{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,8,27]],"date-time":"2026-08-27T20:11:38Z","timestamp":1787861498030,"version":"build-2784847793"},"reference-count":17,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]],"date-time":"2015-02-12T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1423699200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Foot Ankle Int."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Calcaneal osteotomy is an established technique for correcting hindfoot deformity. Patients traditionally receive an osteotomy through the open lateral approach to the calcaneus. To reduce the rate of wound complications associated with a direct open lateral approach, a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique has been adopted. This uses a low-speed, high-torque burr to perform the same osteotomy under radiographic guidance. We hypothesized that the new MIS calcaneal osteotomy would be a safe alternative to open calcaneal osteotomy while obtaining the same displacement.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The safety of the new MIS technique was investigated with a case controlled study on all patients who underwent displacement calcaneal osteotomy at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre from 2008 to 2014. The primary outcome measure was 30 day postoperative complication rate. Secondary outcome measures included operating time, duration of stay, fusion rates, and calcaneal displacement. Eighty-one patients underwent calcaneal osteotomy as part of their corrective surgery, 50 in the Open approach group and 31 in MIS group. The average age was 47.7 years (range 16-77) for the Open group and 50.1 (range 21-77) in the MIS group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>A mean calcaneal displacement of 9.4 mm (SD = 1.16, 8 to 11 mm) and 10.2 mm (SD = 1.06, 8 to 13 mm) was achieved through the MIS and Open approaches, respectively. There were significantly fewer wound complications in the MIS group (6.45%) compared to the Open group (28%, P = .022). The MIS group was associated with significantly lower rate of wound infection (3% versus 20%, P = .044). Three patients in the Open group experienced sural peripheral neuropathy. The average length of stay was 3.8 days following MIS and 4.3 days following open calcaneal osteotomy. Nonunion occurred in only 1 patient in the MIS group and none in the open group.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusions:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>MIS calcaneal osteotomy was found to be a safe technique. It was technically as effective as calcaneal osteotomy performed through an open lateral approach but was associated with significantly fewer wound complications and fewer nerve complications.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Level of Evidence:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Level III, comparative study.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100715571438","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,13]],"date-time":"2015-02-13T00:50:03Z","timestamp":1423788603000},"page":"685-690","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":86,"title":["Complications of Minimally Invasive Calcaneal Osteotomy Versus Open Osteotomy"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"36","author":[{"given":"Adrian R.","family":"Kendal","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Ali","family":"Khalid","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Radiology Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Tom","family":"Ball","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Mark","family":"Rogers","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Paul","family":"Cooke","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Robert","family":"Sharp","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Foot and Ankle Orthopaedic Department, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Badekas T. Results of treatment of stage II posterior tibial tendon rupture with flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer and calcaneal osteotomy. Med Chir Pied. 2010;26:43-51. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/doi:10.1007\/S10243-010-0286-4.","DOI":"10.1007\/s10243-010-0286-4"},{"key":"bibr2-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bariteau JT, Blankenhorn BD, Tofte JN, DiGiovanni CW. What is the role and limit of calcaneal osteotomy in the cavovarus foot? Foot Ankle Clin. 2013;18:697-714. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.fcl.2013.08.001.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.fcl.2013.08.001"},{"key":"bibr3-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bolt PM, Coy S, Toolan BC. A comparison of lateral column lengthening and medial translational osteotomy of the calcaneus for the reconstruction of adult acquired flatfoot. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(11):1115-1123. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3113\/FAI.2007.1115.","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2007.1115"},{"key":"bibr4-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1067-2516(00)80058-7"},{"key":"bibr5-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dawson J, Doll H, Coffey J, Responsiveness and minimally important change for the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) compared with AOFAS and SF-36 assessments following surgery for hallux valgus. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:918-931. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.joca.2007.02.003.","DOI":"10.1016\/j.joca.2007.02.003"},{"key":"bibr6-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dull JM, DiDomenico LA. Percutaneous displacement calcaneal osteotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:336-337. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2004.07.010.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2004.07.010"},{"key":"bibr7-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/0958-2592(92)90062-T"},{"key":"bibr8-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Freeman BJC, Duff S, Allen PE, Nicholson HD, Atkins RM. The extended lateral approach to the hindfoot\u2014anatomical basis and surgical implications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80B:139-142. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/doi:10.1302\/0301-620x.80b1.7987.","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B1.7987"},{"key":"bibr9-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070102200706"},{"key":"bibr10-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ivanic GM, Hofstaetter SG, Trnka HJ. [The acquired flatfoot: mid-term results of the medial displacement calcaneal-osteotomy with flexor digitorum longus transfer]. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und ihre Grenzgebiete. 2006;144:619-625. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1055\/s-2006-955190.","DOI":"10.1055\/s-2006-955190"},{"key":"bibr11-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krause FG, Sutter D, Waehnert D, Ankle joint pressure changes in a pes cavovarus model after lateralizing calcaneal osteotomies. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(9):741-746. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.3113\/FAI.2010.0741.","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2010.0741"},{"key":"bibr12-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR, Reeves CL. Posterior calcaneal displacement osteotomy: a new percutaneous technique. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:332-335. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1053\/j.jfas.2004.07.011.","DOI":"10.1053\/j.jfas.2004.07.011"},{"key":"bibr13-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070402500701"},{"key":"bibr14-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/107110079501601108"},{"key":"bibr15-1071100715571438","first-page":"191","volume":"33","author":"Tennant JN","year":"2013","journal-title":"Iowa Orthop J"},{"key":"bibr16-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.84B1.11847"},{"key":"bibr17-1071100715571438","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zanolli DH, Glisson RR, Nunley JAII, Easley ME. Biomechanical assessment of flexible flatfoot correction: comparison of techniques in a cadaver model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:e45. http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.2106\/JBJS.L.00258.","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.L.00258"}],"container-title":["Foot &amp; Ankle International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1071100715571438","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1071100715571438","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1071100715571438","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T21:24:34Z","timestamp":1777411474000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1071100715571438"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]},"references-count":17,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2015,6]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1071100715571438"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100715571438","relation":{},"ISSN":["1071-1007","1944-7876"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1071-1007","type":"print"},{"value":"1944-7876","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2015,2,12]]}}}