{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T20:02:41Z","timestamp":1777924961253,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":33,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"2","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705881600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1705881600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001659","name":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["FI 1567\/6-1 TAO (The active observer)"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["FI 1567\/6-1 TAO (The active observer)"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001659","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"name":"International Research Training Group","award":["IRTG 1901 \"The Brain in Action\""],"award-info":[{"award-number":["IRTG 1901 \"The Brain in Action\""]}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Psychol Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    To estimate object properties such as mass or friction, our brain relies on visual information to efficiently compute approximations. The role of sensorimotor feedback, however, is not well understood. Here we tested healthy adults (\n                    <jats:italic>N<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 79) in an inclined-plane problem, that is, how much a plane can be tilted before an object starts to slide, and contrasted the interaction group with observation groups who accessed involved forces by watching objects being manipulated. We created objects of different masses and levels of friction and asked participants to estimate the critical tilt angle after pushing an object, lifting it, or both. Estimates correlated with applied forces and were biased toward object mass, with higher estimates for heavier objects. Our findings highlight that inferences about physical object properties are tightly linked to the human sensorimotor system and that humans integrate sensorimotor information even at the risk of nonveridical perceptual estimates.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976231221789","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]],"date-time":"2024-01-22T14:40:40Z","timestamp":1705934440000},"page":"191-201","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The (Un)ideal Physicist: How Humans Rely on Object Interaction for Friction Estimates"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"35","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-7981-0943","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Harun","family":"Karimpur","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen"},{"name":"Center for Mind, Brain, and Behavior, University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-9969-3112","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christian","family":"Wolf","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Experimental Psychology, University of Munster"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Katja","family":"Fiehler","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Experimental Psychology, Justus Liebig University Giessen"},{"name":"Center for Mind, Brain, and Behavior, University of Marburg and Justus Liebig University Giessen"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Adolph K. E. Joh A. S. Eppler M. A. (2010). Infants\u2019 perception of affordances of slopes under high- and low-friction conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36(4) 797\u2013811. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0017450","DOI":"10.1037\/a0017450"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","first-page":"1","volume-title":"Handbook of social cognition","author":"Bargh J. A.","year":"1994","unstructured":"Bargh J. A. (1994). The four horseman of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency and control in social cognition. In Wyers R., Srull T. (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1\u201340). Lawrence Erlbaum."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Battaglia P. W. Hamrick J. B. Tenenbaum J. B. (2013). Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110(45) 18327\u201318332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1306572110","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1306572110"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Benjamini Y. Hochberg Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57(1) 289\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bramley N. R. Gerstenberg T. Tenenbaum J. B. Gureckis T. M. (2018). Intuitive experimentation in the physical world. Cognitive Psychology 195 9\u201338. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2018.05.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2018.05.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","first-page":"133","article-title":"Intuitive cognitive algebra of sliding friction","volume":"12","author":"Corneli E.","year":"2007","unstructured":"Corneli E., Vicovaro M. (2007). Intuitive cognitive algebra of sliding friction. Teorie & Modelli, 12, 133\u2013142.","journal-title":"Teorie & Modelli"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Davis E. Marcus G. (2016). The scope and limits of simulation in automated reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 233 60\u201372. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.artint.2015.12.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.artint.2015.12.003"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fiehler K. Karimpur H. (2023). Spatial coding for action across spatial scales. Nature Reviews Psychology 2(2) 72\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s44159-022-00140-1","DOI":"10.1038\/s44159-022-00140-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freud E. Macdonald S. N. Chen J. Quinlan D. J. Goodale M. A. (2018). Getting a grip on reality: Grasping movements directed to real objects and images rely on dissociable neural representations. Cortex 98 34\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cortex.2017.02.020","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cortex.2017.02.020"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Grierson L. E. M. Carnahan H. (2006). Manual exploration and the perception of slipperiness. Perception and Psychophysics 68(7) 1070\u20131081. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03193710","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03193710"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","unstructured":"jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (1.2). https:\/\/www.jamovi.org"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joh A. S. Adolph K. E. Narayanan P. J. Dietz V. A. (2007). Gauging possibilities for action based on friction underfoot. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(5) 1145\u20131157. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-1523.33.5.1145","DOI":"10.1037\/0096-1523.33.5.1145"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johansson R. S. Westling G. (1984). Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Experimental Brain Research 56(3) 550\u2013564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF00237997","DOI":"10.1007\/BF00237997"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kopiske K. Koska D. Baumann T. Maiwald C. Einh\u00e4user W. (2021). Icy road ahead\u2013rapid adjustments of gaze-gait interactions during perturbed naturalistic walking. Journal of Vision 21(8) Article 11. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/mabn4","DOI":"10.1167\/jov.21.8.11"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kubricht J. R. Holyoak K. J. Lu H. (2017). Intuitive physics: Current research and controversies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(10) 749\u2013759. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2017.06.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2017.06.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lakens D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology 4 Article 863. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00863","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00863"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lederman S. J. Klatzky R. L. (1987). Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition. Cognitive Psychology 19(3) 342\u2013368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/0010-0285(87)90008-9","DOI":"10.1016\/0010-0285(87)90008-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ludwin-Peery E. Bramley N. R. Davis E. Gureckis T. M. (2021). Limits on simulation approaches in intuitive physics. Cognitive Psychology 127 1\u201332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2021.101396","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cogpsych.2021.101396"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Matthis J. S. Yates J. L. Hayhoe M. M. (2018). Gaze and the control of foot placement when walking in natural terrain. Current Biology 28(8) 1224\u20131233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cub.2018.03.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cub.2018.03.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McCloskey M. (1983). Intuitive physics. Scientific American 248(4) 122\u2013130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/scientificamerican0483-122","DOI":"10.1038\/scientificamerican0483-122"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McIntyre J. Zago M. Berthoz A. Lacquaniti F. (2001). Does the brain model Newton\u2019s laws? Nature 4(7) 693\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1097\/00001756-200112040-00004","DOI":"10.1038\/89477"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neup\u00e4rtl N. Tatai F. Rothkopf C. A. (2020). Intuitive physical reasoning about objects\u2019 masses transfers to a visuomotor decision task consistent with Newtonian physics. PLOS Computational Biology 16(10) 1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1007730","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1007730"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Paulun V. C. Gegenfurtner K. R. Goodale M. A. Fleming R. W. (2016). Effects of material properties and object orientation on precision grip kinematics. Experimental Brain Research 234(8) 2253\u20132265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00221-016-4631-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-016-4631-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peirce J. Gray J. R. Simpson S. MacAskill M. H\u00f6chenberger R. Sogo H. Kastman E. Lindel\u00f8v J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods 51(1) 195\u2013203. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-018-01193-y","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-018-01193-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Proffitt D. R. Gilden D. L. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15(2) 384\u2013393. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0096-1523.15.2.384","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0096-1523.15.2.384"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sanborn A. N. Mansinghka V. K. Griffiths T. L. (2013). Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. Psychological Review 120(2) 411\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0031912","DOI":"10.1037\/a0031912"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schwarz C. (2016). The slip hypothesis: Tactile perception and its neuronal bases. Trends in Neurosciences 39(7) 449\u2013462. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tins.2016.04.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tins.2016.04.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Smith A. M. Scott S. H. (1996). Subjective scaling of smooth surface friction. Journal of Neurophysiology 75(5) 1957\u20131962. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1152\/jn.1996.75.5.1957","DOI":"10.1152\/jn.1996.75.5.1957"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Snow J. C. Pettypiece C. E. McAdam T. D. McLean A. D. Stroman P. W. Goodale M. A. Culham J. C. (2011). Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. Scientific Reports 1 1\u201310. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/srep00130","DOI":"10.1038\/srep00130"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"\u2019t Hart B. M. Einh\u00e4user W. (2012). Mind the step: Complementary effects of an implicit task on eye and head movements in real-life gaze allocation. Experimental Brain Research 223(2) 233\u2013249. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00221-012-3254-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s00221-012-3254-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ullman T. D. Spelke E. Battaglia P. Tenenbaum J. B. (2017). Mind games: Game engines as an architecture for intuitive physics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 21(9) 649\u2013665. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.tics.2017.05.012","DOI":"10.1016\/j.tics.2017.05.012"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vicovaro M. (2021). Intuitive physics and cognitive algebra: A review. European Review of Applied Psychology 71(5). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.erap.2020.100610","DOI":"10.1016\/j.erap.2020.100610"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA 310(20) 2191\u20132194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/jama.2013.281053","DOI":"10.1001\/jama.2013.281053"}],"container-title":["Psychological Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976231221789","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/09567976231221789","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976231221789","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T21:38:18Z","timestamp":1777671498000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/09567976231221789"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]},"references-count":33,"journal-issue":{"issue":"2","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2024,2]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/09567976231221789"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09567976231221789","relation":{},"ISSN":["0956-7976","1467-9280"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0956-7976","type":"print"},{"value":"1467-9280","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2024,1,22]]}}}