{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,6]],"date-time":"2026-11-06T22:15:59Z","timestamp":1794003359880,"version":"4.8.0"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,24]],"date-time":"2025-05-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1748044800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/100000925","name":"John Templeton Foundation","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/100000925","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000155","name":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000155","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pers Soc Psychol Bull"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>There is a pressing need to understand why people believe in conspiracies. Although past work has focused on needs and motivations, we propose an alternative driver of belief: overconfidence. Across eight studies with 4,181 U.S. adults, conspiracy believers consistently overestimated their performance on numeracy and perception tests (even after taking their actual performance into account). This relationship with overconfidence was robust in controlling for analytic thinking, the need for uniqueness, and narcissism, and it was strongest for the most fringe conspiracies. We also found that conspiracy believers\u2014particularly overconfident ones\u2014massively overestimated (&gt;4\u00d7) how much others agree with them: Although conspiratorial claims were believed by a majority of participants only 12% of the time, believers thought themselves to be in the majority 93% of the time. This was evident even when asked to rate agreement among counter-partisans, indicating that conspiracists are genuinely unaware that their beliefs are on the fringe.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/01461672251338358","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,24]],"date-time":"2025-05-24T07:02:42Z","timestamp":1748070162000},"page":"2509-2528","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":12,"title":["Overconfidently Conspiratorial: Conspiracy Believers are Dispositionally Overconfident and Massively Overestimate How Much Others Agree With Them"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1344-6143","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gordon","family":"Pennycook","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"},{"name":"University of Regina, SK, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jabin","family":"Binnendyk","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"David G.","family":"Rand","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bayrak F. S\u00fcmer V. Dogruyol B. Saribay S. A. Alper S. Isler O. Yilmaz O. (2025). Reflection predicts and leads to decreased conspiracy belief. Cognition 258 106085. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2025.106085","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2025.106085"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101387"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Binnendyk J. Pennycook G. (2024). Individual differences in overconfidence: A new measurement approach. Judgment and Decision Making 19 1\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/ugb3s","DOI":"10.1017\/jdm.2024.22"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Binnendyk J. Li S. Costello T. Hale R. Moore D. A. Pennycook G. (2024). Is overconfidence a trait? An adversarial collaboration. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/awugz","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/awugz"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bol L. Hacker D. J. (2012). Calibration research: Where do we go from here? Frontiers in Psychology 3 229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2012.00229","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2012.00229"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bowes S. M. Costello T. H. Tasimi A. (2023). The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates. Psychological Bulletin 149(5\u20136) 259\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bul0000392","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000392"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brashier N. M. Marsh E. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology 71(1) 499\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-psych-010419-050807","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-010419-050807"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cichocka A. Marchlewska M. Biddlestone M. (2022). Why do narcissists find conspiracy theories so appealing? Current Opinion in Psychology 47 101386. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101386","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101386"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cichocka A. Marchlewska M. Golec de Zavala A. Olechowski M. (2016). \u201cThey will not control us\u201d: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology 107(3) 556\u2013576. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjop.12158","DOI":"10.1111\/bjop.12158"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clifton L. Clifton D. A. (2019). The correlation between baseline score and post-intervention score and its implications for statistical analysis. Trials 20(1) 43. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s13063-018-3108-3","DOI":"10.1186\/s13063-018-3108-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500001819"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cosgrove T. J. Murphy C. P. (2023). Narcissistic susceptibility to conspiracy beliefs exaggerated by education reduced by cognitive reflection. Frontiers in Psychology 14 1164725. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1164725","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2023.1164725"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Costello T. H. Pennycook G. Rand D. (2025). Just the facts: How dialogues with AI reduce conspiracy beliefs. OSF. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/h7n8u_v1","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/h7n8u_v2"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Costello T. H. Pennycook G. Rand D. G. (2024). Durably reducing conspiracy beliefs through dialogues with AI. Science 385(6714) eadq1814. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.adq1814","DOI":"10.1126\/science.adq1814"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Douglas K. M. Sutton R. M. (2023). What are conspiracy theories? A definitional approach to their correlates consequences and communication. Annual Review of Psychology 74 271\u2013298. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-psych-032420-031329","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-psych-032420-031329"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Douglas K. M. Sutton R. M. Callan M. J. Dawtry R. J. Harvey A. J. (2016). Someone is pulling the strings: Hypersensitive agency detection and belief in conspiracy theories. Thinking & Reasoning 22(1) 57\u201377. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13546783.2015.1051586","DOI":"10.1080\/13546783.2015.1051586"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dunning D. (2011). The Dunning-Kruger effect: On being ignorant of one\u2019s own ignorance. In Olson J. M. Zanna M. P. (Eds.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44 pp. 247\u2013296). Academic Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-385522-0.00005-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frederick S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4) 25\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1257\/089533005775196732","DOI":"10.1257\/089533005775196732"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hornsey M. J. Bierwiaczonek K. Sassenberg K. Douglas K. M. (2023). Individual intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nature Reviews Psychology 2 85\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s44159-022-00133-0","DOI":"10.1038\/s44159-022-00133-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Imhoff R. Lamberty P. K. (2017). Too special to be duped: Need for uniqueness motivates conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology 47(6) 724\u2013734. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.2265","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2265"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jetten J. Peters K. Casara B. G. S. (2022). Economic inequality and conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology 47 101358. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101358","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101358"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Keren G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica 77(3) 217\u2013273. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0001-6918(91)90036-Y","DOI":"10.1016\/0001-6918(91)90036-Y"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.77.6.1121"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lantian A. Muller D. Nurra C. Douglas K. M. (2017). \u201cI Know Things They Don\u2019t Know!\u201d: The role of need for uniqueness in belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychology 48(3) 160\u2013173. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000306","DOI":"10.1027\/1864-9335\/a000306"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lawson A. Larrick R. P. Soll J. B. (2023). Forms of overconfidence: Reconciling divergent levels with consistent individual differences (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4558486). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4558486","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4558486"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lazarevi\u0107 L. B. Puri\u0107 D. Teovanovi\u0107 P. Luki\u0107 P. Zupan Z. Kne\u017eevi\u0107 G. (2021). What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality thinking styles and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences 176 110771. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.PAID.2021.110771","DOI":"10.1016\/j.paid.2021.110771"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Light N. Fernbach P. M. Rabb N. Geana M. V. Sloman S. A. (2022). Knowledge overconfidence is associated with anti-consensus views on controversial scientific issues. Science Advances 8(29) eabo0038. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/SCIADV.ABO0038","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.abo0038"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lipkus I. M. Samsa G. Rimer B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making\u202f: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making 21(1) 37\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989X0102100105","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X0102100105"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lynn M. Harris J. (1997). Individual differences in the pursuit of self-uniqueness through consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27(21) 1861\u20131883. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01629.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01629.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","first-page":"395","volume-title":"Handbook of positive psychology","author":"Lynn M.","year":"2002","unstructured":"Lynn M., Snyder C. R. (2002). Uniqueness seeking. In Snyder C. R., Lopez S. J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 395\u2013410). Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mata A. Ferreira M. B. Sherman S. J. (2013). The metacognitive advantage of deliberative thinkers: A dual-process perspective on overconfidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(3) 353\u2013373. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0033640","DOI":"10.1037\/a0033640"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore D. A. (2023). Overprecision is a property of thinking systems. Psychological Review 130(5) 1339\u20131350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/rev0000370","DOI":"10.1037\/rev0000370"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","volume-title":"Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences","author":"Moore D. A.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Moore D. A., Dev A. S. (2018). Individual differences in overconfidence. In Zeigler-Hill V., Shackelford T. K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 3382\u20133386). Springer."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore D. A. Healy P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. Psychological Review 115 502\u2013517. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-295X.115.2.502","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-295X.115.2.502"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mullen B. Atkins J. L. Champion D. S. Edwards C. Hardy D. Story J. E. Vanderklok M. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21(3) 262\u2013283. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-1031(85)90020-4","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(85)90020-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/bs.aesp.2022.11.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennycook G. Rand D. G. (2019). Lazy not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188 39\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.06.011","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2018.06.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennycook G. Rand D. G. (2021). Examining false beliefs about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 Presidential Election. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2 1\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37016\/mr-2020-51","DOI":"10.37016\/mr-2020-51"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennycook G. Cheyne J. A. Barr N. Koehler D. J. Fugelsang J. A. (2014). Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition 42(1) 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-013-0340-7","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-013-0340-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennycook G. Cheyne J. A. Koehler D. J. Fugelsang J. A. (2016). Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behavior Research Methods 48 341\u2013348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-015-0576-1","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-015-0576-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennycook G. Ross R. M. Koehler D. J. Fugelsang J. A. (2017). Dunning\u2013Kruger effects in reasoning: Theoretical implications of the failure to recognize incompetence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24 1774\u20131784. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-017-1242-7","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-017-1242-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pytlik N. Soll D. Mehl S. (2020). Thinking preferences and conspiracy belief: intuitive thinking and the jumping to conclusions-bias as a basis for the belief in conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychiatry 11 568942. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyt.2020.568942","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyt.2020.568942"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rapp D. N. Withall M. M. (2024). Confidence as a metacognitive contributor to and consequence of misinformation experiences. Current Opinion in Psychology 55 101735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2023.101735","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2023.101735"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Robertson C. E. Pretus C. Rathje S. Harris E. A. Van Bavel J. J. (2022). How social identity shapes conspiratorial belief. Current Opinion in Psychology 47 101423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101423","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101423"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosenthal S. A. Hooley J. M. Montoya R. M. van der Linden S. L. Steshenko Y. (2020). The Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale: A measure to distinguish narcissistic grandiosity from high self-esteem. Assessment 27(3) 487\u2013507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191119858410","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191119858410"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ross L. Greene D. House P. (1977). The \u201cfalse consensus effect\u201d: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 13(3) 279\u2013301. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0022-1031(77)90049-X","DOI":"10.1016\/0022-1031(77)90049-X"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salovich N. A. Kirsch A. M. Rapp D. N. (2022). Evaluative mindsets can protect against the influence of false information. Cognition 225 105121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.COGNITION.2022.105121","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2022.105121"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanchez C. Dunning D. (2021). Jumping to conclusions: Implications for reasoning errors false belief knowledge corruption and impeded learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120(3) 789\u2013815. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspp0000375","DOI":"10.1037\/pspp0000375"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jrp.2013.05.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shenhav A. Rand D. G. Greene J. D. (2012). Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141(3) 423\u2013428. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0025391","DOI":"10.1037\/a0025391"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spiller S. A. (2024). Widely-Used Measures of Overconfidence Are Confounded With Ability (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4468920). Social Science Research Network. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2139\/ssrn.4468920","DOI":"10.2139\/ssrn.4468920"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sternisko A. Cichocka A. Van Bavel J. J. (2020). The dark side of social movements: Social identity non-conformity and the lure of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology 35 1\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2020.02.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2020.02.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swami V. Barron D. Weis L. Voracek M. Stieger S. Furnham A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation with recommendations for researchers. PLoS One 12(2) e0172617. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/JOURNAL.PONE.0172617","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0172617"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swami V. Voracek M. Stieger S. Tran U. S. Furnham A. (2014). Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133(3) 572\u2013585. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2014.08.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2014.08.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tennant P. W. G. Arnold K. F. Ellison G. T. H. Gilthorpe M. S. (2022). Analyses of \u201cchange scores\u201d do not estimate causal effects in observational data. International Journal of Epidemiology 51(5) 1604\u20131615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ije\/dyab050","DOI":"10.1093\/ije\/dyab050"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teovanovi\u0107 P. Luki\u0107 P. Zupan Z. Lazi\u0107 A. Ninkovi\u0107 M. \u017de\u017eelj I. (2021). Irrational beliefs differentially predict adherence to guidelines and pseudoscientific practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35(2) 486\u2013496. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ACP.3770","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3770"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500007622"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Toplak M. E. West R. F. Stanovich K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition 39(7) 1275\u20131289. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-011-0104-1","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-011-0104-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Uscinski J. Enders A. Diekman A. Funchion J. Klofstad C. Kuebler S. Murthi M. Premaratne K. Seelig M. Verdear D. Wuchty S. (2022). The psychological and political correlates of conspiracy theory beliefs. Scientific Reports 12(1) 21672. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-022-25617-0","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-022-25617-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429203787-17"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Prooijen J.-W. (2022). Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology 47 101352. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101352","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101352"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Prooijen J.-W. Krouwel A. P. M. (2016). Extreme political beliefs predict dogmatic intolerance. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8(3) 292\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550616671403","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550616671403"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Prooijen J.-W. Douglas K. M. De Inocencio C. (2018). Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural: Illusory pattern perception. European Journal of Social Psychology 48(3) 320\u2013335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.2331","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2331"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vitriol J. A. Marsh J. K. (2018). The illusion of explanatory depth and endorsement of conspiracy beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology 48(7) 955\u2013969. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.2504","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.2504"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vranic A. Hromatko I. Tonkovic M. (2022). \u201cI did my own research\u201d: Overconfidence (dis)trust in science and endorsement of conspiracy theories. Frontiers in Psychology 13 931865. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.931865","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.931865"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagner-Egger P. Bangerter A. Delouv\u00e9e S. Dieguez S. (2022). Awake together: Sociopsychological processes of engagement in conspiracist communities. Current Opinion in Psychology 47 101417. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101417","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101417"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhou Z. Firestone C. (2019). Humans can decipher adversarial images. Nature Communications 10(1) 1334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41467-019-08931-6","DOI":"10.1038\/s41467-019-08931-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zuckerman E. (2019). QAnon and the emergence of the unreal. Journal of Design and Science 6 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21428\/7808da6b.6b8a82b9","DOI":"10.21428\/7808da6b.6b8a82b9"}],"container-title":["Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01461672251338358","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/01461672251338358","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01461672251338358","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,1]],"date-time":"2026-07-01T05:29:58Z","timestamp":1782883798000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/01461672251338358"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,24]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/01461672251338358"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01461672251338358","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-1672","1552-7433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-1672","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-7433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,5,24]]}}}