. A. (2016). Power analysis for the ActorPartner Interdependence Model [Unpublished manuscript]. https:\/\/robert-ackerman.shinyapps.io\/APIMPowerR\/"},{"key":"bibr2-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Armenti N. A., Babcock J. C. (2016). Conjoint treatment for intimate partner violence: A systematic review and implications. Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice, 5, 109\u2013123. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/cfp0000060","DOI":"10.1037\/cfp0000060"},{"key":"bibr3-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bareket O., Shnabel N. (2020). Domination and objectification: Men\u2019s motivation for dominance over women affects their tendency to sexually objectify women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44, 28\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0361684319871913","DOI":"10.1177\/0361684319871913"},{"key":"bibr4-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumeister R. F., Smart L., Boden J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5\u201333. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.103.1.5","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-295X.103.1.5"},{"key":"bibr5-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen Z., Fiske S. T., Lee T. L. (2009). Ambivalent sexism and power-related gender-role ideology in marriage. Sex Roles, 60, 765\u2013778. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-009-9585-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-009-9585-9"},{"key":"bibr6-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Christopher A. N., Mull M. S. (2006). Conservative ideology and ambivalent sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 223\u2013230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1471-6402.2006.00284.x"},{"key":"bibr7-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Connor R. A., Fiske S. T. (2018). Not minding the gap: How hostile sexism encourages choice explanations for the gender income gap. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43, 22\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0361684318815468","DOI":"10.1177\/0361684318815468"},{"key":"bibr8-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cross E. J., Overall N. C. (2019). Women experience more serious relationship problems when male partners endorse hostile sexism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1022\u20131041. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.2560","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2560"},{"key":"bibr9-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cross E. J., Overall N. C., Hammond M. D., Fletcher G. J. (2017). When does men\u2019s hostile sexism predict relationship aggression? The moderating role of partner commitment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 331\u2013340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550616672000","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550616672000"},{"key":"bibr10-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cross E. J., Overall N. C., Low R. S., McNulty J. K. (2018). An interdependence account of sexism and power: Men\u2019s hostile sexism, biased perceptions of low power, and relationship aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, 338\u2013363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspi0000167","DOI":"10.1037\/pspi0000167"},{"key":"bibr11-0146167220907475","first-page":"37","volume-title":"Advances in personal relationships","volume":"1","author":"Cutrona C. E.","year":"1987"},{"key":"bibr12-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000). The \u201cwhat\u201d and \u201cwhy\u201d of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327965pli1104_01","DOI":"10.1207\/S15327965PLI1104_01"},{"key":"bibr13-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Downey G., Feldman S. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327\u20131343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13072\/midss.655","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0022-3514.70.6.1327"},{"key":"bibr14-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feeney B. C., Collins N. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113\u2013147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1088868314544222","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868314544222"},{"key":"bibr15-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fisher M. I., Hammond M. D. (2018). Personal ties and prejudice: A meta-analysis of romantic attachment and ambivalent sexism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 1084\u20131098. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167218804551","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167218804551"},{"key":"bibr16-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fitzsimons G. M., Finkel E. J., Vandellen M. R. (2015). Transactive goal dynamics. Psychological Review, 122, 648\u2013673. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0039654","DOI":"10.1037\/a0039654"},{"key":"bibr17-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fletcher G. J., Kerr P. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627\u2013658. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0019792","DOI":"10.1037\/a0019792"},{"key":"bibr18-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Girme Y. U., Overall N. C., Simpson J. A., Fletcher G. J. (2015). \u201cAll or nothing\u201d: Attachment avoidance and the curvilinear effects of partner support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 450\u2013475. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a003886","DOI":"10.1037\/a0038866"},{"key":"bibr19-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glick P., Diebold J., Bailey-Werner B., Zhu L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323\u20131334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01461672972312009","DOI":"10.1177\/01461672972312009"},{"key":"bibr20-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glick P., Fiske S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/\/0022-3514.70.3.491","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0022-3514.70.3.491"},{"key":"bibr21-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Glick P., Fiske S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.56.2.109","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0003-066X.56.2.109"},{"key":"bibr22-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hack T. (2017). Hostile sexism. In Nadal K. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of psychology and gender (pp. 895\u2013896). SAGE. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4135\/9781483384269.n298","DOI":"10.4135\/9781483384269.n298"},{"key":"bibr23-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hammond M. D., Cross E. J., Overall N. C. (2020). Relationship (in)security is central to the sources and outcomes of sexism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, e12522. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/spc3.12522","DOI":"10.1111\/spc3.12522"},{"key":"bibr24-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hammond M. D., Milojev P., Huang Y., Sibley C. G. (2018). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 863\u2013874. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550617727588","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617727588"},{"key":"bibr25-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hammond M. D., Overall N. C. (2013). Men\u2019s hostile sexism and biased perceptions of intimate partners: Fostering dissatisfaction and negative behavior in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1585\u20131599. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/014616721499026","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167213499026"},{"key":"bibr26-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hammond M. D., Overall N. C. (2015). Benevolent sexism and support of romantic partner\u2019s goals: Undermining women\u2019s competence while fulfilling men\u2019s intimacy needs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1180\u20131194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167215593492","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167215593492"},{"key":"bibr27-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hammond M. D., Overall N. C. (2017). Dynamics within intimate relationships and the causes, consequences, and functions of sexist attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 120\u2013125. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721416686213","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721416686213"},{"key":"bibr28-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holt-Lunstad J. (2018). Why social relationships are important for physical health: A systems approach to understanding and modifying risk and protection. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 437\u2013458. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurevpsych-122216-011902","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-122216-011902"},{"key":"bibr29-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jayamaha S. D., Overall N. C. (2019). The dyadic nature of self-evaluations: Self-esteem and efficacy shape and are shaped by support processes in relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10, 244\u2013256. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550617750734","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617750734"},{"key":"bibr30-0146167220907475","volume-title":"Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence","author":"Kelley H. H.","year":"1978"},{"key":"bibr31-0146167220907475","volume-title":"Dyadic data analysis","author":"Kenny D. A.","year":"2006"},{"key":"bibr32-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Knee C. R., Hadden B. W., Porter B., Rodriguez L. M. (2013). Self-determination theory and romantic relationship processes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 307\u2013324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1088868313498000","DOI":"10.1177\/1088868313498000"},{"key":"bibr33-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lemay E. P.Jr., Clark M. S., Feeney B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834\u2013853. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.92.5.834","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.92.5.834"},{"key":"bibr34-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351\u2013398. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5465\/19416520802211628","DOI":"10.5465\/19416520802211628"},{"key":"bibr35-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maner J. K. (2017). Dominance and prestige: A tale of two hierarchies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 526\u2013531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721417714323","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721417714323"},{"key":"bibr36-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Masser B. M., Abrams D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51, 609\u2013615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-004-5470-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-004-5470-8"},{"key":"bibr37-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murray S. L. (2005). Regulating the risks of closeness: A relationship-specific sense of felt security. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 74\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.0963-7214.2005.00338.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.0963-7214.2005.00338.x"},{"key":"bibr38-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nadler A., Chernyak-Hai L. (2014). Helping them stay where they are: Status effects on dependency\/autonomy-oriented helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 58\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0034152","DOI":"10.1037\/a0034152"},{"key":"bibr39-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nezlek J. B. (2011). Multilevel modeling for social and personality psychology. SAGE.","DOI":"10.4135\/9781446287996"},{"key":"bibr40-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Fletcher G. J., Simpson J. A., Fillo J. (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners\u2019 negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 730\u2013749. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0038987","DOI":"10.1037\/a0038987"},{"key":"bibr41-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Fletcher G. J. O., Kenny D. A. (2012). When bias and insecurity promote accuracy: Mean-level bias and tracking accuracy in couples\u2019 conflict discussions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 642\u2013655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167211432764","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167211432764"},{"key":"bibr42-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Fletcher G. J. O., Simpson J. A. (2010). Helping each other grow: Romantic partner support, self-improvement and relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1496\u20131513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167210383045","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167210383045"},{"key":"bibr43-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Hammond M. D. (2013). Biased and accurate: Depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 636\u2013650. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167213480188","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167213480188"},{"key":"bibr44-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Hammond M. D., McNulty J. K., Finkel E. J. (2016). When power shapes interpersonal behavior: Low relationship power predicts men\u2019s aggressive responses to low situational power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111, 195\u2013217. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspi0000059","DOI":"10.1037\/pspi0000059"},{"key":"bibr45-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Overall N. C., Sibley C. G., Tan R. (2011). The costs and benefits of sexism: Resistance to influence during relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 271\u2013290. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0022727","DOI":"10.1037\/a0022727"},{"key":"bibr46-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pietromonaco P. R., Collins N. L. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72, 531\u2013542. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/amp0000129","DOI":"10.1037\/amp0000129"},{"key":"bibr47-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/14250-015"},{"key":"bibr48-0146167220907475","volume-title":"Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis","author":"Rosenthal R.","year":"2007","edition":"3"},{"key":"bibr49-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rusbult C. E., Martz J. M., Agnew C. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5, 357\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x"},{"key":"bibr50-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55, 68\u201378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066x.55.1.68","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0003-066X.55.1.68"},{"key":"bibr51-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sheppard L. D., Johnson S. K. (2019). The femme fatale effect: Attractiveness is a liability for businesswomen\u2019s perceived truthfulness, trust, and deservingness of termination. Sex Roles, 81, 779\u2013796. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-019-01031-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-019-01031-1"},{"key":"bibr52-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sibley C. G., Becker J. C. (2012). On the nature of sexist ambivalence: Profiling ambivalent and univalent sexists. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 589\u2013601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.1870","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.1870"},{"key":"bibr53-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sibley C. G., Wilson M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative sexual female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51, 687\u2013696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-004-0718-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-004-0718-x"},{"key":"bibr54-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sibley C. G., Wilson M. S., Duckitt J. (2007). Antecedents of men\u2019s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 160\u2013172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167206294745","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167206294745"},{"key":"bibr55-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Simpson J. A., Rholes W. S., Phillips D. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899\u2013914. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.71.5.899","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0022-3514.71.5.899"},{"key":"bibr56-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tipler C. N., Ruscher J. B. (2019). Dehumanizing representations of women: The shaping of hostile sexist attitudes through animalistic metaphors. Journal of Gender Studies, 28, 109\u2013118. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09589236.2017.1411790","DOI":"10.1080\/09589236.2017.1411790"},{"key":"bibr57-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"West T. V., Kenny D. A. (2011). The truth and bias model of judgment. Psychological Review, 118, 357\u2013378. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0022936","DOI":"10.1037\/a0022936"},{"key":"bibr58-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Whitaker M. P. (2013). Centrality of control-seeking in men\u2019s intimate partner violence perpetration. Prevention Science, 14, 513\u2013523. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11121-012-0332-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11121-012-0332-z"},{"key":"bibr59-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yakushko O. (2005). Ambivalent sexism and relationship patterns among women and men in Ukraine. Sex Roles, 52, 589\u2013596. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-005-3727-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-005-3727-5"},{"key":"bibr60-0146167220907475","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zee K. S., Bolger N. (2019). Visible and invisible social support: How, why, and when. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 314\u2013320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721419835214","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721419835214"}],"container-title":["Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0146167220907475","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/0146167220907475","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0146167220907475","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T15:12:20Z","timestamp":1777648340000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/0146167220907475"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]]},"references-count":60,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2020,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/0146167220907475"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167220907475","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-1672","1552-7433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-1672","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-7433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,3,10]]}}}