{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T18:58:31Z","timestamp":1785351511374,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":96,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785110400000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1785110400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001801","name":"The University of Western Australia","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","award":["Australian Government Research Training Program Sc"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["Australian Government Research Training Program Sc"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001801","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"crossref"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["J Interpers Violence"],"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Jurors in rape trials often rely on stereotypical expectations about how a \u201creal\u201d victim-survivor should behave. Drawing on the Story Model for juror decision-making, this study examined how mock jurors constructed narrative accounts of consent, credibility, and responsibility in an alcohol-related acquaintance rape case. A total of\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                    \u2009=\u2009250 jury-eligible Australian community members read a written trial transcript and provided verdicts accompanied by open-ended explanations of their reasoning. These responses were analysed using a hybrid reflexive thematic analysis, combining an initial inductive phase with a subsequent deductive phase informed by the Story Model. Six themes were developed that shaped juror reasoning: (1) Intoxication as consent threshold, (2) Empathy, blame, and moral intuition, (3) Constructing credibility, (4) Proving the (un)provable, (5) Competing scripts of how consent should be communicated, and (6) Behaviour of a \u201creal\u201d or \u201clegitimate\u201d victim-survivor. Across themes, jurors sought narrative coherence by drawing on socio-culturally available scripts to make sense of ambiguous evidence. Consent and intoxication functioned as central organising elements in these stories, with a persistent double standard whereby intoxication mitigated the defendant\u2019s responsibility while undermining the complainant\u2019s credibility. Although some participants received judicial directions emphasising that there is no \u201ctypical\u201d response to rape, such directions were rarely explicitly incorporated into jurors\u2019 narratives. From a Story Model perspective, this suggests that judicial directions may struggle to displace pre-existing schemas when they are not integrated into jurors\u2019 broader narrative sense-making. Overall, the findings highlight the resilience of rape myth-consistent narratives in juror reasoning and underscore the need for juror education and legal guidance that more directly engage with the narrative processes through which verdict decisions are constructed.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605261467507","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]],"date-time":"2026-07-27T12:16:16Z","timestamp":1785154576000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Making Sense of Consent: A Qualitative Analysis of Australian Mock Juror Decision-Making in a Rape Trial"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2935-3446","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michelle","family":"Wieberneit","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Hilde","family":"Tubex","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Lies","family":"Notebaert","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Joseph","family":"Clare","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albert D. A. Smilek D. (2023). Comparing attentional disengagement between Prolific and MTurk samples. Scientific Reports 13(1) 20574. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41598-023-46048-5","DOI":"10.1038\/s41598-023-46048-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","unstructured":"Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023a). Personal safety Australia. https:\/\/www.abs.gov.au\/statistics\/people\/crime-and-justice\/personal-safety-australia\/latest-release"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","unstructured":"Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2023b). Sexual violence. https:\/\/www.abs.gov.au\/statistics\/people\/crime-and-justice\/sexual-violence\/latest-release"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","unstructured":"Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. (2024 November 26). What are the effects of alcohol? Australian Government Department of Health Disability and Ageing. https:\/\/www.health.gov.au\/topics\/alcohol\/about-alcohol\/what-are-the-effects-of-alcohol"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","unstructured":"Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2025 July 30). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. https:\/\/www.aihw.gov.au\/family-domestic-and-sexual-violence\/population-groups\/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-people"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","unstructured":"Australian Law Reform Commission. (2025). Safe informed supported: Reforming justice responses to sexual violence (ALRC Report No. 143). https:\/\/www.alrc.gov.au\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/JRSV-Final-Report-Book-for-Web-final-20250211.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ballman A. D. Leheney E. K. Miller K. E. Simmons B. L. Wilson L. C. (2016). Bystander perceptions of same-gender versus mixed-gender rape: A pilot study. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma 25(10) 1079\u20131096. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10926771.2016.1228019","DOI":"10.1080\/10926771.2016.1228019"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bedera N. (2021). Moaning and eye contact: Men\u2019s use of ambiguous signals in attributions of consent to their partners. Violence Against Women 27(15\u201316) 3093\u20133113. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077801221992870","DOI":"10.1177\/1077801221992870"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Beres M. (2010). Sexual miscommunication? Untangling assumptions about sexual communication between casual sex partners. Culture Health & Sexuality 12(1) 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13691050903075226","DOI":"10.1080\/13691050903075226"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bieneck S. Krah\u00e9 B. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 26(9) 1785\u20131797. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260510372945","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260510372945"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","first-page":"17","volume-title":"Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking","author":"Bohner G.","year":"2009","unstructured":"Bohner G., Eyssel F., Pina A., Siebler F., Viki G. T. (2009). Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. In Horvath M. A. H., Brown J. M. (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 17\u201345). Willan Publishing."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bornstein B. H. Greene E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science\u202f: A Journal of the American Psychological Society 20(1) 63\u201367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721410397282","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721410397282"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braun V. Clarke V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology 9(1) 3\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/qup0000196","DOI":"10.1037\/qup0000196"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braun V. Clarke V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine 38(6 Suppl.) 608\u2013616. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/02692163241234800","DOI":"10.1177\/02692163241234800"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braun V. Clarke V. Hayfield N. Davey L. Jenkinson E. (2022). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Bager-Charleson S. McBeath A. (Eds.) Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods research (pp. 19\u201338). Springer International Publishing. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-031-13942-0_2","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-031-13942-0_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burt M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38(2) 217\u2013230. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.38.2.217","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.38.2.217"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Calhoun L. G. Cann A. Selby J. W. Magee D. L. (1981). Victim emotional response: Effects on social reaction to victims of rape. British Journal of Social Psychology 20(1) 17\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00468.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00468.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clay-Warner J. McMahon-Howard J. (2009). Rape reporting: \u201cClassic rape\u201d and the behavior of law. Violence and Victims 24(6) 723\u2013743. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1891\/0886-6708.24.6.723","DOI":"10.1891\/0886-6708.24.6.723"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","volume-title":"Criminal victimization in Canada, 2019","author":"Cotter A.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Cotter A. (2021). Criminal victimization in Canada, 2019 (General Social Survey (GSS) on Canadians\u2019 Safety (Victimization)). Statistics Canada."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","unstructured":"Cotter A. (2024). Criminal justice outcomes of sexual assault in Canada 2015 to 2019. Statistics Canada. https:\/\/www150.statcan.gc.ca\/n1\/pub\/85-002-x\/2024001\/article\/00007-eng.htm#r38"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","unstructured":"Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Consent Reforms) Act 2021 (2021)."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","unstructured":"Criminal Trial Courts Bench Book. (2024 June). Judicial Commission of New South Wales. https:\/\/jirs.judcom.nsw.gov.au\/public\/assets\/benchbooks\/criminal\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davies K. Spence R. Cummings E. Cross M. Horvath M. A. H. (2022). Understanding sexual violence and factors related to police outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology 13 Article 977318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.977318","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2022.977318"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davies M. Gilston J. Rogers P. (2012). Examining the relationship between male rape myth acceptance female rape myth acceptance victim blame homophobia gender roles and ambivalent sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27(14) 2807\u20132823. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260512438281","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260512438281"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis G. E. (2023). Reacting to non-prototypical victims: Blame empathy and willingness to label sexual assaults of men and sexual minority victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38(11\u201312) 7457\u20137484. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605221145709","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605221145709"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dinos S. Burrowes N. Hammond K. Cunliffe C. (2015). A systematic review of juries\u2019 assessment of rape victims: Do rape myths impact on juror decision-making? International Journal of Law Crime and Justice 43(1) 36\u201349. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ijlcj.2014.07.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Douglas B. D. Ewell P. J. Brauer M. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk Prolific CloudResearch Qualtrics and SONA. PLoS One 18(3) Article e0279720. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0279720","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0279720"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Eisenberg T. Hannaford-Agor P. L. Hans V. P. Waters N. L. Munsterman G. T. Schwab S. J. Wells M. T. (2005). Judge-jury agreement in criminal cases: A partial replication of Kalven and Zeisel\u2019s the American jury. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 2(1) 171\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1740-1461.2005.00035.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellison L. Munro V. E. (2008). Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors\u2019 assessments of complainant credibility. British Journal of Criminology 49(2) 202\u2013219. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/bjc\/azn077","DOI":"10.1093\/bjc\/azn077"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellison L. Munro V. E. (2009). Of \u201cnormal sex\u201d and \u201creal rape\u201d: Exploring the use of socio-sexual scripts in (mock) jury deliberation. Social & Legal Studies 18(3) 291\u2013312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0964663909339083","DOI":"10.1177\/0964663909339083"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellison L. Munro V. E. (2010). A stranger in the bushes or an elephant in the room? Critical reflections upon received rape myth wisdom in the context of a mock jury study. New Criminal Law Review 13(4) 781\u2013801. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/nclr.2010.13.4.781","DOI":"10.1525\/nclr.2010.13.4.781"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellison L. Munro V. E. (2013). Better the devil you know? \u201cReal rape\u201d stereotypes and the relevance of a previous relationship in (mock) juror deliberations. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof 17(4) 299\u2013322. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1350\/ijep.2013.17.4.433","DOI":"10.1350\/ijep.2013.17.4.433"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ellison L. Munro V. E. (2015). \u201cTelling tales\u201d: Exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room. Legal Studies (Society of Legal Scholars) 35(2) 201\u2013225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/lest.12051","DOI":"10.1111\/lest.12051"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_1","volume-title":"Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no","author":"Estrich S.","year":"1987","unstructured":"Estrich S. (1987). Real rape: How the legal system victimizes women who say no (1st ed.). Harvard University Press.","edition":"1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_1","volume-title":"Attrition of sexual assaults from the New South Wales criminal justice system","author":"Gilbert B.","year":"2025","unstructured":"Gilbert B. (2025). Attrition of sexual assaults from the New South Wales criminal justice system (Bureau Brief No. 170). NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grubb A. Turner E. (2012). Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior 17(5) 443\u2013452. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.avb.2012.06.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avb.2012.06.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hardy A. Young K. Holmes E. A. (2009). Does trauma memory play a role in the experience of reporting sexual assault during police interviews? An exploratory study. Memory (Hove) 17(8) 783\u2013788. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09658210903081835","DOI":"10.1080\/09658210903081835"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helm R. K. Growns B. (2022). Prevalence estimates as priors: Juror characteristics perceived base rates and verdicts in cases reliant on complainant and defendant testimony. Applied Cognitive Psychology 36(4) 891\u2013904. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.3978","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3978"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hockett J. M. Saucier D. A. Badke C. (2016). Rape myths rape scripts and common rape experiences of college women: Differences in perceptions of women who have been raped. Violence Against Women 22(3) 307\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1077801215599844","DOI":"10.1177\/1077801215599844"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hohl K. Conway M. A. (2017). Memory as evidence: How normal features of victim memory lead to the attrition of rape complaints. Criminology & Criminal Justice 17(3) 248\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1748895816668937","DOI":"10.1177\/1748895816668937"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hohl K. Stanko E. A. (2015). Complaints of rape and the criminal justice system: Fresh evidence on the attrition problem in England and Wales. European Journal of Criminology 12(3) 324\u2013341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1477370815571949","DOI":"10.1177\/1477370815571949"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_1","unstructured":"Home Office. (2025). Crime outcomes in England and Wales 2024 to 2025. UK Government. https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/statistics\/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2024-to-2025\/crime-outcomes-in-england-and-wales-2024-to-2025#further-information"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hudspith L. Wager N. Willmott D. Gallagher B. (2024). The impact of rape myth education on jury decision-making: A systematic review. Trauma Violence & Abuse 25(5) 4062\u20134077. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248380241270082","DOI":"10.1177\/15248380241270082"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozkowski K. N. Manning J. Hunt M. (2018). Sexual consent in and out of the bedroom: Disjunctive views of heterosexual college students. Women\u2019s Studies in Communication 41(2) 117\u2013139. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07491409.2018.1470121","DOI":"10.1080\/07491409.2018.1470121"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozkowski K. N. Marcantonio T. L. (2025). Navigating consent during alcohol-involved sex: A qualitative study examining alcohol consumption and the sexual consent communication process. The Journal of Sex Research 62(9) 1851\u20131865. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224499.2025.2473967","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2025.2473967"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozkowski K. N. Marcantonio T. L. Hunt M. E. (2017). College students\u2019 sexual consent communication and perceptions of sexual double standards: A qualitative investigation. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 49(4) 237\u2013244. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1363\/psrh.12041","DOI":"10.1363\/psrh.12041"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozkowski K. N. Peterson Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. The Journal of Sex Research 50(6) 517\u2013523. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224499.2012.700739","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2012.700739"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jozkowski K. N. Peterson Z. D. Sanders S. A. Dennis B. Reece M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students\u2019 conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research 51(8) 904\u2013916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224499.2013.792326","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2013.792326"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_1","volume-title":"The American jury","author":"Kalven H.","year":"1966","unstructured":"Kalven H., Zeisel H. (1966). The American jury. Little, Brown."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_1","volume-title":"Rape myths and jury decision making: An evidence review","author":"Leverick F.","year":"2025","unstructured":"Leverick F., Chalmers J., Keane E., Kinghan J. (2025). Rape myths and jury decision making: An evidence review [Documentation]. University of Glasgow."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levitt H. M. Bamberg M. Creswell J. W. Frost D. M. Josselson R. Su\u00e1rez-Orozco C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary qualitative meta-analytic and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. The American Psychologist 73(1) 26\u201346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/amp0000151","DOI":"10.1037\/amp0000151"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_1","first-page":"434","volume-title":"Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers","author":"Lewis J.","year":"2013","unstructured":"Lewis J., Ritchie J., Ormston R., Morrell G. (2013). Generalising from qualitative research. In Ritchie J., Ormston R., McNaughton Nicholls C., Lewis J. (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd ed., pp. 434\u2013456). Sage.","edition":"2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lynch K. R. Wasarhaley N. E. Golding J. M. Simcic T. (2013). Who bought the drinks? Juror perceptions of intoxication in a rape trial. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28(16) 3205\u20133222. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260513496900","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260513496900"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Martin E. van Golde C. Russell A. M. T. Monds L. A. (2025). Tipsy trashed or totalled? Lay understanding of dose-specific alcohol intoxication and the criminal justice system. Psychology Crime & Law 31(8) 962\u2013986. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/1068316X.2024.2323466","DOI":"10.1080\/1068316X.2024.2323466"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_1","unstructured":"McDonald E. (2020). Rape myths as barriers to fair trial process: Comparing adult rape trials with those in the Aotearoa Sexual Violence Court Pilot. Canterbury University Press. http:\/\/hdl.handle.net\/10092\/18594"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_1","unstructured":"McDonald E. (2022). In the absence of a jury: Examining judge-alone trials. Canterbury University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26021\/11869"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mcintosh S. Davis J. P. (2022). The \u201ccasting couch\u201d scenario: Impact of perceived employment benefit reporting delay complainant gender and participant gender on juror decision-making in rape cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37(9\u201310) NP6676\u2013NP6696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260520966679","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260520966679"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_59_1","unstructured":"Ministry of Justice. (2025). Progression of reported sexual assaults through the criminal justice system. https:\/\/www.justice.govt.nz\/assets\/Documents\/Publications\/Progression-of-reported-sexual-assaults-through-the-criminal-justice-system-2025.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_60_1","volume-title":"\u201cChuck her on a lie detector\u201d: Investigating Australians\u2019 mistrust in women\u2019s reports of sexual assault","author":"Minter K.","year":"2021","unstructured":"Minter K., Carlisle D. E., Coumarelos D. C. (2021). \u201cChuck her on a lie detector\u201d: Investigating Australians\u2019 mistrust in women\u2019s reports of sexual assault (No. 04\/2021). ANROWS."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_61_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Muehlenhard C. L. Humphreys T. P. Jozkowski K. N. Peterson Z. D. (2016). The complexities of sexual consent among college students: A conceptual and empirical review. The Journal of Sex Research 53(4\u20135) 457\u2013487. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224499.2016.1146651","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2016.1146651"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_62_1","unstructured":"New South Wales Law Reform Commission. (2020). Consent in relation to sexual offences. https:\/\/lawreform.nsw.gov.au\/documents\/Publications\/Reports\/Report%20148.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nitschke F. T. Masser B. M. McKimmie B. M. Riachi M. (2021). Intoxicated but not incapacitated: Are there effective methods to assist juries in interpreting evidence of voluntary complainant intoxication in cases of rape? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(9\u201310) 4335\u20134359. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0886260518790601","DOI":"10.1177\/0886260518790601"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nitschke F. T. McKimmie B. M. Vanman E. J. (2019). A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility? Psychological Bulletin 145(10) 953\u2013979. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bul0000206","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000206"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_65_1","unstructured":"Office for National Statistics. (2025). Nature of sexual assault by rape or penetration England and Wales: Year ending March 2025 (Crime Survey for England and Wales). https:\/\/www.ons.gov.uk\/peoplepopulationandcommunity\/crimeandjustice\/articles\/natureofsexualassaultbyrapeorpenetrationenglandandwales\/yearendingmarch2025#reporting-to-the-police"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Hara S. (2012). Monsters playboys virgins and whores: Rape myths in the news media\u2019s coverage of sexual violence. Language and Literature 21(3) 247\u2013259. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963947012444217","DOI":"10.1177\/0963947012444217"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Parratt K. A. Pina A. (2017). From \u201creal rape\u201d to real justice: A systematic review of police officers\u2019 rape myth beliefs. Aggression and Violent Behavior 34 68\u201383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.avb.2017.03.005","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avb.2017.03.005"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pazos L. A. Cash D. K. Quinlivan D. S. Russell T. D. (2024). Perceptions of sexual consent: The role of situational factors and participant gender among college students. Sex Roles 91(1) 7. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-024-01549-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-024-01549-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peer E. Rothschild D. Gordon A. Evernden Z. Damer E. (2022). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods 54(4) 1643\u20131662. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-021-01694-3","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-021-01694-3"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_70_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennington N. Hastie R. (1986). Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(2) 242\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.51.2.242","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.51.2.242"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_71_1","first-page":"519","article-title":"A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The Story Model","volume":"13","author":"Pennington N.","year":"1991","unstructured":"Pennington N., Hastie R. (1991). A cognitive theory of juror decision making: The Story Model. Cardozo Law Review, 13, 519.","journal-title":"Cardozo Law Review"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_72_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pennington N. Hastie R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62(2) 189\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.62.2.189","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.62.2.189"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_73_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quilter J. McNamara L. (2018). The meaning of \u201cintoxication\u201d in Australian criminal cases: Origins and operation. New Criminal Law Review 21(1) 170\u2013207. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/nclr.2018.21.1.170","DOI":"10.1525\/nclr.2018.21.1.170"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_74_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Quilter J. McNamara L. (2023). Complainant intoxication evidence and proof of non-consent in Australian rape trials: Insights from Appellate Court decisions 1 (1st ed. Vol. 1 pp. 173\u2013188). Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781003379331-13","DOI":"10.4324\/9781003379331-13"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_75_1","unstructured":"Quilter J. McNamara L. Seear K. Room R. (2016). Criminal law and the effects of alcohol and other drugs: A national study of the significance of \u201cintoxication\u201d in Australian legislation. University of New South Wales Law Journal 39(3) 913\u2013949. https:\/\/doi.org\/10779\/uow.27778053"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_76_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richardson D. Campbell J. L. (1982). Alcohol and rape: The effect of alcohol on attributions of blame for rape. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 8(3) 468\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167282083013","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167282083013"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_77_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Richardson E. Jenkins L. Willmott D. (2025). Rape myths jury deliberations and conversation analysis: Examining conversational practices used to undermine rape complaints within (mock) jury deliberations. Journal of Criminal Justice 99 Article 102461. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2025.102461","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2025.102461"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_78_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rinehart J. K. Nason E. E. Yeater E. A. Ross R. Vitek K. (2023). Alcohol use rape myth acceptance rape empathy and sexual assault history influence the believability of a hypothetical victim\u2019s report of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38(23\u201324) 12046\u201312066. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605231190345","DOI":"10.1177\/08862605231190345"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_79_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ropp J. W. Lee J. G. King L. L. Bostaph L. M. G. (2024). A prosecutor\u2019s \u201cideal\u201d sexual assault case: A mixed-method approach to understanding sexual assault case processing. Criminology (Beverly Hills) 62(4) 704\u2013738. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1745-9125.12386","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9125.12386"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_80_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rubenzer S. (2011). Judging intoxication. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 29(1) 116\u2013137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.935","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.935"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_81_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ryan K. M. (2011). The relationship between rape myths and sexual scripts: The social construction of rape. Sex Roles 65(11\u201312) 774\u2013782. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11199-011-0033-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s11199-011-0033-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_82_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schuller R. A. McKimmie B. M. Masser B. M. Klippenstine M. A. (2010). Judgments of sexual assault: The impact of complainant emotional demeanor gender and victim stereotypes. New Criminal Law Review 13(4) 759\u2013780. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/nclr.2010.13.4.759","DOI":"10.1525\/nclr.2010.13.4.759"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_83_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shumlich E. J. Fisher W. A. (2020). An exploration of factors that influence enactment of affirmative consent behaviors. The Journal of Sex Research 57(9) 1108\u20131121. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00224499.2020.1761937","DOI":"10.1080\/00224499.2020.1761937"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_84_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sims C. M. Noel N. E. Maisto S. A. (2007). Rape blame as a function of alcohol presence and resistance type. Addictive Behaviors 32(12) 2766\u20132775. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.addbeh.2007.04.013","DOI":"10.1016\/j.addbeh.2007.04.013"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_85_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spohn C. Tellis K. (2019). Sexual assault case outcomes: Disentangling the overlapping decisions of police and prosecutors. Justice Quarterly 36(3) 383\u2013411. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2018.1429645","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2018.1429645"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_86_1","volume-title":"Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude","author":"Temkin J.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Temkin J., Krah\u00e9 B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.","edition":"1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_87_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Thompson L. E. Pozzulo J. (2024). How length of and reason for delayed reporting influence mock-jurors\u2019 judgments in a sexual assault trial. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 40(2) 386\u2013397. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11896-024-09664-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s11896-024-09664-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_88_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tinsley Y. Baylis C. Young W. (2021). \u201cI think she\u2019s learnt her lesson\u201d: Juror use of cultural misconceptions in sexual violence trials. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 52(2) 463\u2013485. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.26686\/vuwlr.v52i2.7128","DOI":"10.26686\/vuwlr.v52i2.7128"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_89_1","first-page":"1","article-title":"Juror understanding of judicial instructions in criminal trials","volume":"119","author":"Trimboli L.","year":"2008","unstructured":"Trimboli L. (2008). Juror understanding of judicial instructions in criminal trials. NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 119, 1\u201315.","journal-title":"NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_90_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van der Bruggen M. Grubb A. (2014). A review of the literature relating to rape victim blaming: An analysis of the impact of observer and victim characteristics on attribution of blame in rape cases. Aggression and Violent Behavior 19(5) 523\u2013531. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.avb.2014.07.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.avb.2014.07.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_91_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walters J. Nguyen L. Liu Y. Ijurco S. M. Evans S. Chacos N. Duran M. Smith C. (2025). Justice without bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions aimed at reducing jury bias in Rape and sexual assault trials. Journal of Criminal Justice 100 Article 102491. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2025.102491","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2025.102491"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_92_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Waterhouse G. F. Reynolds A. Egan V. (2016). Myths and legends: The reality of rape offences reported to a UK police force. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 8(1) 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ejpal.2015.04.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ejpal.2015.04.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_93_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Widanaralalage B. K. Hine B. A. Murphy A. D. Murji K. (2022). \u201cI didn\u2019t feel I was a victim\u201d: A phenomenological analysis of the experiences of male-on-male survivors of rape and sexual abuse. Victims & Offenders 17(8) 1147\u20131172. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15564886.2022.2069898","DOI":"10.1080\/15564886.2022.2069898"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_94_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wieberneit M. Notebaert L. Clare J. Tubex H. (2026). Inoculation in the courtroom: The effect of judicial direction timing on mock juror decisions in a rape trial. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 44(2) 332\u2013347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.70041","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.70041"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_95_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wieberneit M. Thal S. Clare J. Notebaert L. Tubex H. (2024). Silenced survivors: A systematic review of the barriers to reporting investigating prosecuting and sentencing of adult female rape and sexual assault. Trauma Violence & Abuse 25(5) 3742\u20133757. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/15248380241261404","DOI":"10.1177\/15248380241261404"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_96_1","volume-title":"An examination of the relationship between juror attitudes, psychological constructs, and verdict decisions within rape trials","author":"Willmott D.","year":"2018","unstructured":"Willmott D. (2018). An examination of the relationship between juror attitudes, psychological constructs, and verdict decisions within rape trials [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Huddersfield."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_97_1","unstructured":"World Health Organization. (2021). Violence against women prevalence estimates 2018: Global regional and national prevalence estimates for intimate partner violence against women and global and regional prevalence estimates for non-partner sexual violence against women. https:\/\/www.who.int\/publications-detail-redirect\/9789240022256"}],"container-title":["Journal of Interpersonal Violence"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605261467507","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/08862605261467507","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/08862605261467507","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,29]],"date-time":"2026-07-29T18:03:16Z","timestamp":1785348196000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/08862605261467507"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]]},"references-count":96,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/08862605261467507"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/08862605261467507","relation":{},"ISSN":["0886-2605","1552-6518"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0886-2605","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-6518","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,27]]},"article-number":"08862605261467507"}}