{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,7,23]],"date-time":"2026-07-23T17:56:13Z","timestamp":1784829373632,"version":"3.55.0"},"reference-count":62,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"6","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1597622400000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Sex Abuse"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>Actuarial scales provide a relatively objective and reliable assessment of individuals\u2019 risk of recidivism. Recent research has explored how graphs can improve quantitative risk communication. We tested whether graphs can improve understanding and perception of sexual violence risk when matched with risk metric. Participants ( N = 676) were recruited from Amazon\u2019s MTurk platform and read a brief description of a man convicted of a sexual offense, including results of a fictional sexual recidivism risk scale. In Study 1, absolute risk of recidivism enabled participants to distinguish between individuals with relatively high and low risk of sexual recidivism. In Study 2, this distinction was enhanced by adding a graph, especially when percentiles were communicated. Risk ratios increased perceived risk. Objective numeracy increased understanding and reduced perceived risk. We recommend that risk communication assumes limited statistical numeracy, and further research with practitioners to test the effect of graphs and risk metrics on forensic\/judicial decisions.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1079063220951191","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]],"date-time":"2020-08-17T10:01:49Z","timestamp":1597658509000},"page":"698-724","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":6,"title":["Using Graphs in Sexual Violence Risk Communication: Benefits May Depend on the Risk Metric"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-7961-0615","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"N. Zoe","family":"Hilton","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada"},{"name":"Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"L. Maaike","family":"Helmus","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1079063220951191","author":"Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers","year":"2014","journal-title":"ATSA practice guidelines for assessment, treatment interventions, and management strategies for male adult sexual abusers"},{"key":"bibr2-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Batastini A. B., Hoeffner C. E., Vitacco M. J., Morgan R. D., Coaker L. C., Lester M. E. (2019). Does the format of the message affect what is heard? A two-part study on the communication of violence risk assessment data. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 19(1), 44\u201371. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/24732850.2018.1538474","DOI":"10.1080\/24732850.2018.1538474"},{"key":"bibr3-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blais J., Forth A. E. (2014). Prosecution-retained versus court-appointed experts: Comparing and contrasting risk assessment reports in preventative detention hearings. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 531\u2013543. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/lhb0000082","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000082"},{"key":"bibr4-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Blasko B. L., Jeglic E. L., Mercado C. C. (2010). Are actuarial risk data used to make determinations of sex offender risk classification? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55(5), 676\u2013692. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0306624x10372784","DOI":"10.1177\/0306624X10372784"},{"key":"bibr5-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Bodemer N., Meder B., Gigerenzer G. (2014). Communicating relative risk changes with baseline risk: Presentation format and numeracy matter. Medical Decision Making, 34(5), 615\u2013626. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x14526305","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X14526305"},{"key":"bibr6-1079063220951191","volume-title":"The psychology of criminal conduct","author":"Bonta J.","year":"2017","edition":"6"},{"key":"bibr7-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Brouillette-Alarie S., Proulx J., Hanson R. K. (2017). Three central dimensions of sexual recidivism risk: Understanding the latent constructs of Static-99R and Static-2002R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 30(6), 676\u2013704. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1079063217691965","DOI":"10.1177\/1079063217691965"},{"key":"bibr8-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Campbell M. A., French S., Gendreau P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567\u2013590. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854809333610","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854809333610"},{"key":"bibr9-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chandler J., Mueller P., Paolacci G. (2014). Nonna\u00efvet\u00e9 among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46(1), 112\u2013130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3758\/s13428-013-0365-7","DOI":"10.3758\/s13428-013-0365-7"},{"key":"bibr10-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Chevalier C. S., Boccaccini M. T., Murrie D. C., Varela J. G. (2015). Static-99R reporting practices in sexually violent predator cases: Does norm selection reflect adversarial allegiance? Law and Human Behavior, 39, 209\u2013218. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/lhb0000114","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000114"},{"key":"bibr11-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Dolan J. G., Cherkasky O. A., Li Q., Chin N., Veazie P. J. (2016). Should health numeracy be assessed objectively or subjectively? Medical Decision Making, 36, 868\u2013875. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989X15584332","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X15584332"},{"key":"bibr12-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X07304449"},{"key":"bibr13-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Garcia-Retamero R., Cokely E. T. (2013). Communicating health risks with visual aids. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(5), 392\u2013399. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0963721413491570","DOI":"10.1177\/0963721413491570"},{"key":"bibr14-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1017\/S1930297500004952"},{"key":"bibr15-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanson R. K., Babchishin K. M., Helmus L., Thornton D. (2013). Quantifying the relative risk of sex offenders: Risk ratios for Static-99R. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25, 482\u2013515. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1079063212469060","DOI":"10.1177\/1079063212469060"},{"key":"bibr16-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanson R. K., Babchishin K. M., Helmus L. M., Thornton D., Phenix A. (2017). Communicating the results of criterion-referenced prediction measures: Risk categories for the Static-99R and Static-2002R sexual offender risk assessment tools. Psychological Assessment, 29, 582\u2013597. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/pas0000371","DOI":"10.1037\/pas0000371"},{"key":"bibr17-1079063220951191","volume-title":"A five-level risk and needs system: Maximizing assessment results through the development of a common language","author":"Hanson R. K.","year":"2017"},{"key":"bibr18-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanson R. K., Lloyd C. D., Helmus L., Thornton D. (2012). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Percentile ranks for the Static-99\/R and Static-2002\/R sexual offender risk tools. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 11\u201323. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14999013.2012.667511","DOI":"10.1080\/14999013.2012.667511"},{"key":"bibr19-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanson R. K., Morton-Bourgon K. E. (2009). The accuracy of recidivism risk assessments for sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of 118 prediction studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1\u201321. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0014421","DOI":"10.1037\/a0014421"},{"key":"bibr20-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hanson R. K., Thornton D. (2000). Improving risk assessments for sex offenders: A comparison of three actuarial scales. Law and Human Behavior, 24(1), 119\u2013136. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1023\/a:1005482921333","DOI":"10.1023\/A:1005482921333"},{"key":"bibr21-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris G. T., Lowenkamp C. T., Hilton N. Z. (2015). Evidence for risk estimate precision: Implications for individual risk communication. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 33, 111\u2013127. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2158","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2158"},{"key":"bibr22-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Harris G. T., Rice M. E. (2013). Bayes and base rates: What is an informative prior for actuarial risk assessment? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 31(1), 103\u2013124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2048","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2048"},{"key":"bibr23-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854893020004001"},{"key":"bibr24-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/14572-000"},{"key":"bibr25-1079063220951191","volume-title":"Comparison of different online sampling approaches for generating national samples","author":"Heen M. S. J.","year":"2014"},{"key":"bibr26-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1093\/acprof:oso\/9780199386291.003.0009"},{"issue":"3","key":"bibr27-1079063220951191","first-page":"397","volume":"27","author":"Heilbrun K.","year":"1999","journal-title":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law"},{"key":"bibr28-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helmus L., Hanson R. K., Thornton D., Babchishin K. M., Harris A. J. R. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 39, 1148\u20131171. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854812443648","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854812443648"},{"issue":"2","key":"bibr29-1079063220951191","volume":"28","author":"Helmus L. M.","year":"2016","journal-title":"The Forum"},{"key":"bibr30-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helmus L. M. (2018). Sex offender risk assessment: Where are we and where are we going? Current Psychiatry Reports, 20, Article 46. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s11920-018-0909-8","DOI":"10.1007\/s11920-018-0909-8"},{"key":"bibr31-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Helmus L. M., Babchishin K. M. (2017). Primer on risk assessment and the statistics used to evaluate its accuracy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(1), 8\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854816678898","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854816678898"},{"key":"bibr32-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hilton N. Z., Ham E., Nunes K. L., Rodrigues N. C., Frank C., Seto M. C. (2017). Using graphs to improve violence risk communication. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44, 678\u2013694. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854816668916","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854816668916"},{"key":"bibr33-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1037\/12066-000"},{"key":"bibr34-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hilton N. Z., Scurich N., Helmus L. M. (2015). Communicating the risk of violent and offending behavior: Review and introduction to this special issue. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 33, 1\u201318. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2160","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2160"},{"key":"bibr35-1079063220951191","volume-title":"Thinking fast and slow","author":"Kahneman D.","year":"2011"},{"key":"bibr36-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kelley S. M., Ambroziak G., Thornton D., Barahal R. M. (2018). How do professionals assess sexual recidivism risk? An updated survey of practices. Sexual Abuse, 32, 3\u201329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1079063218800474","DOI":"10.1177\/1079063218800474"},{"key":"bibr37-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Krauss D. A., Cook G. I., Klapatch L. (2018). Risk assessment communication difficulties: An empirical examination of the effects of categorical versus probabilistic risk communication in sexually violent predator decisions. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 36, 532\u2013553. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2379","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2379"},{"key":"bibr38-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kreuzmair C., Siegrist M., Keller C. (2016). High numerates count icons and low numerates process large areas in pictographs: Results of an eye-tracking Study. Risk Analysis, 36(8), 1599\u20131614. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/risa.12531","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12531"},{"key":"bibr39-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lehmann R. J. B., Thornton D., Helmus L. M., Hanson R. K. (2016). Developing non-arbitrary metrics for risk communication: Norms for the Risk Matrix 2000. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43, 1661\u20131687. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854816651656","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854816651656"},{"key":"bibr40-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Leonhardt J. M., Robin Keller L. (2018). Do pictographs affect probability comprehension and risk perception of multiple-risk communications? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(3), 756\u2013769. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/joca.12185","DOI":"10.1111\/joca.12185"},{"key":"bibr41-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/2158244016636433"},{"key":"bibr42-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x"},{"key":"bibr43-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lindsay W., Carson D., O\u2019Brien G., Holland A. J., Johnston S., Taylor J. L.\u2004.\u2004.Price K. (2010). The relationship between assessed risk and service security level for offenders with intellectual disability. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(4), 537\u2013548. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/14789941003653212","DOI":"10.1080\/14789941003653212"},{"key":"bibr44-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lipkus I. M., Samsa G., Rimer B. K. (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0272989x0102100105","DOI":"10.1177\/0272989X0102100105"},{"key":"bibr45-1079063220951191","volume-title":"Clinician\u2019s guide to violence risk assessment","author":"Mills J. F.","year":"2011"},{"key":"bibr46-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Neal T. M. S., Grisso T. (2014). Assessment practices and expert judgment methods in forensic psychology and psychiatry. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(12), 1406\u20131421. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0093854814548449","DOI":"10.1177\/0093854814548449"},{"key":"bibr47-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Okan Y., Stone E. R., Bruine de, Bruin W. (2017). Designing graphs that promote both risk understanding and behavior change. Risk Analysis, 38(5), 929\u2013946. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/risa.12895","DOI":"10.1111\/risa.12895"},{"key":"bibr48-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Olver M. E., Wong S. C. P., Nicholaichuk T., Gordon A. (2007). The validity and reliability of the Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender version: Assessing sex offender risk and evaluating therapeutic change. Psychological Assessment, 19(3), 318\u2013329. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1040-3590.19.3.318","DOI":"10.1037\/1040-3590.19.3.318"},{"key":"bibr49-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Peters E., V\u00e4stfj\u00e4ll D., Slovic P., Mertz C. K., Mazzocco K., Dickert S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407\u2013413. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x"},{"key":"bibr50-1079063220951191","unstructured":"Phenix A., Helmus L., Hanson R. K. (2016). Static-99R and Static-2002R Evaluator\u2019s workbook. www.static99.org"},{"key":"bibr51-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Schapira M. M., Walker C. M., Miller T., Fletcher K., Ganschow P. G., Jacobs E. A., Neuner J. M. (2014). Development and validation of the Numeracy Understanding Medicine Instrument Short Form. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 240\u2013253. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10810730.2014.933916","DOI":"10.1080\/10810730.2014.933916"},{"key":"bibr52-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scurich N. (2015). The differential effect of numeracy and anecdotes on the perceived fallibility of forensic science. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(4), 616\u2013623. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13218719.2014.965293","DOI":"10.1080\/13218719.2014.965293"},{"key":"bibr53-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scurich N. (2018). The case against categorical risk estimates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 36, 554\u2013564. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/bsl.2382","DOI":"10.1002\/bsl.2382"},{"key":"bibr54-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Scurich N., Monahan J., John R. S. (2012). Innumeracy and unpacking: Bridging the nomothetic\/idiographic divide in violence risk assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 36(6), 548\u2013554. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/h0093994","DOI":"10.1037\/h0093994"},{"key":"bibr55-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shuster S. (2011). The real problem is the biomedical ignorance of statisticians. British Medical Journal, 342(3), Article d2579. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1136\/bmj.d2579","DOI":"10.1136\/bmj.d2579"},{"key":"bibr56-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Singh J. P., Grann M., Fazel S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499\u2013513. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cpr.2010.11.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.cpr.2010.11.009"},{"key":"bibr57-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Taylor A., Byrne-Davis L. (2017). Clinician numeracy: Use of the medical interpretation and numeracy test in foundation trainee doctors. Numeracy, 10(2), Article 5. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5038\/1936-4660.10.2.5","DOI":"10.5038\/1936-4660.10.2.5"},{"key":"bibr58-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Van Voorhis C. R. W., Morgan B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43\u201350. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.20982\/tqmp.03.2.p043","DOI":"10.20982\/tqmp.03.2.p043"},{"key":"bibr59-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Varela J. G., Boccaccini M. T., Cuervo V. A., Murrie D. C., Clark J. W. (2014). Same score, different message: Perceptions of offender risk depend on Static-99R risk communication format. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 418\u2013427. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/lhb0000073","DOI":"10.1037\/lhb0000073"},{"key":"bibr60-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Walter S. L., Seibert S. E., Goering D., O\u2019Boyle E. H. (2018). A tale of two sample sources: Do results from online panel data and conventional data converge? Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(4), 425\u2013452. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10869-018-9552-y","DOI":"10.1007\/s10869-018-9552-y"},{"key":"bibr61-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Wilhelms E. A., Reyna V. F. (2013). Effective ways to communicate risk and benefit. Virtual Mentor: American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, 15(1), 34\u201341. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1001\/virtualmentor.2013.15.1.stas1-1301","DOI":"10.1001\/virtualmentor.2013.15.1.stas1-1301"},{"key":"bibr62-1079063220951191","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Yang M., Wong S. C. P., Coid J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740\u2013767. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0020473","DOI":"10.1037\/a0020473"}],"container-title":["Sexual Abuse"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1079063220951191","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1079063220951191","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1079063220951191","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T02:38:35Z","timestamp":1777689515000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1079063220951191"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]},"references-count":62,"journal-issue":{"issue":"6","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,9]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1079063220951191"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1079063220951191","relation":{},"ISSN":["1079-0632","1573-286X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1079-0632","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-286X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,8,17]]}}}