{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,1]],"date-time":"2026-05-01T04:39:58Z","timestamp":1777610398318,"version":"3.51.4"},"reference-count":9,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[1981,5,1]],"date-time":"1981-05-01T00:00:00Z","timestamp":357523200000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":[],"crossmark-restriction":false},"short-container-title":["Foot &amp; Ankle"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[1981,5]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Fifty-one feet in 42 patients with varying degrees of symptomatic hallux rigidus and with 2 years of follow-up have been operated with excellent results. Cheilotomy was performed in all cases with only cheilotomy employed in the young patients and implant surgery (single-stem silicone) reserved for the older and more advanced arthritis cases. Pain generally disappeared within 3 months. Range of toe motion in dorsiflexion increased. All patients returned to their activity of choice. All patients were able to utilize off-the-shelf footwear postoperatively. There have been no fractures or inflammatory reactions of the implants as yet, including those inserted 4 or more years ago.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/107110078100100603","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2013,3,3]],"date-time":"2013-03-03T03:24:58Z","timestamp":1362281098000},"page":"315-320","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":62,"title":["Hallux Rigidus: Cheilotomy or Implant?"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"1","author":[{"given":"Nathaniel","family":"Gould","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Vermont College of Medicine Burlington, Vermont"}],"role":[{"role":"author","vocabulary":"crossref"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[1981,5,1]]},"reference":[{"key":"atypb1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","first-page":"1158","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.1.1431.1158","volume":"1","year":"1888","journal-title":"Br. Med. J."},{"key":"atypb2","first-page":"10","volume":"1","year":"1980","journal-title":"Foot Ankle"},{"key":"atypb3","first-page":"576","volume":"54","year":"1979","journal-title":"Mayo Clin. Proc."},{"key":"atypb4","first-page":"48","volume":"142","year":"1979","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop."},{"key":"atypb5","first-page":"57","volume":"142","year":"1979","journal-title":"Clin. Orthop."},{"key":"atypb6","first-page":"82","volume":"60","year":"1978","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg."},{"key":"atypb7","first-page":"83","volume":"62","year":"1980","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg."},{"key":"atypb8","unstructured":"Swanson\u00a0A.B.,Lumsden\u00a0R.M.,Brawnohler\u00a0A.A.,Swanson\u00a0G.D.The Foot and Ankle. Bateman\u00a0J.E., Trott\u00a0A.W., ed. New York: Brian C. Decker; 1980:137-142."},{"key":"atypb9","first-page":"88","volume":"60","year":"1978","journal-title":"J. Bone Joint Surg."}],"container-title":["Foot &amp; Ankle"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/107110078100100603","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/107110078100100603","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,4,28]],"date-time":"2026-04-28T21:16:59Z","timestamp":1777411019000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/107110078100100603"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[1981,5]]},"references-count":9,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[1981,5]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/107110078100100603"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/107110078100100603","relation":{},"ISSN":["0198-0211"],"issn-type":[{"value":"0198-0211","type":"print"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[1981,5]]}}}