{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,13]],"date-time":"2026-06-13T00:55:49Z","timestamp":1781312149395,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"9-10","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]],"date-time":"2025-03-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1742774400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Interpers Violence"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    The present study examined the frequency and content of implicit questions asked to 6- to 17-year-olds during cross-examinations (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u2009122) of children in child sexual assault trials and analyzed how often they rebutted these questions. Through qualitative content analysis, we found that defense attorneys most commonly asked children implicit questions about: ulterior motives, coaching, being untruthful, missing disclosure opportunities, having poor memory, and other credibility issues. Implicit questions were posed in 63% of cases, with children rebutting only 11% of implied inquiries. We observed no significant correlations between the age of children testifying and the overall frequency of implicit questions or rebuttals. However, age differences were found based on the content of the questions; younger children (aged 6\u201312) were more frequently subjected to implicit inquiries about coaching, whereas teenaged adolescents (aged 13\u201317) faced more questions related to truthfulness and credibility issues. In conclusion, children were frequently asked implicit questions that implied credibility concerns, which may be difficult for children to understand. Furthermore, defense attorneys change the focus of the content of their implicit questions depending on the age of the child testifying.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605251327393","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]],"date-time":"2025-03-24T03:35:00Z","timestamp":1742787300000},"page":"2432-2458","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["U.S. Defense Attorneys\u2019 Implicit Questioning of Children in Child Sexual Assault Trials"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0008-7914-0108","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lea","family":"Sobrilsky","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Arizona State University, Tempe, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2526-4443","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Breanne E.","family":"Wylie","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Kelly","family":"McWilliams","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Angela D.","family":"Evans","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Brock University, Saint Catharines, ON, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8082-631X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Stacia N.","family":"Stolzenberg","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Arizona State University, Tempe, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrews S. J. Lamb M. E. (2017). The structural linguistic complexity of lawyers\u2019 questions and children\u2019s responses in Scottish criminal courts. Child Abuse & Neglect 65 182\u2013193. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chiabu.2017.01.022","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chiabu.2017.01.022"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andrews S. J. Lamb M. E. Lyon T. D. (2015). Question types responsiveness and self-contradictions when prosecutors and defense attorneys question alleged victims of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology 29(2) 253\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.3103","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3103"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brendli K. R. Broda M. D. Brown R. (2022). Children with intellectual disability and victimization: A logistic regression analysis. Child Maltreatment 27(3) 320\u2013324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077559521994177","DOI":"10.1177\/1077559521994177"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ciccia A. H. Meulenbroek P. Turkstra L. S. (2009). Adolescent brain and cognitive developments. Topics in Language Disorders 29(3) 249\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/TLD.0b013e3181b53211","DOI":"10.1097\/TLD.0b013e3181b53211"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Corte-Real A. Almiro P. A. Silva M. Nunes T. Abreu J. Carreira C. Vieira D. N. (2023). Oral health professional intervention and child physical abuse\u2014European legal approach. Forensic Sciences Research 8(4) 321\u2013327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/fsr\/owad042","DOI":"10.1093\/fsr\/owad042"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","unstructured":"Criminal Practice Directions. (2015). United Kingdom. https:\/\/www.judiciary.gov.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/crim-pd-2015.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cromer L. D. Goldsmith R. E. (2010). Child sexual abuse myths: Attitudes beliefs and individual differences. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 19(6) 618\u2013647. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10538712.2010.522493","DOI":"10.1080\/10538712.2010.522493"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000551"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanna K. Davies E. Crothers C. Henderson E. (2012). Questioning child witnesses in New Zealand\u2019s criminal justice system: Is cross-examination fair? Psychiatry Psychology and Law 19(4) 530\u2013546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13218719.2011.615813","DOI":"10.1080\/13218719.2011.615813"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","first-page":"345","article-title":"Pre-recording children\u2019s trial testimony: Effects on the criminal justice system","volume":"5","author":"Henderson H.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Henderson H., Lamb M. E. (2017). Pre-recording children\u2019s trial testimony: Effects on the criminal justice system. Criminal Law Review, 5, 345\u2013356.","journal-title":"Criminal Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Henderson H. M. Lamb M. E. (2019). Does implementation of reform authorized in Section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act affect the complexity of the questions asked of young alleged victims in court? Applied Cognitive Psychology 33(2) 201\u2013213. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.3466","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3466"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hobbs P. (2003). You must say it for him: Reformulating a witness testimony on cross-examination at trial. Text 23(4) 477\u2013511. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/text.2003.019","DOI":"10.1515\/text.2003.019"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","volume-title":"Part 1: Benefits of Understanding the Science","author":"Hopper J.","year":"2020","unstructured":"Hopper J. (2020). Important things to get right about the \u201cneurobiology of trauma.\u201d Part 1: Benefits of Understanding the Science. End Violence Against Women International."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kulkofsky S. Klemfuss J. Z. (2008). What the stories children tell can tell about their memory: Narrative skill and young children\u2019s suggestibility. Developmental Psychology 44(5) 1442\u20131456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0012849","DOI":"10.1037\/a0012849"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","first-page":"233","volume-title":"The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment","author":"Lyon T. D.","year":"2011","unstructured":"Lyon T. D., Ahern E. C. (2011). Disclosure of child sexual abuse. In Myers J. (Ed.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (3rd ed., pp. 233\u2013252). SAGE.","edition":"3"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","unstructured":"Ministry of Justice. (2013). Transforming the CJS: A strategy and action plan to reform the criminal justice system. United Kingdom. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/209659\/transforming-cjs-2013.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nathanson R. Saywitz K. J. (2015). Preparing children for court: Effects of a model court education program on children\u2019s anticipatory anxiety. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 33(4) 459\u2013475. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2191","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2191"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stevens L. M. Henderson H. M. Lamb M.E. (2021). Linguistically complex recognition prompts in pre-recorded cross-examinations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 39 369\u2013382. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2504","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2504"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"St. George S. Denne E. Stolzenberg S. N. (2022a). Blaming children: How rape myths manifest in defense attorneys\u2019 questions to children testifying about child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(17\u201318) 16623\u201316646. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605211023485","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605211023485"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"St. George S. Denne E. Stolzenberg S. N. (2022b). \u201cThis incident happened when there were 10 people in the house?\u201d Exploring a framework to categorize defense attorneys\u2019 plausibility questioning in CSA trials. Psychology Crime & Law 30(6) 556\u2013582. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2104277","DOI":"10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2104277"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"St. George S. Sullivan C. Wylie B. E. McWilliams K. Evans A. D. Stolzenberg S. N. (2022c). Did your mom help you remember?: An examination of attorneys\u2019 subtle questioning about suggestive influence to children testifying about child sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(15\u201316) 13902\u201313927. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605211006369","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605211006369"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Szojka Z. A. Andrews S. J. Lamb M. E. Stolzenberg S. N. Lyon T. D. (2017). Challenging the credibility of alleged victims of child sexual abuse in Scottish courts. Psychology Public Policy and Law 23(2) 200\u2013210. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/law0000117","DOI":"10.1037\/law0000117"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wylie B. E. Evans A. D. McWilliams K. Stolzenberg S. N. (2023a). Children\u2019s understanding of implied coaching questions: Does acquiescence influence perceptions of believability? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 85 101510. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.appdev.2022.101510","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appdev.2022.101510"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wylie B. E. St. George S. McWilliams K. Evans A. D. Stolzenberg S. N. (2022). Children\u2019s acquiescence to polysemous implicature questions about coaching: The role of parental support. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 78 101370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.appdev.2021.101370","DOI":"10.1016\/j.appdev.2021.101370"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wylie B. E. Stolzenberg S. N. Evans A. D. (2023b). Describing coercion in the courtroom: The influence of language and maltreatment severity on jurors\u2019 perceptions of child witnesses. Child Maltreatment 29(4) 648\u2013660. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10775595231210015","DOI":"10.1177\/10775595231210015"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yoon E. J. Frank M. C. (2019). The role of salience in young children\u2019s processing of ad hoc implicatures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 186 99\u2013116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jecp.2019.04.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jecp.2019.04.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zajac R. O\u2019Neill S. Hayne H. (2012). Disorder in the courtroom? Child witnesses under cross examination. Developmental Review 32(3) 181\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dr.2012.06.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dr.2012.06.006"}],"container-title":["Journal of Interpersonal Violence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605251327393","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/08862605251327393","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605251327393","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T23:19:11Z","timestamp":1777504751000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/08862605251327393"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9-10","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/08862605251327393"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605251327393","relation":{},"ISSN":["0886-2605","1552-6518"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0886-2605","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-6518","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,3,24]]}}}