{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,28]],"date-time":"2026-07-28T11:05:50Z","timestamp":1785236750442,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779753600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002322","name":"Coordena\u00e7\u00e3o de Aperfei\u00e7oamento de Pessoal de N\u00edvel Superior","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002322","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100004263","name":"Funda\u00e7\u00e3o de Amparo \u00e0 Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100004263","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100003593","name":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00edfico e Tecnol\u00f3gico","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100003593","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100010801","name":"Xunta de Galicia","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100010801","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Journal of Information Science"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This study investigates the perceptions of Brazilian researchers in agronomy regarding the order of authorship and the role of the corresponding author in scientific publications utilizing a survey of 380 responses. Key findings reveal that most researchers see the first author as the primary executor of the research, and the last author as the leader. The study also highlights a significant association between authorship order, research credibility, and citation impact, with differing views based on the type of institutional affiliation. In addition, the survey shows a preference for the corresponding author to be either the first or the last author, emphasizing their role in communication with journals. The results suggest that while the authorship order is crucial for recognizing contributions, the corresponding author\u2019s role is primarily seen as a formality. The study calls for more precise guidelines on authorship practices and further research into authorship dynamics in different scientific fields.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/01655515261446250","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]],"date-time":"2026-05-26T11:04:16Z","timestamp":1779793456000},"page":"1112-1129","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Attribution of authorship order and corresponding author in scientific publications: A survey of Brazilian researchers in the Agronomy field"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"52","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0549-4567","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Samile A. S.","family":"Vanz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8003-0386","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maria Claudia C.","family":"Gr\u00e1cio","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Estadual Paulista J\u00falio de Mesquita Filho, S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6864-1232","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Domingo","family":"Docampo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidad de Vigo, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1608-4478","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Zaida","family":"Chinchilla-Rodr\u00edguez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Madrid, Spain"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2416-2835","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Silvio Telles dos","family":"Santos","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-0968-0108","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sandra C.","family":"Oliveira","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universidade Estadual Paulista J\u00falio de Mesquita Filho, S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moher D Naudet F Cristea IA et al. Assessing scientists for hiring promotion and tenure. PLoS Biol 2018; 16(3): e2004089. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pbio.2004089","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pbio.2004089"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pontika N Klebel T Correia A et al. Indicators of research quality quantity openness and responsibility in institutional review promotion and tenure policies across seven countries. Quant Sci Stud 2022; 3(4): 888\u2013911. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00224","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00224"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peruginelli G P\u00f6l\u00f6nen J. The legal foundation of responsible research assessment: an overview on European Union and Italy. Res Eval 2024; 32(4): 670\u2013682. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/reseval\/rvad035","DOI":"10.1093\/reseval\/rvad035"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mongeon P Smith E Joyal B et al. The rise of the middle author: investigating collaboration and division of labor in biomedical research using partial alphabetical authorship. PLOS ONE 2017; 12: e0184601. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0184601","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0184601"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hil\u00e1rio CM Mart\u00ednez-\u00c1vila D Gr\u00e1cio MCC. El autor de correspondencia en estudios m\u00e9tricos de la informaci\u00f3n: un an\u00e1lisis de la coautor\u00eda en Journal of informetrics. Palabra Clave (La Plata) 2020; 10(1): e104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24215\/18539912e104","DOI":"10.24215\/18539912e104"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yu J Yin C. The relationship between the corresponding author and its byline position: an investigation based on the academic big data. J Phys Conf Ser 2021; 1883: 012129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/1742-6596\/1883\/1\/012129","DOI":"10.1088\/1742-6596\/1883\/1\/012129"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fox CW Ritchey JP Paine CET. Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: first last and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography. Ecol Evol 2018; 8: 11492\u201311507. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ece3.4584","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.4584"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walsh JP Lee YN Tang L. Pathogenic organization in science: division of labor and retractions. Res Pol 2019; 48(2): 444\u2013461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.respol.2018.09.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.respol.2018.09.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gauffriau M. A categorization of arguments for counting methods for publication and citation indicators. J Informetr 2017; 11(3): 672\u2013684. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2017.05.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2017.05.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bu Y Wang B Chinchilla-Rodr\u00edguez Z et al. Considering author sequence in all-author co-citation analysis. Inf Process Manag 2020; 57(6): 102300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ipm.2020.102300","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2020.102300"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_2","unstructured":"International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE). Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors http:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/browse\/roles-and-responsibilities\/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html (2024 accessed 15 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhao Y Wang Y Zhang H et al. Do more heads imply better performance? An empirical study of team thought leaders\u2019 impact on scientific team performance. Inf Process Manag 2024; 61(4): 103757. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ipm.2024.103757","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ipm.2024.103757"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Da Silva JAT. Multiple co-first authors co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit. Online Inf Rev 2021; 45(6): 1116\u20131130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/OIR-06-2020-0219","DOI":"10.1108\/OIR-06-2020-0219"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gr\u00e1cio MCC De Oliveira EFT Chinchilla-Rodr\u00edguez Z et al. Does corresponding authorship influence scientific impact in collaboration: Brazilian institutions as a case of study. Scientometrics 2020; 125: 1349\u20131369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-020-03655-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-020-03655-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu XZ Fang H. Scientific group leaders\u2019 authorship preferences: an empirical investigation. Scientometrics 2014; 98: 909\u2013925. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-013-1083-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-013-1083-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"White HD. Authors as citers over time. J Am Soc Inf Sci 2001; 52(2): 87\u2013108. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-T","DOI":"10.1002\/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1542>3.0.CO;2-T"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Youtie J Bozeman B. Social dynamics of research collaboration: norms practices and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics 2014; 101: 953\u2013962. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1391-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1391-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maru\u0161i\u0107 A Bo\u0161njak L Jeron\u010di\u0107 A. A systematic review of research on the meaning ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLOS ONE 2011; 6(9): e23477. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0023477","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0023477"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burrows S Moore M. Trends in authorship order in biomedical research publications. J Electron Resour Med Libr 2011; 8(2): 155\u2013168. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15424065.2011.576613","DOI":"10.1080\/15424065.2011.576613"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Moya-Aneg\u00f3n F Guerrero-Bote VP Bornmann L et al. The research guarantors of scientific papers and the output counting: a promising new approach. Scientometrics 2013; 97: 421\u2013434. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-013-1046-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-013-1046-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chinchilla-Rodr\u00edguez Z Sugimoto C Larivi\u00e8re V. Follow the leader: on the relationship between leadership and scholarly impact in international collaborations. PLoS ONE 2019; 14(6): e0218309. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0218309","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0218309"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanz SAS Docampo D. Colabora\u00e7\u00e3o brasileira com autores da Austr\u00e1lia Canad\u00e1 Estados Unidos e Reino Unido e o desempenho das Universidades no Ranking ARWUGRAS. Enc Bibli R Eletr Bibliotecon Ci Inf 2022; 27(1): 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5007\/1518-2924.2022.e84306","DOI":"10.5007\/1518-2924.2022.e84306"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tian W Cai R Fang Z et al. Understanding co-corresponding authorship: a bibliometric analysis and detailed overview. JASIST 2023; 75(1): 3\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.24836","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.24836"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanz SAS Gr\u00e1cio MCC De Oliveira SC et al. Collaboration strategies and corresponding authorship in agronomy research of Brazilian academic and non-academic institutions. Scientometrics 2023; 128: 6403\u20136426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-023-04857-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-023-04857-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asubiaro T. How collaboration type publication place funding and author\u2019s role affect citations received by publications from Africa: a bibliometric study of LIS research from 1996 to 2015. Scientometrics 2019; 120: 1261\u20131287. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-019-03157-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-019-03157-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cai R Tian W Luo R et al. The generation mechanism of research leadership in international collaboration based on GERGM: a case from the field of artificial intelligence. Scientometrics 2024; 129: 5821\u20135839. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-024-04974-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-024-04974-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Von Glinow MA Novelli L. Ethical standards within organizational behavior. Acad Manag J 1982; 25(2): 417\u2013436. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5465\/256001","DOI":"10.2307\/256001"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fine MA Kurkek LA. Reflections on determining authorship credit and authorship order on faculty-student collaborations. Am Psychol 1993; 48(11): 1141\u20131147. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0003-066X.48.11.1141","DOI":"10.1037\/0003-066X.48.11.1141"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith E Williams-Jones B. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Sci Eng Ethics 2012; 18: 199\u2013212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-011-9263-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-011-9263-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith E Williams-Jones B Master Z et al. Researchers\u2019 perceptions of ethical authorship distribution in collaborative research teams. Sci Eng Ethics 2020; 26: 1995\u20132022. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-019-00113-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-019-00113-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mali\u010dki M Jeron\u010di\u0107 A Maru\u0161i\u0107 M et al. Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012; 12(189): 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1471-2288-12-189","DOI":"10.1186\/1471-2288-12-189"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_2","unstructured":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00edfico e Tecnol\u00f3gico (CNPq). Anexo 1 - Crit\u00e9rios definidos pelos Comit\u00eas de Assessoramento para avalia\u00e7\u00e3o e classifica\u00e7\u00e3o das propostas https:\/\/www.gov.br\/cnpq\/pt-br\/composicao\/comites-de-assessoramento\/copy2_of_AnexoICriterios_Retificacao.pdf (2023 accessed 15 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_2","unstructured":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00edfico e Tecnol\u00f3gico (CNPq). Chamada CNPq N\u00ba 18\/2024 Bolsas de Produtividade do CNPq http:\/\/memoria2.cnpq.br\/web\/guest\/chamadas-publicas?p_p_id=resultadosportlet_WAR_resultadoscnpqportlet_INSTANCE_0ZaM&filtro=abertas&detalha=chamadaDivulgada&idDivulgacao=12605 (2024 accessed 15 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_2","unstructured":"De Souza RF. \u00c1reas do Conhecimento. Datagramazero 2004; 5(2): 1\u201330. http:\/\/ridi.ibict.br\/handle\/123456789\/109"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_2","unstructured":"Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient\u00edfico e Tecnol\u00f3gico (CNPq). Tabela de \u00e1reas do conhecimentohttp:\/\/lattes.cnpq.br\/documents\/11871\/24930\/TabeladeAreasdoConhecimento.pdf (2016 accessed 15 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ca\u00f1as-Guerrero I Mazarr\u00f3n FR Pou-Merina A et al. Bibliometric analysis of research activity in the \u201cAgronomy\u201d category from the Web of Science 1997\u20132011. Eur J Agron 2013; 50: 19\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.eja.2013.05.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eja.2013.05.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_38_2","unstructured":"Elsevier. Scopus source title list [Internet]. https:\/\/downloads.ctfassets.net\/o78em1y1w4i4\/7xtaTxNiNcWRTeZkV86eNy\/4ebbb5f70db19653adc6c3711b6617d7\/ext_list_Jul_2025.xlsx (July 2025 accessed 15 October 2025)"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_39_2","volume-title":"I SEMEAD \u2013 Semin\u00e1rios em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o (Programa de P\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o, FEA-USP)","author":"Hip\u00f3lito JAM","unstructured":"Hip\u00f3lito JAM, Castellani MR, da Silva SM. Como usar a Internet em pesquisa. In: I SEMEAD \u2013 Semin\u00e1rios em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o (Programa de P\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o, FEA-USP), S\u00e3o Paulo, Brazil, 5\u20138 November 1996."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_40_2","unstructured":"Vasconcellos L Guedes LFA. E-surveys: Vantagens e limita\u00e7\u00f5es dos question\u00e1rios eletr\u00f4nicos via internet no contexto da pesquisa cient\u00edfica. In: X SemeAd - Semin\u00e1rio em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o S\u00e3o Paulo 2007. https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/319774242_E-Surveys_Vantagens_e_Limitacoes_dos_Questionarios_Eletronicos_via_Internet_no_Contexto_da_Pesquisa_Cientifica (accessed 15 October 2025)"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"D\u00edaz de Rada V and Dom\u00ednguez-\u00c1lvarez J\u00c1. Response quality of self-administered questionnaires: a comparison between paper and web questionnaires. Soc Sci Comput Rev 2014; 32(2): 256\u2013269. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0894439313508516","DOI":"10.1177\/0894439313508516"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Manfreda KLM Bosnjak M Berzelak J et al. Web surveys versus other survey modes: a meta-analysis comparing response rates. Int J Mark Res 2008; 50(1): 79\u2013104. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/147078530805000107","DOI":"10.1177\/147078530805000107"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leslie LL. Are high response rates essential to valid surveys? Soc Sci Res 1972; 1(3): 323\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0049-089X(72)90080-4","DOI":"10.1016\/0049-089X(72)90080-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nix J Pickett JT Baek H et al. Police research officer surveys and response rates. Polic Soc 2017; 29(5): 530\u2013550. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10439463.2017.1394300","DOI":"10.1080\/10439463.2017.1394300"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McKibben JD Clemons CA Blythe JM. Survey response rates by requestor\u2019s characteristics. Adv Ag Dev 2025; 6(1): 43\u201354. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37433\/aad.v6i1.525","DOI":"10.37433\/aad.v6i1.525"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_46_2","first-page":"1745","volume-title":"Manual de an\u00e1lise de dados: estat\u00edstica e modelagem multivariada com Excel\u00ae, SPSS\u00ae e Stata\u00ae","author":"F\u00e1vero LP","year":"2017","unstructured":"F\u00e1vero LP, Belfiore P. Manual de an\u00e1lise de dados: estat\u00edstica e modelagem multivariada com Excel\u00ae, SPSS\u00ae e Stata\u00ae. Elsevier Brasil, 2017, p.1745."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anna M Pertti V. Reader characteristics behavior and success in fiction book search. JASIST 2017; 68(9): 2154\u20132165. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/asi.23843","DOI":"10.1002\/asi.23843"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cofie N Braund H Dalgarno N. Eight ways to get a grip on intercoder reliability using qualitative-based measures. Can Med Educ J 2022; 13(2): 73\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.36834\/cmej.72504","DOI":"10.36834\/cmej.72504"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_49_2","unstructured":"Estrela H. Sexo e g\u00eanero na ci\u00eancia: as desigualdades nas atividades acad\u00eamicas cient\u00edficas entre mulheres e homens docentes de programas de p\u00f3s-gradua\u00e7\u00e3o em Ci\u00eancias Agr\u00e1rias. PhD Thesis Universidade Federal De Goi\u00e1s Brazil 2020. http:\/\/repositorio.bc.ufg.br\/tede\/handle\/tede\/10546 (2020 accessed 16 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leta J. As mulheres na ci\u00eancia brasileira: crescimento contrastes e um perfil de sucesso. Estud Av 2003; 17(49): 271\u2013284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/S0103-40142003000300016","DOI":"10.1590\/S0103-40142003000300016"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_51_2","unstructured":"Hil\u00e1rio CM. A ordem dos autores como um indicador de produtividade relativa em coautorias: uma aplica\u00e7\u00e3o no Journal of Informetrics. PhD Thesis Universidade Estadual Paulista Brazil 2020. http:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/11449\/193457 (2020 accessed 16 October 2025)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Man JP Weinkauf JG Tsang M et al. Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. Eur J Epidemiol 2004; 19: 811\u2013817. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/B:EJEP.0000036571.00320.b8","DOI":"10.1023\/B:EJEP.0000036571.00320.b8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bhandari M Guyatt GH Kulkarni AV et al. Perceptions of authors\u2019 contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67(9): 1049\u20131054. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclinepi.2014.04.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tarkang EE Kweku M Zotor FB. Publication practices and responsible authorship: a review article. J Public Health Afr 2017; 8(723): 36\u201342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4081\/jphia.2017.723","DOI":"10.4081\/jphia.2017.723"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Duffy MA. Last and corresponding authorship practices in ecology. Eco Evol 2017; 7: 8876\u20138887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ece3.3435","DOI":"10.1002\/ece3.3435"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chinchilla-Rodr\u00edguez Z Costas R Robinson-Garc\u00eda et al. Examining the quality of the corresponding authorship field in Web of Science and Scopus. Quant Sci Stud 2024; 5(1): 76\u201397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/qss_a_00288","DOI":"10.1162\/qss_a_00288"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mattsson P Sundberg CJ Laget P. Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics 2011; 87: 99\u2013105. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-010-0310-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-010-0310-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bordons M Gonz\u00e1lez-Albo B Aparicio J et al. The influence of R&D intensity of countries on the impact of international collaborative research: evidence from Spain. Scientometrics 2014; 102: 1385\u20131400. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-014-1491-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-014-1491-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frandsen TF Nicolaisen J. What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in different disciplines. J Informetr 2010; 4(4): 608\u2013617. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joi.2010.06.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joi.2010.06.010"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hsiehchen D Espinoza M Hsieh A. Multinational teams and diseconomies of scale in collaborative research. Sci Adv 2015; 1(8): e1500211. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/sciadv.1500211","DOI":"10.1126\/sciadv.1500211"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Teunis T Nota SPFT Schwab JH. Do corresponding authors take responsibility for their work? A covert survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473(2): 729\u2013735. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11999-014-3868-3","DOI":"10.1007\/s11999-014-3868-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vanz SAS Docampo D. The influence of international scientific collaboration with English-speaking countries on the research performance of brazilian academic institutions. J Scientometr Res 2023; 11(3): 358\u2013370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5530\/jscires.11.3.39","DOI":"10.5530\/jscires.11.3.39"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Weiss PS. Who are corresponding authors? ACS Nano 2012; 6(4): 2861\u20132861. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1021\/nn301566x","DOI":"10.1021\/nn301566x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_64_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shen S Rousseau R Wang D. Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one? Scientometrics 2018; 115: 1039\u20131050. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11192-018-2691-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s11192-018-2691-0"}],"container-title":["Journal of Information Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01655515261446250","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/01655515261446250","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/01655515261446250","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,28]],"date-time":"2026-07-28T10:49:53Z","timestamp":1785235793000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/01655515261446250"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/01655515261446250"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/01655515261446250","relation":{},"ISSN":["0165-5515","1741-6485"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0165-5515","type":"print"},{"value":"1741-6485","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,26]]}}}