{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,29]],"date-time":"2026-04-29T03:06:56Z","timestamp":1777432016520,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":1,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"3","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,11]],"date-time":"2015-03-11T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1426032000000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Australas Psychiatry"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objectives:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To describe the background, method, findings and recommendations of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Board evaluation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>An evaluation of the Board in the first half of its initial term indicates that the Board and the new governance processes are developing well. There appears to be a healthy group dynamic and effective working relationships with the Chief Executive Officer and management. A number of priority areas emerged for the Board\u2019s attention. The nature and low level of response from the wider membership indicate a low level of engagement in governance matters. It also seems that there are low levels of \u2018governance literacy\u2019 and that a different approach, perhaps facilitated focus groups, may be a more effective method for eliciting effective feedback on Board performance from the membership.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/1039856215576420","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,11]],"date-time":"2015-03-11T21:32:38Z","timestamp":1426109558000},"page":"226-229","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Board evaluation: method, findings and recommendations"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"23","author":[{"given":"Nick","family":"O\u2019Connor","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"North Shore Ryde Mental Health Service, Australia"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,11]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1039856215576420","volume-title":"Routledge comtemporary corporate governance","author":"Cornforth C","year":"2014"}],"container-title":["Australasian Psychiatry"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1039856215576420","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1039856215576420","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1039856215576420","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T11:46:40Z","timestamp":1777376800000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1039856215576420"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,11]]},"references-count":1,"journal-issue":{"issue":"3","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1039856215576420"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1039856215576420","relation":{},"ISSN":["1039-8562","1440-1665"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1039-8562","type":"print"},{"value":"1440-1665","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,3,11]]}}}