{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,13]],"date-time":"2026-09-13T19:05:26Z","timestamp":1789326326194,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":52,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788998400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788998400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000707","name":"British Psychological Society","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000707","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Pers Soc Psychol Bull"],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    In an era of deepening political polarization, understanding how partisans believe they are perceived by ideological opponents is critical for explaining both hostility and conciliation. Across five studies (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 1,541) conducted in the United Kingdom, the United States, and Canada, we examine how meta-humanization, perceiving that one\u2019s political ingroup is seen as fully human by the outgroup, shapes moral emotional responses and downstream intergroup attitudes. Specifically, we test anger, disgust, and empathy as parallel mediators linking meta-humanization to affective polarization, negotiation, teamwork, and willingness for out-party contact, while examining perceived threat to social cohesion as a moderator. Across studies, meta-humanization reliably predicts more conciliatory intergroup attitudes, with disgust emerging as the primary affective pathway. Our findings advance theory on meta-perceptions by demonstrating that meta-humanization shapes political attitudes through moral emotion regulation, and by identifying threat to social cohesion as a condition that, under moderate levels, drives these processes. Implications for understanding and mitigating identity-based conflicts in polarized political climates are discussed.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/01461672261481208","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,11]],"date-time":"2026-09-11T06:24:23Z","timestamp":1789107863000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Bridging the Political Divide: Meta-Humanization and Moral Emotions Shape Partisan Reconciliation"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6840-4760","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Melissa","family":"Pavetich","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Heriot-Watt University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1218-5239","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sofia","family":"Stathi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Greenwich, London, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bail C. A. Argyle L. P. Brown T. W. Bumpus J. P. Chen H. Hunzaker M. B. F. Lee J. Mann M. Merhout F. Volfovsky A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115(37) 9216\u20139221. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1804840115","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1804840115"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bastian B. Haslam N. (2011). Experiencing dehumanization: Cognitive and emotional effects of everyday dehumanization. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 33(4) 295\u2013303. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01973533.2011.614132","DOI":"10.1080\/01973533.2011.614132"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berendt J. van Leeuwen E. Uhrich S. (2023). Can\u2019t live with them can\u2019t live without them: The ambivalent effects of existential outgroup threat on helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 50(6) 971\u2013984. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01461672231158097","DOI":"10.1177\/01461672231158097"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Borinca I. Koc Y. Mustafa S. (2024). Fostering social cohesion in post-conflict societies: The power of normative apologies in reducing competitive victimhood and enhancing reconciliation and intergroup negotiation. European Journal of Social Psychology 55(6) 1072\u20131083. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ejsp.3116","DOI":"10.1002\/ejsp.3116"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boxell L. Gentzkow M. Shapiro J. (2024). Cross-country trends in affective polarization. The Review of Economics and Statistics 106(2) 557\u2013565. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/rest_a_01160","DOI":"10.1162\/rest_a_01160"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Capozza D. Di Bernardo G. A. Falvo R. (2017). Intergroup contact and outgroup humanization: Is the causal relationship uni- or bidirectional? PLoS One 12(1) e0170554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0170554","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0170554"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohrs J. C. (2013). Threat and authoritarianism: Some theoretical and methodological comments. International Journal of Psychology 48(1) 50-54. https:\/\/doi\/org\/10.1080\/00207594.2012.732699","DOI":"10.1080\/00207594.2012.732699"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dovidio J. F. Johnson J. D. Gaertner S. L. Pearson A. R. Saguy T. Ashburn-Nardo L. (2010). Empathy and intergroup relations. In Mikulincer M. Shaver P. R. (Eds.) Prosocial motives emotions and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 393\u2013408). American Psychological Association. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/12061-020","DOI":"10.1037\/12061-020"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Druckman J. N. Klar S. Krupnikov Y. Levendusky M. Ryan J. B. (2021). How Affective polarization shapes Americans\u2019 political beliefs: A study of response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Experimental Political Science 8(3) 223\u2013234. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/XPS.2020.28","DOI":"10.1017\/XPS.2020.28"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Engels T. Traast I. J. Doosje B. Amodio D. Sauter D. (2024). Moral elevation mitigates dehumanization of ethnic outgroups. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology 6 Article 100187. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cresp.2024.100187","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cresp.2024.100187"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Faul F. Erdfelder E. Buchner A. Lang A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behaviour Research Methods 41 1149-1160","DOI":"10.3758\/BRM.41.4.1149"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Feldman S. Stenner K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology 18(4) 741-770. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/3792208","DOI":"10.1111\/0162-895X.00077"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garrett K. N. Bankert A. (2018). The moral roots of partisan division: How moral conviction heightens affective polarization. British Journal of Political Science 50(2) 621\u2013640. https:\/\/doi.org\/0.1017\/S000712341700059X","DOI":"10.1017\/S000712341700059X"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giner-Sorolla R. Mart\u00ednez R. Fern\u00e1ndez S. Chas A. (2023). Emotions as constituents predictors and outcomes of dehumanization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 51 Article 101281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101281","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101281"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Giner-Sorolla R. Russell P. S. (2019). Not just disgust: Fear and anger also relate to intergroup dehumanization. Collabra: Psychology 5(1) 56. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/collabra.211","DOI":"10.1525\/collabra.211"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Golec de Zavala A. Cichocka A. Iskra-Golec I. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104(6) 1019\u20131039. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0032215","DOI":"10.1037\/a0032215"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graham J. Haidt J. Nosek B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96(5) 1029\u20131046. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0015141","DOI":"10.1037\/a0015141"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hayes A. F. (2018). Partial conditional and moderated mediation: Quantification inference and interpretation. Communication Monographs 85 4-40.","DOI":"10.1080\/03637751.2017.1352100"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Heseltine M. Clemm von Hohenberg B. Menchen-Trevino E. Gackowski T. Wojcieszak M. (2025). Effects of over-time exposure to partisan media and coverage of polarization on perceived polarization. Political Communication 42 432\u2013453. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10584609.2024.2423093","DOI":"10.1080\/10584609.2024.2423093"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jonas E. McGregor I. Klackl J. Agroskin D. Fritsche I. Holbrook C. Nash K. Proulx T. Quirin M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 49 219\u2013286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-0-12-800052-6.00004-4"},{"issue":"15","key":"e_1_3_2_22_1","first-page":"49","article-title":"Relation between reliability towards social media with the scale of credibility on information on Kosovo-Serbia Dialogue","volume":"8","author":"Kalisi M.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Kalisi M. (2021). Relation between reliability towards social media with the scale of credibility on information on Kosovo-Serbia Dialogue. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(15\u201316), 49\u201359.","journal-title":"International Journal of Social Science and Human Research"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kteily N. Hodson G. Bruneau E. (2016). They see us as less than human: Meta-dehumanization predicts intergroup conflict via reciprocal dehumanization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 110 343\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspa0000044","DOI":"10.1037\/pspa0000044"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Landry A. P. Halperin E. (2025). Intergroup psychological interventions: The motivational challenge. American Psychologist 80(2) 206\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/amp0001289","DOI":"10.1037\/amp0001289"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Landry A. P. Ihm E. Schooler J. W. (2022). Filthy animals: Integrating the behavioral immune system and disgust into a model of prophylactic dehumanization. Evolutionary Psychological Science 8 120\u2013133. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s40806-021-00296-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s40806-021-00296-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee A. H. (2022). Social trust in polarized times: How perceptions of political polarization affect Americans\u2019 trust in each other. Political Behaviour 44(3) 1533\u20131554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11109-022-09787-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11109-022-09787-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McDonald M. Porat R. Yarkoney A. Tagar M. R. Kimel S. Saguy T. Halperin E. (2017). Intergroup emotional similarity reduces dehumanization and promotes conciliatory attitudes in prolonged conflict. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 20(1) 125\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1368430215595107","DOI":"10.1177\/1368430215595107"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Merkley E. (2023). Polarization eh? Ideological divergence and partisan sorting in the Canadian mass public. Public Opinion Quarterly 86(4) 932\u2013943 https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/poq\/nfac047","DOI":"10.1093\/poq\/nfac047"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore-Berg S. L. Ankori-Karlinsky L. O. Hameiri B. Bruneau E. (2020). Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans. Proceedings National Academy of Science USA 117(26) 14864\u201314872. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.2001263117","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.2001263117"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moore-Berg S. L. Hameiri B. Bruneau E. G. (2022). Empathy dehumanization and misperceptions: A media intervention humanizes migrants and increases empathy for their plight but only if misinformation about migrants is also corrected. Social Psychological and Personality Science 13(2) 645\u2013655. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/19485506211012793","DOI":"10.1177\/19485506211012793"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Onraet E. Dhont K. Van Hiel A. (2014). The relationships between internal and external threats and right-wing attitudes: A three-wave longitudinal study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 40(6) 712\u2013725. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167214524256","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167214524256"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Owuamalam C. K. Tarrant M. Farrow C. V. Zagefka H. (2013). The effect of meta-stereotyping on judgements of higher-status outgroups when reciprocity and social image improvement motives collide. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 45 12\u201323. http:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0030012","DOI":"10.1037\/a0030012"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Packer D. J. Ungson N. D. (2024). Psychology and social cohesion. Translational Issues in Psychological Science 10(1) 3-6. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/tps0000397","DOI":"10.1037\/tps0000397"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paolini S. White F. A. Tropp L. R. Turner R. N. Page-Gould E. Barlow F. K. G\u00f3mez \u00c1. (2021). Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open. Journal of Social Issues 77 11\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/josi.12427","DOI":"10.1111\/josi.12427"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parker M. T. Janoff-Bulman R. (2013). Lessons from morality-based social identity: The power of outgroup \u201chate \u201d not just ingroup \u201clove\u201d. Social Justice Research 26 81\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11211-012-0175-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s11211-012-0175-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pavetich M. Stathi S. (2021). Meta-humanization reduces prejudice even under high intergroup threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 120(3) 651\u2013671. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspi0000259","DOI":"10.1037\/pspi0000259"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_37_1","unstructured":"Pew Research Center. (2022). As partisan hostility grows signs of frustration with the two-party system. https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2022\/08\/09\/as-partisan-hostility-grows-signs-of-frustration-with-the-two-party-system\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prati F. Crapolicchio E. Dvorakova A. Di Bernardo G. A. Ruzzante D. (2023). Effective ways for reducing dehumanization: Interpersonal and intergroup strategies. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 51 Article 101277. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101277","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101277"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pyszczynski T. Solomon S. Greenberg J. (2015). Thirty years of terror management theory: From Genesis to Revelation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 52 1\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/bs.aesp.2015.03.001","DOI":"10.1016\/bs.aesp.2015.03.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Renstr\u00f6m E. A. B\u00e4ck H. Carroll R. (2023). Threats emotions and affective polarization. Political Psychology 44 1337\u20131366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/pops.12899","DOI":"10.1111\/pops.12899"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roth J. Steinmann M. Loughnane J. Devine P. Muldoon O. Shelly C. van Tilburg W. A. P. Steffens M. C. Campbell C. (2025). Election results can decrease intergroup threat and through that positively affect intergroup relations. Political Psychology 46(1) 7\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/pops.12960","DOI":"10.1111\/pops.12960"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rozin P. Lowery L. Imada S. Haidt J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt anger disgust) and three moral codes (community autonomy divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(4) 574\u2013586. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.76.4.574","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.76.4.574"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scatolon A. Sharvit K. Huici C. Hernandez A. A. Glazer G. S\u00e1nchez E. L. Michna M. (2023). Focusing on the self to humanize others: The role of empathy and morality. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 51 Article 101264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101264","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cobeha.2023.101264"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stephan W. G. Boniecki K. A. Ybarra O. Bettencourt A. Ervin K. S. Jackson L. A. McNatt P. S. Renfro C. L. (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of Blacks and Whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(9) 1242-1254. https:\/\/doi.ord\/10.1177\/01461672022812009","DOI":"10.1177\/01461672022812009"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tapias M. P. Glaser J. Keltner D. Vasquez K. Wickens T. (2007). Emotion and prejudice: Specific emotions toward outgroups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 10(1) 27\u201339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1368430207071338","DOI":"10.1177\/1368430207071338"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tausch N. Birtel M. D. G\u00f3rska P. Bode S. Rocha C. (2024). A post-Brexit intergroup contact intervention reduces affective polarization between Leavers and Remainers short-term. Communications Psychology 2 95. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s44271-024-00146-w","DOI":"10.1038\/s44271-024-00146-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Turner R. N. Hodson G. Dhont K. (2020). The role of individual differences in understanding and enhancing intergroup contact. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 14(6). https:\/\/doi.0rg\/10.1111\/spc3.12533","DOI":"10.1111\/spc3.12533"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tybur J. M. Molho C. Oaten M. (2020). Disgust anger and aggression: Further tests of the equivalence of moral emotions. Collabra: Psychology 6(1) 34. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/collabra.349","DOI":"10.1525\/collabra.349"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Doorn J. Zeelenberg M. Breugelmans S. M. (2014). Anger and prosocial behavior. Emotion Review 6(3) 261\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1754073914523794","DOI":"10.1177\/1754073914523794"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanman E. J. (2016). The role of empathy in intergroup relations. Current Opinion in Psychology 11 59\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2016.06.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2016.06.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varela O. Mead E. (2018). Teamwork skill assessment: Development of a measure for academia. Journal of Education for Business 93(4) 172\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08832323.2018.1433124","DOI":"10.1080\/08832323.2018.1433124"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vonhm M. E. (2025). Key elements of social cohesion in conflict-affected societies: A critical literature review. Cogent Social Sciences 11(1) Article 2586176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/23311886.2025.2586176","DOI":"10.1080\/23311886.2025.2586176"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Willis J. Daniels M. Disler G. Khalil L. Zhou A. (2017). Reliability and validity of the intergroup compromise inventory in two bipartisan samples. SAGE Open 7(4). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2158244017739339","DOI":"10.1177\/2158244017739339"}],"container-title":["Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01461672261481208","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/01461672261481208","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01461672261481208","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,13]],"date-time":"2026-09-13T18:53:04Z","timestamp":1789325584000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/01461672261481208"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"references-count":52,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/01461672261481208"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01461672261481208","relation":{},"ISSN":["0146-1672","1552-7433"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0146-1672","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-7433","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]]},"article-number":"01461672261481208"}}