{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T17:08:15Z","timestamp":1790874495972,"version":"4.1.0"},"reference-count":64,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790553600000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1790553600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Public Underst Sci"],"abstract":"<jats:p>Artificial intelligence operates in a social context and affects everyone. Organizing science communication and engagement activities on the topic for all groups in society is therefore recommendable. However, research shows that mainly higher educated, already engaged citizens participate in science communication activities. To address this gap, our study collected insights from underrepresented citizens in the Netherlands regarding their views on and participation in science communication activities related to artificial intelligence. Using semi-structured interviews (n = 19), we qualitatively explored reasons for (non)participation. Participants knew more about AI than they initially reported, and worldviews were evoked in expressing both concerns and curiosity about AI. AI was deemed relevant but news about the topic was avoided due to a lack of trust. Non participation in engagement or communication activity was driven by both practical and social barriers. Following participants\u2019 advice, we suggest a personal approach could help to make these activities more inviting.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/09636625261486785","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]],"date-time":"2026-09-28T11:15:23Z","timestamp":1790594123000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["\u2018Not for me\u2019: Reasons for (non)participation in science communication activities on Artificial Intelligence in the Netherlands"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1699-5087","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Anne M.","family":"Dijkstra","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Communication Science, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0009-0002-4171-5291","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Pien","family":"Spanjaard","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Marketing and Communication, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_4_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baum SD (2017) On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence. AI & Society 32(4): 543\u2013551. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-016-0677-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-016-0677-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_3_1","volume-title":"Analysis in Qualitative Research","author":"Boeije H","year":"2010","unstructured":"Boeije H (2010) Analysis in Qualitative Research. Sage."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Boik JC (2020) Science-driven societal transformation part I: Worldview. Sustainability 12(17): 1\u201328. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3390\/su12176881","DOI":"10.3390\/su12176881"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bostrom N Yudkowsky E (2014) The ethics of artificial intelligence. In: Frankish K Ramsey WM (eds) The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press pp.316\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/cbo9781139046855.020","DOI":"10.1017\/CBO9781139046855.020"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brosius HB Weimann G (1996) Who sets the agenda: Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research 23(5): 561\u2013580. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/009365096023005002","DOI":"10.1177\/009365096023005002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_7_1","first-page":"31","volume-title":"Science Communication","author":"Bultitude K","year":"2011","unstructured":"Bultitude K (2011) The why and how of science communication. In: Rosulek P (ed.) Science Communication. European Commission, pp.31\u201358."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Burns TW O\u2019Connor DJ Stocklmayer SM (2003) Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science 12(2): 183\u2013202. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09636625030122004","DOI":"10.1177\/09636625030122004"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Canfield K Menezes S Matsuda SB et al. (2020) Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion equity and intersectionality. Frontiers in Communication 5: 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fcomm.2020.00002","DOI":"10.3389\/fcomm.2020.00002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Carbonell J S\u00e1nchez- Esguevillas A Carro B (2016) The role of metaphors in the development of technologies. The case of the artificial intelligence. Futures 84: 145\u2013153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.futures.2016.03.019","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2016.03.019"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cave S Coughlan K Dihal K (2019) \u201cScary robots\u201d examining public responses to AI. In: AIES\u201919: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI\/ACM conference on ai ethics and society Honolulu HI 27\u201328 January 2019. ACM. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3306618.3314232","DOI":"10.1145\/3306618.3314232"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_12_1","unstructured":"Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (2023). CBS Statline. Available at: https:\/\/opendata.cbs.nl\/statline\/ (accessed April 2023)."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Coeckelbergh M (2020) Artificial intelligence responsibility attribution and a relational justification of explainability. Science and Engineering Ethics 26(4): 2051\u20132068. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11948-019-00146-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11948-019-00146-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cologna V Mede NG Berger S et al. (2025) Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries. Nature Human Behaviour 9: 713\u2013730. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-024-02090-5","DOI":"10.31219\/osf.io\/6ay7s"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dawson E (2014) Reframing social exclusion from science communication: Moving away from \u2018barriers\u2019 towards a more complex perspective. Journal of Science Communication 13(2): 1\u20135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22323\/2.13020302","DOI":"10.22323\/2.13020302"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dawson E (2018) Reimagining publics and (non) participation: Exploring exclusion from science communication through the experiences of low-income minority ethnic groups. Public Understanding of Science 27(7): 772\u2013786. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662517750072","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662517750072"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_17_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dick S (2019) Artificial intelligence. Harvard Data Science Review 1(1): 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/99608f92.92fe150c","DOI":"10.1162\/99608f92.92fe150c"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_18_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.22323\/2.16010203"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dijkstra AM Critchley CR (2014) Nanotechnology in Dutch science caf\u00e9s: Public risk perceptions contextualised. Public Understanding of Science. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963662514528080","DOI":"10.1177\/0963662514528080"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_20_1","volume-title":"Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor","author":"Eubanks V","year":"2018","unstructured":"Eubanks V (2018) Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin\u2019s Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_21_1","volume-title":"Automation and Job Transformation in Canada: Who\u2019s at Risk?","author":"Frenette M","year":"2020","unstructured":"Frenette M, Frank K (2020) Automation and Job Transformation in Canada: Who\u2019s at Risk?. Statistics Canada \/ Statistique Canada."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gudowsky N (2021) Limits and benefits of participatory agenda setting for research and innovation. European Journal of Futures Research 9(1): 1\u201311. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s40309-021-00177-0","DOI":"10.1186\/s40309-021-00177-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gupta A Treviranus J (2022) Inclusively designed artificial intelligence. In: Schaffers H Vartiainen M Bus J (eds) Digital Innovation and the Future of Work. River Publishers pp.89\u2013110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1201\/9781003337928","DOI":"10.1201\/9781003337928-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_24_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hansen SL Hilbrich I (2021) Exclusion engagement and empathy: Revisiting public discourse from a communication perspective. Social Epistemology 36(1): 1\u20138. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/02691728.2021.2004622","DOI":"10.1080\/02691728.2021.2004622"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hick A Ziefle M (2022) A qualitative approach to the public perception of AI. International Journal on Cybernetics & Informatics (IJCI) 11(11): 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5121\/ijci.2022.110401","DOI":"10.5121\/ijci.2022.110401"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_26_1","unstructured":"High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (HLEGAI) (2018) A Definition of AI: Main Capabilities and Disciplines. Available at: https:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/futurium\/en\/system\/files\/ged\/ai_hleg_definition_of_ai_18_december_1.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Himmelreich J Lim D (2022) AI and structural injustice: Foundations for equity values and responsibility. In: Bullock JB Chen Y Himmelreich J et al (eds) The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press pp. 210\u2013231. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780197579329.013.13","DOI":"10.1093\/oxfordhb\/9780197579329.013.13"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_28_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu S Li Z Zhang JZ et al. (2018) Engaging scientists in science communication: The effect of social proof and meaning. Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 1044\u20131051. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.09.210","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jclepro.2017.09.210"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_29_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Humm C Schr\u00f6gel P Le\u00dfm\u00f6llmann A (2020) Feeling left out: Underserved audiences in science communication. Media and Communication 8(1): 164\u2013176. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.17645\/mac.v8i1.2480","DOI":"10.17645\/mac.v8i1.2480"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_30_1","first-page":"27","volume-title":"Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology","author":"Jasanoff S","year":"2005","unstructured":"Jasanoff S (2005) The \u201cscience wars\u201d and American politics. In: Dierkes M, von Grote C (eds) Between Understanding and Trust: The Public, Science and Technology. Routledge, pp.27\u201340."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson DG Verdicchio M (2017) Reframing AI discourse. Minds and Machines 27(4): 575\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11023-017-9417-6","DOI":"10.1007\/s11023-017-9417-6"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelley PG Yang Y Heldreth C et al. (2021) Exciting useful worrying futuristic: Public perception of artificial intelligence in 8 countries. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI\/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society New York 19\u201321 May 2021 pp.627\u2013637 Association for Computing Machinery. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1145\/3461702.3462605","DOI":"10.1145\/3461702.3462605"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kokolakis S (2017) Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon. Computers & Security 64: 122\u2013134. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cose.2015.07.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cose.2015.07.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Liu HY (2018) The power structure of artificial intelligence. Law Innovation and Technology 10(2): 197\u2013229. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/17579961.2018.1527480","DOI":"10.1080\/17579961.2018.1527480"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_35_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lyles W Swearingen WS (2019) Who cares? Arnstein\u2019s ladder the emotional paradox of public engagement and (re) imagining planning as caring. Journal of the American Planning Association 85(3): 287\u2013300. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/01944363.2019.1612268","DOI":"10.1080\/01944363.2019.1612268"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McIntosh MJ Morse JM (2015) Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research 2: 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2333393615597674","DOI":"10.1177\/2333393615597674"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"McKinnon M Vos J (2015) Engagement as a threshold concept for science education and science communication. International Journal of Science Education Part B 5(4): 297\u2013318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/21548455.2014.986770","DOI":"10.1080\/21548455.2014.986770"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Makridakis S (2017) The forthcoming artificial intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures 90: 46\u201360. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.futures.2017.03.006","DOI":"10.1016\/j.futures.2017.03.006"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_39_1","unstructured":"Manheim K Kaplan L (2019) Artificial intelligence: Risks to privacy and democracy. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 21(1): 106\u2013188. Available at: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3273016"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Massarani L Merzagora M (2014) Socially inclusive science communication. JCOM: Journal of Science Communication 13(2): 1\u20132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.22323\/2.13020301","DOI":"10.22323\/2.13020301"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_41_1","unstructured":"Modhvadia R Sippy T Field RO et al. (2025) How Do People Feel about AI? Wave Two of a Nationally Representative Survey of UK Attitudes to AI Designed through a Lens of Equity and Inclusion. Ada Lovelace Institute and The Alan Turing Institute. Available at: https:\/\/attitudestoai.uk\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mohamed S Png MT Isaac W (2020) Decolonial AI: Decolonial theory as sociotechnical foresight in artificial intelligence. Philosophy & Technology 33(4): 659\u2013684. Available at: https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13347-020-00405-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s13347-020-00405-8"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_43_1","unstructured":"Nadikattu RR (2016) The emerging role of artificial intelligence in modern society. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 4(4): 906\u2013911. Available at: https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3652429"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nishii LH (2013) The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal 56(6): 1754\u20131774. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5465\/amj.2009.0823","DOI":"10.5465\/amj.2009.0823"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_45_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"O\u2019Connor C Joffe H (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1609406919899220. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1609406919899220","DOI":"10.1177\/1609406919899220"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Petersen BK Chowhan J Cooke GB et al. (2022) Automation and the future of work: An intersectional study of the role of human capital income gender and visible minority status. Economic and Industrial Democracy 44(3): 703\u2013727. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0143831X221088301","DOI":"10.1177\/0143831X221088301"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Powell MC Colin M (2008) Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology: What would it really take? Science Communication 30(1): 126\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1075547008320520","DOI":"10.1177\/1075547008320520"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Powell MC Colin M (2009) Participatory paradoxes: Facilitating citizen engagement in science and technology from the top-down? Bulletin of Science Technology & Society 29(4): 325\u2013342. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0270467609336308","DOI":"10.1177\/0270467609336308"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_49_1","unstructured":"Roche C Lewis D Wall PJ (2021) Artificial intelligence ethics: An inclusive global discourse? In: Masiero S Nielsen P (eds) Proceedings of the 1st Virtual Conference on Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development 2021 pp.643\u2013658. Ifip Working Group 9.4. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2108.09959"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Romero-Rodriguez LM Civila S Aguaded I (2021) Otherness as a form of intersubjective social exclusion: Conceptual discussion from the current communicative scenario. Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society 19(1): 20\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1108\/JICES-11-2019-0130","DOI":"10.1108\/JICES-11-2019-0130"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scheufele DA Krause NM (2019) Science audiences misinformation and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(16): 7662\u20137669. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1805871115","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1805871115"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_52_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schippers B (2020) Artificial intelligence and democratic politics. Political Insight 11(1): 32\u201335. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2041905820911746","DOI":"10.1177\/2041905820911746"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Selwyn N Cordoba BG (2022) Australian public understandings of artificial intelligence. AI & Society 37(4): 1645\u20131662. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-021-01268-z","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-021-01268-z"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_54_1","volume-title":"Vertrouwen in De Wetenschap","author":"Slief J","year":"2025","unstructured":"Slief J, Demirel B, Huffnagel-Bastiaans I, et al. (2025) Vertrouwen in De Wetenschap. Enquete 2025. Rathenau Instituut."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_55_1","unstructured":"The Ada Lovelace Institute; The Alan Turing Institute (2023) How do people feel about AI? A nationally representative survey of public attitudes to artificial intelligence in Britain. Available at: https:\/\/attitudestoai.uk\/"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_56_1","unstructured":"Tucker C (2018) Privacy algorithms and artificial intelligence. In: Agrawal A Gans J Goldfarb A (eds) The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press pp.423\u2013437. Available at: http:\/\/www.nber.org\/chapters\/c14011"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_57_1","unstructured":"Van der Burg S Van den Ende J (2024) Een maatschappelijke onderzoeksagenda voor AI Wat moet volgens de Nederlandse bevolking de focus zijn in toekomstig onderzoek naar AI? Waag Futurelab | Nederlandse AI Coalitie. https:\/\/waag.org\/sites\/waag\/files\/2024-04\/Eindrapport-Een-maatschappelijke-onderzoeksagenda-voor-AI.pdf"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_58_1","volume-title":"Signalen Voor De Toekomst \u2013 Hoe Digitale Ontwikkelingen Menselijke Interactie Veranderen En Wat Dit Betekent Voor I&v-diensten","author":"Wals F","year":"2025","unstructured":"Wals F, Karstens B, Hijstek B, et al. (2025) Signalen Voor De Toekomst \u2013 Hoe Digitale Ontwikkelingen Menselijke Interactie Veranderen En Wat Dit Betekent Voor I&v-diensten. Rathenau Institute."},{"key":"e_1_3_4_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang P (2019) On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 10(2): 1\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2478\/jagi-2019-0002","DOI":"10.2478\/jagi-2019-0002"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wang W Siau K (2019) Artificial intelligence machine learning automation robotics future of work and future of humanity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Database Management 30(1): 61\u201379. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4018\/JDM.201901010","DOI":"10.4018\/JDM.2019010104"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_61_1","unstructured":"West SM Whittaker M Crawford K (2019) Discriminating Systems: Gender Race and Power in Artificial Intelligence. AI Now Institute. Available at: https:\/\/ainowinstitute.org\/publication\/discriminating-systems-gender-race-and-power-in-ai-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780190203986.001.0001"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_63_1","unstructured":"Yarlagadda RT (2018) Internet of things & artificial intelligence in modern society. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 6(2): 374\u2013381. Available at: https:\/\/ssrn.com\/abstract=3798869"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yigitcanlar T Degirmenci K Inkinen T (2022) Drivers behind the public perception of artificial intelligence: Insights from major Australian cities. AI & Society 39: 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s00146-022-01566-0","DOI":"10.1007\/s00146-022-01566-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_4_65_1","unstructured":"Zimmerman A Di Rosa E Kim H (2020 January 9) Technology can\u2019t fix algorithmic injustice. Boston Review. https:\/\/www.bostonreview.net\/articles\/annette-zimmermann-algorithmic-political\/"}],"container-title":["Public Understanding of Science"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09636625261486785","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/09636625261486785","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/09636625261486785","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,10,1]],"date-time":"2026-10-01T16:46:51Z","timestamp":1790873211000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/09636625261486785"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"references-count":64,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/09636625261486785"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09636625261486785","relation":{},"ISSN":["0963-6625","1361-6609"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0963-6625","type":"print"},{"value":"1361-6609","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,28]]},"article-number":"09636625261486785"}}