{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,21]],"date-time":"2026-07-21T23:04:06Z","timestamp":1784675046120,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":27,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,2]],"date-time":"2025-02-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1738454400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>To compare the reliability of different digitizing methods not only among themselves but also with direct measurements from facial plaster models of unoperated cleft babies.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Single-center retrospective study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The study consisted facial models of babies with unilateral (UCLP, n\u2009=\u200965) and bilateral (BCLP, n\u2009=\u200965) cleft lip and palate from the archives of the Department of Orthodontics, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. Those models were digitized using Medit i600, iTero Element 2 (Align Technology), and E3 3Shape scanning devices. A digital caliper with a 0.03 precision (INSIZE Digital Caliper) was used for manual measurements on plaster models. 3Shape Ortho Analyzer software was used for digital measurements.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>All scanning methods were reliable and compatible with a rate of 90% or more compared to manual measurements. The E3 3Shape device showed the lowest deviations (UCLP, between 0.04 and 0.11\u2005mm; BCLP, between 0.04 and 0.25\u2005mm) from manual measurements. In the UCLP group, Medit i600 presented the highest deviation (0.15-0.58\u2005mm) whereas Itero Element 2 showed the highest deviation in the BCLP group (0.16-0.46\u2005mm). Although there were statistically significant differences in the deviations of digital measurements, the values were still within clinically acceptable limits.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Intraoral scanners were less reliable in topographic measurements, especially in cases with increased depth. Although the highest compatible results were found with E3 3Shape model scanner, iTero Element 2 and Medit i600 were promising and advisable for digitizing and archiving the plaster models of babies with cleft lip and palate.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/10556656251314264","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,2]],"date-time":"2025-02-02T23:34:41Z","timestamp":1738539281000},"page":"718-728","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Evaluation of the Reliability of Facial Models Digitalized with Different Imaging Methods in Cleft Lip and Palate"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"63","author":[{"given":"H\u00fcseyin","family":"Budak","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Marmara University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-4932-6717","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Hanife Nuray","family":"Yilmaz","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Marmara University"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,2]]},"reference":[{"issue":"7","key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","first-page":"50","article-title":"Epidemiology and etiology of clefts","volume":"7","author":"Fogh-Andersen P","year":"1971","unstructured":"Fogh-Andersen P. Epidemiology and etiology of clefts. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1971;7(7):50-53.","journal-title":"Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1597\/02-128.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000004954"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000004681"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5152\/TurkJOrthod.2019.18094"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1597\/1545-1569_1993_030_0001_aaafot_2.3.co_2"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1055665619835082"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1597\/03-145.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1597\/10-207"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2341\/09-178-L"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.dental.2009.01.100"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1055665620946987"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.04.011"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2012.03.031"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5152\/TurkJOrthod.2019.18035"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0b013e3181ec6976"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.ajodo.2013.04.017"},{"issue":"3","key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","first-page":"298","article-title":"The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models","volume":"74","author":"Quimby ML","year":"2004","unstructured":"Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(3):298-303.","journal-title":"Angle Orthod"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S0889-5406(03)00152-5"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","first-page":"99","article-title":"Digital modellerde g\u00fcvenirlilik","volume":"29","author":"Erdin\u00e7 AME","year":"2008","unstructured":"Erdin\u00e7 AME, Do\u011fan S, Din\u00e7er B. Digital modellerde g\u00fcvenirlilik. EU Dishek Fak Derg. 2008;29(2):99-103.","journal-title":"EU Dishek Fak Derg"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2319\/110311-681.1"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"8427595","DOI":"10.1155\/2017\/8427595","article-title":"Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression","volume":"2017","author":"Richert R","year":"2017","unstructured":"Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, Farges JC, Fages M, Ducret M. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. J Healthc Eng. 2017;2017(1):8427595.","journal-title":"J Healthc Eng"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"26733040","DOI":"10.1155\/2021\/2673040","article-title":"Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners","volume":"2021","author":"Amornvit P","year":"2021","unstructured":"Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Sanohkan S. Comparison of accuracy of current ten intraoral scanners. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021(1):26733040.","journal-title":"Biomed Res Int"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_25_2","article-title":"Recent advances in intraoral scanners","author":"Eggmann F","unstructured":"Eggmann F, Blatz M. Recent advances in intraoral scanners. J Dent Res. 2024;103(13):1349-1357.","journal-title":"J Dent Res"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_26_2","volume-title":"Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery","author":"Thorne CH","year":"2013","unstructured":"Thorne CH. Grabb and Smith's Plastic Surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013."},{"issue":"7","key":"e_1_3_2_27_2","first-page":"827","article-title":"The accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions in neonates with cleft lip and\/or palate: a laboratory-based study","volume":"11","author":"Unnikrishnan J","year":"2024","unstructured":"Unnikrishnan J, Bakr M, Love R, Idris G. The accuracy of digital impressions versus conventional impressions in neonates with cleft lip and\/or palate: a laboratory-based study. Children (Basel). 2024;11(7):827.","journal-title":"Children (Basel)"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_28_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jdent.2021.103916"}],"container-title":["The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10556656251314264","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/10556656251314264","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10556656251314264","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T16:22:23Z","timestamp":1777393343000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/10556656251314264"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,2]]},"references-count":27,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,4]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/10556656251314264"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10556656251314264","relation":{},"ISSN":["1055-6656","1545-1569"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1055-6656","type":"print"},{"value":"1545-1569","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,2,2]]}}}