{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T05:29:13Z","timestamp":1786426153804,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":45,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]],"date-time":"2026-07-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1784419200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Proc Inst Mech Eng H"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) implants have been proposed as an alternative to titanium (Ti) implants because of their aesthetic and mechanical properties. This in silico study compared the elastic strain distribution of Y-TZP and Ti dental implants under axial and oblique loads using a previously validated finite element model. Two finite element models, with identical geometry, boundary conditions, loading configuration, prosthetic crown, abutment, and screws, and differing only in implant body material, were constructed for biomechanical evaluation. Each model was subjected to a 300\u2009N load applied axially and at 30\u00b0, and equivalent, maximum principal, and minimum principal elastic strains were evaluated in the peri-implant bone, implant body, and abutment screw. Under axial loading, peri-implant bone strain patterns were similar between Ti and Y-TZP, with peak equivalent elastic strain values of approximately 5\u2009millistrain. Under oblique loading, the Y-TZP implant showed lower equivalent elastic strain in the implant body than Ti, with values of approximately 1.3 and 3.0\u2009millistrain, respectively. The abutment screw also showed smaller regions of elevated strain in the Y-TZP model. Within the assumptions of this static linear elastic model, implant material stiffness influenced component-level elastic strain distribution, particularly under oblique loading. These numerical findings should not be interpreted as evidence of improved clinical performance, reduced bone resorption, or superior long-term stability. Further studies should include cyclic loading, fracture and fatigue analyses, interface stability, and patient-specific bone conditions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/09544119261467474","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,20]],"date-time":"2026-07-20T04:41:39Z","timestamp":1784522499000},"page":"782-794","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Biomechanical comparison between Y-TZP and titanium dental implants using finite element analysis"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"240","author":[{"given":"Melody","family":"Chase-Diaz","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2716-4262","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bruno","family":"Agostinho Hernandez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Simulation in Bioengineering, Biomechanics and Biomaterials (CS3B), Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering of Bauru, S\u00e3o Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Pedro Rodrigues","family":"Minim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Victor","family":"Mosquim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Carlos Eduardo Edwards","family":"Rezende","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics, Positivo University, Curitiba, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Jos\u00e9 Henrique","family":"Rubo","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Edson Antonio","family":"Capello Sousa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Centre for Simulation in Bioengineering, Biomechanics and Biomaterials (CS3B), Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering of Bauru, S\u00e3o Paulo State University (UNESP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ana Fl\u00e1via","family":"Sanches Borges","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of S\u00e3o Paulo (USP), Bauru, Brazil"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Montero J. A review of the major prosthetic factors influencing the prognosis of implant prosthodontics. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/jcm10040816","DOI":"10.3390\/jcm10040816"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Oud V Van Der Veken D Van Kerckhoven K et al. The effect of bone quality and bone mineral density on dental implant failures \u2013 a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019; 30: 311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/clr.267_13509","DOI":"10.1111\/clr.267_13509"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bourauel C Aitlahrach M Heinemann F et al. Biomechanical finite element analysis of small diameter and short dental implants: extensive study of commercial implants. Biomed Tech Eng 2012; 57: 21\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/bmt-2011-0047","DOI":"10.1515\/bmt-2011-0047"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_2","first-page":"6","article-title":"Two-dimensional fem analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution","volume":"16","author":"Matsushita Y","year":"1990","unstructured":"Matsushita Y, Kitoh M, Mizuta K, et al. Two-dimensional fem analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990; 16: 6\u201311.","journal-title":"J Oral Implantol"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zupancic Cepic L Frank M Reisinger A et al. Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported 3-unit fixed cad\/cam prostheses in the posterior mandible. Int J Implant Dent 2022; 8: 8. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40729-022-00404-8","DOI":"10.1186\/s40729-022-00404-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Geng JP Tan KB Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585\u2013598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1067\/MPR.2001.115251","DOI":"10.1067\/mpr.2001.115251"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pirmoradian M Naeeni HA Firouzbakht M et al. Finite element analysis and experimental evaluation on stress distribution and sensitivity of dental implants to assess optimum length and thread pitch. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020; 187: 105258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cmpb.2019.105258","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2019.105258"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Qiu P Cao R Li Z et al. A comprehensive biomechanical evaluation of length and diameter of dental implants using finite element analyses: A systematic review. Heliyon 2024; 10: e26876. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e26876","DOI":"10.1016\/j.heliyon.2024.e26876"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang W Ke J Qian G et al. Fabrication of highly bioactive zirconia ceramics via grain-boundary activation for dental implants. J Am Ceram Soc 2022; 105: 5069\u20135081. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/JACE.18476","DOI":"10.1111\/jace.18476"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"He Q Qin Y Zhan X et al. Physicochemical and biological properties of y-tzp ceramics modified by infiltration with different bioactive glasses for dental implant. Ceram Int 2023; 49: 29187\u201329197. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.CERAMINT.2023.06.200","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ceramint.2023.06.200"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahimi S SharifianJazi F Esmaeilkhanian A et al. Effect of SiO2 content on Y-TZP\/Al2O3 ceramic-nanocomposite properties as potential dental applications. Ceram Int 2020; 46: 10910\u201310916. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.CERAMINT.2020.01.105","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ceramint.2020.01.105"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dnery I Kelly J. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 299\u2013307. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.dental.2007.05.007","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2007.05.007"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Depprich R Zipprich H Ommerborn M et al. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo study. Head Face Med 2008; 4: 30. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/1746-160X-4-30","DOI":"10.1186\/1746-160X-4-30"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_2","first-page":"691","article-title":"The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits","volume":"23","author":"Hoffmann O","year":"2008","unstructured":"Hoffmann O, Angelov N, Gallez F, et al. The zirconia implant-bone interface: a preliminary histologic evaluation in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 691\u2013695.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Andreiotelli M Wenz HJ Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20Suppl 4: 32\u201347. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01785.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kohal RJ Wolkewitz M Hinze M et al. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 333\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01656.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2008.01656.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rocchietta I Fontana F Addis A et al. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 844\u2013850. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01727.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2009.01727.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahlert M Burtscher D Grunert I et al. Failure analysis of fractured dental zirconia implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 287\u2013293. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02206.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2011.02206.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Banko\u011flu G\u00fcng\u00f6r M Ayd\u0131n C Y\u0131lmaz H et al. An overview of zirconia dental implants: basic properties and clinical application of three cases. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40: 485\u2013494. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-12-00109","DOI":"10.1563\/AAID-JOI-D-12-00109"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-94-009-0741-6_14"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Azevedo-Silva LJ Ferrairo BM Pires LA et al. Novel 8%-TiO2-nanoparticle-reinforced dense polycrystalline bovine hydroxyapatite bioceramic. Int J Ceram Eng Sci 2022; 4: 158\u2013169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/CES2.10127","DOI":"10.1002\/ces2.10127"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_2","first-page":"189","article-title":"Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants","volume":"15","author":"Kohal RJ","year":"2002","unstructured":"Kohal RJ, Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, et al. Three-dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 189\u2013194.","journal-title":"Int J Prosthodont"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"dos Santos C Coutinho I Amarante J et al. Mechanical properties of ceramic composites based on ZrO2 co-stabilized by Y2O3\u2013CeO2 reinforced with Al2O3 platelets for dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021; 116: 104372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/J.JMBBM.2021.104372","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2021.104372"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_2","article-title":"Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis","volume":"27","author":"Chang CL","year":"2012","unstructured":"Chang CL, Chen CS, Yeung TC, et al. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: e49\u2013e57.","journal-title":"Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fuh LJ Hsu JT Huang HL et al. Biomechanical investigation of thread designs and interface conditions of zirconia and titanium dental implants with bone: three-dimensional numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: e64\u2013e71. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11607\/jomi.2131","DOI":"10.11607\/jomi.2131"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cardelli PL Vertucci V Balestra F et al. Mechanical evaluation and fem analysis of stress in fixed partial dentures zirconium-ceramic. Oral Implantol 2013; 6: 55\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.11138\/orl\/2013.6.3.055","DOI":"10.11138\/orl\/2013.6.3.055"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anami LC Lima JM Corazza PH et al. Finite element analysis of the influence of geometry and design of zirconia crowns on stress distribution. J Prosthodont 2015; 24: 146\u2013151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopr.12175","DOI":"10.1111\/jopr.12175"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_2","first-page":"447","article-title":"[Effect of zirconia abutment angulation on stress distribution in the abutment and the bone around implant: a finite element study]","volume":"24","author":"Yang YZ","year":"2015","unstructured":"Yang YZ, Tian XH, Zhou YM. [Effect of zirconia abutment angulation on stress distribution in the abutment and the bone around implant: a finite element study]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2015; 24: 447\u2013450.","journal-title":"Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lopez CAV Vasco MAA Ruales E et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in zirconia and titanium dental implants. J Oral Implantol 2018; 44: 409\u2013415. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-16-00109","DOI":"10.1563\/aaid-joi-D-16-00109"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sharanraj V Ramesha CM Kumar V et al. Finite element analysis of zirconia ceramic biomaterials used in medical dental implants. Interceram - International Ceramic Review 2019; 68: 24\u201331. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42411-019-0004-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s42411-019-0004-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Talmazov G Veilleux N Abdulmajeed A et al. Finite element analysis of a one-piece zirconia implant in anterior single tooth implant applications. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0229360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0229360","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0229360"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gahlert M Gudehus T Eichhorn S et al. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 662\u2013668. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2007.01401.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Guven S Beydemir K Dundar S et al. Evaluation of stress distributions in peri-implant and periodontal bone tissues in 3- and 5-unit tooth and implant-supported fixed zirconia restorations by finite elements analysis. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 329\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4103\/1305-7456.163223","DOI":"10.4103\/1305-7456.163223"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hernandez BA Freitas JP Capello Sousa EA. Fatigue life estimation of dental implants using a combination of the finite element method and traditional fatigue criteria. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 2023; 237: 975\u2013984. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09544119231186097","DOI":"10.1177\/09544119231186097"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Acharya PH Patel VV Duseja SS et al. Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: a 3d finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont 2021; 13: 79\u201388. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4047\/jap.2021.13.2.79","DOI":"10.4047\/jap.2021.13.2.79"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ak\u00e7a K Uysal S Cehreli M. Implant\u2013tooth-supported fixed partial prostheses: correlations between in vivo occlusal bite forces and marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17(3): 331\u2013336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01169.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1600-0501.2005.01169.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/01.id.0000165030.59555.2c"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sertg\u00f6z A G\u00fcvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76(2): 165\u2013169. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0022-3913(96)90301-7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0022-3913(96)90301-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Tonin BSH Fu J He Y et al. The effect of abutment material stiffness on the mechanical behavior of dental implant assemblies: a 3d finite element study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023; 142: 105847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2023.105847","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2023.105847"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_2","volume-title":"Craig\u2019s restorative dental materials","author":"Powers JM","year":"2012","unstructured":"Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL. Craig\u2019s restorative dental materials. 13r ed. Elsevier, 2012.","edition":"13"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garc\u00eda-de-Albeniz N Jim\u00e9nez-Piqu\u00e9 E Roa JJ et al. A review of surface topographical modification strategies of 3y-tzp: effect in the physicochemical properties microstructure mechanical reliability and biological response. J Eur Ceram Soc 2023; 43(8): 2977\u20133004. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.043","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.02.043"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mao Q Su K Zhou Y et al. Voxel-based micro-finite element analysis of dental implants in a human cadaveric mandible: tissue modulus assignment and sensitivity analyses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2019; 94: 229\u2013237. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2019.03.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmbbm.2019.03.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Park S Park J Kang I et al. Effects of assessing the bone remodeling process in biomechanical finite element stability evaluations of dental implants. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2022; 221: 106852. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cmpb.2022.106852","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cmpb.2022.106852"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Prados-Privado M Mart\u00ednez-Mart\u00ednez C Gehrke SA et al. Influence of bone definition and finite element parameters in bone and dental implants stress: a literature review. Biology 2020; 9(8): 224. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/biology9080224","DOI":"10.3390\/biology9080224"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Watanabe F Hata Y Komatsu S et al. Finite element analysis of the influence of implant inclination loading position and load direction on stress distribution. Odontology 2003; 91(1): 31\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10266-003-0029-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10266-003-0029-7"}],"container-title":["Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09544119261467474","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/09544119261467474","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09544119261467474","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,11]],"date-time":"2026-08-11T04:56:02Z","timestamp":1786424162000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/09544119261467474"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]},"references-count":45,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/09544119261467474"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09544119261467474","relation":{},"ISSN":["0954-4119","2041-3033"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0954-4119","type":"print"},{"value":"2041-3033","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,19]]}}}