{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,24]],"date-time":"2026-08-24T14:00:13Z","timestamp":1787580013984,"version":"build-2736575974"},"reference-count":35,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1771459200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100001665","name":"agence nationale de la recherche","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100001665","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100002661","name":"fonds de la recherche scientifique - fnrs","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100002661","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Psychol Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Conspiracy mentality is conceptualized as a continuum. Research on this topic has focused on unwarranted conspiracy claims and the upper end of the conspiracy-mentality continuum\u2014people seeing conspiracies everywhere. This focus neglects warranted conspiracy claims and the lower end of the continuum. To better understand conspiracy mentality, we aimed to clarify both ends of the continuum using signal detection theory. We examined how people evaluate warranted and unwarranted conspiracy claims across levels of conspiracy mentality in two studies with 331 French-speaking adult participants from France, Switzerland, and Belgium (Study 1) and 576 English-speaking adult participants from the United States and the United Kingdom (Study 2), both groups recruited via Prolific. Compared with participants high in conspiracy mentality, those low in conspiracy mentality not only believed less in conspiracies but also underestimated their prevalence. However, participants low in conspiracy mentality were more accurate at distinguishing warranted from unwarranted conspiracy claims. These results provide a better understanding of conspiracy mentality and its relationship with the perceived truthfulness of conspiracies.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976261417245","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]],"date-time":"2026-02-19T16:22:36Z","timestamp":1771518156000},"page":"155-165","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["To Believe or Not to Believe in Conspiracy Claims? That Is a Question for Signal Detection Theory"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"37","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0006-9478-5647","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Maude","family":"Tagand","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Grenoble Alpes, Universit\u00e9 Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP\/PC2S, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9544-5317","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Dominique","family":"Muller","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Grenoble Alpes, Universit\u00e9 Savoie Mont Blanc, LIP\/PC2S, France"},{"name":"Institut Universitaire de France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-6830-8851","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"C\u00e9cile","family":"Nurra","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Grenoble Alpes, LaRAC, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2737-8049","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Olivier","family":"Klein","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Universit\u00e9 libre de Bruxelles, Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4470-1856","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Benjamin","family":"Aubert-Teillaud","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Universit\u00e9 Paris Cit\u00e9, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale, France"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-8518-386X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Kenzo","family":"Nera","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Center for Social and Cultural Psychology, Universit\u00e9 libre de Bruxelles, Belgium"},{"name":"Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (FRS-FNRS), Belgium"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bates D. M\u00e4chler M. Bolker B. Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1) 1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v067.i01","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v067.i01"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"B\u00e9na J. Rihet M. Carreras O. Terrier P. (2023). Repetition could increase the perceived truth of conspiracy theories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 30(6) 2397\u20132406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13423-023-02276-4","DOI":"10.3758\/s13423-023-02276-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bierwiaczonek K. Gundersen A. B. Kunst J. R. (2022). The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology 46 Article 101346. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101346","DOI":"10.1016\/j.copsyc.2022.101346"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brotherton R. French C. C. Pickering A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology 4 Article 279. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00279","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00279"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bruder M. Haffke P. Neave N. Nouripanah N. Imhoff R. (2013). Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology 4 Article 225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00225","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2013.00225"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Caldwell A. R. (2022). Exploring equivalence testing with the updated TOSTER R Package. PsyArXiv. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/ty8de","DOI":"10.31234\/osf.io\/ty8de"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Constantin J. Grundmann T. (2020). Epistemic authority: Preemption through source sensitive defeat. Synthese 197(9) 4109\u20134130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11229-018-01923-x","DOI":"10.1007\/s11229-018-01923-x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Curran P. J. Hussong A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods 14(2) 81\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0015914","DOI":"10.1037\/a0015914"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeCarlo L. T. (1998). Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods 3(2) 186\u2013205. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1082-989X.3.2.186","DOI":"10.1037\/1082-989X.3.2.186"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"DeCarlo L. T. (2010). On the statistical and theoretical basis of signal detection theory and extensions: Unequal variance random coefficient and mixture models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 54(3) 304\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jmp.2010.01.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jmp.2010.01.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"de Leeuw J. R. Gilbert R. A. Luchterhandt B. (2023). jsPsych: Enabling an open-source collaborative ecosystem of behavioral experiments. Journal of Open Source Software 8(85) Article 5351. https:\/\/joss.theoj.org\/papers\/10.21105\/joss.05351","DOI":"10.21105\/joss.05351"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franks B. Bangerter A. Bauer M. W. Hall M. Noort M. C. (2017). Beyond \u201cmonologicality\u201d? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Article 861. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2017.00861","DOI":"10.3389\/fpsyg.2017.00861"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frenken M. Reusch A. Imhoff R. (2024). \u201cJust because it\u2019s a conspiracy theory doesn\u2019t mean they\u2019re not out to get you\u201d: Differentiating the correlates of judgments of plausible versus implausible conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 16(6) 684\u2013696. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/19485506241240506","DOI":"10.1177\/19485506241240506"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","volume-title":"Signal detection theory and psychophysics","author":"Green D. M.","year":"1966","unstructured":"Green D. M., Swets J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harambam J. Aupers S. (2016). \u2018I am not a conspiracy theorist\u2019: Relational identifications in the Dutch conspiracy milieu. Cultural Sociology 11(1) 113\u2013129. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1749975516661959","DOI":"10.1177\/1749975516661959"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hattersley M. Brown G. D. Michael J. Ludvig E. A. (2022). Of tinfoil hats and thinking caps: Reasoning is more strongly related to implausible than plausible conspiracy beliefs. Cognition 218 Article 104956. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2021.104956","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cognition.2021.104956"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Imhoff R. Bertlich T. (2024). Are conspiracy beliefs a sign of flawed cognition? Reexamining the association of cognitive style and skills with conspiracy beliefs. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.37016\/mr-2020-168","DOI":"10.37016\/mr-2020-168"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Imhoff R. Bruder M. (2014). Speaking (un\u2013)truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality 28(1) 25\u201343. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/per.1930","DOI":"10.1002\/per.1930"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jolley D. Mari S. Douglas K. M. (2020). Consequences of conspiracy theories. In Butter M. Knight P. (Eds.) Routledge Handbook of Conspiracy Theories (1st ed. pp. 231\u2013241). Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429452734-2_7","DOI":"10.4324\/9780429452734-2_7"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Judd C. M. Westfall J. Kenny D. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103(1) 54\u201369. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0028347","DOI":"10.1037\/a0028347"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lakens D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests correlations and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science 8(4) 355\u2013362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550617697177","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550617697177"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lantian A. Bagneux V. Delouv\u00e9e S. Gauvrit N. (2021). Maybe a free thinker but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35(3) 674\u2013684. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.3790","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3790"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lantian A. Muller D. Nurra C. Douglas K. M. (2016). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: Validation of a French and English single-item scale. International Review of Social Psychology 29(1) 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5334\/irsp.8","DOI":"10.5334\/irsp.8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/004839319502500101"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.0) [Computer software]. http:\/\/www.R-project.org"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spiller S. A. Fitzsimons G. J. Lynch J. G. McClelland G. H. (2013). Spotlights floodlights and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research 50(2) 277\u2013288. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1509\/jmr.12.0420","DOI":"10.1509\/jmr.12.0420"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stanislaw H. Todorov N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 31(1) 137\u2013149. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/BF03207704","DOI":"10.3758\/BF03207704"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sutton R. M. Douglas K. M. (2014). Examining the monological nature of conspiracy theories. In van Prooijen J.-W. van Lange P. A. M. (Eds.) Power politics and paranoia: Why people are suspicious of their leaders (pp. 254\u2013273). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/CBO9781139565417","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139565417.018"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swami V. Chamorro-Premuzic T. Furnham A. (2010). Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9\/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24(6) 749\u2013761. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.1583","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.1583"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Swami V. Coles R. Stieger S. Pietschnig J. Furnham A. Rehim S. Voracek M. (2011). Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories. British Journal of Psychology 102(3) 443\u2013463. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.2044-8295.2010.02004.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Prooijen J.-W. van Vugt M. (2018). Conspiracy theories: Evolved functions and psychological mechanisms. Perspectives on Psychological Science 13(6) 770\u2013788. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691618774270","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691618774270"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wagner-Egger P. De Oliveira Fernandes D. Carrel J. Delouv\u00e9e S. (2023). Do real and invented scandals fuel beliefs in conspiracy theories? European Journal of Psychology Open 82(1) 1\u20137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1024\/2673-8627\/a000034","DOI":"10.1024\/2673-8627\/a000034"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wood M. J. Douglas K. M. Sutton R. M. (2012). Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(6) 767\u2013773. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1948550611434786","DOI":"10.1177\/1948550611434786"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yelbuz B. E. Madan E. Alper S. (2022). Reflective thinking predicts lower conspiracy beliefs: A meta-analysis. Judgment and Decision Making 17(4) 720\u2013744. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1930297500008913","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500008913"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yzerbyt V. Y. Muller D. Judd C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers\u2019 approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(3) 424\u2013431. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2003.10.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2003.10.001"}],"container-title":["Psychological Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976261417245","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/09567976261417245","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976261417245","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,22]],"date-time":"2026-08-22T10:27:30Z","timestamp":1787394450000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/09567976261417245"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]]},"references-count":35,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/09567976261417245"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09567976261417245","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v4\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v3\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v3\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v4\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v1\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261417245\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0956-7976","1467-9280"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0956-7976","type":"print"},{"value":"1467-9280","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,2,19]]}}}