{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T10:48:30Z","timestamp":1789469310422,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":57,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"9","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787616000000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1787616000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"funder":[{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100009047","name":"strategic research council","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","award":["358271"],"award-info":[{"award-number":["358271"]}],"id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100009047","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]},{"DOI":"10.13039\/501100008557","name":"turun suomalainen yliopistoseura","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","id":[{"id":"10.13039\/501100008557","id-type":"DOI","asserted-by":"publisher"}]}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Psychol Sci"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>\n                    Evaluating sources is an essential skill in our misinformation-riddled media environment. However, previous studies suggest that people tend not to engage with source information during reading, and very little research exists on how source credibility and readers\u2019 beliefs interact on social media. We examined how source credibility and prior beliefs affect reading social-media posts. Finnish university students (\n                    <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">N<\/jats:italic>\n                    = 83) first filled out a questionnaire measuring beliefs on eight controversial topics and then read 76 mock-up tweets on these topics while their eye movements were recorded. The sources of the tweets were pretested to be either credible or noncredible sources for the topic. Eye-movement results indicate that when credible sources say something belief-inconsistent, or if noncredible sources something belief-consistent, reading of the tweet is slower, and more attention is paid to the sources. Findings suggest that these \u201csource-belief\u201d inconsistencies disrupt reading and elicit deeper processing of source information.\n                  <\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/09567976261467299","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]],"date-time":"2026-08-25T17:04:36Z","timestamp":1787677476000},"page":"633-644","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The WHO Said What? Interaction of Source Credibility and Readers\u2019 Prior Beliefs in the Reading of Social-Media Posts"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"37","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0003-1607-8136","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Oskari J.","family":"Virtanen","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Johanna K.","family":"Kaakinen","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology and Speech-Language Pathology, University of Turku"},{"name":"INVEST Research Flagship and Research Center, University of Turku"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_3_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abendroth J. Richter T. (2023). Reading perspectives moderate text-belief consistency effects in eye movements and comprehension. Discourse Processes 60(2) 119\u2013140. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2023.2172300","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2023.2172300"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anmarkrud \u00d8. Br\u00e5ten I. Florit E. Mason L. (2022). The role of individual differences in sourcing: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review 34(2) Article 2. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-021-09640-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-021-09640-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Arslan R. C. Walther M. P. Tata C. S. (2020). formr: A study framework allowing for automated feedback generation and complex longitudinal experience-sampling studies using R. Behavior Research Methods 52(1) 376\u2013387. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-019-01236-y","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-019-01236-y"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barr D. J. Levy R. Scheepers C. Tily H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68(3) 255\u2013278. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jml.2012.11.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jml.2012.11.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barzilai S. Tzadok E. Eshet-Alkalai Y. (2015). Sourcing while reading divergent expert accounts: Pathways from views of knowing to written argumentation. Instructional Science 43(6) 737\u2013766. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-015-9359-4","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-015-9359-4"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bates D. M\u00e4chler M. Bolker B. Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1) 1\u201348. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v067.i01","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v067.i01"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braasch J. L. G. Br\u00e5ten I. (2017). The Discrepancy-Induced Source Comprehension (D-ISC) model: Basic assumptions and preliminary evidence. Educational Psychologist 52(3) 167\u2013181. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00461520.2017.1323219","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2017.1323219"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braasch J. L. G. Kessler E. D. (2021). Working toward a theoretical model for source comprehension in everyday discourse. Discourse Processes 58(5\u20136) Article 5\u20136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2021.1905393","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2021.1905393"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braasch J. L. G. McCabe R. M. Daniel F. (2016). Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources. Reading and Writing 29(8) 1571\u20131598. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11145-015-9609-5","DOI":"10.1007\/s11145-015-9609-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Braasch J. L. G. Rouet J.-F. Vibert N. Britt M. A. (2012). Readers\u2019 use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition 40(3) 450\u2013465. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-011-0160-6","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-011-0160-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brante E. W. Str\u00f8ms\u00f8 H. I. (2018). Sourcing in text comprehension: A review of interventions targeting sourcing skills. Educational Psychology Review 30(3) 773\u2013799. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-017-9421-7","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-017-9421-7"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Br\u00e5ten I. Salmer\u00f3n L. Str\u00f8ms\u00f8 H. I. (2016). Who said that? Investigating the Plausibility-Induced Source Focusing assumption with Norwegian undergraduate readers. Contemporary Educational Psychology 46 253\u2013262. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2016.07.004","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cedpsych.2016.07.004"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Br\u00e5ten I. Stadtler M. Salmer\u00f3n L. (2017). The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. In Schober M. F. Rapp D. N. Britt A. M. (Eds.) The Routledge handbook of discourse processes (2nd ed. pp. 141\u2013166). Routledge. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9781315687384","DOI":"10.4324\/9781315687384-10"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bri\u00f1ol P. Petty R. E. (2009). Source factors in persuasion: A self-validation approach. European Review of Social Psychology 20(1) 49\u201396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10463280802643640","DOI":"10.1080\/10463280802643640"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown V. A. (2021). An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(1) 1\u201319. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245920960351","DOI":"10.1177\/2515245920960351"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chan M. S. Jones C. R. Hall Jamieson K. Albarrac\u00edn D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science 28(11) 1531\u20131546. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0956797617714579","DOI":"10.1177\/0956797617714579"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Clark J. K. Wegener D. T. Habashi M. M. Evans A. T. (2012). Source expertise and persuasion: The effects of perceived opposition or support on message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(1) 90\u2013100. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0146167211420733","DOI":"10.1177\/0146167211420733"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cho H. Cannon J. Lopez R. Li W. (2024). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society 26(2) 941\u2013960. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/14614448211068530","DOI":"10.1177\/14614448211068530"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_20_1","unstructured":"Christensen R. (2023). ordinal\u2014Regression models for ordinal data (Version 2023.12-4) [Computer software]. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=ordinal"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Edwards K. Smith E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71(1) 5\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0022-3514.71.1.5","DOI":"10.1037\/0022-3514.71.1.5"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Foy J. E. LoCasto P. C. Briner S. W. Dyar S. (2017). \u201cWould a madman have been so wise as this?\u201d The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation. Memory & Cognition 45(2) 281\u2013295. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-016-0656-1","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-016-0656-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_23_1","unstructured":"Goode K. Rey K. (2022). ggResidpanel: Panels and interactive versions of diagnostic plots using \u2018ggplot2\u2019 (Version 0.3.0.9000) [Computer software]. https:\/\/goodekat.github.io\/ggResidpanel\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hahn U. Harris A. J. L. Corner A. (2009). Argument content and argument source: An exploration. Informal Logic 29(4) 337\u2013367. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22329\/il.v29i4.2903","DOI":"10.22329\/il.v29i4.2903"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_25_1","unstructured":"Hartig F. (2022). DHARMa: Residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level\/mixed) regression models (Version 0.4.6) [Computer software]. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=DHARMa"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_26_1","volume-title":"Communication and persuasion","author":"Hovland C. I.","year":"1953","unstructured":"Hovland C. I., Janis I. L., Kelley H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_3_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hy\u00f6n\u00e4 J. Lorch R. F. Rinck M. (2003). Eye movement measures to study global text processing. In Hy\u00f6n\u00e4 J. Radach R. Deubel H. (Eds.) The mind\u2019s eye (pp. 313\u2013334). Elsevier. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/B978-044451020-4\/50018-9","DOI":"10.1016\/B978-044451020-4\/50018-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hy\u00f6n\u00e4 J. Nurminen A. (2006). Do adult readers know how they read? Evidence from eye movement patterns and verbal reports. British Journal of Psychology 97(1) 31\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1348\/000712605X53678","DOI":"10.1348\/000712605X53678"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Joyner L. Buchanan T. Yetkili O. (2023). Moral leniency towards belief-consistent disinformation may help explain its spread on social media. PLOS ONE 18(3) Article e0281777. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0281777","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pone.0281777"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_30_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kammerer Y. Kalbfell E. Gerjets P. (2016). Is this information source commercially biased? How contradictions between web pages stimulate the consideration of source information. Discourse Processes 53(5\u20136) 430\u2013456. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2016.1169968","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2016.1169968"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim S. M. Hannafin M. J. (2016). Synergies: Effects of source representation and goal instructions on evidence quality reasoning and conceptual integration during argumentation-driven inquiry. Instructional Science 44(5) 441\u2013476. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11251-016-9381-1","DOI":"10.1007\/s11251-016-9381-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kumle L. V\u00f5 M. L.-H. Draschkow D. (2021). Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R. Behavior Research Methods 53(6) 2528\u20132543. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-021-01546-0","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-021-01546-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_33_1","unstructured":"Lenth R. V. Bolker B. Buerkner P. Gin\u00e9-V\u00e1zquez I. Herve M. Jung M. Love J. Miguez F. Riebl H. Singmann H. (2024). emmeans: Estimated marginal means aka least-squares means (Version 1.10.0) [Computer software]. https:\/\/CRAN.R-project.org\/package=emmeans"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Madsen J. K. Hahn U. Pilditch T. D. (2020). The impact of partial source dependence on belief and reliability revision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 46(9) 1795\u20131805. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/xlm0000846","DOI":"10.1037\/xlm0000846"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maier J. Richter T. (2013). Text belief consistency effects in the comprehension of multiple texts with conflicting information. Cognition and Instruction 31(2) 151\u2013175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07370008.2013.769997","DOI":"10.1080\/07370008.2013.769997"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Maier J. Richter T. Britt M. A. (2018). Cognitive processes underlying the text-belief consistency effect: An eye-movement study. Applied Cognitive Psychology 32(2) 171\u2013185. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/acp.3391","DOI":"10.1002\/acp.3391"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nicklin C. Plonsky L. (2020). Outliers in L2 research in applied linguistics: A synthesis and data re-analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 40 26\u201355. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0267190520000057","DOI":"10.1017\/S0267190520000057"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petty R. E. Cacioppo J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In Petty R. E. Cacioppo J. T. (Eds.) Communication and persuasion (pp. 1\u201324). Springer New York. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-1-4612-4964-1_1","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-4964-1_1"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pornpitakpan C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades\u2019 evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34(2) 243\u2013281. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rahal R.-M. Fiedler S. (2019). Understanding cognitive and affective mechanisms in social psychology through eye-tracking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 85 Article 103842. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jesp.2019.103842","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jesp.2019.103842"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_41_1","unstructured":"R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.2) [Computer software]. https:\/\/www.R-project.org\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Roozenbeek J. Maertens R. Herzog S. M. Geers M. Kurvers R. Sultan M. Van Der Linden S. (2022). Susceptibility to misinformation is consistent across question framings and response modes and better explained by myside bias and partisanship than analytical thinking. Judgment and Decision Making 17(3) 547\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S1930297500003570","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500003570"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rouet J.-F. Le Bigot L. de Pereyra G. Britt M. A. (2016). Whose story is this? Discrepancy triggers readers\u2019 attention to source information in short narratives. Reading and Writing 29(8) 1549\u20131570. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11145-016-9625-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s11145-016-9625-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_44_1","unstructured":"RStudio Team. (2024). RStudio: Integrated development for R [Computer software]. http:\/\/www.rstudio.com\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salmer\u00f3n L. Gil L. Br\u00e5ten I. (2018). Using eye-tracking to assess sourcing during multiple document reading: A critical analysis. Frontline Learning Research 6(3) 105\u2013122. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14786\/flr.v6i3.368","DOI":"10.14786\/flr.v6i3.368"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saux G. Ros C. Britt M. A. Stadtler M. Burin D. I. Rouet J.-F. (2018). Readers\u2019 selective recall of source features as a function of claim discrepancy and task demands. Discourse Processes 55(5\u20136) 525\u2013544. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2018.1463722","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2018.1463722"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saux G. Vibert N. Dampur\u00e9 J. Burin D. I. Britt M. A. Rouet J.-F. (2021). From simple agents to information sources: Readers\u2019 differential processing of story characters as a function of story consistency. Acta Psychologica 212 Article 103191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.actpsy.2020.103191","DOI":"10.1016\/j.actpsy.2020.103191"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sinatra G. M. Lombardi D. (2020). Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist 55(3) 120\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00461520.2020.1730181","DOI":"10.1080\/00461520.2020.1730181"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sparks J. R. Rapp D. N. (2011). Readers\u2019 reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 37(1) 230\u2013247. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0021331","DOI":"10.1037\/a0021331"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_50_1","unstructured":"SR Research Ltd. (2016). EyeLink Portable Duo [Apparatus]. https:\/\/www.sr-research.com\/eyelink-portable-duo\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_51_1","unstructured":"SR Research Ltd. (2023a). Experiment Builder (Version 2.4.1) [Computer software]. https:\/\/www.sr-research.com\/experiment-builder\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_52_1","unstructured":"SR Research Ltd. (2023b). EyeLink Data Viewer (Version 4.3.210) [Computer software]. https:\/\/www.sr-research.com\/data-viewer\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"van Strien J. L. H. Kammerer Y. Brand-Gruwel S. Boshuizen H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior 60 245\u2013252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.chb.2016.02.057","DOI":"10.1016\/j.chb.2016.02.057"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vosoughi S. Roy D. Aral S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380) 1146\u20131151. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1126\/science.aap9559","DOI":"10.1126\/science.aap9559"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wertgen A. G. Richter T. (2020). Source credibility modulates the validation of implausible information. Memory & Cognition 48(8) 1359\u20131375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13421-020-01067-9","DOI":"10.3758\/s13421-020-01067-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wertgen A. G. Richter T. (2023). Source credibility and plausibility are considered in the validation of textual information: Evidence from a social media context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 35(2) 183\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/20445911.2022.2149757","DOI":"10.1080\/20445911.2022.2149757"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wertgen A. G. Richter T. Rouet J.-F. (2021). The role of source credibility in the validation of information depends on the degree of (im-)plausibility. Discourse Processes 58(5\u20136) 513\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0163853X.2021.1881342","DOI":"10.1080\/0163853X.2021.1881342"},{"key":"e_1_3_3_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wickham H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. https:\/\/ggplot2.tidyverse.org","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-24277-4_9"}],"container-title":["Psychological Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976261467299","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/09567976261467299","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09567976261467299","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,15]],"date-time":"2026-09-15T10:01:38Z","timestamp":1789466498000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/09567976261467299"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]},"references-count":57,"journal-issue":{"issue":"9","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/09567976261467299"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09567976261467299","relation":{"has-review":[{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v2\/review3","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v2\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v2\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v2\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v1\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v3\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v1\/review2","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v1\/review1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v3\/response1","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v1\/review3","asserted-by":"object"},{"id-type":"doi","id":"10.1177\/09567976261467299\/v2\/decision1","asserted-by":"object"}]},"ISSN":["0956-7976","1467-9280"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0956-7976","type":"print"},{"value":"1467-9280","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,25]]}}}