{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T13:22:53Z","timestamp":1789046573598,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788739200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]],"date-time":"2026-09-07T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788739200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100000781","name":"European Research Council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["951393"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["951393"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100000781","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Soc Stud Sci"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Ghostwritten medical papers are a cornerstone of pharmaceutical marketing. We trace how one manuscript written under the instructions and supervision of opioid producer Mallinckrodt was produced and eventually published in a medical journal to present a marketing message. We systematically analyse an archive of internal communications made public after litigation through the lens of Ric\u0153ur\u2019s work on imaginaries. Along his first analytic axis, we show how the ghostwriting process shapes and reshapes identities, ascribing agency and portraying social order. Along the second, legitimacy was constructed by the expert voice of a peer-reviewed article \u2018authored\u2019 by researchers, but written by backstage medical writers. Third, the result was a twisted phantasmagory of both academic writing and pain management. Professional medical writers generated an imaginary of pain management to expand the prescription of opioids by redefining pain categories and reassigning agency and responsibility of actors in pain treatment. Meanwhile, backstage writers also reproduced an imaginary of scientific writing, with efficient writing as an editorial service that misrepresents authorial contribution and responsibility. We suggest that Ric\u0153ur\u2019s analytic scheme could also be used to disentangle technoscientific imaginaries in other settings.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/03063127261474457","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,8]],"date-time":"2026-09-08T05:59:31Z","timestamp":1788847171000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Imaginaries of Writing and Pain: The Backstage of a Ghostwritten Paper"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-1725-8176","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maud","family":"Bernisson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"LISIS, CNRS, Universit\u00e9 Gustave Eiffel, INRAE, Marne-la-Vall\u00e9e, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1800-5884","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Willem","family":"Halffman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Battisti W. P. Wager E. Baltzer L. Bridges D. Cairns A. Carswell C. I. Citrome L. Gurr J. A. Mooney L. A. Moore B. J. Pe\u00f1a T. Sanes-Miller C. H. Veitch K. Woolley K. L. Yarker Y. E. (2015). Good Publication Practice for communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3. Annals of Internal Medicine 163(6) 461\u2013464. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.7326\/M15-0288","DOI":"10.7326\/M15-0288"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bazerman C. (1981). What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(3) 361\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/004839318101100305","DOI":"10.1177\/004839318101100305"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bernisson M. (2025). Legitimizing medical writing: Self-regulation or regulatory escape? Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit 14(3) 41\u201366. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5553\/TCC\/221195072024014003004","DOI":"10.5553\/TCC\/221195072024014003004"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7551\/mitpress\/9780262026581.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_1","unstructured":"Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2023 June 9). Acute inpatient PPS. CMS.Gov. https:\/\/www.cms.gov\/medicare\/payment\/prospective-payment-systems\/acute-inpatient-pps"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_1","unstructured":"Chutchian M. Knauth D. (2022 February 4). Mallinckrodt wins approval of restructuring plan opioid deal. Reuters. https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/transactional\/mallinckrodt-wins-approval-restructuring-plan-opioid-deal-2022-02-04\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"COPE Council. (2019). Discussion document: Authorship. Committee on Publication Ethics. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24318\/cope.2019.3.3","DOI":"10.24318\/cope.2019.3.3"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Croissant J. L. (2014). Agnotology: Ignorance and absence or towards a sociology of things that aren\u2019t there. Social Epistemology 28(1) 4\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02691728.2013.862880","DOI":"10.1080\/02691728.2013.862880"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Curzer H. J. (2021). Authorship and justice: Credit and responsibility. Accountability in Research 28(1) 1\u201322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2020.1794855","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2020.1794855"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.4324\/9780203430866_chapter_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_1","unstructured":"Flichy P. (2008). The internet imaginaire. MIT Press. https:\/\/mitpress.mit.edu\/9780262562386\/the-internet-imaginaire\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fugh-Berman A. J. (2010). The haunting of medical journals: How ghostwriting sold \u201cHRT\u201d. PLoS Medicine 7(9) Article e1000335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000335","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1000335"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_14_1","first-page":"176","volume-title":"Genetic nature\/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide","author":"Fujimura J. H.","year":"2003","unstructured":"Fujimura J. H. (2003). Future imaginaries. In Goodman A. H., Heath D., Lindee M. S. (Eds.), Genetic nature\/culture: Anthropology and science beyond the two-culture divide (pp. 176\u2013199). University of California Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gilbert N. Mulkay M. (1981). Contexts of scientific discourse: Social accounting in experimental papers. In Knorr K. D. Krohn R. Whitley R. (Eds.) The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 269\u2013294). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-94-009-9109-5_11","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-9109-5_11"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_1","volume-title":"Opening Pandora\u2019s box: A sociological analysis of scientists\u2019 discourse","author":"Gilbert N.","year":"1984","unstructured":"Gilbert N., Mulkay M. (1984). Opening Pandora\u2019s box: A sociological analysis of scientists\u2019 discourse. Cambridge University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_1","volume-title":"The presentation of self in everyday life","author":"Goffman E.","year":"1956","unstructured":"Goffman E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life (Monographs; no.2). Edinburgh University Social Sciences Research Centre."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Graf C. Battisti W. P. Bridges D. Bruce-Winkler V. Conaty J. M. Ellison J. M. Field E. A. Gurr J. A. Marx M.-E. Patel M. Sanes-Miller C. Yarker Y. E. (2009). Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: The GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339 Article b4330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.b4330","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.b4330"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grand View Research. (2022). Medical writing market size share & trends analysis report by type (Clinical Regulatory) by application (Medical Journalism Medico Marketing) by end use by region and segment forecasts 2022\u20142030 report overview (GVR-2-68038-908-1). https:\/\/www.grandviewresearch.com\/industry-analysis\/medical-writing-market","DOI":"10.1016\/j.focat.2022.08.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta R. Chernesky J. Lembke A. Michaels D. Tomori C. Greene J. A. Alexander G. C. Koon A. D. (2024). The opioid industry\u2019s use of scientific evidence to advance claims about prescription opioid safety and effectiveness. Health Affairs Scholar 2(10) Article qxae119. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/haschl\/qxae119","DOI":"10.1093\/haschl\/qxae119"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_21_1","volume-title":"Boundaries of regulatory science: Eco\/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands, 1970-1995","author":"Halffman W.","year":"2003","unstructured":"Halffman W. (2003). Boundaries of regulatory science: Eco\/toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands, 1970-1995 [Doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam]."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Healy D. (2004). Shaping the intimate: Influences on the experience of everyday nerves. Social Studies of Science 34(2) 219\u2013245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0306312704042620","DOI":"10.1177\/0306312704042620"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Healy D. Cattell D. (2003). Interface between authorship industry and science in the domain of therapeutics. The British Journal of Psychiatry 183(1) 22\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1192\/bjp.183.1.22","DOI":"10.1192\/bjp.183.1.22"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Herzberg D. (2020). White market drugs: Big pharma and the hidden history of addiction in America. University of Chicago Press. https:\/\/press.uchicago.edu\/ucp\/books\/book\/chicago\/W\/bo58927880.html","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226731919.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hesselmann F. (2023). A tale of two academic communities: Digital imaginaries of automatic screening tools in editorial practice. Minerva 61 221\u2013241. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11024-022-09484-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s11024-022-09484-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_26_1","unstructured":"ICMJE. (2026). Recommendations for the conduct reporting editing and publication of scholarly work in Medical Journals updated Jan 2026. International Council of Medical Journal Editors. https:\/\/www.icmje.org\/recommendations\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_27_1","volume-title":"The fifth branch: Science advisers as policy makers","author":"Jasanoff S.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Jasanoff S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policy makers. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.7208\/chicago\/9780226276663.003.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jasanoff S. Kim S.-H. (2013). Sociotechnical imaginaries and national energy policies. Science as Culture 22(2) 189\u2013196. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09505431.2013.786990","DOI":"10.1080\/09505431.2013.786990"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_30_1","unstructured":"Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. (2022 May 10). Opioid Industry Archive releases 1.4 million documents from leading opioid maker implicated in drug crisis. https:\/\/publichealth.jhu.edu\/2022\/opioid-industry-archive-releases-1-4-million-documents-from-leading-opioid-maker-implicated-in-drug-crisis"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_31_1","volume-title":"Empire of pain: The secret history of the Sackler dynasty","author":"Keefe P. R.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Keefe P. R. (2021). Empire of pain: The secret history of the Sackler dynasty. Anchor."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klein D. E. Mackenzie R. Hawkins B. Koon A. (2024). Inside \u201coperation change agent\u201d: Mallinckrodt\u2019s plan for capturing the opioid market. Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law 49(4) 599\u2013630. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1215\/03616878-11186127","DOI":"10.1215\/03616878-11186127"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_33_1","volume-title":"The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science","author":"Knorr Cetina K. D","year":"1981","unstructured":"Knorr Cetina K. D. (1981). The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science. Pergamon."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_34_1","volume-title":"Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society","author":"Latour B.","year":"1987","unstructured":"Latour B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_35_1","volume-title":"Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts","author":"Latour B.","year":"1979","unstructured":"Latour B., Woolgar S. (1979). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Sage."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lentacker A. Pham K. Chernesky J. M. (2024). Diverting data and drugs: A narrative review of the Mallinckrodt documents. Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 52(1) 118\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/jme.2024.60","DOI":"10.1017\/jme.2024.60"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Loeser J. D. Melzack R. (1999). Pain: An overview. The Lancet 353(9164) 1607\u20131609. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)01311-2","DOI":"10.1016\/S0140-6736(99)01311-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maru\u0161i\u0107 A. Bo\u0161njak L. Jeron\u010di\u0107 A. (2011). A systematic review of research on the meaning ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLOS ONE 6(9) Article e23477. https:\/\/doi.org\/doi:10.1371\/journal.pone.0023477","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0023477"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matheson A. (2011). How industry uses the ICMJE Guidelines to manipulate authorship\u2014And how they should be revised. PLOS Medicine 8(8) Article e1001072. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001072","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.1001072"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matheson A. (2024). The \u201cMonsanto papers\u201d and the nature of ghostwriting and related practices in contemporary peer review scientific literature. Accountability in Research 31(8) 1152\u20131181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2023.2234819","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2023.2234819"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_41_1","unstructured":"McGreal C. (2019 May 25). US medical group that pushed doctors to prescribe painkillers forced to close. The Guardian. https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2019\/may\/25\/american-pain-society-doctors-painkillers"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McHenry L. B. (2018). The Monsanto papers: Poisoning the scientific well. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine 29(3\u20134) 193\u2013205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3233\/JRS-180028","DOI":"10.3233\/JRS-180028"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_43_1","first-page":"435","volume-title":"The handbook of science and technology studies","author":"McNeil M.","year":"2016","unstructured":"McNeil M., Arribas-Ayllon M., Haran J., Mackenzie A., Tutton R. (2016). Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology, and society. In Felt U., Fouch\u00e9 R., Miller C. A., Smith-Doerr L. (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (4th ed., pp. 435\u2013463). MIT Press.","edition":"4"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_44_1","volume-title":"The triumph of doubt: Dark money and the science of deception","author":"Michaels D.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Michaels D. (2020). The triumph of doubt: Dark money and the science of deception. Oxford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_45_1","volume-title":"Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge","author":"Myers G.","year":"1990","unstructured":"Myers G. (1990). Writing biology: Texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge. University of Wisconsin Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_46_1","volume-title":"Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming","author":"Oreskes N.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Oreskes N., Conway E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Penders B. Shaw D. M. (2020). Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science. Accountability in Research 27(6) 347\u2013371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2020.1756787","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2020.1756787"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pieters T. (2023). The imperative of regulation: The co-creation of a medical and non-medical US opioid crisis. Psychoactives 2(4) 317\u2013336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/psychoactives2040020","DOI":"10.3390\/psychoactives2040020"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_49_1","unstructured":"Polaris Market Research. (2022). Medical writing market share size trends industry analysis report by type (Medical Writing Scientific Writing Regulatory Writing Others); by application by end-user (Pharmaceutical Companies CRO Others); by region; segment forecast 2022\u20142030. https:\/\/www.polarismarketresearch.com\/industry-analysis\/medical-writing-market"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_50_1","volume-title":"Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance","author":"Proctor R.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Proctor R., Schiebinger L. L. (Eds.). (2008). Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Stanford University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Radnovich R. Chapman C. R. Gudin J. A. Panchal S. J. Webster L. R. Pergolizzi J. V.Jr. (2014). Acute pain: Effective management requires comprehensive assessment. Postgraduate Medicine 126(4) 59\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3810\/pgm.2014.07.2784","DOI":"10.3810\/pgm.2014.07.2784"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_52_1","unstructured":"Research and Markets. (2023). Medical writing market research report by type (Clinical Writing Scientific Writing and Type Writing) application end-user region\u2014Cumulative impact of COVID-19 Russia Ukraine Conflict and high inflation\u2014Global forecast 2023-2030 (online summary) (No. 5305496). https:\/\/www.researchandmarkets.com\/reports\/5305496\/medical-writing-market-research-report-by-type#rela3-5317177"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ric\u0153ur P. (1984). L\u2019id\u00e9ologie et l\u2019utopie: Deux expressions de l\u2019imaginaire social [Ideology and Utopia: Two Expressions of Social Imaginaries]. Autres Temps. Les cahiers du christianisme social 2(1) 53\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3406\/chris.1984.940","DOI":"10.3406\/chris.1984.940"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_54_1","volume-title":"Lectures on ideology and utopia","author":"Ric\u0153ur P.","year":"1986","unstructured":"Ric\u0153ur P., Taylor G. H. (1986). Lectures on ideology and utopia. Columbia University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ross J. S. Hill K. P. Egilman D. S. Krumholz H. M. (2008). Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: A case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation. JAMA 299(15) Article 1800. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.299.15.1800","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.299.15.1800"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sismondo S. (2007). Ghost management: How much of the medical literature is shaped behind the scenes by the pharmaceutical industry? PLOS Medicine 4(9) Article e286. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040286","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pmed.0040286"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sismondo S. (2009). Ghosts in the machine. Social Studies of Science 39 171\u2013198. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0306312708101047","DOI":"10.1177\/0306312708101047"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sismondo S. (2018). Ghost-managed medicine. Mattering Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1353\/book.81376","DOI":"10.28938\/9780995527775"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sismondo S. Bernisson M. (2024). How an opioid giant deployed a playbook for moulding doctors\u2019 minds. BMJ 385 Article q1208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.q1208","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.q1208"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sundqvist G. Gasper D. St.Clair A. L. Hermansen E. A. T. Yearley S. \u00d8vsteb\u00f8 Tvedten I. Wynne B. (2018). One world or two? Science\u2013policy interactions in the climate field. Critical Policy Studies 12(4) 448\u2013468. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/19460171.2017.1374193","DOI":"10.1080\/19460171.2017.1374193"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tang B. L. (2024). In defense of the ICMJE authorship guideline a rejoinder to Curzer. Accountability in Research 31(7) 874\u2013886. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/08989621.2023.2178907","DOI":"10.1080\/08989621.2023.2178907"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_62_1","unstructured":"UCSF-JHU. (n.d.). Opioid Industry Documents Archive [Dataset]. https:\/\/www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu\/opioids\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Zee A. (2009). The promotion and marketing of OxyContin: Commercial triumph public health tragedy. American Journal of Public Health 99(2) 221\u2013227. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2105\/AJPH.2007.131714","DOI":"10.2105\/AJPH.2007.131714"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vedula S. S. Goldman P. S. Rona I. J. Greene T. M. Dickersin K. (2012). Implementation of a publication strategy in the context of reporting biases. A case study based on new documents from Neurontin\u00ae litigation. Trials 13(1) Article 136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1745-6215-13-136","DOI":"10.1186\/1745-6215-13-136"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wislar J. S. Flanagin A. Fontanarosa P. B. DeAngelis C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ 343 Article d6128. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.d6128","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d6128"}],"container-title":["Social Studies of Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/03063127261474457","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/03063127261474457","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/03063127261474457","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,10]],"date-time":"2026-09-10T12:16:25Z","timestamp":1789042585000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/03063127261474457"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]]},"references-count":64,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/03063127261474457"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03063127261474457","relation":{},"ISSN":["0306-3127","1460-3659"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0306-3127","type":"print"},{"value":"1460-3659","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,7]]},"article-number":"03063127261474457"}}