{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T07:55:54Z","timestamp":1790841354335,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"12","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1779408000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Am J Sports Med"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Bankart repair is commonly performed for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Modern arthroscopic techniques have advanced considerably, raising the question of whether their clinical performance now matches that of traditional open repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Purpose:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare contemporary arthroscopic and open Bankart repair across instability-related, functional, perioperative, and complication outcomes.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Study Design:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A systematic search of the PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted through December 2025. A total of 32 comparative studies met inclusion criteria. Extracted outcomes included postoperative dislocation, subluxation, overall instability, apprehension, patient-reported outcome measures (Rowe, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], University of California Los Angeles [UCLA], Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index [WOSI], and visual analog scale [VAS] scores), postoperative range of motion (ROM), loss of motion relative to baseline, operative time, infection, and reoperation rates. A subgroup analysis stratified studies by publication period (before 2010 vs 2010 onward) to explore the influence of evolving surgical techniques over time.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      No differences were found between arthroscopic and open Bankart repair in postoperative dislocation (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .05), subluxation (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .40), overall instability (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .06), or apprehension (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .40). Patient-reported outcomes, including Rowe (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .19), ASES (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .28), UCLA (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .41), WOSI (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .40), and VAS pain (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .05) scores, were comparable between groups. Postoperative ROM showed no differences across most parameters; however, loss of external rotation in abduction relative to baseline favored arthroscopic repair (mean difference, \u22121.67;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .04). Operative time did not differ between groups (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .11). Arthroscopic repair was associated with a shorter hospital stay (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .0001). Reoperation rates were higher after arthroscopic repair (RR, 2.15;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .0004). Infection rates were similar (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .13). In subgroup analysis, studies published before 2010 showed higher postoperative dislocation (RR, 2.13;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .01) and overall instability (RR, 1.67;\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      = .02) after arthroscopic repair, as well as greater external rotation in abduction with arthroscopy. In contrast, studies published from 2010 onward demonstrated no differences between arthroscopic and open repair across instability, functional, or ROM outcomes.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Arthroscopic and open Bankart repair provide largely comparable postoperative stability, functional recovery, and ROM, with modest differences reflecting the intrinsic nature of each technique. Publication period subgroup analysis suggests that historical instability differences were driven primarily by earlier studies, whereas contemporary studies show comparable instability and functional outcomes between approaches. Given its minimally invasive profile, arthroscopy offers practical advantages, including slightly better preservation of external rotation in abduction, while maintaining stability outcomes comparable to open repair.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465261443999","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]],"date-time":"2026-05-22T11:01:16Z","timestamp":1779447676000},"page":"3093-3111","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Arthroscopic vs Open Bankart Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"54","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-1765-4222","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Marc","family":"Boutros","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebano"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-9902-7878","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Guy","family":"Awad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebano"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jean-Pierre","family":"Saad","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebano"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-7553-5247","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Reina","family":"Khatib","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph de Beyrouth, Beyrouth, Lebano"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Zina","family":"Smadi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas, US"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Bassem","family":"Elhassan","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, US"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2011.11.032"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.03.009"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1002\/jor.1100100205"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2024.11.097"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jse.2024.03.041"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546506288239"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2016.08.024"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00402-015-2175-0"},{"issue":"10","key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","first-page":"1036","article-title":"Retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic versus open stabilization for recurrent shoulder dislocation","volume":"16","author":"Chhabra HS","year":"2024","unstructured":"Chhabra HS, Sardar D, Kumar A, Das B. Retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic versus open stabilization for recurrent shoulder dislocation. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2024;16(10):1036-1041.","journal-title":"Int J Pharm Clin Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200008000-00007"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546520949840"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2013.10.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s43465-023-00867-w"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504265188"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.10.022"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-200007000-00011"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/00003086-199704000-00013"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1941738111409175"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/s0749-8063(05)80308-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/036354659602400204"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","first-page":"2063","article-title":"Comparison of open and arthroscopic surgical management for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study","volume":"15","author":"Gupta KL","year":"2024","unstructured":"Gupta KL, Singh VK. Comparison of open and arthroscopic surgical management for recurrent anterior shoulder instability: a prospective study. J Cardiovasc Dis Res. 2024;15(2):2063-2073.","journal-title":"J Cardiovasc Dis Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2022.03.030"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0095399703258747"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","first-page":"118","article-title":"Return to play after non-operative management of primary anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review","volume":"81","author":"Hurley ET","year":"2023","unstructured":"Hurley ET, Colasanti CA, Haskel JD, et al. Return to play after non-operative management of primary anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013. 2023;81(2):118-124.","journal-title":"Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2013"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546504265264"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001670050133"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465010290050201"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_29_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s001670050096"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1053\/jars.2002.31701"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_31_2","first-page":"1214","article-title":"A retrospective comparative study of arthroscopic versus open surgical treatment for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder","volume":"16","author":"Kumar S","year":"2024","unstructured":"Kumar S, Ranjan V, Utkarsh. A retrospective comparative study of arthroscopic versus open surgical treatment for recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder. Int J Pharm Clin Res. 2024;16(2):1214-1217.","journal-title":"Int J Pharm Clin Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.E.01139"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_33_2","unstructured":"Liang Z Li B Muheremu A. Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair in patients with recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder\u2014a ten year follow-up study. 2019;12(6):7814-7819."},{"key":"e_1_3_2_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2021.11.052"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1186\/2047-783X-14-1-18"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3944\/AOTT.2010.2289"},{"issue":"6","key":"e_1_3_2_37_2","article-title":"Comparison of time to recurrence of instability after open and arthroscopic Bankart repair techniques","volume":"4","author":"Mandeep VS","year":"2016","unstructured":"Mandeep VS, Manzo RL, Cote M, et al. Comparison of time to recurrence of instability after open and arthroscopic Bankart repair techniques. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4(6):2325967116654114. doi: 10.1177\/2325967116654114.","journal-title":"Orthop J Sports Med"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2005.02.021"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.01656"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.RVW.23.00022"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_41_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-010-1093-5"},{"issue":"2","key":"e_1_3_2_42_2","first-page":"104","article-title":"Traumatic first time shoulder dislocation: surgery vs non-operative treatment","volume":"4","author":"Polyzois I","year":"2016","unstructured":"Polyzois I, Dattani R, Gupta R, Levy O, Narvani AA. Traumatic first time shoulder dislocation: surgery vs non-operative treatment. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016;4(2):104-108.","journal-title":"Arch Bone Jt Surg"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546505283267"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507304329"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/00004623-197860010-00001"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.F.00261"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_47_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jseint.2024.04.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_48_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546515578250"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_49_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/JAAOSGlobal-D-18-00093"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_50_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/BPO.0000000000000215"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_51_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546506296520"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_52_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1067\/mse.2001.112019"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_53_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/03635465980260030501"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_54_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.i4919"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_55_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.l4898"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_56_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jseint.2025.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_57_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.eats.2016.02.014"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_58_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2309499017727947"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_59_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2023.07.060"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_60_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0278-5919(20)30191-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_61_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.12659\/MSM.894346"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_62_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.arthro.2019.11.109"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_63_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00167-011-1674-y"}],"container-title":["The American Journal of Sports Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/03635465261443999","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/03635465261443999","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/03635465261443999","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T07:01:42Z","timestamp":1790838102000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/03635465261443999"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"12","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,10]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/03635465261443999"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/03635465261443999","relation":{},"ISSN":["0363-5465","1552-3365"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0363-5465","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-3365","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,22]]}}}