{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T14:49:09Z","timestamp":1777387749416,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":24,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,25]],"date-time":"2009-06-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1245888000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Am J Sports Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Several biomechanical studies comparing open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair methods have shown inferior performance of arthroscopic repairs. Suture anchor\u2013augmented transosseous repairs and suture bridge repairs have shown superior biomechanical performance when compared with other methods, but these 2 repair methods have not been directly compared.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Hypothesis<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There will be no difference in the biomechanical performance of the transosseous\u2013suture anchor and suture bridge techniques.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Study Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Controlled laboratory study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Eight paired cadaveric shoulder specimens (16 specimens) had creation followed by repair of a complete tear of the supraspinatus, with the first member of each pair undergoing repair by a transosseous\u2013suture anchor technique and the second member undergoing repair by the suture bridge technique. Specimens were then cycled from 10 to 180 N for 200 cycles, followed by testing to failure at 33 mm\/s. Elongation was measured during cyclic testing, and failure load and stiffness were obtained during load-to-failure testing. Failure method was recorded.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>There was no significant difference between transosseous\u2013suture anchor repairs and suture bridge repairs for elongation (4.0 \u00b1 1.60 mm vs 3.5 \u00b1 1.1 mm, P = .31), failure load (408 \u00b1 93 N vs 419 \u00b1 62 N, P = .70), or stiffness (58 \u00b1 10 N\/mm vs 58 \u00b1 14 N\/mm, P = .94). The most common mode of failure with each method was suture cutting through tendon.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The suture bridge repair exhibited similar biomechanical performance during cyclic and load-to-failure testing as a transosseous\u2013suture anchor repair, which historically has been performed in open or mini-open fashion.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs can be performed that are as strong as open or mini-open repairs.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546509336260","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,25]],"date-time":"2009-06-25T21:40:45Z","timestamp":1245966045000},"page":"1991-1995","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":25,"title":["A Biomechanical Comparison of Transosseous\u2013Suture Anchor and Suture Bridge Rotator Cuff Repairs in Cadavers"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"37","author":[{"given":"Leslie J.","family":"Bisson","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"From the University at Buffalo, Department of Orthopaedics, Buffalo, New York"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Leslie M.","family":"Manohar","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"From the University at Buffalo, Department of Orthopaedics, Buffalo, New York"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"b1-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546506290187"},{"key":"b2-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.01.002"},{"key":"b3-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507312640"},{"key":"b4-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-199707000-00013"},{"key":"b5-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0749-8063(03)00126-9"},{"key":"b6-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.01.005"},{"key":"b7-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.76B3.8175836"},{"key":"b8-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.1100130413"},{"key":"b9-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505281238"},{"key":"b10-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.04.007"},{"key":"b11-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546508314424"},{"issue":"2","key":"b12-0371991","first-page":"403","volume":"88","author":"Ma CB","year":"2006","journal-title":"J Bone Joint Surg Am"},{"key":"b13-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2007.07.010"},{"key":"b14-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505279575"},{"key":"b15-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.07.017"},{"key":"b16-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.010"},{"key":"b17-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507313092"},{"key":"b18-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2006.09.011"},{"key":"b19-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200212000-00005"},{"key":"b20-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2003.50036"},{"key":"b21-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.00697"},{"key":"b22-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2006.01.019"},{"key":"b23-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465030310040301"},{"key":"b24-0371991","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.00049"}],"container-title":["The American Journal of Sports Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0363546509336260","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/0363546509336260","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/0363546509336260","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T09:39:31Z","timestamp":1777369171000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/0363546509336260"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,25]]},"references-count":24,"journal-issue":{"issue":"10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2009,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/0363546509336260"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0363546509336260","relation":{},"ISSN":["0363-5465","1552-3365"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0363-5465","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-3365","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2009,6,25]]}}}