{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,30]],"date-time":"2026-04-30T04:21:51Z","timestamp":1777522911971,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":59,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"4","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,20]],"date-time":"2020-01-20T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1579478400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Adaptive Behavior"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>This article explores the opinion dynamics of a double coalition opinion against a third opinion under majority rule updates on odd fixed size connected groups. For this purpose, coalition benefit criteria and three opinion formation models which extend the 2-state majority rule model on lattices are introduced. The proposed models focus on the coalition profit of its constituent coalition opinions and cover the possible final scenarios from coalition alliance perspective: either minor opinion or major opinion is favored, or dynamics do not favor to any coalition opinion. Opinion exchanges take place on a torus embedded lattice network of a 3-state system having in consideration tie configurations and two rules to break them: either by random choice or leaving ties unaltered. Models were analyzed in the statistical mechanics spirit through Monte Carlo simulations without node replacement. Estimations for coalition benefits, the growth of coalition ties, and consensus probabilities are reported. The loss of coalition strengths due to coalition ties and its indecision is indicated. In particular, the logistic decay of consensus probability is due to the logistic adaptive growth of coalition ties. Scaling behaviors for consensus time and coalition ties in terms of network size are suggested. The results of numerical simulations are discussed in the context of social influence and social dynamics.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1059712319895486","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,20]],"date-time":"2020-01-20T23:53:11Z","timestamp":1579564391000},"page":"333-347","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":3,"title":["Majority rule dynamics between a double coalition and a third opinion: coalition profit models and majority coalition ties"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"29","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-5693-4844","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Felipe Gayosso","family":"Mart\u00ednez","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering (ESIME) of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico (IPN), campus Adolfo Lopez Mateos, Zacatenco, Mexico"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Balankin","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering (ESIME) of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico (IPN), campus Adolfo Lopez Mateos, Zacatenco, Mexico"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,20]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Abrica-Jacinto N. L., Kurmyshev E., Juarez H. A. (2017). Effects of the interaction between ideological affinity and psychological reaction of agents on the opinion dynamics in a relative agreement model. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(3), Article 3. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18564\/jasss.3377","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.3377"},{"key":"bibr2-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Axelrod R. M., Bennett D. S. (1993). A landscape theory of aggregation. British Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 211\u2013233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S000712340000973X","DOI":"10.1017\/S000712340000973X"},{"key":"bibr3-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Axtell R. L. (2000). Effects of interaction topology and activation regime in several multi-agent systems. In Moss S., Davidsson P. (Eds.), International workshop on multi-agent systems and agent based simulation (MABS 2000, Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 1979, pp. 33\u201348). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-44561-7_3","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-44561-7_3"},{"key":"bibr4-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balankin A. S., Mart\u00ednez Cruz M. A., Gayosso Mart\u00ednez F., Mart\u00ednez-Gonz\u00e1lez C. L., Morales Ruiz L., Pati\u00f1o Ortiz J. (2015). Effect of heterogeneity in initial geographic distribution on opinions\u2019 competitiveness. Entropy, 17(5), 3160\u20133171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3390\/e17053160","DOI":"10.3390\/e17053160"},{"key":"bibr5-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balankin A. S., Mart\u00ednez Cruz M. A., Gayosso Mart\u00ednez F., Mena B., Tobon A., Pati\u00f1o-Ortiz J., Pati\u00f1o-Ortiz M., Samayoa D. (2017). Ising percolation in a three-state majority vote model. Physics Letters A, 381(5), 440\u2013445. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.physleta.2016.12.001","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physleta.2016.12.001"},{"key":"bibr6-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Balankin A. S., Mart\u00ednez Cruz M. A., Trejo Mart\u00ednez A. (2011). Effect of initial concentration and spatial heterogeneity of active agent distribution on opinion dynamics. Physica A, 390(21\u201322), 3876\u20133887. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.physa.2011.05.034","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2011.05.034"},{"key":"bibr7-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ball P. (2002). The physical modeling of society: A historical perspective. Physica A, 314, 1\u201314. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-4371(02)01042-7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4371(02)01042-7"},{"key":"bibr8-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ball P. (2004). The physical modeling of human social systems. ComPlexUs, 1, 190\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1159\/000082449","DOI":"10.1159\/000082449"},{"key":"bibr9-1059712319895486","first-page":"272","volume-title":"Critical mass: How one thing leads to another","author":"Ball P.","year":"2005"},{"key":"bibr10-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bernardes A. T., Costa U. M. S., Araujo A. D., Stauffer D. (2001). Damage spreading, coarsening dynamics and distribution of political votes in Sznajd model on square lattice. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 12(2), 159\u2013167. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S0129183101001584","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183101001584"},{"key":"bibr11-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bordogna C. M., Albano V. E. (2007). Statistical methods applied to the study of opinion formation models: A brief overview and results of a numerical study of a model based on the social impact theory. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 19(6), Article 065144. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0953-8984\/19\/6\/065144","DOI":"10.1088\/0953-8984\/19\/6\/065144"},{"key":"bibr12-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bostrom N. (2003). Are you living in a computer simulation? Philosophical Quarterly, 53(211), 243\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1467-9213.00309","DOI":"10.1111\/1467-9213.00309"},{"key":"bibr13-1059712319895486","volume-title":"Elementary differential equations and boundary value problems","author":"Boyce W. E.","year":"2009","edition":"9"},{"key":"bibr14-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Castellano C., Fortunato S., Loreto V. (2009). Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(2), 591\u2013646. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/RevModPhys.81.591","DOI":"10.1103\/RevModPhys.81.591"},{"key":"bibr15-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cavallini F. (1993). Fitting a logistic curve to data. The College Mathematics Journal, 24(3), 247\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2686488","DOI":"10.1080\/07468342.1993.11973540"},{"key":"bibr16-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen P., Redner S. (2005a). Consensus formation in multi-state majority and plurality models. Journal of Physics A, 38(33), 7239\u20137252. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1088\/0305-4470\/38\/33\/003","DOI":"10.1088\/0305-4470\/38\/33\/003"},{"key":"bibr17-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen P., Redner S. (2005b). Majority rule dynamics in finite dimensions. Physical Review E, 71(3), Article 036101. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevE.71.036101","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.71.036101"},{"key":"bibr18-1059712319895486","volume-title":"Influence: Science and practice","author":"Cialdini R. B.","year":"2001","edition":"4"},{"key":"bibr19-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Costa Filho R. N., Almeida M. P., Andrade J. S.Jr., Moreira J. E. (1999). Scaling behavior in a proportional voting process. Physical Review E, 60(1), 1067\u20131068. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevE.60.1067","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevE.60.1067"},{"key":"bibr20-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dong Y., Zhan M., Kou G., Ding Z., Liang H. (2018). A survey on the fusion process in opinion dynamics. Information Fusion, 43, 53\u201365. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.inffus.2017.11.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.inffus.2017.11.009"},{"key":"bibr21-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emerson P. (2016a). Majority rule in the West. In Emerson P. (Ed.), From majority rule to inclusive politics (pp. 31\u201346). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-23500-4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-23500-4_3"},{"key":"bibr22-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Emerson P. (2016b). Majority rule: The right way may be wrong. In Emerson P. (Ed.), From majority rule to inclusive politics (pp. 11\u201329). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-23500-4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-23500-4_2"},{"key":"bibr23-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Figueredo A. J., V\u00e1zquez G., Hagenah G. H., Schneider S. M. R. (2007). The K-factor, covitality, and personality: A psychometric test of life history theory. Human Nature, 18(1), 47\u201337. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF02820846","DOI":"10.1007\/BF02820846"},{"key":"bibr24-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fokas N. (2007). Growth functions, social diffusion, and social change. Review of Sociology, 13(1), 5\u201330. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1556\/RevSoc.13.2007.1.1","DOI":"10.1556\/RevSoc.13.2007.1.1"},{"key":"bibr25-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Folino G., Medicino G., Senatore A., Spezzano G., Straface S. (2006). A model based on cellular automata for the parallel simulation of 3D unsaturated flow. Parallel Computing, 32, 357\u2013376. https:\/\/doi:10.1016\/j.parco.2006.06.003","DOI":"10.1016\/j.parco.2006.06.003"},{"key":"bibr26-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Fortunato S., Castellano C. (2007). Scaling and universality in proportional elections. Physical Review Letters, 99, Article 138701. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevLett.99.138701","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.99.138701"},{"key":"bibr27-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (1999). Comment on \u201ca landscape theory of aggregation.\u201dBritish Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 411\u2013412. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/194312","DOI":"10.1017\/S0007123498210325"},{"key":"bibr28-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (2000). Real space renormalization group and totalitarian paradox of majority rule voting. Physica A, 285, 66\u201376. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0378-4371(00)00272-7","DOI":"10.1016\/S0378-4371(00)00272-7"},{"key":"bibr29-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (2002). Spontaneous coalition forming. Why some are stable? In Bandini S., Chopard B., Tomassini M. (Eds.), Cellular automata (ACRI 2002, Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 2493, pp. 1\u20139). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/3-540-45830-1_1","DOI":"10.1007\/3-540-45830-1_1"},{"key":"bibr30-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (2004). The dynamics of minority opinions in democratic debate. Physica A, 336, 56\u201362. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.physa.2004.01.010","DOI":"10.1016\/j.physa.2004.01.010"},{"key":"bibr31-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (2008). Sociophysics: A review of Galam models. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 19(3), 1\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S0129183108012297","DOI":"10.1142\/S0129183108012297"},{"key":"bibr32-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Galam S. (2016). The Trump phenomenon, an explanation from sociophysics. Journal of Modern Physics B, 31(10), Article 1742015. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S0217979217420152","DOI":"10.1142\/S0217979217420152"},{"key":"bibr33-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Goldsmith E. B. (2015). Introduction to social influence: Why it matters. In Xiao J. J. (Ed.), Social influence and sustainable consumption (International series on consumer science, pp. 3\u201322). Springer. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-20738-4","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-319-20738-4_1"},{"key":"bibr34-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Holyst J. A., Kacperski K., Schweitzer F. (2001). Social impact models of opinion dynamics. In Stauffer D. (Ed.), Annual reviews of computational physics 1X (pp. 253\u2013273). World Scientific. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/9789812811578_0005","DOI":"10.1142\/9789812811578_0005"},{"key":"bibr35-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kao A. B., Miller N., Torney C., Hartnett A., Couzin I. D. (2014). Collective learning and optimal consensus decisions in social animal groups. PLOS Computational Biology, 10(8), Article e1003762. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1003762","DOI":"10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1003762"},{"key":"bibr36-1059712319895486","first-page":"1","volume-title":"The art of computer programming. Volume: 2: Seminumerical algorithms","author":"Knuth D.","year":"1998","edition":"3"},{"key":"bibr37-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1142\/5283"},{"key":"bibr38-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/978-1-4612-5578-9_8"},{"key":"bibr39-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krapivsky P. L., Redner S. (2003). Dynamics of majority rule in two-state interacting spins systems. Physical Review Letters, 90(23), Article 238701. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1103\/PhysRevLett.90.238701","DOI":"10.1103\/PhysRevLett.90.238701"},{"key":"bibr40-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"127","DOI":"10.1007\/978-3-540-32259-7_7","volume-title":"Environments for multi-agent systems","volume":"3374","author":"Kr\u00fcgl F.","year":"2005"},{"key":"bibr41-1059712319895486","first-page":"467","volume-title":"An essay concerning human understanding (R. Woolhouse, Introduction and Redaction","author":"Locke J.","year":"1997"},{"key":"bibr42-1059712319895486","first-page":"109","volume-title":"An essay concerning human understanding","author":"Locke J.","year":"1997"},{"key":"bibr43-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lyra M. L., Costa U. M. S., Costa Filho R. N., Andrade J. S. (2003). Generalized Zipf\u2019s law in proportional voting processes. Europhysics Letters, 62, 131\u2013137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1209\/epl\/i2003-00371-6","DOI":"10.1209\/epl\/i2003-00371-6"},{"key":"bibr44-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mesterton-Gibbons M., Gavrilets S., Gravner J., Akcay E. (2011). Models of coalition or alliance formation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 274(1), 187\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jtbi.2010.12.031","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jtbi.2010.12.031"},{"key":"bibr45-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Meysam A., Cioffi-Revilla C. (2015). Activation regimes in opinion dynamics. Comparing asynchronous updating schemes. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 18(3), 1\u201312. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18564\/jasss.2733","DOI":"10.18564\/jasss.2733"},{"key":"bibr46-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Murnigham J. K. (1978). Models of coalition behavior: Game theoretic, social psychological, and political perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 85(5), 1130\u20131153. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.85.5.1130.","DOI":"10.1037\/\/0033-2909.85.5.1130"},{"key":"bibr47-1059712319895486","unstructured":"Nigel G., Troitzsch K. G. (2012). Cellular automata. In Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press; McGraw-Hill Education. http:\/\/www.modares.ac.ir\/uploads\/Agr.Oth.Lib.16.pdf"},{"key":"bibr48-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Packard N. H., Wolfram S. (1984). Two-dimensional cellular automata. Journal of Statistic Physics, 38, 901\u2013406. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/BF01010423","DOI":"10.1007\/BF01010423"},{"key":"bibr49-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Reznick D., Bryant M. J., Bashey F. (2002). r- and K-Selection revisited: The role of population regulation in life-history evolution. Ecology, 83(2), 1509\u20131520. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/3071970","DOI":"10.1890\/0012-9658(2002)083[1509:RAKSRT]2.0.CO;2"},{"key":"bibr50-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Salazar H. A., Oerlemans L., van Stroe-Biezen S. (2012). Social Influence on sustainable consumption: Evidence from a behavioral experiment. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 172\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1470-6431.2012.01110.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1470-6431.2012.01110.x"},{"key":"bibr51-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schelling T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/0022250X.1971.9989794","DOI":"10.1080\/0022250X.1971.9989794"},{"key":"bibr52-1059712319895486","unstructured":"Sobkowicz P. (2009). Modelling opinion formation with physics tools: Call for closer link with reality. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(1), Article 11. http:\/\/jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk\/12\/1\/11.html"},{"key":"bibr53-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D. (2003). How to convince others? Monte Carlo simulations of the Sznajd model. In Gubernatis J. E. (Ed.), AIP conference proceedings on the Monte Carlo method in the physical sciences: Celebrating 50th anniversary of the metropolis algorithm (Vol. 690, pp. 147\u2013155). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1063\/1.1632125","DOI":"10.1063\/1.1632125"},{"key":"bibr54-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D. (2013). A biased review of sociophysics. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151(1\u20132), 9\u201320. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10955-012-0604-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s10955-012-0604-9"},{"key":"bibr55-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Stauffer D., Sousa A. O., De Oliviera M. (2000). Generalization to square lattice of Sznajd sociophysics model. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 11(6), 1239\u20131245. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1142\/S012918310000105X","DOI":"10.1142\/S012918310000105X"},{"key":"bibr56-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor E., Hewitt K., Reeves R. A., Hobbs S. H., Lawless W. F. (2013). Group decision-making: Consensus rule versus majority rule. Procedia Technology, 9, 498\u2013504. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.protcy.2013.12.055","DOI":"10.1016\/j.protcy.2013.12.055"},{"key":"bibr57-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ten Velden F. S., Beersma B., De Dreu C. K. (2007). Majority and minority Influence in group negotiation: The moderating effects of social motivation and decision rules. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 259\u2013268. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.92.1.259","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.92.1.259"},{"key":"bibr58-1059712319895486","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Troitzsch K. G. (2012). Simulating communication and interpretation as a means of interaction in human social systems. Simulation, 88(1), 7\u201317. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0037549710386515","DOI":"10.1177\/0037549710386515"},{"key":"bibr59-1059712319895486","unstructured":"Vandermeer J. (2010). How populations grow: The exponential and logistic equations. Nature, Education Knowledge, 3(10), Article 15. https:\/\/www.nature.com\/scitable\/knowledge\/library\/how-populations-grow-the-exponential-and-logistic-13240157"}],"container-title":["Adaptive Behavior"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1059712319895486","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1059712319895486","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1059712319895486","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T16:19:02Z","timestamp":1777393142000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1059712319895486"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,20]]},"references-count":59,"journal-issue":{"issue":"4","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,8]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1059712319895486"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1059712319895486","relation":{},"ISSN":["1059-7123","1741-2633"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1059-7123","type":"print"},{"value":"1741-2633","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,1,20]]}}}