{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,4]],"date-time":"2026-05-04T21:11:28Z","timestamp":1777929088028,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":10,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1996,3,1]],"date-time":"1996-03-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":825638400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["J Med Screen"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,3]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives\u2014<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To assess the efficacy of dual film reading in screening mammography with a suitably trained radiographer as the second reader and to determine a suitable decision model for radiographer\/radiologist double reading.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting\u2014<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Three breast screening centres in South Thames (West) region.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods\u2014<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Seven radiographers with prior film reading training double read 17 202 screening mammograms with a radiologist. Screening performance of radiographers and radiologists was assessed taking into account interval cancers. The efficacy of radiographer\/radiologist double reading was assessed in terms of changes in sensitivity and specificity compared with radiologist single reading.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results\u2014<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Radiographers yielded equivalent sensitivity but lower specificity than radiologist film readers. The effect of double reading between radiographer\/radiologist pairs was an increase in sensitivity of 6.4%, which was achieved at the cost of a 0.6% decrease in specificity. This was reached by a decision system involving radiologists' review of radiographer queries and recall classifications. If all radiographer queries were recalled a large increase in sensitivity would be counterbalanced by an equally large decrease in specificity.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions\u2014<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Radiographer\/radiologist double reading resulted in similar increases in sensitivity as those previously reported in radiologist double reading studies. Radiologist review of radiographer reported abnormalities is a suitable means by which to limit excess recall.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/096914139600300106","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2017,1,17]],"date-time":"2017-01-17T19:44:24Z","timestamp":1484682264000},"page":"18-22","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":39,"title":["Comparison of Radiographer\/Radiologist Double Film Reading with Single Reading in Breast Cancer Screening"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"3","author":[{"given":"Regina","family":"Pauli","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Psychology and Counselling, Roehampton Institute, Whitelands, West Hill, London, SW15 3SN, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Sean","family":"Hammond","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Julie","family":"Cooke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Jarvis Breast Cancer Screening Diagnostic and Training Centre, Guildford, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Janet","family":"Ansell","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Breast Screening QA, Guildford, United Kingdom"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1996,3,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-096914139600300106","volume-title":"Breast cancer screening. Report to the health ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.","author":"Forrest P","year":"1987"},{"key":"bibr2-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0009-9260(05)81850-1"},{"key":"bibr3-096914139600300106","first-page":"443","volume":"61","author":"Yerushalmy J","year":"1951","journal-title":"American Review of Tuberculosis"},{"key":"bibr4-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/radiology.191.1.8134580"},{"key":"bibr5-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"43","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1742-1241.1991.tb08824.x","volume":"45","author":"Haiart DC","year":"1991","journal-title":"Br J Clin Pract"},{"key":"bibr6-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pauli R, Hammond S, Ansell J. Radiographers as film readers: An evaluation of performance in breast screening. In: Kundel H, ed. Image perception., 1995:135\u201342. (Proc SPIE 2436.).","DOI":"10.1117\/12.206843"},{"key":"bibr7-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1259\/0007-1285-69-817-10"},{"key":"bibr8-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1148\/99.3.523"},{"key":"bibr9-096914139600300106","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2214\/ajr.150.5.1201-a"},{"key":"bibr10-096914139600300106","volume-title":"Breast cancer screening 1991; evidence and experience since the Forrest Report.","author":"NHS Breast Screening Programme","year":"1991"}],"container-title":["Journal of Medical Screening"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/096914139600300106","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/096914139600300106","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T23:27:34Z","timestamp":1777678054000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/096914139600300106"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1996,3]]},"references-count":10,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1996,3]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/096914139600300106"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/096914139600300106","relation":{},"ISSN":["0969-1413","1475-5793"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0969-1413","type":"print"},{"value":"1475-5793","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1996,3]]}}}