{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T05:21:30Z","timestamp":1777612890706,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":16,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"1","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,24]],"date-time":"2020-09-24T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1600905600000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Foot Ankle Int."],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]},"abstract":"<jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Background:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Allograft reconstruction of the peroneal tendons is an option for treatment of major tears of 1 or both peroneal tendons. No consensus on a superior distal fixation method has been reported. The purpose of the study was to compare load to failure and stiffness of a Pulvertaft weave (PTW) through a residual tendon stump to direct-to-bone interference screw (IS) fixation.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Methods:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Fifteen pairs of long leg cadaver specimens were used. All grafts were secured proximally to the peroneus brevis myotendinous junction via a PTW technique. Distally, the tendons were either sutured to the peroneus brevis stump via PTW or secured to the base of the fifth metatarsal via IS. Stiffness (slope of force\/displacement) was measured for the intact tendon and after reconstruction, and finally each specimen was loaded to failure.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Results:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>Mean load to failure was significantly higher in the PTW group compared with the IS group (373.6 \u00b1 265.5 N vs 150.1 \u00b1 93.1 N; P = .01). The PTW and IS groups had significantly lower stiffness compared with the intact specimens ( P &lt; .001). There was no statistical significance in stiffness between the 2 techniques ( P = .96).<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Conclusion:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The PTW technique yielded higher load to failure in comparison to IS. There was no difference in overall construct stiffness between both techniques. Both constructs demonstrated 19% decrease in stiffness compared to the intact state.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>\n                  <jats:sec>\n                    <jats:title>Clinical Relevance:<\/jats:title>\n                    <jats:p>The PTW and IS constructs were biomechanically similar, and these results suggest that both should be moderately overtensioned to compensate for an inherent decreased initial stiffness.<\/jats:p>\n                  <\/jats:sec>","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100720952092","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,24]],"date-time":"2020-09-24T08:05:07Z","timestamp":1600934707000},"page":"83-88","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":1,"title":["Load to Failure and Stiffness of Interference Screw vs Pulvertaft Weave for Distal Fixation in Peroneal Allograft Reconstruction"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"42","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-8412-4275","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Mostafa M.","family":"Abousayed","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-3982-9951","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Michelle M.","family":"Coleman","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Pooyan","family":"Abbasi","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"Bryan A.","family":"Bean","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"given":"John M.","family":"Thompson","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1238-3673","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Gregory P.","family":"Guyton","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,24]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1302\/0301-620X.80B5.0800781"},{"key":"bibr2-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2325967120909556"},{"key":"bibr3-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100717702848"},{"key":"bibr4-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100719879659"},{"key":"bibr5-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2008.0427"},{"key":"bibr6-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100718762442"},{"key":"bibr7-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0363546507308936"},{"key":"bibr8-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1016\/S1083-7515(03)00006-8"},{"key":"bibr9-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100713487527"},{"key":"bibr10-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.5435\/00124635-200810000-00001"},{"key":"bibr11-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.3113\/FAI.2009.1207"},{"key":"bibr12-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070302400605"},{"key":"bibr13-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.2106\/JBJS.G.01089"},{"key":"bibr14-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100716658469"},{"key":"bibr15-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/107110070302400311"},{"key":"bibr16-1071100720952092","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/1071100718760256"}],"container-title":["Foot &amp; Ankle International"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1071100720952092","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1071100720952092","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1071100720952092","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T21:24:30Z","timestamp":1777411470000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1071100720952092"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,24]]},"references-count":16,"journal-issue":{"issue":"1","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,1]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1071100720952092"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1071100720952092","relation":{},"ISSN":["1071-1007","1944-7876"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1071-1007","type":"print"},{"value":"1944-7876","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,9,24]]}}}