{"status":"ok","message-type":"work","message-version":"1.0.0","message":{"indexed":{"date-parts":[[2026,11,3]],"date-time":"2026-11-03T14:37:27Z","timestamp":1793716647840,"version":"4.6.1"},"reference-count":63,"publisher":"SAGE Publications","issue":"8","license":[{"start":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,21]],"date-time":"2020-12-21T00:00:00Z","timestamp":1608508800000},"content-version":"tdm","delay-in-days":0,"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/page\/policies\/text-and-data-mining-license"}],"content-domain":{"domain":["journals.sagepub.com"],"crossmark-restriction":true},"short-container-title":["Sex Abuse"],"published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]},"abstract":"<jats:p>In response to several high-profile violent offenses against children over the past two decades, Congress has enacted several pieces of legislation aimed at increasing punishment for those convicted of federal sex offenses. Coinciding with these enhanced penalties was a demographic shift in the composition of those prosecuted for these offenses. In the federal criminal justice system, sex offenses fall into two main categories: child pornography and sexual abuse. The racial and ethnic makeup of individuals charged for federal sex offenses has significantly changed over the past 15 years. The current study utilizes federal sentencing data from the United States Sentencing Commission for the years 2006 to 2017 to explore the nature of punishment for these offenses over time. We also employ multivariate analyses to examine differences in punishment for the two types of offenses and employ disaggregated analyses by offense type to examine temporal change in racial\/ethnic disparities in sentence length and departures from the federal sentencing guidelines. Findings demonstrate that convicted individuals who are Black and Hispanic are receiving harsher sentences over time net of controls for other key predictors such as age, sex, criminal history, and presumptive sentence length. Implications for how legislatively enhanced penalties and changing demographic makeup of those convicted for these offenses may have introduced extra-legal disparity into federal sentencing are further discussed.<\/jats:p>","DOI":"10.1177\/1079063220981062","type":"journal-article","created":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,21]],"date-time":"2020-12-21T05:13:44Z","timestamp":1608527624000},"page":"891-922","update-policy":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/sage-journals-update-policy","source":"Crossref","is-referenced-by-count":8,"title":["Race, Ethnicity, and Punishment for Federal Sex Offenses: Changing Composition in Child Pornography and Sex Abuse Cases and Temporal Disparity in Sentencing Over Time"],"prefix":"10.1177","volume":"33","author":[{"ORCID":"https:\/\/orcid.org\/0000-0002-2242-0044","authenticated-orcid":false,"given":"Richard D.","family":"Hartley","sequence":"first","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Alexander","family":"Testa","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]},{"given":"Erika","family":"Martinez","sequence":"additional","affiliation":[{"name":"The University of Texas at San Antonio, USA"}],"role":[{"vocabulary":"crossref","role":"author"}]}],"member":"179","published-online":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,21]]},"reference":[{"key":"bibr1-1079063220981062","unstructured":"Adams W., Flynn A. (2017). Federal prosecution of commercial sexual exploitation of children cases, 2004\u20132013 (NCJ Publication No. 250746). Bureau of Justice Statistics. https:\/\/www.bjs.gov\/content\/pub\/pdf\/fpcsecc0413.pdf"},{"key":"bibr2-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albonetti C. A. (1987). Prosecutorial discretion: The effects of uncertainty. Law & Society Review, 21(2), 291\u2013313. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/3053523","DOI":"10.2307\/3053523"},{"key":"bibr3-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Albonetti C. A. (1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion. Social Problems, 38(2), 247\u2013266. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/800532","DOI":"10.1525\/sp.1991.38.2.03a00090"},{"key":"bibr4-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10508-014-0270-x"},{"key":"bibr5-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Baumer E. (2013). Reassessing and redirecting research on race and sentencing. Justice Quarterly, 30, 231\u2013261. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2012.682602","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2012.682602"},{"key":"bibr6-1079063220981062","first-page":"349","volume":"16","author":"Bontrager S.","year":"2013","journal-title":"Journal of Gender Race & Justice"},{"key":"bibr7-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Doerner J. K., Demuth S. S. (2010). The independent and joint effects of race\/ethnicity, gender, and age on sentencing outcomes in US federal courts. Justice Quarterly, 27, 1\u201327. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418820902926197","DOI":"10.1080\/07418820902926197"},{"key":"bibr8-1079063220981062","first-page":"723","volume":"91","author":"Droske T. J.","year":"2008","journal-title":"Marquette Law Review"},{"key":"bibr9-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0022427810391538"},{"key":"bibr10-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Franklin T. W. (2013). Sentencing Native Americans in US federal courts: An examination of disparity. Justice Quarterly, 30(2), 310\u2013339. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2011.605072","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2011.605072"},{"key":"bibr11-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0011128719828353"},{"key":"bibr12-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Frase R. S. (2019). Forty years of American sentencing guidelines: What have we learned? Crime and Justice, 48(1), 79\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/701503","DOI":"10.1086\/701503"},{"key":"bibr13-1079063220981062","first-page":"545","volume":"22","author":"Hamilton M.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Stanford Law & Policy Review"},{"key":"bibr14-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartley R. D., Madden S., Spohn C. (2007). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 383\u2013407. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418820701485379","DOI":"10.1080\/07418820701485379"},{"key":"bibr15-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartley R. D., Miller H. V., Spohn C. C. (2010). Do you get what you pay for? Attorney type and its effects of criminal court outcomes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1063\u20131070. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.009"},{"key":"bibr16-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2011.585140"},{"key":"bibr17-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Hartley R. D., Tillyer R. (2018). Examining prosecutorial discretion in federal criminal cases: Legal and extra-legal determinants of declination and charge change decisions. Justice Quarterly, 35(7), 1195\u20131225. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2018.1530367","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2018.1530367"},{"key":"bibr18-1079063220981062","first-page":"853","volume":"88","author":"Hessick C. B.","year":"2011","journal-title":"Washington University Law Review"},{"key":"bibr19-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9133.2007.00446.x"},{"key":"bibr20-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Huebner B. M., Bynum T. S. (2006). An analysis of parole decision making using a sample of sex offenders: A focal concerns perspective. Criminology, 44(4), 961\u2013991. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2006.00069.x"},{"key":"bibr21-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson B. D., Betsinger S. (2009). Punishing the \u201cmodel minority\u201d: Asian-American criminal sentencing outcomes in federal district courts. Criminology, 47(4), 1045\u20131090. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2009.00169.x"},{"key":"bibr22-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson B. D., Larroulet P. (2019). The \u201cdistance traveled\u201d: Investigating the downstream consequences of charge reductions for disparities in incarceration. Justice Quarterly, 36(7), 1229\u20131257. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2018.1529250","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2018.1529250"},{"key":"bibr23-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Johnson B. D., Ulmer J. T., Kramer J. H. (2008). The social context of guideline circumvention: The case of federal district courts. Criminology, 46, 711\u2013783. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2008.00125.x"},{"key":"bibr24-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Kaiser K., Spohn C. (2014). \u201cFundamentally flawed?\u201d Exploring the use of policy disagreements in judicial downward departures for child pornography offenses. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 241\u2013270. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1745-9133.12082","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9133.12082"},{"key":"bibr25-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"King R. D. (2019). Cumulative impact: Why prison sentences have increased. Criminology, 57(1), 157\u2013180. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1745-9125.12197","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9125.12197"},{"key":"bibr26-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"King R. D., Light M. T. (2019). Have racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing declined? Crime and Justice, 48, 365\u2013437. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/701505","DOI":"10.1086\/701505"},{"key":"bibr27-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lee J. G. (2019). To detain or not to detain? Using propensity scores to examine the relationship between pretrial detention and conviction. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(1), 128\u2013152. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0887403416668016","DOI":"10.1177\/0887403416668016"},{"key":"bibr28-1079063220981062","first-page":"1","volume":"21","author":"Lee J. G.","year":"2020","journal-title":"Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society"},{"key":"bibr29-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Levenson J., Brannon Y., Fortney T., Baker J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 1\u201325. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1530-2415.2007.00119.x"},{"key":"bibr30-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/lasr.12073"},{"key":"bibr31-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Light M. T., Massoglia M., King R. D. (2014). Citizenship and punishment: The salience of national membership in US criminal courts. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 825\u2013847. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0003122414543659","DOI":"10.1177\/0003122414543659"},{"key":"bibr32-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Lynch M. (2019). Focally concerned about focal concerns: A conceptual and methodological critique of sentencing disparities research. Justice Quarterly, 36, 1148\u20131175. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2019.1686163","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2019.1686163"},{"key":"bibr33-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/lasr.12348"},{"key":"bibr34-1079063220981062","first-page":"311","volume-title":"Punishment decisions: Locations of disparity. ASC division on corrections and sentencing handbook","volume":"2","author":"Maddan S.","year":"2018"},{"key":"bibr35-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1007\/s10940-005-7362-7"},{"key":"bibr36-1079063220981062","unstructured":"Motivans M., Kyckelhahn T. (2007). Federal prosecution of child sex exploitation offenders, 2006. United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. https:\/\/www.bjs.gov\/content\/pub\/pdf\/fpcseo06.pdf"},{"key":"bibr37-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1086\/320276"},{"key":"bibr38-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Nir E., Griffiths E. (2018). Sentencing on the evidence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(4), 365\u2013390. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177%2F0887403416635248","DOI":"10.1177\/0887403416635248"},{"key":"bibr39-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Pickett J. T., Mancini C., Mears D. P. (2013). Vulnerable victims, monstrous offenders, and unmanageable risk: Explaining public opinion on the social control of sex crime. Criminology, 51(3), 729\u2013759. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/1745-9125.12018","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9125.12018"},{"key":"bibr40-1079063220981062","first-page":"1195","volume":"84","author":"Rachlinski J. J.","year":"2009","journal-title":"Notre Dame Law Review"},{"key":"bibr41-1079063220981062","unstructured":"Sample L. L. (2001). The social construction of the sex offender (Unpublished dissertation). University of Missouri, St. Louis, MI."},{"key":"bibr42-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Shermer L. O. N., Johnson B. D. (2010). Criminal prosecutions: Examining prosecutorial discretion and charge reductions in US federal district courts. Justice Quarterly, 27(3), 394\u2013430. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418820902856972","DOI":"10.1080\/07418820902856972"},{"key":"bibr43-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spears J. W., Spohn C. C. (1997). The effect of evidence factors and victim characteristics on prosecutors\u2019 charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 501\u2013524. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418829700093451","DOI":"10.1080\/07418829700093451"},{"key":"bibr44-1079063220981062","first-page":"169","volume-title":"Reforming criminal justice: A report of the academy for justice on bridging the gap between scholarship and reform","volume":"4","author":"Spohn C.","year":"2017"},{"key":"bibr45-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00891.x"},{"key":"bibr46-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Spohn C., Spears J. (1996). The effect of offender and victim characteristics on sexual assault case processing decisions. Justice Quarterly, 13(4), 649\u2013679. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418829600093141","DOI":"10.1080\/07418829600093141"},{"key":"bibr47-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/000312240006500505"},{"key":"bibr48-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1177\/0731121416679371"},{"key":"bibr49-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Steffensmeier D., Ulmer J., Kramer J. (1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, Black, and male. Criminology, 36(4), 763\u2013798. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01265.x"},{"key":"bibr50-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Testa A., Lee J. G. (2020). Trends in sentencing of federal drug offenders: Findings from US district courts 2002\u20132017. Journal of Drug Issues. Advance online publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/0022042620959071","DOI":"10.1177\/0022042620959071"},{"key":"bibr51-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/1745-9133.12075"},{"key":"bibr52-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2014.958186"},{"key":"bibr53-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ulmer J. T. (2012). Recent developments and new directions in sentencing research. Justice Quarterly, 29, 1\u201340. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/07418825.2011.624115","DOI":"10.1080\/07418825.2011.624115"},{"key":"bibr54-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ulmer J. T., Bradley M. S. (2019). Criminal justice in Indian country: A theoretical and empirical agenda. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 337\u2013357. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-criminol-011518-024805","DOI":"10.1146\/annurev-criminol-011518-024805"},{"key":"bibr55-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ulmer J. T., Johnson B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42(1), 137\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1146\/annurev-criminol-011518-024805","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00516.x"},{"key":"bibr56-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"publisher","DOI":"10.1111\/j.1745-9133.2011.00761.x"},{"key":"bibr57-1079063220981062","volume-title":"Supreme Court of the United States 543 U.S. 220","author":"United States v. Booker","year":"2005"},{"key":"bibr58-1079063220981062","unstructured":"United States Department of Justice. (2017). Indian country investigations and prosecutions."},{"key":"bibr59-1079063220981062","unstructured":"United States Sentencing Commission. (2009). History of the child pornography guidelines"},{"key":"bibr60-1079063220981062","unstructured":"United States Sentencing Commission. (2012). Report to congress: Federal child pornography offenses."},{"key":"bibr61-1079063220981062","unstructured":"United States Sentencing Commission. (2019). Mandatory minimum penalties for sex offenses in the federal criminal justice system."},{"key":"bibr62-1079063220981062","unstructured":"United States Sentencing Commission. (2020). Quick facts federal offenders in prison June 2020."},{"key":"bibr63-1079063220981062","doi-asserted-by":"crossref","unstructured":"Ward J. T., Hartley R. D., Tillyer R. (2016). Unpacking gender and race\/ethnicity biases in the federal sentencing of drug offenders: A casual mediation approach. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 196\u2013206. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.008","DOI":"10.1016\/j.jcrimjus.2016.05.008"}],"container-title":["Sexual Abuse"],"original-title":[],"language":"en","link":[{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1079063220981062","content-type":"application\/pdf","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full-xml\/10.1177\/1079063220981062","content-type":"application\/xml","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"text-mining"},{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/pdf\/10.1177\/1079063220981062","content-type":"unspecified","content-version":"vor","intended-application":"similarity-checking"}],"deposited":{"date-parts":[[2026,5,2]],"date-time":"2026-05-02T02:38:39Z","timestamp":1777689519000},"score":1,"resource":{"primary":{"URL":"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.1177\/1079063220981062"}},"subtitle":[],"short-title":[],"issued":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,21]]},"references-count":63,"journal-issue":{"issue":"8","published-print":{"date-parts":[[2021,12]]}},"alternative-id":["10.1177\/1079063220981062"],"URL":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1079063220981062","relation":{},"ISSN":["1079-0632","1573-286X"],"issn-type":[{"value":"1079-0632","type":"print"},{"value":"1573-286X","type":"electronic"}],"subject":[],"published":{"date-parts":[[2020,12,21]]}}}