{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T05:43:53Z","timestamp":1786167833182,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":36,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"17-18","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]],"date-time":"2026-06-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1780272000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Interpers Violence"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Domestic violence (DV) legislation has expanded significantly across the United States, yet there is limited systematic understanding of how state criminal statutes currently define and structure responses to domestic violence. This study examines how DV is codified across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, focusing on statutory definitions, sentencing provisions, protective order violations, survivor-related legal defenses, second-look sentencing opportunities, and mandated treatment or intervention programs. Using doctrinal legal analysis and qualitative content analysis, we conducted a comprehensive state-by-state review of statutory provisions drawn from state legislative databases, legal search engines, and Westlaw. Relevant statutory provisions from the state criminal codes were coded to capture how jurisdictions define qualifying relationships and abuse, categorize DV offenses and penalties, address violations of protective orders, provide survivor-specific legal defenses or sentencing relief, and mandate or authorize DV intervention programs. Findings reveal substantial variation across states in how DV is codified and punished. In most jurisdictions, DV offenses are treated as misdemeanors with felony escalation for repeat offenses, although some states classify these crimes as felonies only. Violations of protective orders are widely criminalized, though the severity of penalties differs across jurisdictions. In contrast, statutory provisions addressing survivors who become defendants remain relatively rare, with only a small number of states providing explicit defenses or second-look sentencing mechanisms. States also vary considerably in the extent to which they mandate or authorize batterer intervention or DV prevention programs. Overall, the findings highlight a fragmented statutory landscape in which punitive responses are common but survivor-centered provisions and rehabilitative frameworks remain unevenly implemented. These differences have important implications for legal consistency, survivor protections, and the alignment of statutory frameworks with contemporary research on DV and coercive control.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605261455844","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,2]],"date-time":"2026-06-02T04:31:12Z","timestamp":1780374672000},"page":"6866-6884","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["A State-by-State Review of Domestic Violence Sentencing Statutes Across the United States"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"41","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0005-2443-5513","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gabriel","family":"Alvarez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, Irvine, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Disni","family":"Perera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, Irvine, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Stuti S.","family":"Kokkalera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Aaron S. M. Beaulaurier R. L. (2017). The need for new emphasis on batterers intervention programs. Trauma Violence & Abuse 18(4) 425\u2013432. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1524838015622440","DOI":"10.1177\/1524838015622440"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adams A. E. Sullivan C. M. Bybee D. Greeson M. R. (2008). Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women 14(5) 563\u2013588. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077801208315529","DOI":"10.1177\/1077801208315529"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Alvarez G. (2025). Reassessing criminalisation: A review of global responses to domestic violence. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 1\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01924036.2025.2600051","DOI":"10.1080\/01924036.2025.2600051"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Buzawa E. S. Buzawa C. G. (2017). The evolution of the response to domestic violence in the United States. In Buzawa E. S. Buzawa C. G. (Eds.) Global responses to domestic violence (pp. 61\u201386). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-56721-1_4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-56721-1_4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell J. K. Nicolla S. Weissman D. M. Moracco K. E. (2024). The uptake and measurement of alternative approaches to domestic violence intervention programs: A scoping review. Trauma Violence & Abuse 25(4) 3269\u20133284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248380241244398","DOI":"10.1177\/15248380241244398"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cunha O. Silva A. Cruz A. R. de Castro Rodrigues A. Braga T. Gon\u00e7alves R. A. (2023). Dropout among perpetrators of intimate partner violence attending an intervention program. Psychology Crime & Law 29(6) 634\u2013652. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2030337","DOI":"10.1080\/1068316X.2022.2030337"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dugan L. (2003). Domestic violence legislation: Exploring its impact on the likelihood of domestic violence police involvement and arrest. Criminology & Public Policy 2(2) 283\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00126.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00126.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","unstructured":"Garrett S. M. (2023). Coercive control legislation: Using the tort system to empower survivors of domestic violence. California Law Review 111(5) 1601\u20131632. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.15779\/Z385H7BV60"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1525\/9780520968295"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","volume-title":"Imperfect victims: Criminalized survivors and the promise of abolition feminism","author":"Goodmark L.","year":"2023","unstructured":"Goodmark L. (2023). Imperfect victims: Criminalized survivors and the promise of abolition feminism. University of California Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","unstructured":"Harrington A. (2024). Second look myopia: State sentencing reform and the local prosecutorial response. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973) 114(4) 826\u2013878. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/48820322"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","unstructured":"Holliday J. R. McNiel D. E. Morris N. P. Faigman D. L. Binder R. L. (2022). The use of battered woman syndrome in US criminal courts. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 50(3) 373\u2013380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.29158\/jaapl.210105-21"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kajeepeta S. Bates L. M. Keyes K. M. Bailey Z. D. Roberts D. E. Prins S. J. (2024). The relationship between intimate partner violence policing and family surveillance in large US Counties. Race and Social Problems 16(4) 378\u2013396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12552-024-09422-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s12552-024-09422-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim M. E. (2018). From carceral feminism to transformative justice: Women-of-color feminism and alternatives to incarceration. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work 27(3) 219\u2013233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15313204.2018.1474827","DOI":"10.1080\/15313204.2018.1474827"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","unstructured":"Klein A. Centerbar D. Keller S. Klein J. (2014). Impact of differential sentencing severity for domestic violence offenses and all other offenses over abusers\u2019 life spans. National Institute of Justice. https:\/\/www.ojp.gov\/pdffiles1\/nij\/grants\/244757.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koehler S. (2025). Minding the gaps: How intimate partner violence legislation is failing to address coercive control. Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality 43 157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.24926\/25730037.704","DOI":"10.24926\/25730037.704"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kokkalera S. S. Strah B. M. Bornstein A. (2021). Too young for the crime yet old enough to do life: A critical review of how state Felony murder laws apply to juvenile defendants. Journal of Criminal Justice and Law 4(2) Article 2. https:\/\/jcjl.pubpub.org\/pub\/v4i290107","DOI":"10.21428\/cb6ab371.a1fe8f4b"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Laugalis V. R. Koza M. Kokkalera S. S. Vaughn M. S. (2023). Technically not life: How de facto life sentences condemn juveniles to die in prison. Criminal Justice Review 50(2) 143\u2013169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/07340168231216100","DOI":"10.1177\/07340168231216100"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee J. Copeland A. Hickmon N. (2026). An analysis of state laws regarding first-time violations of protective orders for intimate partner violence. Criminal Justice Policy Review 37(2) 129\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08874034251414965","DOI":"10.1177\/08874034251414965"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee J. Kanaboshi N. Petlakh K. (2023). Domestic violence protection orders for teen dating violence: An analysis of state laws and practices. Trauma Violence & Abuse 24(4) 2789\u20132807. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248380221113782","DOI":"10.1177\/15248380221113782"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","unstructured":"Lewis K. (2015). The road to inequality is paved with good intentions: The effect of language in domestic violence statutes on male victims. UMKC Law Review 83(3) 789\u2013810. https:\/\/heinonline.org\/HOL\/P?h=hein.journals\/umkc83&i=807"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maiuro R. D. Eberle J. A. (2008). State standards for domestic violence perpetrator treatment: Current status trends and recommendations. Violence & Victims 23(2) 133\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1891\/0886-6708.23.2.133","DOI":"10.1891\/0886-6708.23.2.133"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","unstructured":"Manring T. (2021). Minding the gap in domestic violence legislation: Should states adopt course of conduct laws? The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973) 111(3) 773\u2013803. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/48617798"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","volume-title":"Domestic violence: A review of state legislation defining police and prosecution duties and powers","author":"Miller N.","year":"2004","unstructured":"Miller N. (2004). Domestic violence: A review of state legislation defining police and prosecution duties and powers. Institute for Law and Justice."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","volume-title":"Two decades of specialized domestic violence courts: A review of the literature","author":"Moore S.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Moore S. (2009). Two decades of specialized domestic violence courts: A review of the literature. Center for Court Innovation."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nolasco C. A. R. I. Vaughn M. S. del Carmen R. V. (2010). Toward a new methodology for legal research in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21(1) 1\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10511250903518944","DOI":"10.1080\/10511250903518944"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","unstructured":"Oregon Legislative Committee Services. (2012). Background brief on domestic violence. https:\/\/www.oregonlegislature.gov\/citizen_engagement\/Reports\/DomesticViolence.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Panza N. R. Deutsch E. Hamann K. (2020). Statutes governing juvenile competency to stand trial proceedings: An analysis of consistency with best practice recommendations. Psychology Public Policy and Law 26(3) 274\u2013285. https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/doi\/10.1037\/law0000237","DOI":"10.1037\/law0000237"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ralph B. Helps N. McGowan J. Fitz-Gibbon K. (2025). Understanding participant (dis)engagement from domestic violence perpetrator group programs: A review and qualitative synthesis. Trauma Violence & Abuse. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248380251381824","DOI":"10.1177\/15248380251381824"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richardson R. A. Rodriguez-Planas N. Hadd A. R. Wiederkehr K. Jamshed F. Clark C. J. Benmarhnia T. (2025). Does domestic violence legislation reduce permissive attitudes about intimate partner violence? Longitudinal evidence from men and women from 61 countries. BMJ Public Health 3(1) Article e001837. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmjph-2024-001837","DOI":"10.1136\/bmjph-2024-001837"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","unstructured":"Sadusky J. (2020). The criminal legal system response to domestic violence: Questions and debate. https:\/\/bwjp.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/CLS-Response-to-DV_FINAL_-Feb-2020.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","unstructured":"Second Chances Working Group. (2025). Second chances working group second look tracker. https:\/\/report-builder.politicopro.com\/report\/232a4c22-a416-4c9c-b5a4-a4b83de3558f#:~:text=AI%20Summary:%20The%20bill%20provides 2025%2D2026%20Regular%20Session"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","unstructured":"Smith S. G. Zhang X. Basile K. C. Merrick M. T. Wang J. Kresnow M. Chen J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief\u2014Updated release. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https:\/\/stacks.cdc.gov\/view\/cdc\/60893"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sullivan C. M. (2018). Understanding how domestic violence support services promote survivor well-being: A conceptual model. Journal of Family Violence 33(2) 123\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10896-017-9931-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s10896-017-9931-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walby S. Towers J. (2018). Untangling the concept of coercive control: Theorizing domestic violent crime. Criminology & Criminal Justice 18(1) 7\u201328. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1748895817743541","DOI":"10.1177\/1748895817743541"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zeoli A. M. Norris A. Brenner H. (2011). A summary and analysis of warrantless arrest statutes for domestic violence in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(14) 2811\u20132833. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260510390945","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260510390945"}],"container-title":["Journal of Interpersonal Violence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605261455844","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/08862605261455844","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605261455844","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,8]],"date-time":"2026-08-08T05:17:03Z","timestamp":1786166223000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/08862605261455844"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]},"references-count":36,"journal-issue":{"issue":"17-18","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/08862605261455844"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605261455844","relation":{},"ISSN":["0886-2605","1552-6518"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0886-2605","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-6518","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,1]]}}}