{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,6]],"date-time":"2026-09-06T04:11:05Z","timestamp":1788667865082,"version":"build-2803163510"},"reference-count":23,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788307200000},"content-version":"vor","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc\/4.0\/"},{"start":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1788307200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal"],"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Objective<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Metopic synostosis (MS) is commonly corrected using multi-segment fronto-orbital advancement (FOA), including the frontal bone and supraorbital bandeau. Although this technique reliably expands the anterior vault, it is associated with contour irregularities and bandeau step-offs. The single-segment FOA, utilizing a unified parietal bone flap, was developed with the goal of restoring a seamless frontal contour. This study compares morphologic outcomes between single-segment and multi-segment FOA in MS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Design<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A retrospective review of 3-dimensional imaging of patients with MS who underwent single-segment or multi-segment FOA.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Setting<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Tertiary pediatric institution.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Patients, Participants<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Twenty patients with MS were included (10 single-segment, 10 multi-segment). Ten control patients were included at each time point for comparison.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Interventions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Single-segment or multi-segment FOA<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Main Outcome Measure(s)<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Pre- and 2-week, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative imaging were analyzed to assess craniometric variables and intracranial volumes. Craniofacial composites were created.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>\n                      Single-segment FOA demonstrated significantly shorter operative time (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.003) and reduced blood loss (\n                      <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">P<\/jats:italic>\n                      \u2009=\u20090.008). Both groups achieved comparable increases in total (13-15%) and anterior cranial volume (23-28%) postoperatively. Craniometric analysis revealed equivalent improvement in orbital morphology. The interfrontal angle normalized to control levels in the single-segment group but remained significantly different in the multi-segment cohort through 2 years.\n                    <\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Single-segment FOA provides cranial and orbital morphologic correction equivalent to multi-segment FOA while reducing perioperative burden and limiting osteotomies across the frontal contour. This technique offers an efficient and reliable alternative for appropriately selected patients with MS.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/10556656261485387","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]],"date-time":"2026-09-02T16:47:49Z","timestamp":1788367669000},"update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["Comparison of Craniofacial Morphology Following Single- Versus Multi-Segment Fronto-Orbital Advancement for Metopic Synostosis"],"prefix":"10.1177","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3168-1879","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Lucas M.","family":"Harrison","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Christopher A.","family":"Derderian","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Dr Derderian Plastic Surgery, Dallas, Texas, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0001-9025-399X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Rami R.","family":"Hallac","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alex A.","family":"Kane","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paymon","family":"Sanati-Mehrizy","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_2_2_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.coms.2022.01.001"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_3_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000000588"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_4_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3171\/2024.10.FOCUS24572"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_5_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0b013e3181f76081"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_6_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000003800"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_7_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000000223"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_8_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000005661"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_9_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002129"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_10_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcms.2018.11.008"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_11_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000008535"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_12_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004649"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_13_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s00381-003-0750-0"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_14_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000007865"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_15_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1055665620969294"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_16_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000004114"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_17_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000000284"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_18_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318218fcab"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_19_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/SCS.0000000000003935"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_20_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000011753"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_21_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0000000000002052"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_22_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/GOX.0000000000004097"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_23_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1055665618775729"},{"key":"e_1_3_2_24_2","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1097\/PRS.0b013e318195661a"}],"container-title":["The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10556656261485387","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/10556656261485387","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10556656261485387","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,6]],"date-time":"2026-09-06T03:40:47Z","timestamp":1788666047000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/10556656261485387"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]]},"references-count":23,"alternative-id":["10.1177\/10556656261485387"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10556656261485387","relation":{},"ISSN":["1055-6656","1545-1569"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1055-6656","type":"print"},{"value":"1545-1569","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2026,9,2]]},"article-number":"10556656261485387"}}