{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T18:20:15Z","timestamp":1780510815932,"version":"3.54.1"},"reference-count":68,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"5","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1757462400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Assessment"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) has enjoyed global popularity due to its good balance of content coverage and brevity and has been officially translated into 12 languages in addition to the original English version. The current study aimed to further enhance the cultural accessibility of the BFI-2 by translating it into the Korean language and comprehensively validating the Korean version in two South Korean samples: working adults and college students. Across the two samples, the Korean BFI-2 demonstrated good reliability (e.g., test-retest reliability, Cronbach\u2019s alpha), construct validity (e.g., convergent\/discriminant validity), and criterion-related validity with a wide range of outcome measures. Additionally, we compared the psychometric properties of the Korean BFI-2 to those of the original English and Chinese versions to further establish its comparability with other language versions. Overall, our results demonstrate that the Korean BFI-2 is a reliable and valid personality measure that can be confidently used by other researchers. Implications, limitations, and future directions were discussed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/10731911251357466","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]],"date-time":"2025-09-10T11:12:26Z","timestamp":1757502746000},"page":"866-889","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":0,"title":["The Big Five Inventory-2 in Korea: Validation and Cross-Cultural Comparisons with the U.S. and Chinese Versions"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-2133-108X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Jinsoo","family":"Choi","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2750-7827","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Nanhee","family":"Kim","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-6730-7336","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Bo","family":"Zhang","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0003-0106-1852","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Sang Woo","family":"Park","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-3705-856X","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Seonghee","family":"Cho","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-1578-5889","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Young Woo","family":"Sohn","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2875-8919","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Christopher J.","family":"Soto","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Oliver P.","family":"John","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"University of California, Berkeley, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]]},"reference":[{"key":"e_1_3_5_2_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Allen M. S. Walter E. E. (2018). Linking big five personality traits to sexuality and sexual health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 144(10) 1081\u20131110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bul0000157","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000157"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_3_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Anglim J. Horwood S. Smillie L. D. Marrero R. J. Wood J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 146(4) 279\u2013323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/bul0000226","DOI":"10.1037\/bul0000226"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_4_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asparouhov T. Muth\u00e9n B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 16(3) 397\u2013438. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705510903008204","DOI":"10.1080\/10705510903008204"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_5_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asparouhov T. Muth\u00e9n B. (2014). Multiple-group factor analysis alignment. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 21(4) 495\u2013508. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705511.2014.919210","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2014.919210"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_6_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Asparouhov T. Muth\u00e9n B. (2023). Multiple group alignment for exploratory and structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 30(2) 169\u2013191. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705511.2022.2127100","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2022.2127100"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_7_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Barrick M. R. Mount M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology 44(1) 1\u201326. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_8_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Berry C. M. Ones D. S. Sackett P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance organizational deviance and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(2) 410\u2013424. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.92.2.410","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.92.2.410"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_9_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bogg T. Roberts B. W. (2004). Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: A meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. Psychological Bulletin 130(6) 887\u2013919. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0033-2909.130.6.887","DOI":"10.1037\/0033-2909.130.6.887"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_10_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown A. (2016). Item response models for forced-choice questionnaires: A common framework. Psychometrika 81 135\u2013160. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11336-014-9434-9","DOI":"10.1007\/s11336-014-9434-9"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_11_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brown A. Maydeu-Olivares A. (2011). Item response modeling of forced-choice questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71(3) 460\u2013502. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0013164410375112","DOI":"10.1177\/0013164410375112"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_12_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bucher M. A. Suzuki T. Samuel D. B. (2019). A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes. Clinical Psychology Review 70 51\u201363. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cpr.2019.04.002","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpr.2019.04.002"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_13_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cao M. Drasgow F. (2019). Does forcing reduce faking? A meta-analytic review of forced-choice personality measures in high-stakes situations. Journal of Applied Psychology 104(11) 1347\u20131368. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/apl0000414","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0000414"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_14_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chen C. Lee S. Y. Stevenson H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science 6(3) 170\u2013175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_15_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Choi J. Kwon S. Zhang B. (2025). A structural after measurement approach to bifactor predictive models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 32(2) 173\u2013186. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705511.2024.2385951","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2024.2385951"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_16_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Cohen S. Kamarck T. Mermelstein R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 24(4) 385\u2013396. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2136404","DOI":"10.2307\/2136404"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_17_1","volume-title":"Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual","author":"Costa P. T.","year":"1992","unstructured":"Costa P. T., McCrae R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PIR) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_18_1","volume-title":"Psychological tests and personnel decisions","author":"Cronbach L. J.","year":"1957","unstructured":"Cronbach L. J., Gleser C. G. (1957). Psychological tests and personnel decisions. University of Illinois Press."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_19_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Danner D. Lechner C. M. Soto C. J. John O. P. (2021). Modelling the incremental value of personality facets: The domains-incremental facets-acquiescence bifactor showmodel. Assessment 35(1) 67\u201384. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/per.2268","DOI":"10.1002\/per.2268"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_20_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Diener E. D. Emmons R. A. Larsen R. J. Griffin S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 49(1) 71\u201375. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327752jpa4901_13","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327752jpa4901_13"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_21_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ehrhart K. H. Roesch S. C. Ehrhart M. G. Kilian B. (2008). A test of the factor structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP five-factor model measure across gender and ethnic groups. Journal of Personality Assessment 90(5) 507\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00223890802248869","DOI":"10.1080\/00223890802248869"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_22_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Flake J. K. McCoach D. B. (2018). An investigation of the alignment method with polytomous indicators under conditions of partial measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 25(1) 56\u201370. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10705511.2017.1374187","DOI":"10.1080\/10705511.2017.1374187"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_23_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gnambs T. Schroeders U. (2020). Cognitive abilities explain wording effects in the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Assessment 27(2) 404\u2013418. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191117746503","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191117746503"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_5_24_1","first-page":"7","article-title":"A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models","volume":"7","author":"Goldberg L. R.","year":"1999","unstructured":"Goldberg L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7\u201328.","journal-title":"Personality Psychology in Europe"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_25_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Gosling S. D. Rentfrow P. J. Swann W. B.Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37(6) 504\u2013528. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/S0092-6566(03)00046-1","DOI":"10.1016\/S0092-6566(03)00046-1"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_26_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hu J. Connelly B. S. (2021). Faking by actual applicants on personality tests: A meta-analysis of within-subjects studies. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 29(3\u20134) 412\u2013426. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/ijsa.12338","DOI":"10.1111\/ijsa.12338"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_27_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hulin C. L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item and scale translations: Fidelity across languages. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 18(2) 115\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022002187018002001","DOI":"10.1177\/0022002187018002001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_28_1","unstructured":"International Monetary Fund. (2024). Report for selected countries and subject. https:\/\/www.imf.org\/en\/Publications\/WEO\/weo-database\/2024\/April\/weo-report?c=542 &s=NGDP_RPCH NGDPD PPPGDP NGDPDPC PPPPC PCPIPCH &sy=2022&ey=2029&ssm=0&scsm=1&scc=0&ssd=1&ssc=0&sic=0&sort=country&ds=.&br=1"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_29_1","first-page":"102","volume-title":"Handbook of personality: Theory and research","author":"John O. P.","year":"1999","unstructured":"John O. P., Srivastava S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In Pervin L. A., John O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102\u2013138). Guilford Press.","edition":"2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_30_1","volume-title":"Big Five Inventory (BFI) [Database record]","author":"John O. P.","year":"1991","unstructured":"John O. P., Donahue E. M., Kentle R. L. (1991). Big Five Inventory (BFI) [Database record]. APA PsycTests."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_31_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Jonason P. K. Webster G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: A concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological Assessment 22(2) 420\u2013432. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0019265","DOI":"10.1037\/a0019265"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_32_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Judge T. A. Heller D. Mount M. K. (2002). Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(3) 530\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/0021-9010.87.3.530","DOI":"10.1037\/0021-9010.87.3.530"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_33_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Judge T. A. Rodell J. B. Klinger R. L. Simon L. S. Crawford E. R. (2013). Hierarchical representations of the five-factor model of personality in predicting job performance: Integrating three organizing frameworks with two theoretical perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 98(6) 875\u2013925. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0033901","DOI":"10.1037\/a0033901"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_34_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kim L. E. J\u00f6rg V. Klassen R. M. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of teacher personality on teacher effectiveness and burnout. Educational Psychology Review 31 163\u2013195. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10648-018-9458-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10648-018-9458-2"},{"issue":"1","key":"e_1_3_5_35_1","first-page":"15","article-title":"Standardization and validation of big five inventory-Korean version (BFI-K) in elders","volume":"17","author":"Kim S. Y.","year":"2010","unstructured":"Kim S. Y., Kim J. M., Yoo J. A., Bae K. Y., Kim S. W., Yang S. J., Shin I. S., Yoon J. S. (2010). Standardization and validation of big five inventory-Korean version (BFI-K) in elders. Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry, 17(1), 15\u201325.","journal-title":"Korean Journal of Biological Psychiatry"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_36_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Klotz A. C. Swider B. W. Kwon S. H. (2023). Back-translation practices in organizational research: Avoiding loss in translation. Journal of Applied Psychology 108(5) 699\u2013727. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/apl0001050","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0001050"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_37_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Koh\u00fat M. Koh\u00fatov\u00e1 V. \u017ditn\u00fd P. Halama P. (2020). Further validation of Slovak Big Five Inventory 2: 6-months test-retest stability and predictive power. Studia Psychologica 62(3) 246\u2013258. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31577\/sp.2020.03.803","DOI":"10.31577\/sp.2020.03.803"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_38_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lemmens J. S. Valkenburg P. M. Peter J. (2009). Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media Psychology 12(1) 77\u201395. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/15213260802669458","DOI":"10.1080\/15213260802669458"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_39_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li L. Zhang B. Sun T. Drasgow F. (2025). The more contextualized the more valid: Effects of contextualization strategies on forced-choice measurement. Journal of Business and Psychology 40 711\u2013729. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10869-024-09983-2","DOI":"10.1007\/s10869-024-09983-2"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_40_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Li M. Zhang B. Li L. Sun T. Brown A. (2024). Mixed-keying or desirability-matching in the construction of forced-choice measures? An empirical investigation and practical recommendations. Organizational Research Methods 28(2) 296\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10944281241229784","DOI":"10.1177\/10944281241229784"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_41_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lorenzo-Seva U. Ten Berge J. M. (2006). Tucker\u2019s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2(2) 57\u201364. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1614-2241.2.2.57","DOI":"10.1027\/1614-2241.2.2.57"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_42_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Luo J. Zhang B. Cao M. Roberts B. W. (2023). The stressful personality: A meta-analytical review of the relation between personality and stress. Personality and Social Psychology Review 27(2) 128\u2013194. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10888683221104002","DOI":"10.1177\/10888683221104002"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_43_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Mammadov S. (2022). Big Five personality traits and academic performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality 90(2) 222\u2013255. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopy.12663","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12663"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_44_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Muris P. Merckelbach H. Otgaar H. Meijer E. (2017). The malevolent side of human nature: A meta-analysis and critical review of the literature on the dark triad (narcissism Machiavellianism and psychopathy). Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(2) 183\u2013204. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691616666070","DOI":"10.1177\/1745691616666070"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_45_1","volume-title":"Mplus user\u2019s guide","author":"Muth\u00e9n L. K.","year":"1998","unstructured":"Muth\u00e9n L. K., Muth\u00e9n B. O. (1998\u20132024). Mplus user\u2019s guide (8th ed.). Muth\u00e9n & Muth\u00e9n.","edition":"8"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_46_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Norton P. J. (2007). Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21): Psychometric analysis across four racial groups. Anxiety Stress & Coping 20(3) 253\u2013265. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10615800701309279","DOI":"10.1080\/10615800701309279"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_47_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023 sources methodologies and technical notes. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/d7f76adc-en.","DOI":"10.1787\/d7f76adc-en"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_48_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Organ D. W. Ryan K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology 48(4) 775\u2013802. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_49_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Piedmont R. L. Chae J. H. (1997). Cross-cultural generalizability of the five-factor model of personality: Development and validation of the NEO PI-R for Koreans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 28(2) 131\u2013155. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0022022197282001","DOI":"10.1177\/0022022197282001"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_50_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rad M. S. Martingano A. J. Ginges J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(45) 11401\u201311405. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1073\/pnas.1721165115","DOI":"10.1073\/pnas.1721165115"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_51_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rammstedt B. Danner D. Soto C. J. John O. P. (2018). Validation of the short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) and their German adaptations. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 36(1) 149\u2013161. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000481","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000481"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_52_1","volume-title":"psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research","author":"Revelle W. R.","year":"2017","unstructured":"Revelle W. R. (2017). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Northwestern University."},{"key":"e_1_3_5_53_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Rosseel Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software 48(2) 1\u201336. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.18637\/jss.v048.i02","DOI":"10.18637\/jss.v048.i02"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_54_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Saucier G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg\u2019s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment 63(3) 506\u2013516. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1207\/s15327752jpa6303_8","DOI":"10.1207\/s15327752jpa6303_8"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_55_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shchebetenko S. Kalugin A. Y. Mishkevich A. M. Soto C. J. John O. P. (2020). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory\u20132: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment 27(3) 472\u2013486. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191119860901","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191119860901"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_56_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shi D. Song H. Lewis M. D. (2019). The impact of partial factorial invariance on cross-group comparisons. Assessment 26(7) 1217\u20131233. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191117711020","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191117711020"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_57_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Soto C. J. John O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth fidelity and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113(1) 117\u2013143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pspp0000096","DOI":"10.1037\/pspp0000096"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_58_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spector P. E. Bauer J. A. Fox S. (2010). Measurement artifacts in the assessment of counterproductive work behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Do we know what we think we know? Journal of Applied Psychology 95(4) 781\u2013790. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0019477","DOI":"10.1037\/a0019477"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_59_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spector P. E. Liu C. Sanchez J. I. (2015). Methodological and substantive issues in conducting multinational and cross-cultural research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 2(1) 101\u2013131. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111310","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111310"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_60_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Speer A. B. Wegmeyer L. J. Tenbrink A. P. Delacruz A. Y. Christiansen N. D. Salim R. M. (2023). Comparing forced-choice and single-stimulus personality scores on a level playing field: A meta-analysis of psychometric properties and susceptibility to faking. Journal of Applied Psychology 108(11) 1812\u20131833. https:\/\/doi.org\/doi\/10.1037\/apl0001099","DOI":"10.1037\/apl0001099"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_61_1","unstructured":"Statistics Korea. (2025). Employment rate by gender and age group. https:\/\/www.index.go.kr\/unify\/idx-info.do?idxCd=4212"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_62_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Sun T. Zhang B. Cao M. Drasgow F. (2022). Faking detection improved: Adopting a Likert item response process tree model. Organizational Research Methods 25(3) 490\u2013512. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10944281211002904","DOI":"10.1177\/10944281211002904"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_63_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Vedel A. Wellnitz K. B. Ludeke S. Soto C. J. John O. P. Andersen S. C. (2020). Development and validation of the Danish Big Five Inventory-2: Domain- and facet-level structure construct validity and reliability. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 37(1) 42\u201351. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000570","DOI":"10.1027\/1015-5759\/a000570"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_64_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wetzel E. L\u00fcdtke O. Zettler I. B\u00f6hnke J. R. (2016). The stability of extreme response style and acquiescence over 8 years. Assessment 23(3) 279\u2013291. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1073191115583714","DOI":"10.1177\/1073191115583714"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_65_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang B. Cao M. Tay L. Luo J. Drasgow F. (2020). Examining the item response process to personality measures in high-stakes situations: Issues of measurement validity and predictive validity. Personnel Psychology 73(2) 305\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/peps.12353","DOI":"10.1111\/peps.12353"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_66_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang B. Li Y. M. Li J. Luo J. Ye Y. Yin L. Chen Z. Soto C. J. John O. P. (2022). The Big Five Inventory\u20132 in China: A comprehensive psychometric evaluation in four diverse samples. Assessment 29(6) 1262\u20131284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10731911211008245","DOI":"10.1177\/10731911211008245"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_67_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang B. Luo J. Li J. (2024). Moving beyond Likert and traditional forced-choice scales: A comprehensive investigation of the graded forced-choice format. Multivariate Behavioral Research 59(3) 434\u2013460. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/00273171.2023.2235682","DOI":"10.1080\/00273171.2023.2235682"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_68_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zhang B. Sun T. Cao M. Drasgow F. (2021). Using bifactor models to examine the predictive validity of hierarchical constructs: Pros cons and solutions. Organizational Research Methods 24(3) 530\u2013571. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1094428120915522","DOI":"10.1177\/1094428120915522"},{"key":"e_1_3_5_69_1","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Zell E. Lesick T. L. (2022). Big five personality traits and performance: A quantitative synthesis of 50+ meta-analyses. Journal of Personality 90(4) 559\u2013573. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/jopy.12683","DOI":"10.1111\/jopy.12683"}],"container-title":["Assessment"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10731911251357466","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/10731911251357466","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/10731911251357466","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,6,3]],"date-time":"2026-06-03T17:49:00Z","timestamp":1780508940000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/10731911251357466"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]]},"references-count":68,"journal-issue":{"issue":"5","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2026,7]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/10731911251357466"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/10731911251357466","relation":{},"ISSN":["1073-1911","1552-3489"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1073-1911","type":"print"},{"value":"1552-3489","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2025,9,10]]}}}